- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Antiangiogenic effects of oridonin
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine volume 17, Article number: 192 (2017)
Oridonin, the major terpene found in Rabdosia rubescens (Henmsl.) Hara, is widely used as a dietary supplement and therapeutic drug. Oridonin has been proven to possess good anti-tumour activity, but little is known about its effect on angiogenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the antiangiogenic effects of oridonin in vivo and in vitro and prove that oridonin anti-tumour activity is based on suppressing angiogenesis.
In vitro, the antiangiogenesis effect was studied by proliferation, apoptosis, migration, invasion, and tube formation experiments on human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs). In vivo, using the Tg (fli1: GFP) zebrafish model, the embryonic vasculogenesis and postnatal regeneration were evaluated. The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling pathway gene expressions were assessed by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Furthermore, the inhibition effects on tumour growth and metastasis were observed using a xenograft zebrafish tumour model and xenograft nude mouse tumour model. Angiogenesis was assayed by immunostaining with cluster of differentiation 31. Importantly, the proteins were identified as being differentially expressed in an in vivo model by two-dimensional electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (2D–MS) and western blot (WB).
The results indicated that oridonin inhibited HUVEC proliferation, migration, invasion, and tube formation and induced cell apoptosis. Oridonin inhibited zebrafish angiogenesis during embryonic development and tail fin regeneration. RT-PCR showed that oridonin decreased the VEGFA, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3 expressions in zebrafish, while the TP53 expression increased. Moreover, oridonin had strong effects on tumour growth and metastasis in vivo. 2D–MS identified a total of 50 proteins differentially expressed (17 up-expressed, 28 down-expressed). Lastly, WB showed that Claudin 1, Claudin 4, and Claudin 7 were closely related to tumour growth and metastasis.
This study demonstrated that oridonin could inhibit tumour growth and metastasis, which mainly based on oridonin antiangiogenic effects. Claudin 1, Claudin 4, and Claudin 7 were the main contributors to the mechanism.
Angiogenesis, new blood vessel formation, is a significant step in biological and pathological processes. The identification of small molecules that block angiogenesis and are safe has been a challenge in drug development. Specific anti-angiogenic agents have arisen as an attractive therapeutic approach for the treatment of angiogenesis-dependent diseases, especially tumour metastasis [1–4]. The Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs), especially VEGF-A, are key angiogenic factors. The VEGF receptor VEGFR2 is the primary receptor mediating the angiogenic activity of VEGF through distinct signal transduction pathways [5, 6]. Anti-angiogenic drugs, e.g., bevacizumab (Avastin®), inhibit VEGF signalling by blocking either VEGF ligands or VEGFRs. However, therapy-associated problems and severe adverse events are desirable to be overcome [7, 8]. To exploit safer and efficient agents, researchers have investigated natural products. In addition to their direct effect upon cancer cells, a number of herbal remedies have been identified to suppress angiogenesis and thereby reduce tumour growth. Certain Chinese herbal medicines contain natural anti-angiogenic compounds that need to be proven effective and safe for human use [9–12].
Oridonin, an effective diterpenoid component, has been proven to possess anti-tumour activity [13–18]. Oridonin inhibits the formation of capillary-like networks, indicating that it exhibits anti-angiogenesis activity . Dong et al. proved the oridonin inhibits tumour growth and metastasis through anti-angiogenesis by blocking the Notch signalling . Liu et al. indicated that the oridonin anti-tumour effect was mainly based on its anti-proliferation and anti-angiogenesis . However, the anti-tumour effect of oridonin based on its inhibition angiogenesis and its mechanism has still not been fully elucidated in vivo.
In the present study, we chose the Tg (fli1: GFP) zebrafish model, and investigated how oridonin inhibits angiogenesis. The anti-tumour effect of oridonin in vivo was observed in a xenograft zebrafish tumour model and xenograft nude mouse tumour model. Importantly, 2D–MS, RT-PCR, and WB identified anti-tumour mechanisms based on the inhibition of angiogenesis in vivo.
Oridonin (No: 1126YA13, purity more than 98%) was purchased from Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co., Ltd., in China. A 100 g/L stock solution of oridonin was diluted in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and stored at 4 °C in darkness. A serial dilution was made in 100% DMSO that was 1000 times more concentrated to allow for a 1:1000 dilution with EM to create a serial dilution with a final DMSO concentration of 0.1%. HepG2-Luciferase cells were purchased from Shanghai Biomodel Organism Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd. Cell Tracker CM-Dil (No: 1,583,101) was purchased from Shanghai Qianchen Biological Technology Co., Ltd. RPMI1640 culture solution (No: 11,875,093) was purchased from Invitrogen. Annexin V-FITC (No: 556,547) and Matrigel (No: 354,234) were purchased from BD Pharmingen. Calcein-AM (No: 56,496), MTT (No: M5655), penicillin, streptomycin, DMSO, and tricaine methanesulfonate (MS-222) were obtained from Sigma. Bevacizumab (Avastin®) and Trizol (No: 11,667,165,001) were purchased from Roche. Anti-CD31, claudin-1 (No: 81,796), claudin-4 (No: 37,643), and claudin-7 (No: 17,670) were purchased from Sigma. Recombinant RNase (No: 2313A), Reverse TranScriptase M-MLV (No: 2641A), and SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM (No: RR420) were purchased from Takara. The other chemicals used in this study were of analytical grade.
HUVEC culture, viability and apoptosis assay
Human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs) (cell bank, SIBS, CAS.) were cultured in endothelial cell growth medium (ECGM): RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum, 100 U penicillin, and 100 U streptomycin, at 37 °C under a humidified 95%: 5% (v/v) mixture of air and CO2. When grown to 6 × 104 cells/well, the cells were treated with DMSO (0.1%) or various concentrations of oridonin (20, 39, 78, 156, 312, 625, 1250, and 2500 μg/ml) for 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. The cell viability was determined by an MTT assay at 570 nm. At least three independent experiments at least were performed in triplicate.
HUVECs (2.5 × 105 cells/mL) were treated without or with oridonin at various concentrations (39, 156, 625, and 2500 μg/ml) for 24 h. Then, the cells were harvested by trypsinization, washed twice with PBS, and labelled with a kit according to the directions and examined.
HUVEC migration and invasion assay
HUVECs were cultured in ECGM, and 4 × 105 HUVECs were seeded on Millicell treated without or with oridonin at various concentrations (39, 78, 156, and 312 μg/ml) for 24 h. Then, the cells that did not pass through were removed, and a crystal violet staining assay and acetic acid destaining were performed. The crystal violet medium was gathered up, and the assay was examined at 570 nm.
The cells were placed on a Transwell Building support, and the next day 2% BAS was added, and the cells were dried at 37 °C for 2 h and washed with PBS. The HUVECs were cultured in ECGM, and 4 × 105 HUVECs were seeded on Millicell treated without or with oridonin at various concentrations (39, 78, 156, and 312 μg/ml) for 24 h. Then, the cells that did not pass through were removed, and a crystal violet staining assay and acetic acid destaining were performed. The crystal violet medium was gathered up, and the assay was examined at 570 nm.
HUVEC tube formation assay
HUVECs were cultured in ECGM, and when the cells grew to 4 × 105 cell/well, they were treated without or with oridonin at various concentrations (25, 100, and 400 μg/ml) for 24 h. Then, Matrigel was added, and the cells were dried at 37 °C for 6 h. Finally, Calcein-AM was added and the cells were incubated for 37 min in the darkness according to the directions and examined.
Fish husbandry and embryo collection
Zebrafish (fli1: GFP) were obtained from Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, SIBS, CAS. All fish were at the juvenile stage and were cultured in our laboratory until sexual maturation for spawning at standard laboratory conditions of 28 ± 0.5 °C on a 14:10 light/dark photoperiod in a recirculation system according to standard zebrafish breeding protocols . The water supplied to the system was filtered by reverse osmosis (pH 7.0–7.5), and Instant Ocean® salt was added to the water to raise the conductivity to 450–1000 μS/cm (system water). The fish were fed twice a day with live artemias (Jiahong Feed Co., Tianjin, China).
Zebrafish embryos were obtained from adults in tanks with a sex ratio of 1:2 for female to male, and spawning was induced in the morning when the light was turned on. Embryos were collected within 0.5 h of spawning and rinsed in an embryo medium (EM: 0.137 M NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 0.25 mM Na2HPO4, 0.44 mM KH2PO4, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgSO4 and 4.2 mM NaHCO3) , and then incubated in Petri dishes at 28 ± 0.5 °C until chemical treatment. The fertilized embryos with normal morphology were staged under an SMZ 1500 dissection microscope (Nikon, Japan) according to the standard methods .
Assessment of zebrafish embryo vascular changes and microscopy
The zebrafish embryos were treated with EM or various concentrations of oridonin (50, 100, and 200 μg/ml), and incubated in 96-well plates (1 embryo per well with 200 μl solution) at 28 ± 0.5 °C from 6 h post-fertilization (hpf) to 72 hpf. At 72 hpf, the larvae were removed from the 96-well plates and anesthetized with 0.03% MS-222 for 3–5 s until their bodies stopped moving. Then, the larvae were transferred to a glass slide, and the morphological and viability changes of the vessels were observed with a fluorescence inverted microscope (Nikon, Japan). Images were taken with NIS-Elements F2.3 (Nikon, Japan), and the number of complete intersegment vessels (ISVs) and the diameter of the blood vessels were obtained from the images. The assay was repeated at least three times independently with 10 embryos per group.
Assessment of adult zebrafish caudal fin regenerative angiogenesis and microscopy
The zebrafish were normally divided into 3 groups and maintained at 28 ± 0.5 °C on a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle in tanks. The fish were anesthetized with 0.03% MS-222 for 2–3 min until the gills stopped moving and then promptly transferred to glass slides to amputate the caudal fins at the mid-fin level . The fish were placed back to a recovery tank immediately and recovered within 3 min. EM and oridonin (50 and 150 μg/ml) were added to different tank at 28 ± 0.5 °C for 7 days post amputation (dpa), and the length of fin regeneration and regenerative blood vessels were obtained from images. The assay was repeated three times independently with 6 fins per group.
Assessment of zebrafish larvae caudal fin regeneration and microscopy
The zebrafish larvae (48 hpf) were normally divided into 4 groups and maintained at 28 ± 0.5 °C on a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle in 6-well plates (10 larvae per well with 4 ml solution). The larvae were anesthetized with 0.03% MS-222 for 3–5 s until their body stopped moving, and then transferred to glass slides to amputate the caudal fins completely . The larvae were immediately placed back and recovered within 3 min. EM and oridonin (10, 40, and 80 μg/ml) were added to different wells at 28 ± 0.5 °C for 4 dpa, and the length of the fin regeneration was obtained from images. The assay was repeated three times independently with 10 fins per group.
RNA isolation and RT-PCR
After the 4 dpa exposure period, larvae of the same treatment were pooled together for the analysis of the VEGFA, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, and tumour protein p53 (TP53) expressions. Twenty larvae per group were homogenized in 1.0 ml Trizol reagent with a homogenizer (Polytron, Kinematica, Littau, Switzerland), and the total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The OD260/OD280 ratio, as well as the banding patterns on a 1% agarose gel, was routinely checked for the purity and integrity of the RNA sample. Reverse transcription was carried out using an M-MLV reverse transcriptase kit according to the manufacturer’s procedure. For RT-PCR, we used 2.0 μl from the reverse transcription product, amplified directly on a 7300 Real Time PCR System using a 20.0 μl SYBR reaction mixture. The primers (Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) were designed based on the cDNA sequences from the NCBI reported database (Table 1).
Tumor model in zebrafish and anti-tumour effect
The zebrafish embryos were collected within 0.5 h of spawning and rinsed in EM, and then incubated in Petri dishes at 28 ± 0.5 °C in EM for 24 h. The PTU (0.2 mM) was added, and the embryos were incubated for an additional 24 h, and the prepared HepG2-Luciferase cells were labelled with DiI dye. At 54 hpf, the embryos were anesthetized by 0.03% (wt/vol) MS-222, and after 1 min, they were placed on slides. The tumor cells were counted at a concentration of 30 cells per nl to prepare for implantation, and the cell suspension was placed on ice during the entire microinjection procedure. The microcapillary glass needle was loaded with 4 μl of cell suspension. The needle was connected to the micromanipulator, and then the needle tip was gently inserted into the perivitelline space of the zebrafish embryo. 5 nl of the cell suspension containing approximately 150 cells was injected into the perivitelline space of each embryo, and the injected zebrafish embryos were transfered into PTU water.
The zebrafish tumour model was normally divided into 3 groups (control group, Avastin group, oridonin group) and maintained at 28 ± 0.5 °C on a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle in 6-well plates (10 larvae per well with 4 ml solution) for 7 days. The areas of tumour metastasis, heartbeats in 10 s and the body weight were obtained according to the images and tests. The assay was repeated three times independently.
Protein analysis and identification
The number in each experimental group was 46. The samples of the control group and oridonin group were weighed, the lysis solution was added at 1:6 (W/V), and the solutions were homogenized and separated by centrifugation (11,000 pm, 2 s, 4 °C). After 3 min’ standing (4 °C), the solutions were centrifuged (4000 g) to obtain a supernatant for concentration by the Bradford method, and 100 μg total protein was prepared for isoelectric focusing (30 V 6 h, 60 V 6 h, 500 V 1 h, 1000 V 1 h, and 8000 V 20 h). Then, SDS-PAGE was performed, and the protein was stained by silver nitrate. After wet gel scanning, data analysis was performed using Image Master TM 2D Platinum software to obtain the differentially expressed proteins.
On the benchtop, we chosen certain points (50) and transferred them into 96 wells, added ddH2O (5 min ultrasound), acetonitrile (50 μl, dehydration), 10 mM DTT/25 mM NH4HCO3 (50 μl, 56 °C, 1 h), and 25 mM NH4HCO3 (50 μl, keep in darkness 45 min), and dehydrated and air-dried the solutions. Pancreatic enzyme liquid storage (10 ng/μl, 4 °C 30 min) and 25 mM NH4HCO3 (15 μl, 37 °C, 24 h) were added. TFA was added at a concentration of 0.1%, and the enzymatic hydrolysis reaction was terminated, followed by blending, and centrifugation. A mass spectrum sample was prepared for detection (Autoflex II MALDI-TOF/TOF, Smart Beam, Protomics HP, Cation mode), and the result was queried (Peptide Mass Fingerprint, Flex analysis 3.0, database search by http://www.matrixscience.com).
Xenograft nude mouse tumour model
Male nude mice, 6 weeks old, were inoculated subcutaneously in the right flank with 5 × 106 HepG2-Luciferase cells suspended in 50 μl PBS. When the tumour volume reached ∼150 mm3, the mice were randomly assigned to an oridonin treatment group (n = 6) or the control (DMSO) group (n = 6). The oridonin groups (2, 4, and 8 mg/kg) were administered daily with an intraperitoneal injection. The tumour volume was determined using digital Vernier calliper measurements and the formula A × B2 × 0.52, where A is the longest diameter of the tumour and B is the shortest diameter of the tumour. The inhibitory rate is calculated by V0-V/ V0 *100%, where V0 is the control group tumour volume and V is the oridonin group tumour volume.
HE staining and immunostaining with CD31
Based on the primary tumour size, the mice were segregated into groups for the appropriate treatments. Starting on day 7, oridonin was injected intraperitoneally every 2 days. The lungs were dissected and fixed in 10% formaldehyde when the mice were agonal, and the paraffin-embedded lungs were cut for HE staining. The slides were examined under light microscopy, and pictures were taken at 200× magnification.
The tumours were harvested and excised, fixed in 4% neutral paraformaldehyde, and then embedded in paraffin and sectioned for the immunohistochemical analysis. The endothelial cells were identified by immunostaining with CD31 antibody. To evaluate the protein expression, semiquantitative image analysis on the sections was conducted by Image-Pro Plus software.
RT-PCR and WB
The RT-PCR procedure was the same as seen earlier in this article. The primers (Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) were designed according to the cDNA sequences from the NCBI reported database, and are listed in Table 2. The WB procedure was as the follows. The zebrafish were treated under different conditions and lysed with lysis buffer. The protein samples were separated by electrophoresis on SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to a PVDF membrane. The blots were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight, and after incubation with secondary antibodies, an enhanced chemiluminescence reagent was used for the signal detection. The data were quantified and normalized using Image software.
All data were reported as the means ± standard error (SEM). The t-test for independent analysis was applied to evaluate the difference between the treatment and control groups, and a value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Oridonin inhibited HUVEC proliferation
According to preliminary experiments, we checked the HUVEC activity at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. The MTT results showed that oridonin inhibited the HUVEC proliferation compared with those that were DMSO-treated (0.1%). The higher the concentration of oridonin was, the stronger the effect was (Fig. 1). The IC50 values were 272, 153, 121, and 109 μg/ml at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h respectively.
Oridonin induced HUVEC apoptosis
FACS detected the apoptosis of HUVECs, and the results showed that oridonin induced HUVEC apoptosis mainly in the stages of Q2 and Q4; the Q2 area for the late apoptosis of the cells and the Q4 area for the early apoptosis. Within the scope of concentration of the experimental groups, the higher the oridonin concentration, the stronger the effect was compared with the DMSO-treated group (0.1%) (Fig. 2).
Oridonin inhibited HUVEC migration and invasion
The transwell method detected human umbilical vein endothelial cell migration and invasion, and the results showed that oridonin inhibited HUVEC migration and invasion compared with DMSO- treated (0.1%) HUVECs. Within the scope of concentration of the experimental groups, with the higher oridonin concentrations, the inhibition effect was enhanced (Figs. 3 and 4).
Oridonin inhibited HUVEC tube formation
The results showed that oridonin inhibited the HUVEC tube formation compared with the DMSO-treated (0.1%) group. Within the scope of the low concentration to high concentration, the oridonin showed an increasing inhibition (Fig. 5).
Oridonin inhibited angiogenesis during embryonic development
Tg (fli1: GFP) zebrafish embryos were treated with EM or different concentrations of oridonin (50, 100, and 200 μg/ml) from 6 hpf to 72 hpf. When the zebrafish were analysed at 72 hpf, a time period in which all ISVs in the EM-treated control group from 6 hpf to 72 hpf were fully extended and formed dorsal longitudinal anastomotic vessels, the oridonin-treated groups showed significant reductions in the diameter of the complete ISVs compared with those of the control group. The greatest reduction was observed in the embryos treated with 100 and 200 μg/ml of oridonin (Fig. 6). Furthermore, the number of vessel segments that were extended from the yolk sac extension to the caudal fin remained unchanged. These results demonstrated that oridonin inhibited the angiogenesis of the ISVs in zebrafish embryos.
Oridonin inhibited caudal fin regeneration of the larvae
Figure depicts the lengths of regenerative caudal fins in the control group, which was treated with EM for 4 dpa and in the 80 mg L−1 oridonin group. Following oridonin treatment (10, 40, and 80 μg/ml) for 4 dpa, the lengths of the regenerative vascularized fin tissues dose-dependently decreased compared with those of the control group (Fig. 7).
Oridonin inhibited caudal fin regeneration of adult zebrafish
Figure depicts the lengths of the regenerative caudal fins in the control group, which was treated with EM for 7 dpa and in the 150 μg/ml oridonin group. Following oridonin treatment (50, and 150 μg/ml) for 7 dpa, the lengths of the regenerated vascularized fin tissues dose-dependently decreased compared with those of the control group (Fig. 8).
Oridonin decreased VEGFA,VEGFR2,and VEGFR3 expression but increased TP53 expression
Zebrafish larvae were exposed to oridonin after 4 dpa, and the VEGFA and VEGFR2 levels were measured using RT-PCR. The results showed that the VEGFA, VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 gene levels dose-dependently decreased in the larvae after exposure to oridonin (10, 40, and 80 μg/ml) for 4 dpa, while the TP53 gene level dose-dependently increased (Fig. 9).
Anti-tumour effect of oridonin in xenograft zebrafish model
We found that oridonin impeded the tumour growth and metastasis in the xenograft zebrafish tumour model experiment. The anti-tumour effect of oridonin was weaker than that of Avastin (Fig. 10). However, oridonin had no effect on the heartbeats and body weights, while prolonged the survival times (Table 3). From the observation of the heartbeat and body weight on the 6th day, we proved some of the advantages of oridonin in applications.
2-D isoelectric focusing results
We found that the oridonin groups (a, b, c) and the control groups (1,2,3) have very different protein quantities (Fig. 11).
MS identification results
We found that the oridonin groups (a, b, c) and the control groups (1,2,3) have very different protein quantities. A total of 50 proteins were found to be differentially expressed, of which 17 were up-expressed and 28 down-expressed (Table 4, Fig. 12).
Anti-tumour effect of oridonin in xenograft tumour mouse model
Oridonin had an anti-tumour effect in the xenograft tumour mouse model compared with the control group. Oridonin inhibited the tumour growth, and with the increasing concentration (2, 4, 8 mg/kg), the anti-tumour effect was stronger (Fig. 13, Table 5). In addition, in the process of the experiment, compared with the control group, the mice treated with oridonin exhibited an improved with mental state and dietary conditions.
Haematoxylin & eosin staining and immunohistochemistry results
The HE staining of tissue sections of tumours from mice treated with oridonin showed that the cells were arranged with nest loading, interstitial, including visible more rules sample gland structure. The cells presented as circular, round or oval, with small nucleoli, nuclear fission, nuclear pulp ratio decrease, which prompted the cancer cells in the direction of high differentiation. The control group cell density was larger, with a diffuse distribution of a disordered arrangement that did not form nests or an adenoid structure. The cells were pleomorphic, round or oval, with a large nucleoplasm ratio, with deep nuclear staining deep, large and obvious nucleoli, and nuclear fission, which showed obvious necrosis. The mouse tumour tissue section CD31 fluorescent stained treated with oridonin showed that the blood vessel density in the tumour tissue was significantly less than that in the control group (P < 0.05), 36.62 ± 10.51 and 14.73 ± 8.20 respectively (Fig. 14).
The mouse tumour tissue sections were exposed to oridonin after 7 days, and the Claudin family gene expression levels were measured using RT-PCR. The results showed that the Claudin 1, Claudin 4, Claudin 5, Claudin 12, and Claudin 18 gene levels dose-dependently decreased (2, 4, and 8 mg/kg/d), and the Claudin 2, Claudin 3, Claudin 6, Claudin 7, Claudin 8, and Claudin 9 gene level dose-dependently increased. Further more, the WB results proved that the Claudin 1, Claudin 4, and Claudin 7 proteins were closely related to the mechanism of tumour growth and metastasis (Fig. 15).
At present, many cancer cases and deaths can be prevented through reducing the prevalence of risk factors, while increasing the effectiveness of clinical care, particularly for disadvantaged populations. We will facilitate the broader application of existing cancer control knowledge [25, 26]. Angiogenesis is required for tumour growth and metastasis. More than 90% of deaths from solid tumours are attributable to tumour metastasis . Substantial research has been devoted to determining the effect of angiogenesis on tumour development and progression, and the mechanism of action of angiogenesis inhibitors is different from that of traditional chemotherapeutic agents and radiation therapy, providing them with potential in cancer management [28–31]. Moreover, researchers have focused on the health benefits of natural products that influence some steps in cancer-induced angiogenesis, especially in traditional Chinese medicine [32–34]. Identifying novel angiogenesis inhibitors can promote the discovery of new drugs for angiogenic diseases. The in vitro experiments in the present study showed that oridonin induced HUVEC apoptosis, and inhibited the proliferation, migration, invasion, and tube formation. The in vivo experiments demonstrated by vascular assays that oridonin inhibited angiogenesis in zebrafish embryos, suppressed the regenerated of the caudal fins of zebrafish larvae, and suppressed the regenerative angiogenesis of caudal fins in adult zebrafish. These results were consistent with those of a previous study, which found that oridonin could inhibit the formation of capillary-like networks in human dermal microvascular endothelial cells .
Phenotypic changes in angiogenesis are always involved in angiogenesis-related signalling pathways. VEGF signalling is mainly mediated by VEGFR2, and blocking the activity of VEGFR2 can limit angiogenesis [35, 36]. VEGFA is a key angiogenic factor, and VEGFR2, is the primary receptor mediating the angiogenic activity [5, 6]. VEGF signalling is a potential target of antiangiogenic therapy. VEGFR3 mainly participates in early blood vessels formation . TP53 is one of the important tumour suppressor genes, which can make a gene stable and regulate cell growth, differentiation, and aging. TP53 is known as the “guardian gene” [38, 39]. Therefore, our study at least partially elucidates the mechanism of the antiangiogenic activity of oridonin, which may be related to the down-regulation of VEGFA, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3 expression, while up-regulation the TP53 expression.
We chose the xenograft zebrafish tumour model and observed the oridonin activity on tumour metastasis. The anti-tumour effect of oridonin was weaker than that of Bevacizumab. However, from the observations of the heartbeat, body weight and survival time, we demonstrated some advantages of oridonin in application. Moreover, 2D–MS identified a total of 50 proteins differentially expressed, of which 17 were up-expressed and 28 down-expressed. Moreover, among the 50 proteins, 12 proteins (3 up-expressed, 9 down-expressed) are closely related to tumour growth and metastasis: 5′-nucleotidase domain-containing protein 3, cathepsin, Napor protein (up-expressed); high mobility group protein B2, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4H isoform 2/(EIF4H), transcriptional activator protein Pur-alpha, claudin-4, casein kinase II alpha 1 subunit, cytochrome b-c1 complex subunit 2, cleavage stimulation factor subunit 2, ER membrane protein complex subunit 1 isoform X2, and nuclear receptor coactivator 5 (down-expressed). In summary, these proteins can regulate the tumour cell proliferation, migration and growth by direct or indirect effects [40–49]. We chose the xenograft tumour mouse model and observed the oridonin activity on tumour growth and metastasis. The result verified the great anti-tumour effect of oridonin. Accordingly, the mice tumour tissue sections were subjected to HE staining and CD31 fluorescent staining, which showed the oridonin anti-tumour activity based on the inhibitory effect of angiogenesis.
Importantly, the Claudin-4 protein was focus of the research. Claudins are crucial structural and functional components of tight junctions, which are essential for holding endothelial and/or epithelial cells together. Claudin family proteins have a significant role in tumour growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis, and are highly expressed in many types of epithelial tumours [50, 51]. Claudin 4 is a transmembrane protein, which is often restricted to tight junction structures and has been shown to provide a barrier to paracellular diffusion. Research suggested that Claudin 4 plays an important role in tumour growth and malignancy via the control of cell proliferation, migration, apoptosis, and metastasis [52–54]. Significantly, Claudin 4 expression may be useful to distinguish switch/sucrose non-fermentable complex-deficient undifferentiated carcinomas from sarcomas . Finally, our research showed that Claudin 1, Claudin 4, and Claudin 7 were closely related to tumour growth and metastasis. Claudin 1, Claudin 4 and Claudin 7 are down-expressed. Claudin 1 and Claudin 7 can be used in cancer diagnosis and treatment . Claudin 4 has a correlation with tumour angiogenesis, and can be used as a treatment target protein, which was consistent with our research results [52, 53]. Moreover, the research conformed that Claudin 4 and VEGFA, VEGFR2, VEGFR3, and TP53 were all contributed to the anti-tumour effect based on the inhibition of angiogenesis (Fig.16). A meta-analysis indicates that Claudin-4 over-expression is associated with progress of gastric cancer and poor survival in gastric cancer patients . Aberrant Claudin 4 expression plays an important role in the clinicopathological characteristics of gastric cancer . Claudin 4 is thus a potent target for cancer therapy, and that an anti-Claudin 4 antibody is a promising candidate anticancer agent [59, 60].
The present study has demonstrated that oridonin inhibited angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Further study indicated that the inhibited angiogenesis effect from oridonin might be based on the down-regulation of VEGFA, VEGFR2, and VEGFR3, and the up-regulation of TP53 gene expression. Claudin 1, Claudin 4, and Claudin 7 were the main proteins contributing to the oridonin anti-tumour effect based on the inhibition of angiogenesis.
Two-dimensional electrophoresis-mass spectrometer
Cluster of differentiation 31
Days post amputation
Endothelial cell growth medium
Hematoxylin and eosin.
Human umbilical vascular endothelial cells
Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
Tumor protein p53
Vascular endothelial growth factor
Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature. 2011;473(7347):298–307.
Li B, Xiu R. Angiogenesis: from molecular mechanisms to translational implications. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2013;54(4):345–55.
Zhao Y, Adjei AA. Targeting Angiogenesis in Cancer Therapy: Moving Beyond Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor. Oncologist. 2015;20(6):660–73.
Paduch R. The role of lymphangiogenesis and angiogenesis in tumor metastasis. Cell Oncol (Dordr). 2016;39(5):397–410.
Siveen KS, Prabhu K, Krishnankutty R, Kuttikrishnan S, Tsakou M, Alali FQ, et al. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Signaling in Tumour Vascularization: Potential and Challenges. Curr Vasc Pharmacol. 2017;5 [Epub ahead of print]
Alirahimi E, Ashkiyan A, Kazemi-Lomedasht F, Azadmanesh K, Hosseininejad-Chafi M, Habibi-Anbouhi M, et al. Intrabody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 mediates downregulation of surface localization. Cancer Gene Ther. 2017;24(1):33–7.
Zuo PY, Chen XL, Liu YW, Xiao CL, Liu CY. Increased risk of cerebrovascular events in patients with cancer treated with bevacizumab: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102484.
Frandsen S, Kopp S, Wehland M, Pietsch J, Infanger M, Grimm D. Latest Results for Anti-Angiogenic Drugs in Cancer Treatment. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(39):5927–42.
Harvey AL, Edrada-Ebel R, Quinn RJ. The re-emergence of natural products for drug discovery in the genomics era. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14(2):111–29.
Khalid EB, Ayman EE, Rahman H, Abdelkarim G, Najda A. Natural products against cancer angiogenesis. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(11):14513–36.
Lu K, Bhat M, Basu S. Plants and their active compounds: natural molecules to target angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2016;19(3):287–95.
Kumar M, Dhatwalia SK, Dhawan DK. Role of angiogenic factors of herbal origin in regulation of molecular pathways that control tumor angiogenesis. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(11):14341–54.
Zhou GB, Kang H, Wang L, Gao L, Liu P, Xie J, et al. Oridonin, a diterpenoid extracted from medicinal herbs, targets AML1-ETO fusion protein and shows potent antitumor activity with low adverse effects on t (8;21) leukemia in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2007;109(8):3441–50.
Kang N, Zhang JH, Qiu F, Tashiro S, Onodera S, Ikejima T. Inhibition of EGFR signaling augments oridonin-induced apoptosis in human laryngeal cancer cells via enhancing oxidative stress coincident with activation of both the intrinsic and extrinsic apoptotic pathways. Cancer Lett. 2010;294(2):147–58.
Kang N, Zhang JH, Qiu F, Chen S, Tashiro S, Onodera S, et al. Induction of G(2)/M phase arrest and apoptosis by oridonin in human laryngeal carcinoma cells. J Nat Prod. 2010;73(6):1058–63.
Cheng Y, Qiu F, Ye YC, Guo ZM, Tashiro S, Onodera S, et al. Autophagy inhibits reactive oxygen species-mediated apoptosis via activating p38-nuclear factor-kappa B survival pathways in oridonin-treated murine fibrosarcoma L929 cells. FEBS J. 2009;276(5):1291–306.
Gao F, Tang Q, Yang P, Fang Y, Li W, Wu Y. Apoptosis inducing and differentiation enhancement effect of oridonin on the all-trans-retinoic acid-sensitive and -resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia cells. Int J Lab Hematol. 2010;32(1 Pt 1):e114–22.
Liu H, Qian C, Shen Z. Anti-tumor activity of oridonin on SNU-5 subcutaneous xenograft model via regulation of c-Met pathway. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(9):9139–46.
Meade-Tollin LC, Wijeratne EM, Cooper D, Guild M, Jon E, Fritz A, et al. Ponicidin and oridonin are responsible for the antiangiogenic activity of Rabdosia rubescens, a constituent of the herbal supplement PC SPES. J Nat Prod. 2004;67(1):2–4.
Dong Y, Zhang T, Li J, Deng H, Song Y, Zhai D, et al. Oridonin inhibits tumor growth and metastasis through anti-angiogenesis by blocking the Notch signaling. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e113830.
Westerfield M. The zebrafish book: A guide for the laboratory use of zebrafish (Danio rerio). 4th ed. Eugene (Oregon): University of Oregon; 2000.
Kimmel CB, Ballard WW, Kimmel SR, Ullmann B, Schilling TF. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev Dyn. 1995;203(3):253–310.
Bayliss PE, Bellavance KL, Whitehead GG, Abrams JM, Aegerter S, Robbins HS, et al. Chemical modulation of receptor signaling inhibits regenerative angiogenesis in adult zebrafish. Nat Chem Biol. 2006;2(5):265–73.
Mathew LK, Simonich MT, Tanguay RL. AHR-dependent misregulation of Wnt signaling disrupts tissue regeneration. Biochem Pharmacol. 2009;77(4):498–507.
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, et al. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(2):115–32.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7–30.
Valastyan S, Weinberg RA. Tumor metastasis: molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell. 2011;147(2):275–92.
Fens MH, Storm G, Schiffelers RM. Tumor vasculature as target for therapeutic intervention. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2010;19(11):1321–38.
Eichholz A, Merchant S, Gaya AM. Anti-angiogenesis therapies: their potential in cancer management. Onco Targets Ther. 2010;3:69–82.
Aalders KC, Tryfonidis K, Senkus E, Cardoso F. Anti-angiogenic treatment in breast cancer: Facts, successes, failures and future perspectives. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;53:98–110.
Chen LT, Oh DY, Ryu MH, Yeh KH, Yeo W, Carlesi R, et al. Anti-angiogenic Therapy in Patients with Advanced Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancer Res Treat. 2017; doi:10.4143/crt.2016.176.
Ye L, Jia Y, Ji KE, Sanders AJ, Xue K, Ji J, et al. Traditional Chinese medicine in the prevention and treatment of cancer and cancer metastasis. Oncol Lett. 2015;10(3):1240–50.
Tu X, Deng Y, Chen J, Hu Q, He C, Jordan JB, et al. Screening study on the anti-angiogenic effects of Traditional Chinese Medicine - Part I: Heat-clearing and detoxicating TCM. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;194:280–7.
Choi HS, Kim MK, Lee K, Lee KM, Choi YK, Shin YC, et al. SH003 represses tumor angiogenesis by blocking VEGF binding to VEGFR2. Oncotarget. 2016;7(22):32969–79.
Ferrara N, Gerver HP, LeCouter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med. 2003;9(6):669–76.
Shibuya M. Differential roles of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 and receptor-2 in angiogenesis. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2006;39(5):469–78.
Jiang L, Zhou X, Yu F, Huang L, Ma Q, Zhou J, et al. The Expression of FLT4 (VEGFR3) Gene during the Early Stage of Development in Zebrafish. Progress in Modern Biomedicine. 2012;12:2224–7.
Gong Z, Huang H, Xu K, Liang F, Li X, Xiong W, et al. Advances in microRNAs and TP53 Gene Regulatory Network. Prog Biochem Biophys. 2012;39:1133–44.
Xu-Monette ZY, Medeiros LJ, Li Y, Orlowski RZ, Andreeff M, Bueso-Ramos CE, et al. Dysfunction of the TP53 tumor suppressor gene in lymphoid malignancies. Blood. 2012;119(16):3668–83.
Zhang W, Wang S, Wang Q, Yang Z, Pan Z, Li L, et al. Overexpression of cysteine cathepsin L is a marker of invasion and metastasis in ovarian cancer. Oncol Rep. 2014;31(3):1334–42.
Fan B, Jiao BH, Fan FS, Lu SK, Song J, Guo CY, et al. Downregulation of miR-95-3p inhibits proliferation, and invasion promoting apoptosis of glioma cells by targeting CELF2. Int J Oncol. 2015;47(3):1025–33.
An Y, Zhang Z, Shang Y, Jiang X, Dong J, Yu P, et al. miR-23b-3p regulates the chemoresistance of gastric cancer cells by targeting ATG12 and HMGB2. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1766.
Fiume G, Rossi A, de Laurentiis A, Falcone C, Pisano A, Vecchio E, et al. Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4H Is under Transcriptional Control of p65/NF-κB. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66087.
Ma X, Miao H, Jing B, Pan Q, Zhang H, Chen Y, et al. Claudin-4 controls the proliferation, apoptosis, migration and in vivo growth of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2015;34(2):681–90.
Guerra B, Rasmussen TD, Schnitzler A, Jensen HH, Boldyreff BS, Miyata Y, et al. Protein kinase CK2 inhibition is associated with the destabilization of HIF-1α in human cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2015;356(2 Pt B):751–61.
Creaney J, Ma S, Sneddon SA, Tourigny MR, Dick IM, Leon JS, et al. Strong spontaneous tumor neoantigen responses induced by a natural human carcinogen. Oncoimmunology. 2015;4(7):e1011492.
Peterlongo P, Catucci I, Colombo M, Caleca L, Mucaki E, Bogliolo M, et al. FANCM c.5791C>T nonsense mutation (rs144567652) induces exon skipping, affects DNA repair activity and is a familial breast cancer risk factor. Hum Mol Genet. 2015;24(18):5345–55.
Bhatti P, Doody MM, Rajaraman P, et al. Novel breast cancer risk alleles and interaction with ionizing radiation among U.S. radiologic technologists. Radiat Res. 2010;173(2):214–24.
Gao S, Li A, Liu F, Chen F, Williams M, Zhang C, et al. NCOA5 haploinsufficiency results in glucose intolerance and subsequent hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2013;24(6):725–37.
Singh AB, Sharma A, Dhawan P. Claudin family of proteins and cancer: an overview. J Oncol. 2010;2010:541957.
Ding L, Lu Z, Lu Q, Chen YH. The claudin family of proteins in human malignancy: a clinical perspective. Cancer Manag Res. 2013;5:367–75.
Cui YF, Liu AH, An DZ, Sun RB, Shi Y, Shi YX, et al. Claudin-4 is required for vasculogenic mimicry formation in human breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2015;6(13):11087–97.
Radi DA, Abd-Elazeem MA. Prognostic Significance of Lymphatic Vessel Density Detected by D2-40 and Its Relation to Claudin-4 Expression in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma. Int J Surg Pathol. 2016;24(3):219–26.
Hicks DA, Galimanis CE, Webb PG, Spillman MA, Behbakht K, Neville MC, et al. Claudin-4 activity in ovarian tumor cell apoptosis resistance and migration. BMC Cancer. 2016;16(1):788.
Schaefer IM, Agaimy A, Fletcher CD, Hornick JL. Claudin-4 expression distinguishes SWI/SNF complex-deficient undifferentiated carcinomas from sarcomas. Mod Pathol. 2017; doi:10.1038/modpathol.2016.230.
Karabulut M, Alis H, Bas K, Karabulut S, Afsar CU, Oguz H, et al. Clinical significance of serum claudin-1 and claudin-7 levels in patients with colorectal cancer. Mol Clin Oncol. 2015;3(6):1255–67.
Liu JX, Wei ZY, Chen JS, Lu HC, Hao L, Li WJ. Prognostic and clinical significance of claudin-4 in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13:207.
Chen X, Zhao J, Li A, Gao P, Sun J, Song Y, et al. Clinicopathological significance of claudin 4 expression in gastric carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther. 2016;9:3205–12.
Kuwada M, Chihara Y, Luo Y, Li X, Nushiguchi Y, Fujiwara R, et al. Pro-chemotherapeutic effects of antibody against extracellular domain of claudin-4 in bladder cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015;369(1):212–21.
Hashimoto Y, Kawahigashi Y, Hata T, Li X, Watari A, Tada M, et al. Efficacy and safety evaluation of claudin-4-targeted antitumor therapy using a human and mouse cross-reactive monoclonal antibody. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2016;4(5):e00266.
The authors are very grateful to Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, CAS, for providing Tg (fli1a: GFP) zebrafish to us.
We are grateful for the support of the National Science Foundation (project number: 31,300,908) and the state administration of the TCM famous Chinese medicine expert’s Qian Bowen inheritance studio for financial support.
Availability of data and materials
The data and materials will be freely available to any scientist wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes.
Guofu Zhu and Donglai Sheng designed this study. Lili Tian performed the experiments. Kangjie Xie analyzed the data. Guofu Zhu and Xiaoqing Wan read and revised the paper. All authors read and approved the paper before its final submission.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All study protocols involving animals in this research were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. No human participant, human tissue and personal data were involving in this research.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.