Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Polyphenols contribute to the antioxidant and antiproliferative activity of Phyllanthus debilis plant in-vitro

BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:339

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1324-5

Received: 2 July 2016

Accepted: 25 August 2016

Published: 1 September 2016

Abstract

Background

Phyllanthus debilis (Elapitawakka) is a medicinal plant used in traditional systems of medicine in Sri Lanka. Present study was carried out to evaluate in-vitro anti-oxidant and anti-proliferative activity of the water extracts of aerial parts (AP) and roots (RP) of P.debilis plant and the role of polyphenolic compounds in view of its medicinal use.

Method

Total polyphenols, flavonoids and proanthocyanidin content of the extracts were quantified. DPPH, hydroxyl radical, nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide scavenging potentials and the total antioxidant capacity, ferric ion reducing power were determined to evaluate antioxidant capacity. Anti-proliferative activity was assessed with MTT assay for Human Rhabdomyosarcoma (RD) and normal rat liver cells (CC1) after 24 h exposure to the plant extracts. DPPH and MTT assays were carried out for AP and RP extracts after removal of polyphenols to assess the contribution of polyphenols on antioxidant and anti-proliferative activity of Phyllanthus debilis.

Results

Flavonoid content of the AP extract was significantly lower than that of RP (P < 0.001) while no significant difference was observed in polyphenolic as well as in proanthocyanidin contents. All the assays except for phosphomolybdate assay demonstrated that the RP extract had higher antioxidant capacity (p < 0.001) compared to AP. Further, antioxidant capacity and anti-proliferative activity were lower (p < 0.001) in AP and RP in the absence of polyphenols compared to the crude extract.

Conclusion

Root contains higher levels of flavonoids than the aerial part. Moreover, the presence of polyphenols is required for antioxidant and anti-proliferative activities of both AP and RP.

Keywords

Phyllanthus debilis Polyphenols Antioxidant activity Anti-proliferative activity RD CC1

Background

Reactive free radicals are constantly generated in human body through biological reactions. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydroxyl radical (OH.), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide radical (O2) and singlet oxygen (O2.) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) such as nitric oxide (NO˙), peroxynitrite (ONOO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) are the main sources of reactive free radicles. The production of free radicals are neutralized by endogenous antioxidants and enzymes, however excessive production of reactive molecules causes oxidative stress. As a result they oxidize biologically important macro molecules such as DNA, proteins, lipids and carbohydrates [1]. DNA strand breaks and abnormal DNA linkages caused by ROS and RNS are closely associated with carcinogenesis [2]. The consequence of oxidative stress is also associated with cardiovascular, metabolic, inflammatory diseases and various neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis [3].

Plants produce broad spectrum of polyphenolic compounds as secondary metabolites for their survival under stress conditions. Polyphenols have an ability to neutralize free radicals by donating them electrons or hydrogen atoms which may play a vital role in health benefits [4].

Phyllanthus debilis (Elapitawakka/Bim nelli) is an annual plant found in Sri Lanka. The genus Phyllanthus (Euphorbiaceae) contains about 800 species in worldwide and most of these plants have been used as drugs in traditional systems of medicine all over the world [5]. Studies carried out on P.debilis with authenticated plant are very limited up-to date. Aqueous extract of P.debilis has shown anti-hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic activity in mice [6]. Further analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity have been demonstrated for the petroleum ether extract of the whole plant in animal models [7]. Anticancer, antibacterial and antioxidant activity have also reported with different solvent extracts in vitro [5, 810].

The whole plant of P.debilis or its parts are used to prepare porridge or ‘decoction’ in traditional medicine and folk medicine to treat ailments such as liver complications, diabetes mellitus and skin diseases in Sri Lanka [11]. The present study was carried out to explore the antioxidant activity and the potential anti-proliferative activity of the water extract of P.debilis plant as used in traditional systems of medicine. Since it is important to understand the contribution of polyphenols on antioxidant and anti-proliferative activity, further investigations were carried out with the plant extracts after removing their polyphenols.

Methods

Chemicals and equipment

Gallic acid, 2-deoxy-D-ribose, Folin-Ciocalteu’s reagent and other chemicals needed for cell culture and cell viability studies were purchased from Sigma Chemicals Co. (P.O. Box 14508, St. Louis, MO 63178 USA). 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), aluminium chloride, polyvinyl-polypyrrolidone (PVPP) were purchased from Fluka (Flukachemie GmbH, CH-9471 Buchs). L-Ascorbic acid, hydrogen peroxide, N-(1-naphthyl)-ethylene diaminedihydro chloride and ethanol were purchased from BDH Chemicals (BDH Chemicals Ltd, Poole, England). All chemicals used were of analytical grade.

SHIMADZU UV 1601 UV/Visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) was used to read the absorbance. LFT 600 EC freeze dryer was used to freeze-dry the plant extracts (LFT 600 EC, −90–95 °C temperature, 10 valves with Hitachi pump). Cells used for the assessment of anti-proliferative activity (RD, CC1) were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified CO2 incubator (SHEL LAB/Sheldon manufacturing Inc., Cornelius, OR 97113, USA). Olympus (1X70-S1F2) inverted fluorescence microscope (Olympus Optical Co. Ltd. Japan) and digital camera (MDC 200 (USB 2.0) 2 M pixels with CCD chip) were used for assessment and imaging of cell morphology.

RD cell line was kindly donated by Dr Sunethra Gunasena, Medical Research Institute, Colombo 08, Sri Lanka and CC1 (Normal rat liver fibroblast) cell line was obtained from Dr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, University of Karachi, Pakistan.

Plant materials

Phyllanthus debilis plants in the seeding stage were collected from Pannipitiya area in the Colombo district, Sri Lanka (June 2014). The plant was taxonomically identified and voucher specimens were deposited in Botany Department, Bandaranayaka Memorial Aurveda Research Institute, Nawinna, Colombo, Sri Lanka (Deposition number: 755/a).

Preparation of the decoctions

The plant materials were washed in distilled water followed by deionized water and air dried. The aerial parts and the root parts were separated and freeze dried until a constant weight was obtained. Dried samples were ground using a kitchen blender. The powdered aerial parts (50 g) were refluxed with 500 mL of deionized water for 3 h in triplicate. The roots were pooled together and the powdered roots (50 g) were refluxed as previously. Decoctions were filtered through a glass funnel plugged with cotton wool, then through a Whatman filter paper. Filtrate was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 15 min and the supernatant was freeze dried. The freeze dried samples were weighed and stored at −20 °C in sterile glass bottles until further use. The yield was calculated as a percentage of the dried plant material.

Removal of polyphenols

Polyphenols were removed using Polyvinyl polypyrrolidone (PVVP) column as described by Soysa (1997) [12, 13]. Briefly, a cotton wool plug was placed inside a 5 cm3 syringe after removing the plunger and the needle. Syringe was filled with PVPP (1.7 g). Water extract of AP and RP (3 mL) was layered over the PVPP column. The PVPP column was placed in a 15 mL falcon tube and centrifuged at 2,000 g for 10 min. Centrifugation was repeated for 6 times with the same column adding 1 mL of the extract and each fraction was collected to separate tubes. The first fraction was discarded and remaining fractions were analyzed for the presence polyphenols. The Absorbance of AP (aerial parts) and RP (root parts) before and after PVPP treatment were scanned for wavelengths using a UV/Visible scanning spectrophotometer.

Determination of total polyphenolic and flavonoid content

Total polyphenolic content (TPC) of the AP and RP were determined using Foiln-Ciocalteu’s method [14]. Gallic acid was used to construct the standard curve and total phenolic content was expressed as w/w% gallic acid equivalents (GAE w/w %).

The flavonoid content of the extracts was determined by aluminum chloride colorimetric assay [15]. Calibration curve was plotted using EGCG (− (−) -Epigallocatechingallate) standard and flavonoid content was expressed as w/w% EGCG equivalents (EGCGE w/w %).

Determination of total proanthocyanidins

A volume of 2 ml of vanillin reagent (1 g vanillin in 50 mL, 70 % H2SO4) was mixed with 200 μL of the sample (400, 500, 700 μg/mL). The resulting mixture was allowed to stand for 15 min at room temperature. The absorbance was determined at 500 nm [16]. Calibration curve was constructed using EGCG and the total proanthocyanidin content was expressed as w/w % EGCG equivalent.

Qualitative analysis of plant phytochemicals

Qualitative analysis for the phytochemicals were carried out using the methods described by Saeed et al., (2012) for alkaloids, tannins, terpenes, saponins, cardiac glycosides present in the water extracts of the plant [17].

Phosphomolybdate assay for total antioxidant capacity

Total antioxidant capacity was determined using phosphomolybdate method [18]. Results were expressed as w/w% ascorbic acid equivalent (AAE).

2,2′- Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity assay

In vitro antioxidant activity of the AP, RP, PFAP and PFRP were determined using stable free radical 2,2′- diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) [15]. Results were expressed as percentage inhibition calculated from the formula (1).
$$ \%\ Scavenge\ of\ DPPH\ free\ radical=\frac{\left( Ab\ of\ control- Ab\ of\ sample\right)\ X\ 100}{Ab\ of\ control} $$
(1)

Hydroxyl radical scavenging assay

Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of AP and RP was determined in lyophilized plant extracts. Fenton reaction was used to generate hydroxyl radicals in vitro [19]. The assay is based on quantification of degradation product of 2-deoxyribose by condensation with TBA. The percentage scavenging activity of hydroxyl radical was calculated using the formula (1). Ascorbic acid served as the positive control.

Hydrogen peroxide scavenging activity

Assay was carried out according to the method developed by Fernando and Soysa [20]. Percentage scavenging activity was calculated using the formula (1). Ascorbic acid served as the positive control.

Ferric ion reducing power

The reducing ability to convert ferric ions to ferrous ions by AP and RP was carried out as previously described [15]. Ascorbic acid served as the positive control.

Nitric oxide radical scavenging

This assay is based on Griess Illosvoy reaction [15]. The pink azo-dye generated during reaction was measured at 540 nm. Ascorbic acid served as the positive control.

Antiproliferative activity

Cell culture

RD (Rhabdomyosarcoma) and CC1 (normal rat liver) cells were cultured in tissue culture flasks with DMEM (Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium) supplemented with 10 % FBS, 3 % glutamine, 1%penicillin-streptomycin, and 1 M HEPES (4-(2-Hydroxyethyl) piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid) buffer in humidified CO2 incubator in 37 °C.

Cell morphology

Cell morphology was observed before and after the treatment of the extract at different concentrations using an inverted fluorescence microscope. Images of the cells were captured.

MTT ((3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide)) assay

Cells were plated in 24-well flat bottom tissue culture plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well and kept overnight at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator to obtain a 70 % confluent mono layer. The cells were treated with AP, RP, PFAP and PFRP at different concentrations for 24 h. Cells for negative controls were exposed to the same conditions without the plant extract. Cycloheximide (0.1 %, 50 μl) served as the positive control. Medium was replaced by MEM (1 ml) and MTT reagent (100 μl, 5 mg/ml). The contents were incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. Isopropyl alcohol (750 μl) in 0.05 M HCl was added to dissolve MTT crystals. Absorbance was recorded at 570 nm. Percentage cell viability was calculated using the formula 2 [21].
$$ \%\ Cytotoxicity = \frac{\left( Ab\ of\ Negative\ control- Ab\ of\ sample\right)\ X\ 100}{Ab\ of\ Negative\ control} $$
(2)

Statistics and calculations

Each experiment was performed at least in triplicate for three lyophilized samples prepared from aerial extracts and for the pooled sample (lyophilized) of the root extract. Calibration curves were considered as linear if R2 > 0.99. The EC50 values were calculated from either linear or logarithmic dose response curves where R2 > 0.95 was considered as linear. Student t test was carried out for the statistical calculations using Microsoft Excel.

Results and discussion

Extraction yield, total phenolic, flavonoid and proanthocyanidin content

The extraction efficiency of aerial parts and the pooled sample of the roots were 12.1 (±0.5) and 12.5 % of the dry weight respectively. Total polyphenol content, flavonoid and proanthocyanidin content of extracts are depicted in Table 1. Mean values for TPC, flavonoid and proanthocyanidin content are higher in roots. However a significant difference was observed only with flavonoid content which is a subgroup of polyphenols. Significant difference was not observed for both polyphenolic and proanthocyanidin content between AP and RP (Table 1).
Table 1

Extraction yield, polyphenolic, flavonoid and proanthocyanidincontent of extracts

Part of the plant

Total polyphenolic content (w/w% GAE)

Flavonoid (w/w% EGCGE)

Proanthocyanidin (w/w% EGCGE)

Aerial parts (n = 3)

12.0 ± 0.6

65.9 ± 3.6*

13.8 ± 2.2

Roots (n = 3)

17.8 ± 3.7

82.6 ± 4.6*

14.5 ± 3.0

Results are expressed as mean ± SD. GAE -Gallic acid equivalent; EGCGE- (−) Epigallocatechingallate equivalent).*P < 0.001 when compared AP with RP. AP: aerial parts, RP: roots

Plant polyphenols are secondary metabolites, which synthesize for their defense against abiotic and biotic stress conditions. They also play numerous roles in biological systems such as antioxidants, antimicrobial and anticancer agents [22]. Gallic acid, rutin, corilagin, furosin and geraniin are some of the polyphenols characterized in aerial parts of P.debilis [10]. Flavonoids are also a subset of polyphenols. They involve in regulatory mechanisms in cell proliferation and differentiation to protect eukaryotic cells from oxidative stress through regulating the activity of different protein kinases [23]. Flavonoids have ability to scavenge free radicals and also serve to chelate metals that generate free hydroxyl radicals via the Fenton reaction [24]. The highest amount of flavonoid content was observed in RP than AP (P < 0.001) (Table 1). Proanthocyanidins is a subset of flavonoid which is synthesized in flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. They are oligomers of flavan-3-ol units with diverse biological activities [25]. Both roots and aerial part showed similar proanthocyanidin content. The present study also showed the presence of alkaloids, tannins, terpenes and saponins but the absence of cardiac glycosides. However a previous study reported that absence of saponin, triterpenoids, and tannins in p.deblis [26].

Ferric ion reducing power

Reducing potential is a marker of antioxidant capacity and it was assessed by ferric ion reducing assay. Ferric ions can be reduced to ferrous ions by the antioxidants present in the plant extracts. Ferric ion formation is monitored through the blue green colored complex at 700 nm [27]. Both parts of the plant showed higher reducing ability than the ascorbic acid standard. The capacity to reduce Fe 3+ by the root extracts is significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the ascorbic acid or AP at all the concentrations studied. Furthermore the root showed a reducing capacity even at 0.2 μg/mL (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Ferric ion reducing capacity of plant extracts and L-Ascorbic acid standard at different concentrations. The results are presented as mean ± SD for shoot samples (n =3), root samples (n = 3) and L-Ascorbic acid (n =3)

Total antioxidant capacity

The assay is based on the reduction of molybdenum (VI) to molybdenum (V) which forms a green chromophore with phosphate in the acidic medium [28]. Total antioxidant capacity of both AP and RP depicts no significance difference (Table 2 and Fig. 2). Ferric ion reducing power results indicate higher reducing potential of root but molybdenum reduction assay demonstrates no significant difference in antioxidant potential in both extracts. This showed that though the capacity to reduce Fe3+to Fe2+is higher in roots, overlapping curves signifies (Fig. 2) that the capacity to reduce Mo6+ to Mo5+is similar in both parts. The positive control, ascorbic acid also showed different behavior in reducing power between ferric ion and molybdenum (VI) ion.
Table 2

EC50 values for free radical scavenging assays for hydroxyl, nitric oxide assay and hydrogen peroxide with relevant positive standards

EC 50 values

OH. (μg/mL)

NO. (μg/mL)

H2O2 (μg/mL)

Total antioxidant capacity (w/w % AAE)

AP(Aerial parts) (n = 3)

49.27 ± 4.75*

211.05 ± 7.61*

42.54 ± 2.23*

37.7 ± 3.2

RP (Root) (n = 3)

27.77 ± 3.26*

170.75 ± 3.16*

30.23 ± 3.35*

35.3 ± 5.6

Gallic acid (n = 3)

27.37 ± 1.89

N/A

N/A

N/A

Ascorbic acid (n = 3)

N/A

212.58 ± 2.87

13.82 ± 1.11

N/A

Significant difference at *P < 0.001 when compared RP with AP. AAE: Ascorbic acid equivalent, N/A: Not applicable

Fig. 2

Total antioxidant capacity of plant extracts and L-Ascorbic acid at different concentrations. The results are presented as mean ± SD for AP (Aerial parts) (n =3), root samples (RP) (n = 3) and L-Ascorbic acid (n =3)

Hydroxyl radical scavenging assay

Hydroxyl radicals are generated by reducing the oxygen molecule to water and it is one of the main sources of reactive oxygen species in biological systems [29]. The values obtained for EC50 show that hydroxyl radical scavenging ability of RP is significantly higher than AP and no significant difference were found between root and ascorbic acid (Table 2). Further it was observed that the percentage scavenging ability of RP is higher at lower concentrations (below around 20 μg/mL) than the gallic acid. Scavenging capacity of AP is parallel to that of the gallic acid standard (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Dose response curve for percentage hydroxyl radical scavenging of plant extracts and L-Ascorbic acid standard. The results are presented as mean ± SD for aerial parts (AP), root parts (RP) and gallic acid standard

Nitric oxide radical scavenging assay

Figure 4 Nitric oxide (NO) is a free radical and a signaling molecule which is responsible for various biological functions. It has been found that the peroxynitrite derived from NO under oxidative conditions is a highly reactive radical which can damage macromolecules [30]. The Present study showed that roots of P.debilis has high NO scavenging capacity and the EC50 is lower than the ascorbic acid (p < 0.001) (Table 2). These observations suggest that the possibility of using P.debilis in the treatment of degenerative diseases by scavenging nitric oxide free radicals. However further research should be carried out in this regard.
Fig. 4

Dose response curve of nitric oxide radical scavenging percentage of plant extracts and L-Ascorbic acid standard. The results are presented as mean ± SD for AP (n =3), root samples (PR) (n = 3) and Gallic acid standard (n =3) AP: Aerial parts, RP: Root parts

Hydrogen peroxide scavenging assay (Fig. 5)

Fig. 5

Dose response curve of percentage hydrogen peroxide scavenging ability of plant extracts and L-Ascorbic acid standard. The results are presented as mean ± SD for shoot samples (n =3), root samples (n = 3) and L-Ascorbic acid standard (n =3)

Hydrogen peroxide is a metabolic byproduct results from the action of superoxide dismutase with superoxide radical. Superoxide radicals have a capability of generating reactive oxygen species [31]. Hydrogen peroxide is less toxic than superoxide radical in biological systems. Both roots and aerial parts of the plants showed moderate activity against H2O2 scavenging activity. However the EC 50 values were higher than the ascorbic acid reference standard (Table 2).

Spectrum analysis

The presence of polyphenols in both shoot and roots is evidenced by showing an absorbance peak between 190 and 700 nm. The broad peak observed around 235 nm was remained constant while the signals between the 230 to 500 nm were disappeared from both parts of the plant after PVPP treatment (Fig. 6). Data published by Shela et al., (1993) states that polyphenolic compounds in white wine had a maximum absorbance between 250 – 350 nm [32]. Similar observations were also found in the present study.
Fig. 6

The photometric scanning spectrum obtained for the root and shoot samples before and after the treatment with PVPP. AP: Aerial parts, PFAP: polyphenol free aerial parts, PFRP: Polyphenol free root parts

Scavenging capacity for DPPH radical in the presence and absence of polyphenolic compounds of the plant extracts

Antioxidants readily react with DPPH radical change its original purple color into yellow [15]. The DPPH radical scavenging capacity of the root is comparable to ascorbic acid and significantly higher (P < 0.001) than the aerial parts (Table 3). Interestingly, DPPH scavenging capacity of the root extract at lower concentrations is higher than that of ascorbic acid but lower at high concentrations (Fig. 7). A previous study has reported that methanolic extracts of P.debilis has high DPPH scavenging activity and the results are comparable with the present study [33].
Table 3

DPPH scavenging assay, EC50 values with the presence and absence of polyphenols

Plant extract

EC50 values before removal of polyphenols (μg/mL)

EC50 values of after removal of polyphenols (μg/mL)

AP(Aerial parts) (n = 3)

8.6 ± 0.4

695.1 ± 4.6

RP (Roots) (n = 3)

3.7 ± 0.1

583.3 ± 12.3

Ascorbic acid (n = 3)

3.3 ± 0.3

-

Fig. 7

The dose dependent response curves for percentage scavenging of DPPH by water extracts of root and aerial parts (AP) of P.debilis plant comparison with L-Ascorbic acid. The results are presented as mean ± SD for shoot (n =3), root (n = 3) and L-Ascorbic acid (n =3)

Polyvinyl polypyrrolidone (PVPP) is highly cross linked polymer which has high affinity towards polyphenols [13, 34]. In the absence of polyphenols both root and aerial parts showed high EC50 values for the DPPH assay. The EC50 ratios with the absence and presence of polyphenols are over 100 fold for both extracts. These results indicate that polyphenols are the main contributory factor for DPPH radical scavenging activity and involvement of non-polyphenols for the antioxidant activity is negligible. Spectrophotometric analysis suggests that the substance(s) which have maximum absorbance around 235 nm are not responsible for scavenging of DPPH (Fig. 8 and Table 3).
Fig. 8

The dose dependent percentage scavenging potential of DPPH in the absence of polyphenols in AP and RP (n = 3). PFAP: Polyphenol free aerial parts, PFRP: Polyphenol free root parts. The results are presented as mean ± SD for AP

Cell morphology

Anti-proliferative activity of AP and RP against RD and CC1 cells

Figure 9 depicts the morphological changes of RD cells treated with AP and RP extracts. Shrunken cells with condensed cytoplasm and membrane blebbing characteristics to apoptosis were observed in RD cells treated with plant extracts [35]. The cell death was concentration dependent for both AP and RP with the cell lines investigated. Normal rat liver fibroblast cells(CC1), showed apoptotic features characteristic to apoptosis only at high concentrations.
Fig. 9

Morphological changes of cells observed after 24 h exposure of AP and RP extracts and cycloheximide (positive control) under light microscopy. a and b are negative controls of RD and CC1 cells. c and d are positive controls of RD and CC1 cells treated with cycloheximide (0.1 %, 50 μl) as the positive control respectively. e & f: RD Cells treated with AP at concentrations 200 and 500 μg/mL, respectively. g & h: CC1 Cells treated with AP at concentrations 800 and 1000 μg/mL, respectively. i & j RD cells treated with RP at concentrations at 200 and 500 μg/mL. k & l: CC1 cells treated with RP at concentrations 800 and 1000 μg/mL, respectively (20X)

Anti-proliferative activity was high in RD cells by both AP and RP extracts compared to the CC1 cells (Table 4 & Fig. 10). Even at a concentration such as 1200 μg/mL, the percentage cytotoxicity of CC1 cells was only 58.99 ± 2.43 % and 54.11 ± 0.88 % for AP and RP extracts respectively. Several compounds which have been isolated from P.deblis provide evidence for antioxidant and anti-proliferative activity confirmed in the present study. Gallic acid, rutin, corilagin, furosin and geraniin isolated from P. deblis and geraniin have shown high DPPH scavenging activity [10, 36]. It is reported that geraniin has antioxidant properties and induces apoptotic cell death in human lung adenocarcinoma cells in vitro and in vivo [37]. Gallic acid is a common naturally occurring phenol found inplants used for therapeutic purposes including phyllanthus species [38]. It acts as an antioxidant and exerts anti-proliferative effect on glioma T98G cells via dose-dependent epigenetic regulation mediated by miRNAs [39, 40]. The authors have further reported that the anticancer activity is based on its antioxidant effects.
Table 4

Comparison of EC50 values of the MTT cytotoxicity assay

 

AP (n = 3)

RP (n = 3)

RD cell line (μg/mL)

287.16 ± 8.39 *

216.52 ± 11.90*

CC1 cell line(μg/mL)

555.03 ± 4.21*

842.01 ± 7.53*

*P < 0.01 when compared between AP (Aerial parts) and RP (Root parts)

Fig. 10

Dose dependent cytotoxic effect of AP and RP with RD and CC1 cells and cytotoxicity of polyphenol absence samples with RD cells, after 24 h exposure

The EC50 for MTT assay is significantly high (P < 0.001) for the RD cells treated with polyphenol free extracts compared to the crude extract (Figs. 9 & 10 and Table 4). Dose dependent increase in cytotoxicity was observed even in the absence of polyphenols at high concentrations. However the percentage cell viability in the absence of polyphenols was only 28.41 ± 2.94 and 26.77 ± 5.37 %, even at a concentration of 600 μg/mL with AP and RP respectively. At the same concentration AP and RP had 69.09 ± 0.70 and 63.36 ± 1.60 % cell viably respectively.

Hypophyllanthin and Phyllanthin are non polyphenolic compounds found in some phyllanthus species including P. deblis have shown that they exhibit anti-proliferative and antioxidant activity in vitro and vivo [38, 41]. The presence of non-phenolics which have anti-proliferative activity may have contributed to the cell death in the PVPP treated extracts (Fig. 10). However the contribution is low compared to the phenolic compounds.

The evidence supports that polyphenolic compounds are essentially responsible for cell death activating via the increase production of ROS (Reactive oxygen species). Based on the results it may be more effective to prescribe root instead of whole plant in therapy.

Conclusions

The present study reveals that antioxidant activity and anti-proliferative activity are higher in root compared to aerial parts which associate with their phenolic content. Polyphenolic compounds present in both RP and AP extracts show a significant contribution for antioxidant activity and anti-proliferative activity against RD cell line. It was also found that P. debilis does not show cytotoxic activity against CC1 control cells as same as the cancer cells.

Abbreviations

AAE: 

Ascorbic acid equivalent

AP: 

Aerial parts

CC1: 

normal rat liver cells

DPPH: 

1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl

EGCG: 

(−) -Epigallocatechingallate

GAE: 

Gallic acid equivalent

MTT: 

3 4, 5-(dimethylthiazol-2-yl) 2-5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide

PFAP: 

Polyphenol free aerial parts

PFRP: 

Polyphenol free root parts

PVPP: 

Polyvinyl polypyrrolidone

RD: 

Rhabdomyosarcoma cells

RP: 

Root parts

TPC: 

Total polyphenolic content

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge University of Colombo, Sri Lanka for the financial assistance by awarding the Research Grant AP/3/2/2014/RG/11. The authors are grateful to Dr. S. Gunasena Medical Research Institute, Colombo 08, Sri Lanka for providing the RD cell line, Ms. Sudeepa Sugathadasa and Ms. Pushpa Jeewandara, Department of Botany, Bandaranayake Memorial Ayurvedic Research Institute, Nawinna, Colombo, Sri Lanka for the identification of the plant.

The technical assistance offered by technical staff, Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Colombo, is also acknowledged.

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

Designing the project, data interpretation and revising the manuscript was carried out by PS. SW supervised the project. All the experimental work, data analysis and drafting of the manuscript were carried out by DP. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Colombo, Faculty of Medicine
(2)
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of Colombo, Faculty of Medicine

References

  1. Lobo V, Patil A, Phatak A, Chandra N. Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: Impact on human health. Pharmacogn Rev. 2010;4(8):118–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett LI, Rojas S, Seefeldt T. Role of antioxidants in the prevention of cancer. J Exp Clin Med. 2012;4(4):215–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Ramalingam M, Kim SJ. Reactive oxygen/nitrogen species and their functional correlations in neurodegenerative diseases. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2012;119(8):891–910.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Tsao R. Chemistry and biochemistry of dietary polyphenols. Nutrients. 2010;2(12):1231–46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Komuraiah A, Bolla K, Rao KN, Ragan A, Raju VS, Charya MAS. Antibacterial studies and phytochemical constituents of South Indian Phyllanthus species. Afr J Biotechnol. 2009;8(19):4991–5.Google Scholar
  6. Wanniarachchi KK, Peiris LDC, Ratnasooriya WD. Antihyperglycemic and hypoglycemic activities of Phyllanthus debilis aqueous plant extract in mice. Pharm Biol. 2009;47(3):260–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandrashekar KS, Joshi AB, Satyanarayana D, Pai P. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of Phyllanthus debilis. Whole Plant Pharmaceutical Biology. 2005;43(7):586–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Sureban SM, Subramaniam D, Rajendran P, Ramanujam RP, Dieckgraefe BK, Houchen CW, et al. Therapeutic effects of Phyllanthus species: induction of TNF-α-mediated apoptosis in HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Am J Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;1(4):70–6.Google Scholar
  9. Mariappan P, Sundaramurthy K, Balasundaram J. Studies on phytochemical screening, total phenol content and antioxidant activity of root and shoot of Phyllanthus debilis and Phyllanthus virgatus. International Journal of Current Biotechnology. 2015;3(2):7–12.Google Scholar
  10. Kumaran A, Karunakaran RJ. Antioxidant activity of polyphenols from Phyllanthus debilis Klein ex Willd. Journal of Natural Remedies. 2006;6:141–6.Google Scholar
  11. Pharmacopia A. Department of ayurveda Colombo. Sri Lanka. 1975;1(3):71.Google Scholar
  12. Soysa SSSBDP. Metabolism of caffeine: effects of chemical constituents of tea. University of Colombo UC (MED). 1996. p. 230.Google Scholar
  13. Mitchell AE, Hong YJ, J. May C, Wright CA Bamforth CW. A Comparison of Polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP), Silica Xerogel and a Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) - Silica Co-Product for Their Ability to Remove Polyphenols from Beer. J Inst of Brewing. 2005;111(1): 20–5.Google Scholar
  14. Folin O, Ciocalteu V. On tyrosine and tryptophane determinations in proteins. J Biol Chem. 1927;73:627–50.Google Scholar
  15. Silva IK, Soysa P. Evaluation of phytochemical composition and antioxidant capacity of a decoction containing Adenanthera pavonina L and Thespesia populnea L. Pharmacogn Mag. 2011;7(27):193–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Adedapo AA, Jimoh FO, Afolayan AJ, Masika PJ. Antioxidant activities and phenolic contents of the methanol extracts of the stems of Acokantheraoppositifolia and Adeniagummifera. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008;8:54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Saeed N, Khan MR, Shabbir M. Antioxidant activity, total phenolic and total flavonoid contents of whole plant extracts Torilisleptophylla L. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012;12:221.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Olugbami JO, Gbadegesin MA, Odunola OA. In vitro free radical scavenging and antioxidant properties of ethanol extract of Terminalia glaucescens. Pharmacognosy Research. 2015;7(1):49–56.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Gutteridge JM, Halliwell B. The deoxyribose assay: an assay both for “free” hydroxyl radical and for site-specific hydroxyl radical production. Biochem J. 1988;253(3):932–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Fernando CD, Soysa P. Optimized enzymatic colorimetric assay for determination of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) scavenging activity of plant extracts. Methods X. 2015;2:283–91.Google Scholar
  21. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Meth. 1983;65:55–63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. War AR, Paulraj MG, Ahmad T, et al. Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signal Behav. 2012;7(10):1306–20.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Brunetti C, Ferdinando MD, Fini A, Pollastri S, Tattini M. Flavonoids as antioxidants and developmental regulators: relative significance in plants and humans. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14(2):3540–55.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar S, Pandey AK. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: an overview. Sci World J. 2013. doi:10.1155/2013/162750.Google Scholar
  25. He F, Pan QH, Shi Y, Duan CQ. Biosynthesis and genetic regulation of proanthocyanidins in plants. Molecules. 2008;13:2674–703.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Chandrashekar KS, Joshi AB, Satyanarayana D, Pai P. Phytochemical observation of whole plant of phyllanthus debilis klein ex willd. Anc Sci Life. 2005;25(1):39–41.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Gülçin İ. Fe3+–Fe2+ transformation method: an important antioxidant assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1208:233–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ahmed D, Khan MM, Saeed R. Comparative analysis of phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant and antibacterial potential of methanolic, hexanic and aqueous extracts from Adiantum caudatum leaves. Antioxidants. 2015;4(2):394–409.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Lipinski B. Hydroxyl radical and its scavengers in health and disease. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2011. doi:10.1155/2011/809696.Google Scholar
  30. Pacher P, Beckman JS, Liaudet L. Nitric oxide and peroxynitrite in health and disease. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(1):315–424.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Lennicke C, Rahn J, Lichtenfels R, Wessjohann LA, Seliger B. Hydrogen peroxide – production, fate and role in redox signaling of tumor cells. Cell Communication and Signaling. 2015;13:39. doi:10.1186/s12964-015-0118-6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Gorinstein S, Weisz M, Zemser M, Tilis K, Stiller A, Flam I, et al. Spectroscopic analysis of polyphenols in white wines. Journal of fermentation and bioenoineering. 1993;75(2):115–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Kumaran A, Karunakaran RJ. In vitro antioxidant activities of methanol extracts of five Phyllanthus species from India. LWT- Food Science and Technology. 2007;40(2):344–52.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Verza SG, Pavei C, Ortega GG. Study of the Specificity of Cross-Povidone (PVPP) as binding agent in the quantification of polyphenolic compounds. J Braz Chem Soc. 2008;19(8):1627–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Elmore S. A review of programmed cell death. Toxicol Pathol. 2007;35(4):495–516.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Anokwuru CP, Sinisi A, Samie A, Taglialatela-Scafati O. Antibacterial and antioxidant constituents of Acalypha wilkesiana. Nat Prod Res. 2015;29(12):1180–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Li J, Wang S, Yin J, Pan L. Geraniin induces apoptotic cell death in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells in vitro and in vivo. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2013;91(12):1016–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Mao X, Wu LF, Guo HL, Chen WJ, Cui YP, Qi Q, et al. The genus Phyllanthus: an ethnopharmacological, phytochemical, and pharmacological review. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2016. doi:10.1155/2016/7584952.Google Scholar
  39. Paolini A, Crti V, Pasi F, Mazzini G, Nano R, Capelli E. Gallic acid exerts a protective or an anti-proliferative effect on glioma T98G cells via dose-dependent epigenetic regulation mediated by miRNAs. Int J Oncol. 2015;46(4):1491–7.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Chuang CY, Liu HC, Wu LC, Chen CY, Chang JT, Hsu SL. Gallic acid induces apoptosis of lung fibroblasts via a reactive oxygen species-dependent ataxia telangiectasia mutated-p53 activation pathway. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(5):2943–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Parvathaneni M, Battu GR, Gray AI, Gummalla P. Investigation of anticancer potential of hypophyllanthin and phyllanthin against breast cancer by in vitro and in vivo methods. Asian Pac J Trop Dis. 2014;4 Suppl 1:71–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement