Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Screening of traditional Chinese medicines with therapeutic potential on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease through inhibiting oxidative stress and inflammatory response

  • Ming-Xing Zhou1,
  • Xuan Wei2,
  • Ai-Ling Li1,
  • Ai-Min Wang1,
  • Ling-Zi Lu1,
  • Yue Yang1,
  • Dong-Mei Ren1,
  • Xiao-Ning Wang1,
  • Xue-Sen Wen1,
  • Hong-Xiang Lou1 and
  • Tao Shen1Email author
BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:360

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1347-y

Received: 19 July 2016

Accepted: 10 September 2016

Published: 13 September 2016

Abstract

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major public health problem and gives arise to severe chronic morbidity and mortality in the world. Inflammatory response and oxidative stress play dominant roles in the pathological mechanism of COPD, and have been regarded to be two important targets for the COPD therapy. Traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) possess satisfying curative effects on COPD under guidance of the TCM theory in China, and merit in-depth investigations as a resource of lead compounds.

Methods

One hundred ninety-six of TCMs were collected, and extracted to establish a TCM extract library, and then further evaluated for their potency on inhibitions of oxidative stress and inflammatory response using NADP(H):quinone oxidoreductase (QR) assay and nitric oxide (NO) production assay, respectively.

Results

Our investigation observed that 38 of the tested TCM extracts induced QR activity in hepa 1c1c7 murine hepatoma cells, and 55 of them inhibited NO production in RAW 264.7 murine macrophages at the tested concentrations. Noteworthily, 20 of TCM extracts simultaneously inhibited oxidative stress and inflammatory responses.

Conclusion

The observed bioactive TCMs, particularly these 20 TCMs with dual inhibitory effects, might be useful for the treatment of COPD. More importantly, the results of the present research afford us an opportunity to discover new lead molecules as COPD therapeutic agents from these active TCMs.

Keywords

Traditional Chinese medicines Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Oxidative stress Inflammatory response

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a disease characterized by progressive and not fully reversible airflow limitation, which is associated with abnormal inflammatory response of the lung to noxious particles and gases [1]. Tobacco smoke, indoor and outdoor air pollutions, as well as exposure to occupational dust and chemicals are the three dominant risk factors for COPD. It is the fourth leading cause of chronic morbidity and mortality in the United States. On the basis of investigation by the World Bank/World Health Organization, COPD is predicted to rank fifth in 2020 as a worldwide burden of disease. A horrifying fact is that half of global deaths from COPD occur in the Western Pacific Region, with the majority of these existing in China, which might be contributing to high incidence of smoking and severe air pollution in the industrialization advancement [2].

Cumulative evidences indicate that inflammatory response, oxidative stress, and protease imbalance play dominant roles in the pathological mechanism of COPD [3, 4]. Briefly, exogenous irritants and reactive oxygen species (ROS) activate inflammatory cells (e.g. macrophages, neutrophils) and epithelial cells in the respiratory tract that release ROS, inflammatory mediators [e.g. leukotriene B4 (LTB4), interleukin-8 (IL-8), tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β)], proteases (e.g. cathepsins, matrix metalloproteinases)[3, 5, 6]. ROS stimulates nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) and increase the release of inflammatory cytokines, inflammatory mediators promote the production of endogenous ROS, while proteases cause alveolar destruction and mucus secretion. Hence, the synergistic reactions of inflammation, oxidative stress, and protease imbalance amplify pathophysiology of COPD, and inhibitions of these three processes are regarded to be effective strategies for the treatment, as well as drug research and development of COPD [7].

Plenty of traditional Chinese medicines (TCMs) have been used clinically to treat COPD in the form of single or compound prescription under guidance of the TCM theory in China, and demonstrated satisfying curative effects [8, 9]. Their clinical effectiveness implies that TCM is an important resource of new drugs and/or lead compounds with COPD therapeutic potential. Based on this rationale, we have launched a systemic research on discovering new drugs and lead molecules for COPD treatment from TCM targeting inhibitions of oxidative stress and inflammatory response. We firstly collected and extracted TCM materials to establish a TCM extract library, and then carried out a biological screening of these TCMs using NADP(H):quinone oxidoreductase (QR) assay and nitric oxide (NO) production assay to find the TCMs with potential therapeutic effect on COPD.

Methods

Chemicals

Sulforaphane (SF, purity >98 %) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Didox (purity >98 %) was purchased from MedChem Express (Monmouth Junction, ON, USA). Solvents used for extraction were of analytical grade and obtained from Tianjin Fuyu Chemical Company (Tianjin, China).

Collection and Identification of tested TCMs

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) materials were purchased from the Jinan Jianlian TCM Co. Ltd in Shandong province, Anguo TCM market in Hebei province, and Bozhou TCM market in Anhui Province. These TCMs were identified by Prof. Lan Xiang, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University, through comparing their characteristics in plant morphology and taxonomy with that described in Chinese Pharmacopoeia. Voucher specimens (Voucher ID see Table 1) of TCMs have been deposited at the Laboratory of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University.
Table 1

Inhibitions on oxidative stress and inflammation of TCMs evaluated using QR induction and NO production assay

No

Plant name

Part used in TCM

Voucher ID

Yields (%)

Induction of QR activity (MQI)

Inhibition of NO production (MIR)

1

Acacia catechu (L.f.) Wild.

Branch

20151128-100-EC

69.8

N/D

N/D

2

Acanthopanax gracilistylus W. W. Smith

Root-bark

20150802-20-WJP

9.8

N/D

68.0 % (100)

3

Acanthopanax senticosus (Rupr. et Maxim.) Harms

Rhizome

20150801-8-CWJ

7.7

N/D

52.0 % (200)

4

Achyranthes bidentata Bl.

Rhizome

20150801-4-NX

8.7

N/D

N/D

5

Aconitum carmichaeli Debx.

Root

20151128-58-FZ

14.7

N/D

N/D

6

Acorns tatarinowii Schott

Rhizome

20151128-30-SCP

10.5

N/D

N/D

7

Adenophora tetraphylla (Thunb.) Fisch.

Root

20151128-76-SS

19.1

N/D

N/D

8

Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb.

Aerial part

20151128-31-XHC

9.8

N/D

41.2 % (200)

9

Akebia trifoliata (Thunb.) Koidz. subsp. australis (Diels) T. Shimizu

Rattan

20150802-14-BMT

11.6

N/D

N/D

10

Albizia julibrissin Durazz.

Bark

20151128-134-HHP

8.9

1.64 fold (200)

N/D

11

Alisma orientalis (Sam.) Juzep.

Root

20151128-71-ZX

13.6

N/D

34.2 % (200)

12

Allium tuberosum Rottl.

Seed

20150717-4-JCZ

3.8

N/D

N/D

13

Amomum kravanh Pierre ex Gagnep.

Fruit

20151128-137-DK

2.1

N/D

N/D

14

Amomum villosum Lour.

Fruit

20150801-9-SR

8.3

N/D

N/D

15

Ampelopsis japonica (Thunb.) Makino

Root

20151128-127-BL

10.7

N/D

N/D

16

Andrographis paniculata (Burm.f.) Nees

Aerial part

20151128-83-CXL

9.9

2.04 fold (200)

N/D

17

Anemarrhena asphodeloides Bge.

Rhizome

20150802-17-ZM

10.2

N/D

41.2 % (200)

18

Angelica dahurica (Fisch. ex Hoffm.) Benth. et Hook.f.

Root

20151128-125-BZ

8.9

N/D

N/D

19

Angelica pubescens Maxim. f. biserrata Shan et Yuan

Root

20150802-16-DH

25.1

N/D

N/D

20

Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels

Root

20151128-34-DG

19.4

1.41 fold (200)

N/D

21

Arctium lappa L.

Fruit

20151128-33-NBZ

18.4

N/D

N/D

22

Areca catechu L.

Peel

20151128-104-DFP

2.3

N/D

N/D

23

Areca catechu L.

Fruit

20151128-145-BL

8.2

1.33 fold (25)

N/D

24

Arisaema erubescens (Wall.) Schott

Tuber

20151128-23-TNX

1.2

1.36 fold (200)

N/D

25

Aristolochia debilis Sieb. et Zucc.

Aerial part

20151128-21-TXT

3.2

N/D

N/D

26

Artemisia argyi Levi. et Vant.

Leaf

20150716-6-AY

12.9

N/D

86.2 % (200)

27

Artemisia scoparia Waldst. et Kit.

Aerial part

20151128-74-YC

12.8

1.48 fold (200)

38.8 % (100)

28

Asarum heterotropoides Fr. Schmldt var. mandshuricum (Maxim.) Kitag.

Root and rhizome

20151128-72-XX

11.4

N/D

N/D

29

Atractylode lancea (Thunb.) DC.

Rhizome

20151128-136-CZ

24.2

N/D

52.3 %(200)

30

Atractylodes macrocephala Koldz.

Rhizome

20151128-123-BZ

12.9

N/D

N/D

31

Aucklandia lappa Decne.

Root

20151128-15-MX

16.3

2.31 fold (25)

94.7 % (25)

32

Belamcanda chinensis (L.) DC.

Rhizome

20151128-106-SG

29.6

N/D

N/D

33

Bletilla striata (Thunb.) Reichb.f.

Rhizome

20150801-12-BJ

2.1

N/D

N/D

34

Bolbostemma paniculatum (Maxim.) Franquet

Tuber

20151128-5-TBM

15.1

N/D

N/D

35

Callicarpa macrophylla Vahl

Leaf

20151128-7-DYZZ

4.3

N/D

85.8 % (200)

36

Cassia angustifolia Vahl.

Leaf

20150802-25-FXY

9.4

1.54 fold (50)

79.7 % (200)

37

Cassia obtusifolia L.

Seed

20151128-38-JMZ

7.9

N/D

N/D

38

Chaenomeles speciosa (Sweet) Nakai

Fruit

20151128-24-MG

30.5

N/D

N/D

39

Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.

Flower

20150802-28-JH

23.3

N/D

90.2 % (200)

40

Cimicifuga heracleifolia Kom.

Rhizome

20151128-28-SM

14.1

1.95 fold (100)

86.4 % (200)

41

Cinnamomum cassia Presl

Branch

20150717-2-GZ

5.0

N/D

N/D

42

Cirsium japonicum Fisch. ex DC.

Aerial part

20151128-9-DJ

6.7

N/D

N/D

43

Cirsium setosum (Willd.) M.Bieb.

Aerial part

20151128-10-XJ

12.7

1.51 fold (200)

38.8 % (200)

44

Cistanchede deserticola Y. C. Ma

Stem

20150801-7-RCR

23.6

N/D

N/D

45

Citrus aurantium L.

Fruit

20150801-11-ZQ

17.0

N/D

N/D

46

Citrus limon (L.) Burm. f.

Fruit

20150716-16-NM

19.5

1.79 fold (200)

N/D

47

Citrus medica L. var. sarcodac-tylis Swingle

Fruit

20151128-55-FS

39.6

N/D

N/D

48

Citrus reticulata Blanco.

Pericarp

20150716-10-CP

22.0

N/D

N/D

49

Clematis armandii Franch.

Rattan

20150802-12-CMT

4.5

N/D

N/D

50

Codonopsis pilosula(Franch.) Nannf.

Root

20151128-59-DS

48.4

N/D

N/D

51

Coix lacryma-jobi L. var. ma-yuen (Roman.) Stapf

Seed

20150716-15-YYR

6.5

N/D

N/D

52

Commelina communis L.

Aerial part

20151128-88-YZC

4.4

N/D

N/D

53

Coptis chinensis Franch.

Rhizome

20150802-31-HL

6.6

N/D

57.1 %(200)

54

Cornus officinalis Sieb. et Zucc.

Fruit

20150802-27-SZY

43.6

N/D

N/D

55

Crataegus pinnatifida Bge. var. major N. E. Br.

Fruit

20150716-2-SZ

34.8

N/D

N/D

56

Cremastra appendiculata (D. Don) Makino

Pseudobulb

20151128-12-SCG

2.6

N/D

61.0 % (200)

57

Croton tiglium L.

Fruit

20150802-8-BD

1.1

N/D

N/D

58

Curculigo orchioides Gaertn.

Rhizome

20151128-121-XM

4.5

1.57 fold (200)

47.8 % at (200)

59

Curcuma phaeocaulis Val.

Rhizome

20150801-20-EZ

2.6

N/D

66.9 % (25)

60

Curcuma wenyujin Y. H. Chen et C. Ling

Root

20150802-26-YJ

9.0

N/D

N/D

61

Cynanchum atratum Bge.

Root and rhizome

20151128-40-BW

23.6

N/D

N/D

62

Cynanchum stauntonii (Decne.) Schltr ex Lévl.

Rhizome

20150801-13-BQ

10.6.

N/D

N/D

63

Cynomorium songaricum Rupr.

Stem

20150716-14-SY

17.9

N/D

N/D

64

Cyperus rotundus L.

Rhizome

20151128-80-XF

11.6

1.74 fold (200)

N/D

65

Dendrobium nobile Lindl.

Stem

20150802-13-MH

9.0

N/D

38.9 % (200)

66

Dictamnus dasycarpus Turcz.

Velamen

20150802-4-BXP

9.0

N/D

N/D

67

Dioscorea opposita Thunb.

Rhizome

20150716-1-SY

1.7

N/D

N/D

68

Dipsacus asperoides C. Y. Cheng et T. M. Ai

Rhizome

20150716-13-XD

17.5

N/D

38.6 % (200)

69

Drynaria fortunei (Kunze) J. Sm.

Rhizome

20151128-78-GSB

4.8

N/D

N/D

70

Eclipta prostrata L.

Aerial part

20151128-99-MHL

9.0

N/D

N/D

71

Epimedium brevicornum Maxim.

Aerial part

20150716-9-YYH

20.5

N/D

N/D

72

Equisetum hiemale L.

Aerial part

20151128-108-MZ

4.9

N/D

41.7 %(200)

73

Eriocaulon buergerianum Koern.

Flower

20151128-139-GJC

7.9

N/D

N/D

74

Eucommia ulmoides Oliv.

Root-bark

20151128-51-DZ

8.3

1.56 fold (200)

62.5 % (200)

75

Eugenia caryophyllata Thunb.

Bud

20151128-1-DX

27.5

N/D

N/D

76

Eupatorium fortunei Turcz.

Aerial part

20151128-66-PL

10.1

N/D

N/D

77

Euphorbia humifusa Willd.

Whole plant

20151128-37-DJC

9.5

N/D

N/D

78

Ferula Sinkiangensis K. M. Shen

Resin

20151128-140-EW

6.1

N/D

N/D

79

Forsythia suspense (Thnub.) Vahl

Fruit

20151128-53-LQ

28.3

N/D

48.3 % (200)

80

Fraxinus rhynchophylla Hance

Bark

20151128-86-QP

8.0

N/D

90.7 % (200)

81

Fritillaria ussuriensis Maxim.

Bulb

20151128-118-PBM

4.1

N/D

N/D

82

Ganoderma sinense Zhao, Xu et Zhang

Sporophore

20150801-2-ZZ

2.9

N/D

N/D

83

Gardenia jasminoides Ellis.

Fruit

20150717-7-ZZ

16.1

N/D

N/D

84

Gastrodia elata Bl.

Tuber

20150801-16-TM

7.5

N/D

N/D

85

Glycyrrhiza uralensis Fisch.

Rhizome

20150716-5-GC

15.7

2.19 fold (100)

82.9 % (200)

86

Hippophae rhamnoides L.

Fruit

20151128-57-SJ

36.5

N/D

N/D

87

Homalomena occulta (Lour.) Schott

Rhizome

20151128-13-QNJ

9.3

N/D

N/D

88

Hordeum vulgare L.

Fruit

20151128-135-MY

11.5

N/D

N/D

89

Houttuynia cordata Thunb.

Aerial part

20150801-18-YXC

16.7

N/D

N/D

90

Illicium difengpi K. I .B. et K. I. M.

Bark

20151128-132-DFP

1.9

1.52 fold (100)

N/D

91

Illicium verum Hook. f.

Fruit

20151128-2-BJHX

13.3

N/D

55.7 % (200)

92

Inula helenium L.

Root

20150802-5-TMX

13.2

1.77 fold (12.5)

100 % (100)

93

Isatis indigotica Fort.

Root

20150802-9-BLG

17.9

N/D

N/D

94

Isatis indigotica Fort.

Leaf

20151128-102-DQY

13.6

1.66 fold (50)

N/D

95

Kaempferia galanga L.

Rhizome

20151128-105-SN

4.7

N/D

N/D

96

Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad.

Fruit

20150802-23-DFZ

8.5

N/D

N/D

97

Laminaria Japonica Aresch.

Thallus

20150802-10-KB

18.5

N/D

N/D

98

Lepidium apetalum Willd.

Seed

20150802-22-TLZ

2.9

N/D

N/D

99

Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort.

Rhizome

20151128-19-CX

16.1

1.73 fold (200)

69.0 % (100)

100

Ligustrum lucidum Ait.

Fruit

20151128-18-NZZ

24.2

N/D

N/D

101

Lilium lancifolium Thunb.

Leaf

20151128-32-BH

4.3

N/D

N/D

102

Lindera aggregata (Sims) Kosterm.

Root

20150801-15-WY

10.7

1.59 fold (200)

N/D

103

Lithospermum erythrorhizon Sieb. et Zucc.

Root

20151128-93-ZC

6.4

1.52 fold (50)

57.1 % (200)

104

Lobelia chinensi Lour.

Whole plant

20151128-129-BBL

23.7

N/D

N/D

105

Lonicera hypoglauca Miq.

Flower

20150801-1-SYH

31.4

N/D

N/D

106

Lonicera japonica Thunb.

Flower

20150801-3-JYH

26.7

N/D

N/D

107

Lophatherum gracile Brongn.

Stem and leaf

20151128-91-DZY

8.6

N/D

N/D

108

Lycium barbarum L.

Fruit

20150801-6-GQ

11.5

N/D

N/D

109

Lycium chinense Mill.

Root-bark

20150802-21-DGP

7.5

N/D

N/D

110

Lycopodium japonicum Thunb.

Whole plant

20151128-138-SJC

22.3

N/D

53.0 % (200)

111

Lycopus lucidusTurcz. var. hirtus Regel

Aerial part

20151128-70-ZL

13.5

N/D

61.6 % (200)

112

Lysimachia christinae Hance

Whole plant

20151128-67-JQC

11.2

N/D

N/D

113

Mahonia bealei (Fort.) Carr.

Stem

20151128-114-GLM

6.1

N/D

N/D

114

Melia toosendan Sleb. et Zucc.

Fruit

20151128-107-CLZ

16.2

N/D

N/D

115

Menispermum dauricum DC.

Rhizome

20151128-120-BDG

11.0

N/D

N/D

116

Mentha haplocalyx Briq.

Aerial part

20150716-8-BH

19.1

N/D

N/D

117

Mignolia officinalis Rehd. et Wils.

Bark

20151128-84-HP

22.9

N/D

N/D

118

Misla chinensis Maxim.

Aerial part

20151128-81-XR

6.9

1.60 fold (100)

N/D

119

Morinda officinalis How.

Root

20151128-112-BJT

28.8

N/D

N/D

120

Morus alba L.

Branch

20151128-142-SZ

7.4

1.37 fold (100)

61.2 % (200)

121

Morus alba L.

Fruit

20151128-143-SS

29.9

N/D

N/D

122

Nardostachys chinensis Batal.

Root and rhizome

20151128-115-GS

12.3

N/D

N/D

123

Oroxylum inddicum (L.) Vent.

Seed

20151128-26-MHD

14.0

N/D

85.4 % (200)

124

Orostachys fimbriatus (Turcz.) Berg.

Aerial part

20151128-109-WS

6.3

N/D

N/D

125

Paeonia lactiflora Pall.

Rhizome

20150716-7-BS

6.4

N/D

N/D

126

Panax ginseng C. A. Mey

Rhizome

20150801-10-SSS

39.4

N/D

N/D

127

Panax quinque folium L.

Root

20150802-29-XYS

14.8

N/D

N/D

128

Perilla frutescens (L.) Britt.

Leaf

20150717-6-ZS

2.8

1.73 fold (200)

57.8 % (200)

129

Peucedanum praeruptorum Dunn

Root

20151128-85-QH

20.6

N/D

77.6 % (200)

130

Phellodendron chinense Schneid.

Tree-bark

20151128-41-HB

12.7

N/D

N/D

131

Phragmites communis Trin.

Root

20151128-49-LG

3.8

N/D

N/D

132

Physalis alkekengi L. var. franchetii (Mast.) Makino

Calyx

20150730-2-GJD

14.2

1.79 fold (200)

91.4 % (200)

133

Pinellia ternate (Thunb.) Breit.

Tuber

20151128-130-BX

0.8

1.74 fold (200)

N/D

134

Piper nigrum L.

Fruit

20151128-92-HHJ

5.4

N/D

N/D

135

Plantago asiatica L.

Whole plant

20150716-4-CQC

13.7

N/D

N/D

136

Platycodon grandiflorum (Jacq.) A. DC.

Root

20151128-87-JG

33.4

N/D

N/D

137

Pogostemon cablin (Blanco) Benth.

Aerial part

20151128-16-GHX

5.5

1.73 fold (100)

56.6 % (200)

138

Polygonatum kingianum Coll. et Hemsl.

Rhizome

20151128-90-HJ

6.8

N/D

N/D

139

Polygonatum odoratum (Mill.) Druce

Rhizome

20151128-113-YZ

21.6

N/D

N/D

140

Polygonum aviculare L.

Aerial part

20151128-89-BX

10.8

N/D

N/D

141

Polygonum cuspidatum Sieb. et Zucc.

Root and rhizome

20151128-63-HZ

21.7

N/D

60.5 % (200)

142

Polygonum multiflorum Thunb.

Root

20151128-54-HSW

6.8

N/D

35.5 % (200)

143

Polyyala tenuifolia Willd.

Root

20151128-46-YZ

34.4

N/D

N/D

144

Potentilla chinensis Ser.

Whole plant

20151128-65-WLC

8.9

N/D

N/D

145

Prunella vulgaris L.

Peel

20150716-11-XKC

4.1

N/D

N/D

146

Prunus armeniaca L. var. ansu Maxim.

Seed

20151128-60-KXR

5.7

N/D

N/D

147

Prunus persica (L.) Batsch

Seed

20151128-61-TR

3.7

N/D

N/D

148

Pseudolarx kaempleri Gord.

Velamen

20151128-6-TJP

14.8

N/D

N/D

149

Pseudostellaria beterphylla (Miq.) Pax ex Pax et Hoffm.

Root

20151128-27-TZS

13.5

N/D

N/D

150

Psoralea corylifolia L.

Fruit

20150801-19-BGZ

10.2

N/D

N/D

151

Pulsatilla chinensis (Bunge) Regel

Root

20151128-124-BTW

22.7

N/D

N/D

152

Punica granatum L.

Peel

20151128-117-SLP

31.3

N/D

N/D

153

Pyrrosia sheareri (Bak.) Ching

Leaf

20151128-116-SW

12.2

1.85 fold (50)

N/D

154

Rabdosia rubescens (Hemsl.) Hara

Aerial part

20151128-39-DLC

8.4

1.38 fold (100)

43.2 % (200)

155

Raphanus sativus L.

Seed

20150802-30-LFZ

13.8

N/D

N/D

156

Rhaponlicum uniflorum (L.) DC.

Root

20151128-97-LL

4.4

1.54 fold (200)

N/D

157

Rheum palmatum L.

Root and rhizome

20151128-103-DH

25.6

N/D

60.2 % (200)

158

Rhodiola crenulata (Hook. f. et Thoms.) H. Ohba

Rhizome

20150801-5-HJT

13.3

N/D

46.3 % (200)

159

Rosa chinensis Jacq.

Flower

20151128-110-YJH

18.9

N/D

N/D

160

Rosa laevigata Michx.

Fruit

20151128-68-JYZ

25.2

1.67 fold (50)

57 % (200)

161

Rubia cordifolia L.

Root and rhizome

20151128-73-QC

10.0

N/D

N/D

162

Salvia miltiorrhiza Bge.

Root and rhizome

20151128-29-DS

39.7

1.44 fold (100)

64.5 % (200)

163

Sanguisorba officinalis L.

Root

20151128-36-DY

3.5

N/D

N/D

164

Saposhnikovia divaricata (Turcz.) Schischk.

Root

20150802-19-FF

15.9

1.95 fold (100)

N/D

165

Sareassum pallidum (Turn.) C. Ag.

Frond

20150802-1-HZ

11.5

N/D

N/D

166

Sargentodoxa cuneate (Oliv.) Rehd. et Wils.

Rattan

20151128-8-DXT

16.9

N/D

N/D

167

Scrophularia ningpoensis Hemsl.

Root

20151128-128-XS

50.5

N/D

N/D

168

Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi.

Rhizome

20150716-12-HQ

30.2

N/D

87.4 %(200)

169

Scutellaria barbata D. Don

Whole plant

20151128-35-BZL

10.2

N/D

59.0 % (200)

170

Sedum sarmentosum Bunge.

Whole plant

20151128-64-CPC

17.5

N/D

N/D

171

Selaginella tamariscina (Beauv.) Spring

Whole plant

20151128-69-JB

8.9

N/D

N/D

172

Senecio scandens Buch.-Ham.

Aerial part

20151128-14-QLG

11.4

N/D

38.1 % (200)

173

Sesamum indicum L.

Seed

20150717-3-HZM

3.3

N/D

N/D

174

Siegesbeckia orientalis L.

Aerial part

20151128-98-XXC

4.8

1.91 fold (200)

54.9 % (200)

175

Siphonostegia chinensis Benth.

Whole plant

20151128-119-BLJM

9.7

N/D

34.6 % (200)

176

Smilax glabra Roxb.

Rhizome

20151128-101-TFL

10.9

N/D

N/D

177

Sophora flavescens Ait.

Root

20151128-62-KS

21.4

N/D

N/D

178

Sophora japonica L.

Flower and bud

20151128-95-HH

37.1

1.44 fold (200)

N/D

179

Sparganium stoloniferum Buch.-Ham.

Tuber

20151128-3-SL

4.5

1.57 fold (200)

N/D

180

Spatholobus suberectus Dunn

Rattan

20151128-56-JXT

5.8

N/D

N/D

181

Stemona sessilifolia (Miq.) Miq.

Root

20150802-24-BB

30.6

N/D

N/D

182

Stephania tetrandra S. Moore

Root

20151128-43-FJ

72.9

N/D

50.0 % (200)

183

Sterculia lychnophora Hance

Seed

20150801-21-PDH

3.2

N/D

30.7 % (200)

184

Taraxacum mongolicum Hand.-Mazz.

Whole plant

20150716-3-PGY

17.2

N/D

42.3 % (200)

185

Taxillus chinensis (DC.) Danser

Aerial part

20150802-15-SJS

6.3

N/D

N/D

186

Trichosanthes kirilowii Maxim.

Seed

20131120-1-GL

20.5

N/D

N/D

187

Tripterygium wilfordii Hook. f.

Root

20150802-18-LGT

8.3

N/D

N/D

188

Tussilago farfara L.

Bud

20150802-6-KDH

9.9

2.38 fold (50)

N/D

189

Uncaria rhynchophylla (Miq.) Miq. ex Havil.

Stem

20151128-79-GT

6.5

N/D

N/D

190

Usnea diffracta Vain.

Thallus

20150802-2-SL

11.0

N/D

44.5 % (200)

191

Vaccaria segetatis (Neck.) Garcke

Seed

20151128-20-WBLX

4.9

N/D

N/D

192

Verbena officinalis L.

Aerial part

20151128-17-MBC

7.9

N/D

N/D

193

Viola yedoensis Makino

Whole plant

20150802-7-ZHDD

25.6

N/D

N/D

194

Xanthium sibiricum Patr.

Fruit

20151128-47-CEZ

3.5

N/D

N/D

195

Zanthoxylum nitidum (Roxb.) DC.

Root

20151128-52-LMZ

6.1

N/D

38.2 % (200)

196

Zanthoxylum schinifoliumSleb. et Zucc.

Peel

20151128-48-HJ

21.2

1.75 fold (200)

50.3 % (200)

SF (2.0 μM) with an approximately 1.7-fold induction was used as a positive control for QR assay; Didox (100 μM) with an approximately 60 % inhibition of NO production was adopted as a positive control for NO inhibitory assay; MQI: the maximum folds of QR inducing activity under the tested concentration; MIR: the maximum inhibition rate of NO production under the nontoxic tested concentration; N/D, undetected

Preparations of TCM extractions

Crushed aerial parts or leaves of plant materials (50 g) were extracted under reflux for 2 h with 75 % ethanol (EtOH, 2 × 500 mL), and then EtOH was removed under reduced pressure. The yield of each extract was presented as a percentage of weight of dried plant material, and has been summarized in Table 1.

Cell cultures

Hepa 1c1c7 murine hepatoma cells (American Type Culture Collection, ATCC) were maintained in Eagle’s minimal essential medium (MEM, Gibco) supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gemini Bio-product). RAW 264.7 murine macrophages (ATCC) were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with 10 % FBS. All cells were incubated at 37 °C in a humidified incubator containing 5 % CO2.

NADP(H): quinone oxidoreductase (QR) assay

NADP(H):quinone oxidoreductase (QR) assay was modified from previously described method [10]. Hepa 1c1c7 cells (1.0 × 104 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with the indicated doses of tested extracts for 24 h. The medium was decanted, and the cells were incubated with 40 μL of lysing solution [0.8 % digitonin and 2 mM EDTA solution (pH 7.8)] for 15 min at 37 °C. Then, 170 μL of a complete reaction mixture containing bovine serum albumin, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide (MTT), 1.5 % Tween 20, 0.5 M Tris–HCl, 7.5 mM flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), 150 mM glucose-6-phosphate, 10 units/μL glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, 50 mM NADP, and 50 mM menadione was added into each well. After incubation for 4 min, a blue color was developed and the reaction was arrested by adding 50 μL per well of a 0.3 mM dicoumarol solution (pH 7.4). Absorbance was measured at 630 nm on the Model 680 plate reader (Bio-rad). SF (2.0 μM) was adopted as a positive control.

Nitric oxide (NO) production assay

Inhibition of NO production by LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 murine macrophages was applied to evaluate anti-inflammatory functions of TCM extracts. RAW 264.7 cells (8.0 × 104 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with 1 μg/mL LPS, in the absence or presence of tested TCM extractions for 24 h. Then, 100 μL of supernatant was removed to a new 96-well plate and added with 100 μL of Griess reagent (0.1 % naphthylethylenediamine and 1 % sulfanilamide in 5 % H3PO4 solution) at room temperature for 15 min. Absorbance was measured at 570 nm on the Model 680 plate reader (Bio-rad). Nitrite concentration was calculated from a NaNO2 standard curve. Didox (100 μM) was used as a positive control.

Cell viability assay

The anti-proliferative effect of TCM extracts on RAW 264.7 cells were simultaneously determined using a 3-(4,5-dimthylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma) assay. Briefly, 100 μL of DMEM media containing 0.4 % MTT were added to each wells, after removing 100 μL of supernatant as described in NO production assay. Then, the cells were incubated at 37 °C for 3 h, and absorbance was measured at 570 nm on the Model 680 plate reader (Bio-rad).

Statistical analysis

One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc multiple comparison Bonferroni test were applied to compare the significant difference between two groups. Results are presented as the mean ± SD. P < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results and Discussion

To establish a TCM extract library for biological screening, we firstly selected 196 TCMs based on Chinese Pharmacopoeia (Edition 2015) and TCM literatures, and collected TCMs from Jinan local TCM drugstore, as well as the two biggest Chinese TCM markets, Anguo and Bozhou TCM markets. After plant material authentication, TCMs were extracted with 75 % EtOH to prepare their EtOH extracts, and then the concentrations of 200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, 6.25 μg/mL were selected as tested doses for bioassays. Names, origin, extract yields and biological activities of investigated TCMs were summarized in Table 1.

We adopted a bioassay measuring QR activity in hepa 1c1c7 murine hepatoma cells to evaluate the ability of TCM extracts on inhibiting of oxidative stress [10]. Although QR is a phase II detoxification enzyme, it possesses same regulating mechanism with antioxidant enzymes [e.g. glutamate-cysteine ligase, modifier subunit (GCLM) and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1)], since these enzymes are antioxidant response element (ARE)-containing target genes and are mediated by ARE located in their promoter region [11]. Specially, upon the exposure of cells to oxidative stress and/or toxicants, nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) translocates into the nucleus, binds to the ARE sequence, and activates the transcription of these ARE-target genes [12]. Therefore, QR and antioxidant enzymes (e.g. GCLM and HO-1) possess same responses against endogenous and exogenous insults, which have also been verified by our recent researches [13, 14]. Considering above mentioned inducing mechanism of QR and antioxidant enzymes, determination of QR activity is a rational and effective method for analyzing the potency of oxidative stress inhibition. In the current study, we normalized the data by setting the untreated control group as 1, and then the QR inducing activity of tested extracts was represented by the maximum folds of QR inducing activity (MQI) compared with the untreated control group. SF as a positive control displayed an approximately 1.7-fold induction at 2.0 μM. 1.3-fold of QR inducing activity (MQI = 1.3) under the tested concentrations was adopted as a criterion for bioactive TCM extracts. To be more precise, the level of QR inducing activity was ranked as the following criteria: strong (MQI ≥ 1.8); moderate (1.8 > MQI ≥1.5); weak (1.5 > MQI ≥1.3); undetected (MQI < 1.3).

Ultimately, 38 TCM extracts demonstrated the QR inducing activities with MQI ranging from 1.33- to 2.38- folds under the tested concentrations (Table 1). Of which, eight TCM extracts strongly induced QR activity in hepa 1c1c7 cells (MQI ≥ 1.8), including Andrographis paniculata (aerial part, 16), Aucklandia lappa (root, 31), Cimicifuga heracleifolia (rhizome, 40), Glycyrrhiz uralensis (rhizome, 85), Pyrrosia sheareri (leaf, 153), Saposhnikovia divaricate (root, 164), Siegesbeckia orientalis (aerial part, 174), and Tussilago farfara (bud, 188). Twenty-two extracts are moderate QR inducers (1.8 > MQI ≥1.5), containing Albizia julibrissin (bark, 10), Cassia angustifolia (leaf, 36), Cirsium setosum (aerial part, 43), Citrus limon (fruit, 46), Curculigo orchioides (rhizome, 58), Cyperus rotundus (rhizome, 64), Eucommia ulmoides (root-bark, 74), Illicium difengpi (bark, 90), Inula helenium (root, 92), Isatis indigotica (leaf, 93), Ligusticum chuanxiong (rhizome, 99), Lindera aggregate (root, 102), Lithospermum erythrorhizon (root, 103), Misla chinensis (aerial part, 118), Perilla frutescens (leaf, 128), Physalis alkekengi L. var. franchetii (calyx, 132), Pinellia ternata (tuber, 133), Pogostemon cablin (aerial part, 137), Rhaponlicum uniflorum (root, 156), Rosa laevigata (fruit, 160), Sparganium stoloniferum (tuber, 179), and Zanthoxylum schinifolium (peel, 196). Moreover, eight extracts possessed weak QR inducing effect (1.5 > MQI ≥1.3), including Angelica sinensis (root, 20), Areca catechu (fruit, 23), Arisaema erubescens (tuber, 24), Artemisia scoparia (aerial part, 27), Morus alba (branch, 120), Rabdosia rubescens (aerial part, 154), Salvia miltiorrhiza (root and rhizome, 162), and Sophora japonica (flower and bud, 178). QR inducing effects of 38 bioactive TCM extracts in hepa 1c1c7 cells have been detailedly summarized in Additional file 1: Table S1 and Figure S1.

During the chronic inflammation process, excessive NO have been produced and involved in the tissue injury through damages to proteins, lipids, DNA, and the modulation of leukocyte activity [15]. Accordingly, inhibiting NO production is regarded to be an effective strategy for the therapy of inflammation-related diseases. Herein, we detected NO level in LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages to evaluate anti-inflammatory function of TCM extracts. Cytotoxicities of tested TCM extracts were simultaneously evaluated by a MTT assay to confirm that the decrease of NO production was not attributed to inhibition of cell proliferation. The maximum inhibition rate (MIR) of NO production under the nontoxic tested concentration, which was calculated by comparing the decreased NO concentration in TCM-treated group with that in LPS-stimulated group, was adopted to evaluate the anti-inflammatory property. Didox with an approximately 60 % inhibition of NO production at 100 μM was used as a positive control. The inhibitory potency of TCM extracts on NO production was ranked according to the criteria as follows: strong (MIR ≥ 80 %); moderate (80 % > MIR ≥ 50 %); weak (50 % > MIR ≥ 30 %); undetected (MIR <30 %).

Our investigation indicated that 55 TCM extracts inhibited the LPS-induced NO production with MIRs between 30.7 % and 100 % under the tested nontoxic concentrations (Table 1). Thereinto, 11 TCM extracts strongly inhibited NO production in RAW 264.7 cells (MIR ≥ 80 %), including Artemisia argyi (leaf, 26), Aucklandia lappa (root, 31), Callicarpa macrophylla (leaf, 35), Chrysanthemum morifolium (flower, 39), Cimicifuga heracleifolia (rhizome, 40), Fraxinus rhynchophylla (bark, 80), Glycyrrhiza uralensis (rhizome, 85), Inula helenium (root, 92), Oraxylum inddicum (seed, 123), Physalis alkekengi L. var. franchetii (calyx, 132), and Scutellaria baicalensis (rhizome, 168). Moreever, 25 extracts displayed moderate inhibitory effect of NO production (80 % > MIR ≥ 50 %), and 19 extracts weakly inhibited NO production (50 % > MIR ≥30 %). Inhibitory effects on NO production of 55 bioactive TCM extracts in RAW 264.7 cells have been detailedly summarized in Additional file 1: Table S1 and Figure S1.

Since oxidative stress and inflammatory response have the synergistic reactions in the pathophysiology of COPD, TCMs having dual inhibitions on the two targets are apt to be the resource for discovering lead molecules [5, 7]. Our results indicated that the extracts of Artemisia scoparia (aerial part, 27), Aucklandia lappa (root, 31), Cassia angustifolia (leaf, 36), Cimicifuga heracleifolia (rhizome, 40), Cirsium setosum (aerial part, 43), Curculigo orchioides (rhizome, 58), Eucommia ulmoides (root-bark, 74), Glycyrrhiza uralensis (rhizome, 85), Inula helenium (root, 92), Ligusticum chuanxiong (rhizome, 99), Lithospermum erythrorhizon (root, 103), Morus alba (branch, 120), Perilla frutescens (leaf, 128), Physalis alkekengi var. franchetii (calyx, 132), Pogostemon cablin (aerial part, 137), Rabdosia rubescens (aerial part, 154), Rosa laevigata (fruit, 160), Salvia miltiorrhiza (root and rhizome, 162), Siegesbeckia orientalis (aerial part, 174), and Zanthoxylum schinifolium (peel, 196) simultaneously inhibited oxidative stress and inflammation (Table 1 and Additional file 1: Table S1). Most of all, both QR inducing effects and NO inhibitory activities of the extracts of Aucklandia lappa (31), Cimicifuga heracleifolia (40), and Glycyrrhiza uralensis (85) are labelled as the level of strong. In addition, the extracts of Inula helenium (92) and Physalis alkekengi L. var. franchetii (132) also demonstrated the potencies that are closed to the strong level.

To our knowledge, this is the first systemic screening of QR inducing extracts from TCMs to discover TCMs with the capacity of inhibiting oxidative stress. Plenty of work on investigation of natural-derived molecules for their regulation on oxidative stress have been carried out, and acquired some active ingredients existed in above evaluated TCMs, such as andrographolide from Andrographis paniculata (16) [16], (Z)-ligustilide from Angelica sinensis (20) [17], dehydroglyasperin C from Glycyrrhiza uralensis (85) [18], isoalantolactone from Inula helenium (92) [19], 2’,3’-dihydroxy-4’,6’-dimethoxychalcone from Perilla frutescens (128) [20], oridonin from Rabdosia rubescens (154) [21], danshensu and tanshinone I from Salvia miltiorrhiza (162) [22]. These data support our observed QR inducing effects of the active TCMs. More importantly, the majority of QR inducing TCMs tested in present research have still not been phytochemically investigated through targeting oxidative stress inhibition, which affords us an opportunity to discover new lead molecules from them [23].

TCMs have been adopted for the therapy of inflammation-related diseases with a long history in China. Compared with QR inducing assay, NO inhibitory effect assay and other in vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory models are classical and commonly adopted biological research methods, and accordingly more literatures concerning inflammation of TCMs have been published. Based on our findings, we carried out a systemic search of reported inflammation-related literatures of our observed 55 active TCM extracts, and concluded that: some TCMs have been comprehensively investigated for their anti-inflammatory property and resulted in the discovery of diverse types of natural products, covering agrimonolide from Agrimonia pilosa (8) [24], (-)-nyasol from Anemarrhena asphodeloides (17) [25], alantolactone from Aucklandia lappa (31) [26], berberine from Coptis chinensis (53) [27], forsythiaside from Forsythia suspensa (79) [28], resveratrol from Polygonum cuspidatum (141) [29], etc. Beside these comprehensively investigated molecules, a great deal of constituents have been isolated from these active TCMs, and required further confirmation of their anti-inflammatory function. Meanwhile, a number of TCMs [e.g. Alisma orientalis (11), Equisetum hiemale (72), Cirsium setosum (43)] have not been investigated in the field of inflammation. Significantly, little research on the therapeutic effect of COPD has been performed, and thus these active TCMs are still being researched.

In the present screening assay, we only adopted two typical markers, QR and NO, to evaluate the potential of TCMs as oxidative stress and inflammation inhibitory agents. Based on our preliminary results, active TCM extracts could be subjected to further research in the field of phytochemistry and pharmacology, however, solid evidences on their biological functions are required before a systemic investigation [14]. With regard to the inhibition on oxidative stress, the levels of endogenous glutathione (GSH) and reactive ROS, as well as the protein level of key intracellular redox-balancing protein GCLM, are suggested to be detected to estimate the intracellular redox state and antioxidant capacity when exposed to TCM extracts [3032]. Concerning the inhibition of inflammation by the active TCMs, the levels of crucial inflammatory mediators in the COPD pathology, including TNFα, LTB4, and IL-8, should be determined to confirm their anti-inflammatory potential [33].

Additionally, the pivotal regulators for oxidative stress and inflammation should be sufficiently investigated to verify action of mechanism of the active TCMs. The transcription factor Nrf2 plays a dominant role for regulating oxidative stress. It is ubiquitously expressed in human organs, particularly rich in lung, and counteracts oxidative injury through activating intracellular redox-balancing proteins (e.g. GCLM, GST, HO-1) and up-regulating endogenous antioxidants (e.g. GSH) [11, 34]. NF-kB regulates the expression of proinflammatory genes including cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules, and its inhibition therefore definitely relieves the inflammatory response of COPD [7, 35]. It has also been verified that phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) are involved in the regulation of inflammatory response [36, 37]. Hence, the further research on active TCM extracts and purified ingredients could focus on their action of mechanism on Nrf2, NF-kB, PI3K, and MAPK signaling pathways, as well as the cross talk between these pathways.

Conclusion

Although the present research indicates that some TCMs possessed inhibitory effects on inflammation and oxidative stress, further pharmacological investigations in vitro and in vivo models are warranted. Furthermore, bioassay-guided fractionations and identifications of active ingredients should be launched to help us illustrate the mechanism of these active species, and discover new lead molecules with unknown mechanisms and potent functions on oxidative stress- and inflammation-related diseases, especially COPD. Accordingly, these results may give new insight in research and development of COPD therapeutic agents.

Abbreviations

ARE: 

Antioxidant response element

COPD: 

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

GCLM: 

Glutamate-cysteine ligase, modifier subunit

GSH: 

Glutathione

GST: 

Glutathione S transferase

HO-1: 

Heme oxygenase-1

IL-8: 

Interleukin-8

LPS: 

Lipopolysaccharides

LTB4: 

Leukotriene B4

MAPK: 

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

MIR: 

Maximum inhibition rate

MQI: 

Maximum folds of QR inducing activity

MTT: 

3-(4,5-dimthylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

NF-kB: 

Nuclear factor kB

Nrf2: 

Nuclear factor E2-related factor 2

PI3K: 

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

QR: 

NADP(H):quinone oxidoreductase

ROS: 

Reactive oxygen species

SF: 

Sulforaphane

TCM: 

Traditional Chinese medicine

TGF-β: 

Transforming growth factor-β

TNFα: 

Tumor necrosis factor α

Declarations

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to appreciate Profs. Lan Xiang and Hu-Ning Chen, as well as Mr. Yu Zhao in Shandong University for TCM collection and identification.

Funding

This work was supported by NNSF of China (31470419), NSF of Shandong (ZR2014HM019 and 2015ZRE27209), Science & Technology Development Plan Project of Shandong (2014GSF118023) and Young Scholars Program of Shandong University (2015WLJH50).

Availability of data and materials

The datasets during and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Moreover, Additional file 1 is available along with the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

D-MR, H-XL and TS conceived and designed the experiments; M-XZ, XW, A-MW, L-ZL, YY and X-SW performed the experiments; X-NW and TS analyzed the data; A-LL contributed reagents, materials, and analysis tools; M-XZ and TS wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors state no conflict or competing interests are associated with the present study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Key Lab of Chemical Biology (MOE), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University
(2)
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

References

  1. Pauwels RA, Buist AS, Calverley PM, Jenkins CR, Hurd S. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. NHLBI/WHO Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) workshop summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1256–76.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lopez A, Shibuya K, Rao C, Mathers C, Hansell A, Held L, Schmid V, Buist S. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current burden and future projections. Eur Respir J. 2006;27:397–412.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes PJ, Shapiro S, Pauwels R. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: molecular and cellular mechanisms. Eur Respir J. 2003;22:672–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnes PJ, Hansel TT. Prospects for new drugs for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. 2004;364:985–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnes PJ. Mediators of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Pharmacol Rev. 2004;56:515–48.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yao H, Rahman I. Current concepts on oxidative/carbonyl stress, inflammation and epigenetics in pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011;254:72–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes PJ. Novel approaches and targets for treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:S72–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jiang YX, Wu JF, Du J. Survey of study on therapeutic mechanism of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease treated by traditional Chinese medicine. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2005;9:860–4.Google Scholar
  9. Gao Z, Li FS, Yang J, Xu D, Yang CH. Investigation on the literature concerning the clinically used traditional Chinese medicines for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the past ten years. Zhongguo Shi Yan Fang Ji Xue Za Zhi. 2010;16:286–8.Google Scholar
  10. Gerhäuser C, You M, Liu J, Moriarty RM, Hawthorne M, Mehta RG, Moon RC, Pezzuto JM. Cancer chemopreventive potential of sulforamate, a novel analogue of sulforaphane that induces phase 2 drug-metabolizing enzymes. Cancer Res. 1997;57:272–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lau A, Villeneuve NF, Sun Z, Wong PK, Zhang DD. Dual roles of Nrf2 in cancer. Pharmacol Res. 2008;58:262–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Bryan HK, Olayanju A, Goldring CE, Park BK. The Nrf2 cell defence pathway: Keap1-dependent and-independent mechanisms of regulation. Biochem Pharmacol. 2013;85:705–17.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Shen T, Jiang T, Long M, Chen J, Ren D-M, Wong PK, Chapman E, Zhou B, Zhang DD. A curcumin derivative that inhibits vinyl carbamate-induced lung carcinogenesis via activation of the Nrf2 protective response. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2015;23:651–64.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Shen T, Chen X-M, Harder B, Long M, Wang X-N, Lou H-X, Wondrak GT, Ren D-M, Zhang DD. Plant extracts of the family Lauraceae: a potential resource for chemopreventive agents that activate the nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2/antioxidant response element pathway. Planta Med. 2014;80:426–34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Faro MLL, Fox B, Whatmore JL, Winyard PG, Whiteman M. Hydrogen sulfide and nitric oxide interactions in inflammation. Nitric Oxide. 2014;41:38–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Guan S, Tee W, Ng D, Chan T, Peh H, Ho W, Cheng C, Mak J, Wong W. Andrographolide protects against cigarette smoke‐induced oxidative lung injury via augmentation of Nrf2 activity. Br J Pharmacol. 2013;168:1707–18.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Dietz BM, Liu D, Hagos GK, Yao P, Schinkovitz A, Pro SM, Deng S, Farnsworth NR, Pauli GF, van Breemen RB. Angelica sinensis and its alkylphthalides induce the detoxification enzyme NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreductase 1 by alkylating Keap1. Chem Res Toxicol. 2008;21:1939–48.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim HJ, Lim SS, Park IS, Lim JS, Seo JY, Kim JS. Neuroprotective effects of dehydroglyasperin C through activation of heme oxygenase-1 in mouse hippocampal cells. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:5583–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Seo JY, Park J, Kim HJ, Lee IA, Lim JS, Lim SS, Choi SJ, Park JHY, Kang HJ, Kim JS. Isoalantolactone from Inula helenium caused Nrf2-mediated induction of detoxifying enzymes. J Med Food. 2009;12:1038–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Izumi Y, Matsumura A, Wakita S, Akagi KI, Fukuda H, Kume T, Irie K, Takada-Takatori Y, Sugimoto H, Hashimoto T. Isolation, identification, and biological evaluation of Nrf2-ARE activator from the leaves of green perilla (Perilla frutescens var. crispa f. viridis). Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53:669–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Du Y, Villaneuva NF, Wang X-J, Sun Z, Chen W, Li J, Lou H, Wong PK, Zhang DD. Oridonin confers protection against arsenic-induced toxicity through activation of the Nrf2-mediated defensive response. Environ Health Persp. 2008;116:1154–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Tao S, Zheng Y, Lau A, Jaramillo MC, Chau BT, Lantz RC, Wong PK, Wondrak GT, Zhang DD. Tanshinone I activates the Nrf2-dependent antioxidant response and protects against As(III)-induced lung inflammation in vitro and in vivo. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;19:1647–61.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar H, Kim IS, More SV, Kim BW, Choi DK. Natural product-derived pharmacological modulators of Nrf2/ARE pathway for chronic diseases. Nat Prod Rep. 2014;31:109–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen L, Teng H, Fang T, Xiao J. Agrimonolide from Agrimonia pilosa suppresses inflammatory responses through down-regulation of COX-2/iNOS and inactivation of NF-kB in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated macrophages. Phytomedicine. 2016;23:846–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee HJ, Li H, Chang HR, Jung H, Lee DY, Ryu JH. (-)-Nyasol, isolated from Anemarrhena asphodeloides suppresses neuroinflammatory response through the inhibition of I-kB alpha degradation in LPS-stimulated BV-2 microglial cells. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem. 2013;28:954–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Chun J, Choi RJ, Khan S, Lee DS, Kim YC, Nam YJ, Lee DU, Kim YS. Alantolactone suppresses inducible nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase-2 expression by down-regulating NF-kB, MAPK and AP-1 via the MyD88 signaling pathway in LPS-activated RAW 264.7 cells. Int Immunopharmacol. 2012;14:375–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Li Z, Geng Y-N, Jiang J-D, Kong W-J. Antioxidant and anti-Inflammatory activities of berberine in the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Evid-Based Compl Alt. 2014;2014:289264.Google Scholar
  28. Cheng L, Li F, Ma R, Hu XP. Forsythiaside inhibits cigarette smoke-induced lung inflammation by activation of Nrf2 and inhibition of NF-kappa B. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015;28:494–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Das S, Das DK. Anti-inflammatory responses of resveratrol. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2007;6:168–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sies H. Glutathione and its role in cellular functions. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999;27:916–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lim J, Nakamura BN, Mohar I, Kavanagh TJ, Luderer U. Glutamate cysteine ligase modifier subunit (Gclm) null mice have increased ovarian oxidative stress and accelerated age-telated ovarian failure. Endocrinology. 2015;156:3329–43.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Tong L, Chuang CC, Wu S, Zuo L. Reactive oxygen species in redox cancer therapy. Cancer Lett. 2015;367:18–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Barnes PJ. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med. 2014;35:71–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Cho HY, Kleeberger SR. Nrf2 protects against airway disorders. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;244:43–56.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lawrence T. The Nuclear Factor NF-kappa B Pathway in Inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2009;1:a001651.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson GL, Lapadat R. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways mediated by ERK, JNK, and p38 protein kinases. Science. 2002;298:1911–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Sasaki T, Irie-Sasaki J, Jones RG, Oliveira-dos-Santos AJ, Stanford WL, Bolon B, Wakeham A, Itie A, Bouchard D, Kozieradzki I, Joza N, Mak TW, Ohashi PS, Suzuki A, Penninger JM. Function of PI3Kγ in thymocyte development, T cell activation, and neutrophil migration. Science. 2000;287:1040–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement