Skip to main content
Download PDF

Nanoformulated herbal compounds: enhanced antibacterial efficacy of camphor and thymol-loaded nanogels

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies volume 24, Article number: 138 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Herbal components are highly useful assets for the advancement of novel antibacterial drugs. Nanotechnology holds great promise as an approach to enhance the effectiveness and develop the composition of these substances. The study developed nanogels incorporating camphor, thymol, and a combination derived from the initial nanoemulsions with particle sizes of 103, 85, and 135 nm, respectively. The viscosity of nanogels and the successful loading of compounds in them were examined by viscometery and ATR-FTIR studies. The bactericidal properties of the nanogels were examined against four bacterial strains. The nanogel containing camphor and thymol at 1250 µg/mL concentration exhibited complete growth suppression against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. The thymol nanogel at 1250 µg/mL and the camphor nanogel at 2500 µg/mL exhibited complete inhibition of growth on Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli, respectively. Both nanogels showed favorable effectiveness as antibacterial agents and could potentially examine a wide range of pathogens and in vivo studies.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Bacterial infections pose significant difficulties to global healthcare systems, and the misuse of antibiotics has led to bacterial resistance [1, 2]. Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes are two types of bacteria classified as gram-positive. These bacteria cause significant health risks and provide various obstacles. S. aureus is responsible for skin and soft tissue infections, bacteremia, osteomyelitis, endocarditis, and pneumonia [3, 4]. L. monocytogenes is a type of bacteria that can lead to many health problems, such as listeriosis, gastroenteritis, septicemia, and issues in the central nervous system [5]. Furthermore, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Escherichia coli are two types of bacteria that belong to the gram-negative category and can contribute to severe diseases in humans. P. aeruginosa is an opportunistic organism that causes nosocomial infections, such as wound infections, burn skin, otitis, keratitis, urinary tract infections, and ventilator-associated pneumonia [6, 7]. In addition, E. coli can be a pathogenic agent for various gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal diseases, including diarrhea, bacteremia, cystitis, and abdominal infections [8].

Herbal-derived substances, including essential oils, extractions, or their main constituents, are valuable resources for developing novel antibacterial agents [9,10,11]. Camphor is a white crystalline solid material with a strong aroma usually obtained from the bark of the Cinnamomum camphora tree through distilling [12]. Camphor exhibits potent antibacterial properties against various bacteria, including Streptococcus mutants, Enterococcus faecalis, and S. aureus [13, 14]. This terpenoid has been used as an antiseptic, culinary spice, cold treatment, and aphrodisiac [15, 16]. Due to its significant hydrocarbon moiety, camphor demonstrates a nonpolar nature; it does not readily dissolve in water [17].

Thymol is another herbal terpenoid that is derived from many essential oils, particularly thyme spp. It has various biological effects, including flavoring, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, local anesthetic, antinociceptive, antiseptic, and antifungal effects [18, 19]. However, it is renowned for its formidable antibacterial attributes against a wide range of pathogens, such as S. aureus and E. coli [20, 21].

The solubility of most herbal active agents, such as camphor and thymol, in water is low [22, 23]. On the other hand, it is necessary to enhance their solubility to utilize them as disinfectants. Incorporating herbal compounds in nanoformulations has recently been introduced to enhance their effectiveness by augmenting solubility [24, 25]. Nanogels with three-dimensional networks are widely used in developing topical drug delivery systems due to their ability to effectively include both hydrophilic and hydrophobic pharmaceuticals [26, 27]. In addition, nanogels exhibit considerable biocompatibility, biodegradability, sufficient stability, and superior drug-loading capabilities than other nanocarriers [28, 29].

For the first time, nanogel containing camphor was prepared. A comprehensive comparison was then made between its antibacterial effects with nanogel containing thymol and thymol-camphor containing nanogel. Our study focuses on investigating the antibacterial effects of these nanogels on four different types of bacteria, including P. aeruginosa, E. coli, S. aureus, and L. monocytogenes.

Materials and methods

Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27,853), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25,922), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25,923), and Listeria monocytogenes (ATCC 7644) were acquired from the Pasteur Institute of Iran. Camphor, thymol, tween 80, Muler hinton broth, and Muler hinton agar were purchased from Merck Chemicals (Germany). Carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (USA).

Preparation and characterizations of nanogels

The nanogel containing camphor, thymol, and a combination of camphor-thymol was prepared using their primary nanoemulsion, as outlined in our earlier research [30]. In summary, camphor, thymol (either separately or in combination), ethanol, and tween 80 were initially mixed. Then distilled water was gradually added until the total volume reached 5000 µL (while stirring at a speed of 2000 rpm for a duration of 60 min at room temperature). The particle size and particle size distribution (SPAN) of the nanoemulsions were examined using a DLS-type instrument (K-One-Nano-ltd). The SPAN values were determined using the formula d90-d10/d50, where d represents the diameter and 10, 50, and 90 correspond to the percentiles of particles with diameters lower than these thresholds.

The prepared nanoemulsions containing camphor, thymol, and camphor-thymol were gelified by adding CMC, the thickening agent. The gelation process was accomplished by agitating for 15 h at a speed of 2000 rpm; the prepared nanogels were named C-NGEL, T-NGEL, and CT-NGEL. In addition, a gel blank (Gel(-C)) was developed using similar procedures but without including camphor or thymol. Table 1 provides an in-depth description of the created nanogels and their constituents.

The rheological properties of the nanogels were examined using a rheometer apparatus (MCR-302- Anton Paar- Austria) to determine their viscosity under various shear rates. In addition, the incorporation of camphor and thymol into nanogels was examined using Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier-Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy (Tensor II, Bruker, Germany). The spectra of camphor, thymol, CMC, Gel(-C), C-NGEL, T-NGEL, and CT-NGEL were measured in the 400–4000 cm− 1 range. Furthermore, the stability of the nanogels was assessed by storing them at ambient temperature and in a refrigerator for a duration of 6 months, followed by a visual examination.

Table 1 Ingredients used in the nanogels preparation
Full size table

The antimicrobial properties of the samples were examined using the ATCC100 methodology outlined in our prior publication [31]. The steps for conducting antibacterial tests are shown in Fig. 1. In summary, 1, 0.5, and 0.25 g of C-NGEL, T-NGEL, and CT-NGEL were individually applied to 5-centimeter plates. Subsequently, four milliliters of each bacterial suspension, with a concentration of 2 × 105 CFU/mL, were added. As the nanogels contained 2% w/v (20.000 µg/mL) of active agent, the concentration of samples was fixed at 5000, 2500, and 2500 µg/mL. In addition, 1 gram of Gel(-C) was introduced to three plates as the negative control, while the control plates were left untreated. Subsequently, the plates were placed in a shaking incubator at a temperature of 37 °C for 24 h. Afterward, 10 µL of plate suspensions were cultivated on muller hinton gel and incubated for 24 h. The quantity of colonies cultivated on agar gels was enumerated and evaluated with the control group. The growth inhibition was determined by calculating the difference between the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) in the control group and the sample group, divided by the number of CFUs in the control group, and then multiplied by 100 (CFU control − CFU sample /CFU control ×100).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Steps for conducting antibacterial testing

Full size image

Results

Physicochemical properties of the nanogels

DLS profiles of primary nanoemulsions are shown in Fig. 2A-D. Particle sizes of blank nanoemulsion, camphor-thymol nanoemulsion, camphor nanoemulsion, and thymol nanoemulsion were obtained as 111, 135, 103, and 85 nm, respectively. Their SPAN values were > 1, 0.98, 0.97, and 0.96.

The nanoemulsions were gellified by adding 3.5% w/v of CMC; the viscosity curve of the nanogels, including Gel(-C), CT-NGEL, C-NGEL, and T-NGEL are illustrated in Fig. 3A-D. Their viscosity is fully fitted with a common regression curve for non-Newtonian fluids, i.e., Carreau-Yasuda, where the viscosity decreases by increasing shear rate. Furthermore, all nanogels, Gel(-C), CT-NGEL, C-NGEL, and T-NGEL, remained stable without undergoing any phase separation or dissociation after being stored at ambient temperature and in the refrigerator for six months.

Fig. 2
figure 2

DLS profiles of primary nanoemulsions: A: blank nanoemulsion (111 nm), B: camphor-thymol nanoemulsion (135 nm), C: camphor nanoemulsion (103 nm), and D: thymol nanoemulsion (85 nm)

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Analyzing the viscosity curves of the nanogels: A: blank nanogel (Gel(-C)), B: camphor-thymol nanogel (CT-NGEL), C: camphor nanogel (C-NGEL), and D: thymol nanogel (T-NGEL)

Full size image

The ATR-FTIR spectrum of camphor (Fig. 4A) exhibited peaks at 2958 and 2872 cm− 1, which corresponded to the C-H stretching vibration of hydrocarbon. The presence of the carbonyl group was confirmed by the prominent and intense band observed at 1738 cm− 1. The stretching vibration at 1447 cm− 1 can be attributed to methylene groups, while the spectra at 1372 cm− 1 correspond to methyl groups. The occurrence of C-O stretching was confirmed by a spectrum at 1044 cm− 1.

The ATR-FTIR spectrum of thymol (Fig. 4B) exhibited a wide range of spectra extending from 3200 to 3400 cm− 1, which can be ascribed to the presence of OH groups resulting from hydrogen bonding. The band observed at 3034 cm− 1 corresponds to the = C-H functional group, while the stretching vibrations observed at 2957, 2926, and 2867 cm− 1 are associated with the –CH functional group. The absorption peak at 1620 cm− 1 is attributed to the vibrational motion of the C = C bond in the aromatic ring of an aromatic compound. The presence of a peak at 1458 cm− 1 in the spectrum indicates the presence of an alcohol functional group (C-OH) undergoing bending vibrations during absorption. The stretching vibrations at 124, 1156, and 1057 cm− 1 are attributed to the C-O bond and the deformation vibration of C-OH. The absorption at 886 cm− 1 correlates with the vibration of C-H bonds in benzene rings. The vibration absorption at 738 cm− 1 is assigned to the alkenes.

The ATR-FTIR spectrum of CMC (Fig. 4C) exhibited a wide peak in the 3100–3600 cm− 1 range, attributed to the stretching of the hydroxyl group caused by hydrogen bonding. The absorption peak at 1589 cm− 1 indicates the presence of the COO group, specifically due to asymmetric stretching. Likewise, the peak at 1411 cm− 1 is attributed to the symmetric stretching of the COO group. The spectral pattern observed at approximately 991 cm− 1 is associated with the stretching of the C-O bond.

The ATR-FTIR spectrum of Gel(-C) (Fig. 4D) exhibited a broad peak in an area of 3300–3600 cm− 1, which can be attributed to the stretching vibration of hydroxyl groups resulting from hydrogen bonding between water and tween 80. The absorption peak observed at around 2924 cm− 1 corresponds to the stretching of the C-H bonds, which is prompted by the presence of tween 80 and CMC. The peak observed at 1733 cm− 1 relates to the stretching of the C = O bond, which indicates the presence of the carbonyl group in tween 80. The intense and robust peak observed at 1083 cm− 1 was ascribed to the stretching of the C-O bond. The COO- band at 1589 cm− 1 was observed to move to a lower wave number of 1581 cm− 1 in the presence of CMC. This shift confirms the interaction between CMC and tween 80 by intermolecular hydrogen bonding.

The ATR-FTIR spectrum of C-NGEL (Fig. 4E) revealed an extensive peak ranging from 3400 to 3600 cm− 1, which can be ascribed to the presence of OH groups resulting from hydrogen bonding between tween 80, water, CMC, and camphor. The spectra at 2923 cm− 1 are associated with the stretching of C-H bonds caused by the presence of camphor, tween 80, and CMC. The spectra at 1736 cm− 1 verified the existence of C = O stretching, indicating the overlapping carbonyl group in camphor with tween 80. The intense and robust peak observed at 1081 cm− 1 is credited to the stretching velocity of the C-O bond. The COO- band at 1589 cm− 1, when CMC was present, displayed a noticeable shift towards a lower wave number at 1581 cm− 1. This shift confirms the interaction between CMC and tween 80 through intermolecular H-bonding.

The ATR-FTIR spectrum of T-NGEL (Fig. 4F)) exhibits a broad area comprising 3400 to 3600 cm-1, which could be attributed to groups arising from hydrogen bonding. Additionally, the peaks observed at 2979 and 2926 cm− 1 are associated with the stretching of C-H bonds, which can be ascribed to the presence of thymol, tween 80, and CMC. The absorption at 1724 and 1666 cm− 1 indicates the stretching of the C = O bond, implying the presence of the carbonyl group in thymol and tween 80. The sharp and stable peak at 1079 cm− 1 corresponds to the stretching of the C-O bond. The COO- band at 1589 cm− 1, when CMC is present, is observed to shift to a lower wave number at 1582 cm− 1. This shift validates the link between CMC and tween 80 by intermolecular hydrogen bonding.

The ATR-FTIR spectrum of CT-NGEL (Fig. 4G) revealed a wide band that spans 3400–3700 cm− 1, which can be explained by the presence of OH groups resulting from hydrogen bonding between tween 80, water, CMC, thymol, and camphor. The band observed at 2924 cm− 1 is attributed to the stretching of C-H bonds, which can be ascribed to the existence of thymol, camphor, tween 80, and CMC. The band observed at a wavenumber of 1736 cm− 1 corresponds to the stretching of the C = O bond, which indicates the presence of the carbonyl group in camphor, thymol, and tween 80. The prominent and robust peak observed at 1081 cm− 1 belongs to the stretching of the C-O bond. The COO- band at 1589 cm− 1, when CMC was present, exhibited an apparent trend towards a lower wave number at 1581 cm− 1. This shift confirms an association between CMC and tween 80 through intermolecular H-bonding.

Fig. 4
figure 4

The ATR-FTIR spectra of A: camphor, B: thymol, C: CMC, D: balnk nangel (Gel(-C)), E: camphor nanogel (C-NGEL), F: thymol nanogel (T-NGEL), and G:camphor-thymol nanogel (CT-NGEL)

Full size image

Antibacterial properties

Antibacterial effects of Gel(-C), C-NGEL, T-NGEL, and CT-NGEL against P. aeruginosa, E. coli, S. aureus, and L. monocytogenes are summarized in Fig. 5A-D. Gel(-C) did not show growth-inhibitory effects on all bacteria. Besides, a positive relationship was observed between the nanogel concentration and their bacterial growth-inhibitory effects. Interestingly, C-NGEL and T-NGEL at 1250, 2500, and 5000 µg/mL showed 100% growth inhabitation on P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Besides, C-NGEL (2500 and 5000 µg/mL), T-NGEL (5000 µg/mL), and CT-NGEL (5000 µg/mL) showed 100% growth inhabitation on E. coli. Moreover, T-NGEL at 1250, 2500, and 5000 µg/mL showed 100% growth inhabitation on L. monocytogenes.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The antibacterial properties of the blank nanogel (Gel(-C)), camphor nanogel (C-NGEL), thymol nanogel (T-NGEL), and camphor-thymol nanogel (CT-NGEL) against A: P. aeruginosa, B: E. coli, C: S. aureus, and D: L. monocytogenes

Full size image

Discussions

The utilization of herbal medicines (extracts, oil, and essential oil) traces back to ancient civilizations for treating various ailments [32, 33]. In contemporary times, it has garnered substantial attention from researchers and innovators globally owing to its perceived health benefits. Recently, extracts and plant materials have been used to synthesize metal nanoparticle-based antibiotics and develop new antibacterial agents [34, 35]. However, herbal bioactive agents are characterized by low solubility, permeability, and bioavailability. Besides, some bioactive compounds, such as thymol and camphor, possess hydroxyl groups; they are physically and chemically unstable, which reduces their antibacterial activity [36, 37]. Nowadays, it is accepted that nanoformulated herbal ingredients have potential platforms to raise bioavailability, physicochemical properties, high loading capacity, increased solubility, decreased volatility, and target drug delivery [38,39,40]. Nanoemulsions with straightforward preparation methods, high drug loading capability, and high stability represent pioneering vehicles for encapsulating plant bioactives, enhancing solubility and bioavailability [41, 42]. However, due to its liquid nature, its topical use is challenging. Thus, the present investigation attempted to prepare nanogels incorporating camphor, thymol, and their combination via their primary nanoemulsion, earning the advantages of nanoemulsion and facilitating topical usage simultaneously.

Prior research has extensively documented the diverse array of properties attributed to camphor and thymol, with particular emphasis on their notable antibacterial and antifungal characteristics. Our findings are consonant with this body of literature, which has highlighted camphor’s pivotal role as a predominant constituent in essential oils derived from various botanical sources such as Lavandula pedunculata, Lavandula dentate [43], Lavandula stoechas [44], Artemisia annua [45], Tanacetum parthenium [46], Rosmarinus tournefortii [47], Tanacetum parthenium [48], Chiliadenus antiatlanticus [49] exhibiting robust antibacterial efficacy against a wide spectrum of both gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Additionally, when utilized as the principal component in cedar leaf essential oil, camphor has demonstrated significant inhibition of Candida albicans biofilm formation [50]. Moreover, within the context of Hedychium spicatum, camphor has been associated with potent antifungal effects against several phytopathogenic fungi, including Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Rhizoctonia solani, Sclerotium rolfsii, and Colletotrichum falcatum [51]. Despite these remarkable observations, the precise mechanistic underpinnings governing camphor’s antibacterial activity remain partially understood. Current evidence suggests that its antimicrobial effects may be attributed, in part, to the reduction of the pH gradient, destabilization of the cell membrane’s double-layer structure, and interaction with membrane-bound enzymes and proteins [43, 52, 53]. Besides, camphor exerts an analgesic action when used topically, producing a warm sensation. It excites and desensitizes sensory nerves by activating heat-sensitive TRP vanilloid subtype 1 (TRPV1) and TRPV3 receptors [54, 55]. This intricate interplay underscores the multifaceted nature of camphor’s bioactivity and the need for further elucidation through comprehensive mechanistic studies.

From the literature, thymol has demonstrated remarkable effectiveness against numerous gram-positive bacterial strains, including but not limited to Staphylococcus aureus [56, 57], Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus mutans and Bacillus subtilis [58], Bacillus cereus [59, 60], as well as an extensive roster of gram-negative bacteria such as Enterobacter sakazakii [61], Escherichia coli [57, 59], Pseudomonas aeruginosa [57, 59], Aeromonas hydrophila [62], Salmonella Infantis [60], Salmonella typhimurium [63], Salmonella paratyphi [63], Shigella flexneri [63]. Moreover, comparable to camphor, thymol has been observed to exhibit profound antifungal properties, effectively combatting various species within the Candida species [64,65,66], Trichophyton species [67], and Cryptococcus neoformans [68, 69]. The mechanisms underpinning thymol’s antibacterial prowess are multifaceted, encompassing both membrane-related and intracellular actions. Its lipophilic nature facilitates its interaction with bacterial lipid membranes, disrupting membrane pumps and enzymes crucial for bacterial survival [21, 70]. Additionally, thymol’s ability to bind with large intracellular macromolecules, such as DNA, induces structural alterations within bacterial cells, ultimately culminating in bacterial death [71, 72]. This intricate interplay between thymol and microbial targets underscores its potential as a versatile antimicrobial agent, warranting further investigation and exploitation in the ongoing quest for novel therapeutic interventions against infectious diseases.

Our study bridges the gap between traditional herbal remedies and modern nanoformulation techniques. The findings unveil a potent antimicrobial activity whereby these compounds effectively curbed the growth of P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, L. monocytogenes, and E. coli at concentrations equal to or below 2500 µg/mL. Unlike prior studies where camphor and thymol were examined either as predominant constituents of essential oils or in their pure forms, our approach involved their nanogel dosage form as a practical form. Recently, nanogels containing essential oils or plant compounds have been widely used in animal models. For instance, nanogels containing cinnamon essential oil and eugenol showed promising effects in wound healing [73, 74]. It seems that the achievements of such studies have reached enough maturity to measure their effectiveness in clinical trials, although their safety considerations must be observed.

Conclusion

In this study, an attempt was made to develop nanogels of camphor, thymol, and their mix. The efficiency of camphor and thymol nanogels was higher than their mixture. Both C-NGEL and T-NGEL showed 100% inhibitory effects on P. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Besides, C-NGEL and T-NGEL showed 100% growth inhibitory effects on L. monocytogenes and E. coli, respectively. Considering the straightforward preparation method and high efficacy, they could be introduced as candidates for other pathogens and in vivo studies.

Data availability

All data are available by reasonable request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Chinemerem Nwobodo D, Ugwu MC, Oliseloke Anie C, Al-Ouqaili MTS, Chinedu Ikem J, Victor Chigozie U, Saki M. Antibiotic resistance: the challenges and some emerging strategies for tackling a global menace. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36(9):e24655. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24655.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Escolà-Vergé L, Los-Arcos I, Almirante B. New antibiotics for the treatment of infections by multidrug-resistant microorganisms. Med Clin (Barc). 2020;154(9):351–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2019.11.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tong SYC, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG Jr. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):603–61. 10.1128/CMR.00134 – 14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheung GYC, Bae JS, Otto M. Pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Virulence. 2021;12(1):547–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2021.1878688.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Quereda JJ, Moron-Garcia A, Palacios-Gorba C, Dessaux C, Garcia-Del Portillo F, Pucciarelli MG, Ortega AD. Pathogenicity and virulence of Listeria monocytogenes: a trip from environmental to medical microbiology. Virulence. 2021;12(1):2509–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/21505594.2021.1975526.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wood SJ, Kuzel TM, Shafikhani SH. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: infections, animal modeling, and therapeutics. Cells. 2023;12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12010199.

  7. Qin S, Xiao W, Zhou C, Pu Q, Deng X, Lan L, Liang H, Song X, Wu M. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: pathogenesis, virulence factors, antibiotic resistance, interaction with host, technology advances and emerging therapeutics. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2022;7(1):199. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-01056-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gambushe SM, Zishiri OT, El Zowalaty ME. Review of Escherichia coli O157:H7 prevalence, pathogenicity, Heavy Metal and Antimicrobial Resistance, African Perspective. Infect Drug Resist. 2022;15:4645–73. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S365269.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Osanloo M, Yousefpoor Y, Alipanah H, Ghanbariasad A, Jalilvand M, Amani A. In-vitro Assessment of essential oils as Anticancer Therapeutic agents: a systematic literature review. Jordan J Pharm Sci. 2022;15(2):173–203. https://doi.org/10.35516/jjps.v15i2.319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Osanloo M, Ghaznavi G, Abdollahi A. Sureveying the chemical composition and antibacterial activity of essential oils from selected medicinal plants against human pathogens. Iran J Microbiol. 2020;12(6):505–12. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v12i6.5032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang X, Wang T, Jiang X, Ruan Y, Wang J, Qi C. The potential mechanism of Guizhi Fuling Wan effect in the treatment of cervical squamous cell carcinoma: a bioinformatics analysis investigation. Medicine. 2024;103(5):e37153. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000037153.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee SH, Kim DS, Park SH, Park H. Phytochemistry and Applications of Cinnamomum camphora essential oils. Molecules. 2022;27(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27092695.

  13. Kim YM, Shin M, Kang JW, Kang DHJJFS. Effect of sub-lethal treatment of carvacrol and thymol on virulence potential and resistance to several bactericidal treatments of Staphylococcus aureus. J Food Saf. 2022;42(5):e13004. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfs.13004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rahman F, Priya V, Gayathri R, Geetha RJIJPSRR. In vitro antibacterial activity of camphor oil against oral microbes. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2016;39(1):119–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh H, Kumar R, Mazumder A, Salahuddin, Yadav RK, Chauhan B, Abdulah MM. Camphor and Menthol as Anticancer agents: synthesis, structure-activity Relationship and Interaction with Cancer Cell lines. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2023;23(6):614–23. https://doi.org/10.2174/1871520622666220810153735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Santos CD, Cabot JC. Persistent effects after camphor ingestion: a case report and literature review. J Emerg Med. 2015;48(3):298–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.05.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nakata S, Murakami MJL. Self-motion of a camphor disk on an aqueous phase depending on the alkyl chain length of sulfate surfactants. Langmuir. 2010;26(4):2414–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/la903509z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kowalczyk A, Przychodna M, Sopata S, Bodalska A, Fecka I. Thymol and Thyme essential oil-new insights into selected therapeutic applications. Molecules. 2020;25(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184125.

  19. Islam MT, Khalipha ABR, Bagchi R, Mondal M, Smrity SZ, Uddin SJ, Shilpi JA, Rouf R. Anticancer activity of thymol: a literature-based review and docking study with emphasis on its anticancer mechanisms. IUBMB Life. 2019;71(1):9–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/iub.1935.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Xu J, Zhou F, Ji BP, Pei RS, Xu N. The antibacterial mechanism of carvacrol and thymol against Escherichia coli. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2008;47(3):174–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02407.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Marchese A, Orhan IE, Daglia M, Barbieri R, Di Lorenzo A, Nabavi SF, Gortzi O, Izadi M. Nabavi SMJFc: Antibacterial and antifungal activities of thymol: a brief review of the literature. Food Chem. 2016;210:402–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang T, Yin Y, Jiang X, Ruan Y, Xu J, Hu X, Li T, Chu L, Li L. Exploring the mechanism of luteolin by regulating microglia polarization based on network pharmacology and in vitro experiments. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):13767. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41101-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang T, Jiang X, Ruan Y, Li L, Chu L. The mechanism of action of the combination of Astragalus Membranaceus and Ligusticum Chuanxiong in the treatment of ischemic stroke based on network pharmacology and molecular docking. Medicine. 2022;101(28):e29593. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000029593.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ansari SH, Islam F, Sameem M. Influence of nanotechnology on herbal drugs: a review. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2012;3(3):142–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-4040.101006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bonifácio BV, da Silva PB, Ramos MAS, Negri KMS, Bauab TM, Chorilli M. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems and herbal medicines: a review. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9(null):1–15. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S52634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Abdollahi A, Zarenezhad E, Ghaznavi G, Khalili pour M, Osanloo M. Promising antibacterial activity of a mat of polycaprolactone nanofibers impregnated with a green nanogel. Nanomed Res J. 2020;5(2):192–201. https://doi.org/10.22034/NMRJ.2020.02.010.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tetik G, Rençber S, Özoglu ET, Yapar EA, Karavana SY, Özer Ö. Design and evaluation of topical antioxidant nanogel formulations. J Cosmet Sci. 2021;72(1):47–62. PMID: 35349425.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Azadi S, Osanloo M, Zarenezhad E, Farjam M, Jalali A, Ghanbariasad AJBCM, Therapies. Nano-scaled emulsion and nanogel containing Mentha pulegium essential oil: cytotoxicity on human melanoma cells and effects on apoptosis regulator genes. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023;23(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-03834-y.

  29. Ranjbar R, Zarenezhad E, Abdollahi A, Nasrizadeh M, Firooziyan S, Namdar N, Osanloo M. Nanoemulsion and Nanogel Containing Cuminum cyminum L essential oil: antioxidant, Anticancer, Antibacterial, and Antilarval Properties. J Trop Med. 2023;2023:5075581. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5075581.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Roozitalab G, Yousefpoor Y, Abdollahi A, Safari M, Rasti F, Osanloo M. Antioxidative, anticancer, and antibacterial activities of a nanoemulsion-based gel containing Myrtus communis L. essential oil. Chem Pap. 2022;76(7):4261–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-022-02185-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Osanloo M, Firooziyan S, Abdollahi A, Hatami S, Nematollahi A, Elahi N, Zarenezhad E. Nanoemulsion and nanogel containing Artemisia dracunculus essential oil; larvicidal effect and antibacterial activity. BMC Res Notes. 2022;15(1):276. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06135-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Uddin MZ, Emran TB, Dutta M, Ullah S, Rana S. In vivo antidepressant, analgesic, anti-inflammatory activities, in vitro antioxidant and antibacterial potential of fractionated Elatostema Papillosum Wed. extract. Pharma Innov J. 2019;8:241–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Alves de Lima Sampaio M, Carolina Justino de Araújo A, Arthur de Oliveira Borges J, Mariana Gonçalves Lima C, Douglas Melo Coutinho H, Ramos Freitas P, Emran TB, Obaidullah AJ. Olinda Macedo Da Silva R: antibacterial and antibiotic-modifying activity of the commercialized essential oil of Copaifera Spp. Associated with LED lights against a Staphylococcus aureus strain. J Funct Foods. 2024;114:106075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2024.106075.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Biswas FB, Roy TG, Rahman MA, Emran TB. An in vitro antibacterial and antifungal effects of cadmium(II) complexes of hexamethyltetraazacyclotetradecadiene and isomers of its saturated analogue. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2014;7s1:S534–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1995-7645(14)60286-8.

  35. Roy A, Singh V, Sharma S, Ali D, Azad AK, Kumar G, Emran TB. Antibacterial and dye degradation activity of Green Synthesized Iron nanoparticles. J Nanomater. 2022;2022:3636481. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3636481.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Yamali C, Gul M, Gul HI. Current Pharmaceutical Research on the significant Pharmacophore Mannich bases in Drug Design. Curr Top Med Chem. 2023;23(27):2590–608. https://doi.org/10.2174/0115680266256102230922101939.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Figueroa-Robles A, Antunes-Ricardo M, Guajardo-Flores D. Encapsulation of phenolic compounds with liposomal improvement in the cosmetic industry. Int J Pharm. 2021;593:120125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.120125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Swain SS, Paidesetty SK, Padhy RN, Hussain T. Nano-technology platforms to increase the antibacterial drug suitability of essential oils: a drug prospective assessment. OpenNano. 2023;9:100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.onano.2022.100115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Woranuch S, Yoksan R. Eugenol-loaded chitosan nanoparticles: I. Thermal stability improvement of eugenol through encapsulation. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;96(2):578–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zanetti M, Carniel TK, Dalcanton F, dos Anjos RS, Riella HG, de Araújo PH, de Oliveira D, Fiori MA. Use of encapsulated natural compounds as antimicrobial additives in food packaging: a brief review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2018;81:51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.09.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Eqbal A, Ansari VA, Hafeez A, Ahsan F, Imran M, Tanweer S. Recent applications of nanoemulsion based drug delivery system: a review. Res J Pharm Technol. 2021;14(5):2852–8. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Garcia CR, Malik MH, Biswas S, Tam VH, Rumbaugh KP, Li W, Liu X. Nanoemulsion delivery systems for enhanced efficacy of antimicrobials and essential oils. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(3):633–53. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1BM01537K.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bouazama S, Harhar H, Costa J, Desjobert J, Talbaoui A, Tabyaoui M. Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of the essential oils of Lavandula Pedunculata and Lavandula Dentata. J Mater Environ Sci. 2017;8:2154–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. El Omari N, Balahbib A, Bakrim S, Benali T, Ullah R, Alotaibi A, Naceiri El Mrabti H, Goh BH, Ong SK, Ming LC, et al. Fenchone and Camphor: main natural compounds from Lavandula stoechas L., expediting multiple in vitro biological activities. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e21222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21222.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Donato R, Santomauro F, Bilia AR, Flamini G, Sacco C. Antibacterial activity of Tuscan Artemisia annua essential oil and its major components against some foodborne pathogens. LWT - Food Sci Technol. 2015;64(2):1251–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.07.014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Polatoglu K, Demirci F, Demirci B, Gören N, Başer KH. Antibacterial activity and the variation of Tanacetum parthenium (L.) Schultz Bip. Essential oils from Turkey. J Oleo Sci. 2010;59(4):177–84. https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.59.177.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Bendeddouche MS, Benhassaini H, Hazem Z, Romane A. Essential oil analysis and antibacterial activity of Rosmarinus tournefortii from Algeria. Nat Prod Commun. 2011;6(10):1934578X1100601026. PMID: 22164796.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mohsenzadeh F, Chehregani A, Amiri H. Chemical composition, antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity of essential oils of Tanacetum parthenium in different developmental stages. Pharm Biol. 2011;49(9):920–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/13880209.2011.556650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. El Yaagoubi M, Ortiz S, Mechqoq H, Cavaleiro C, Lecsö-Bornet M, Rodrigues MJ, Custódio L, El Mousadik A, Grougnet R, El Aouad N, et al. Chemical Composition, Antibacterial Screening and cytotoxic activity of Chiliadenus antiatlanticus (Asteraceae) essential oil. Chem Biodivers. 2021;18(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202100115.

  50. Manoharan RK, Lee JH, Lee J. Antibiofilm and Antihyphal Activities of Cedar Leaf Essential Oil, Camphor, and fenchone derivatives against Candida albicans. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:1476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01476.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Rawat A, Rawat M, Prakash O, Kumar R, Punetha H, Rawat DS. Comparative study on eucalyptol and camphor rich essential oils from rhizomes of Hedychium Spicatum Sm. And their pharmacological, antioxidant and antifungal activities. Acad Bras Cienc. 2022;94:e20210932. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765202220210932.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Chen J, Tang C, Zhang R, Ye S, Zhao Z, Huang Y, Xu X, Lan W, Yang D. Metabolomics analysis to evaluate the antibacterial activity of the essential oil from the leaves of Cinnamomum camphora (Linn.) Presl. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;253:112652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.112652.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang L, Zhang K, Zhang K, Zhang J, Fu J, Li J, Wang G, Qiu Z, Wang X, Li J. Antibacterial activity of Cinnamomum camphora essential oil on Escherichia coli during Planktonic Growth and Biofilm formation. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:561002. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.561002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Xu H, Blair NT, Clapham DE. Camphor activates and strongly desensitizes the transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype 1 channel in a vanilloid-independent mechanism. J Neurosci. 2005;25(39):8924–37. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2574-05.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Cahusac PMB, Veermalla A. Effects of Camphor and related compounds on slowly adapting mechanoreceptors in the rat sinus hair follicle. IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2022;13:114–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibneur.2022.07.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Valliammai A, Selvaraj A, Yuvashree U, Aravindraja C, Karutha Pandian S. Sara-dependent antibiofilm activity of thymol enhances the antibacterial efficacy of rifampicin against Staphylococcus aureus. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1744. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01744.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Wattanasatcha A, Rengpipat S, Wanichwecharungruang S. Thymol nanospheres as an effective anti-bacterial agent. Int J Pharm. 2012;434(1):360–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.06.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mathela CS, Singh KK, Gupta VK. Synthesis and in vitro antibacterial activity of thymol and carvacrol derivatives. Acta Pol Pharm. 2010;67(4):375–80. PMID: 20635533.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Zarrini G, Delgosha ZB, Moghaddam KM, Shahverdi AR. Post-antibacterial effect of thymol. Pharm Biol. 2010;48(6):633–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/13880200903229098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Gavaric N, Mozina SS, Kladar N, Bozin B. Chemical Profile, antioxidant and antibacterial activity of Thyme and Oregano essential oils, Thymol and Carvacrol and their possible synergism. J Essent Oil-Bear Plants. 2015;18(4):1013–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0972060X.2014.971069.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Tian L, Wang X, Liu R, Zhang D, Wang X, Sun R, Guo W, Yang S, Li H, Gong G. Antibacterial mechanism of thymol against Enterobacter sakazakii. Food Control. 2021;123:107716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107716.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Liang C, Huang S, Geng Y, Huang X, Chen D, Lai W, Guo H, Deng H, Fang J, Yin L. A study on the antibacterial mechanism of thymol against Aeromonas hydrophila in vitro. Aquacult Int. 2022;30:115–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-021-00789-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Liang H, Bao F, Dong X, Tan R, Zhang C, Lu Q, Cheng Y. Antibacterial thymol derivatives isolated from Centipeda minima. Molecules. 2007;12(8):1606–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/12081606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Sharifzadeh A, Khosravi A, Shokri H, Shirzadi H. Potential effect of 2-isopropyl-5-methylphenol (thymol) alone and in combination with fluconazole against clinical isolates of Candida albicans, C. Glabrata and C. Krusei. J Mycol Med. 2018;28(2):294–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mycmed.2018.04.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. De Castro RD, de Souza TMPA, Bezerra LMD, Ferreira GLS, de Brito Costa EMM, Cavalcanti AL. Antifungal activity and mode of action of thymol and its synergism with nystatin against Candida species involved with infections in the oral cavity: an in vitro study. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2015;15(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0947-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Guo N, Liu J, Wu X, Bi X, Meng R, Wang X, Xiang H, Deng X, Yu L. Antifungal activity of thymol against clinical isolates of fluconazole-sensitive and-resistant Candida albicans. J Med Microbiol. 2009;58(8):1074–9. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.008052-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Soković M, Glamočlija J, Ćirić A, Kataranovski D, Marin PD, Vukojević J, Brkić D. Antifungal activity of the essential oil of Thymus vulgaris L. and Thymol on Experimentally Induced Dermatomycoses. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2008;34(12):1388–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/03639040802130053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Teixeira APC, Nóbrega RO. Lima EdO, Araújo WdO, Lima IdO: antifungal activity study of the monoterpene thymol against Cryptococcus neoformans. Nat Prod Res. 2020;34(18):2630–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/14786419.2018.1547296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Jung K-W, Chung M-S, Bai H-W, Chung B-Y, Lee S. Investigation of antifungal mechanisms of thymol in the human fungal pathogen, Cryptococcus neoformans. Molecules. 2021;26(11):3476. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26113476.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Kachur K, Suntres Z. The antibacterial properties of phenolic isomers, carvacrol and thymol. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2020;60(18):3042–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2019.1675585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Rudramurthy GR, Swamy MK, Sinniah UR, Ghasemzadeh A. Nanoparticles: alternatives against drug-resistant pathogenic microbes. Molecules. 2016;21(7):836. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21070836.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Wang L-H, Zhang Z-H, Zeng X-A, Gong D-M, Wang M-S. Combination of microbiological, spectroscopic and molecular docking techniques to study the antibacterial mechanism of thymol against Staphylococcus aureus: membrane damage and genomic DNA binding. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(6):1615–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-0102-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Osanloo M, Noori F, Tavassoli A, Ataollahi MR, Davoodi A, Seifalah-Zade M, Taghinezhad A, Fereydouni N, Goodarzi A. Effect of PCL nanofiber mats coated with chitosan microcapsules containing cinnamon essential oil for wound healing. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2023;23(1):84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-03905-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Noori F, Osanloo M, Moradi HR, Ghaderi Jafarbeigloo H, Jirehnezhadyan M, Kouhpayeh SA, Tirgare M, Bozorgi A, Goodarzi A. Fabrication, characterization, and in vivo implantation of eugenol-loaded nanogels and PCL/Cs electrospun nanofibers for wound healing applications. J Bioact Compat Polym. 2023;38(6):480–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/08839115231207337.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Fasa University of Medical Sciences supported this study grant No. 401368.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Microbiology, School of Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran

    Abbas Abdollahi

  2. Noncommunicable Disease Research Center, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran

    Narges Fereydouni & Elham Zarenezhad

  3. Student Research Committee, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran

    Hamid Moradi

  4. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran

    Hamid Moradi

  5. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

    Abolfazl Karimivaselabadi

  6. Department of Medical Nanotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran

    Mahmoud Osanloo

Authors
  1. Abbas Abdollahi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Narges Fereydouni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hamid Moradi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abolfazl Karimivaselabadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elham Zarenezhad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mahmoud Osanloo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

AA performed antibacterial tests. NF revised the MS. HM prepared the nanogels. AK wrote part of the Introduction and Discussion. EZ interpreted ATR-FTIR. MO design of study, analysis, and drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to drafting and approving the final MS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmoud Osanloo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study has received ethical approval under the reference number IR.FUMS.REC.1402.002. Furthermore, as this research did not involve any human subjects, using an informed consent form was unnecessary.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdollahi, A., Fereydouni, N., Moradi, H. et al. Nanoformulated herbal compounds: enhanced antibacterial efficacy of camphor and thymol-loaded nanogels. BMC Complement Med Ther 24, 138 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04435-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04435-z

Keywords

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us