Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Effects of aqueous leaf extract of Asystasia gangetica on the blood pressure and heart rate in male spontaneously hypertensive Wistar rats

BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)201313:283

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-13-283

Received: 8 July 2013

Accepted: 24 October 2013

Published: 26 October 2013

Abstract

Background

Asystasia gangentica (A. gangetica) belongs to the family Acanthaceae. It is used to treat hypertension, rheumatism, asthma, diabetes mellitus, and as an anthelmintic in South Africa, India, Cameroun, Nigeria, and Kenya respectively. It has also been reported to inhibit the angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE) in-vitro. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate the in-vivo effect of aqueous leaf extract (ALE) of A. gangetica on the blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in anaesthetized male spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR); and to elucidate possible mechanism(s) by which it acts.

Methods

The ALE of A. gangetica (10–400 mg/kg), angiotensin I human acetate salt hydrate (ANG I, 3.1–100 μg/kg) and angiotensin II human (ANG II, 3.1–50 μg/kg) were administered intravenously. The BP and HR were measured via a pressure transducer connecting the femoral artery to a Powerlab and a computer for recording.

Results

A. gangetica significantly (p<0.05), and dose-dependently reduced the systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial BP. The significant (p<0.05) reductions in HR were not dose-dependent. Both ANG I and ANG II increased the BP dose-dependently. Co-infusion of A. gangetica (200 mg/kg) with either ANG I or ANG II significantly (p<0.05) suppressed the hypertensive effect of both ANG I and ANG II respectively, and was associated with reductions in HR.

Conclusions

A. gangetica ALE reduced BP and HR in the SHR. The reduction in BP may be a result of actions of the ALE on the ACE, the ANG II receptors and the heart rate.

Keywords

Asystasia gangetica Blood pressureHeart rateSpontaneously hypertensive ratsRenin angiotensin aldosterone system

Background

A great number of plants have been used throughout the world from time immemorial for the prevention and cure of sickness [1]. About eighty percent of the active compounds of drugs used for the treatment of cardiovascular conditions are extracted from medicinal plants, e.g. foxglove (digitalis lanata), Allium sativum (garlic), camphor and Adonis vernalis[13].

Drugs used for the treatment of hypertension include angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), alpha1 adrenoceptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin II (ANG II) receptor antagonists, diuretics and beta adrenoceptor blockers [47]. Most of these drugs are expensive, and in many cases, none of them can control hypertension on its own. Consequently, combination therapy is often required [5, 6]. However, combination therapy (polytherapy) has its drawbacks, such as increased risk of drug interactions, side effects and poor compliance [810]. These necessitate continuous search for novel agents which are more effective, cheaper, come with less side-effects, and preferably used alone.

Asystasia gangentica (A. gangetica) belongs to the family Acanthaceae [11, 12]. There are eight species native to Southern Africa, and notably, the Kwazulu Natal province of South Africa [12]. A. gangetica is used to treat asthma in Nigeria [13], as an antihelmintic in Kenya [14], and as stomachic, astringent, and diaphoretic in India [15]. It has also been suggested to exhibit antihypertensive effects through inhibition of ACE in-vitro[12]. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of ALE of A. gangetica on the blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), and also investigate if inhibition of the ACE or the ANG II receptor mediates its effect in-vivo.

Methods

Study design

The study was designed as an in- vivo experimental model assessing the effects of A. gangetica on BP and HR in male SHR.

Collection and preparation of plant material

A. gangetica plants were obtained from Newplant nursery in George, Western Cape, South Africa (SA), in March 2009. A sample of the plant was deposited at the University of the Western Cape (UWC) herbarium for identification and authentication by the taxonomist. It was registered under the voucher number 3469. Fresh leaves (1314.27 g) were picked from plants and washed twice with distilled water. Leaves were permitted to dry completely in a room where the temperature was maintained at 23°C for a period of 14 days. Dried leaves (967 g) were then pulverized to a fine powder (738 g) using a Hammer mill and stored in airtight glass containers.

Aqueous extraction of plant material

A Soxhlet apparatus was used to extract the active compounds from 738 g powder over 48 hours. A Soxhlet thimble was constructed with glass fibre. Fine powder of the A. gangetica was wetted with distilled water, and placed between two layers of glass fibre (used as a barrier to prevent powder from passing into the extract). Distilled water (400 ml) was placed in a round bottom flask and connected together along with the reflux condenser. A heating element was used to supply sufficient heat to boil the distilled water. After extraction, the remnant of the crude plant material was discarded. The aqueous extract was then placed in a deep freezer for a period of 72 hours and transferred to a freeze drier for a period of 72–96 hours to produce a dry powder ready for reconstitution and administration. A powder weighing 179 g was obtained.

Materials and equipments used in the extraction process of the plant

The materials and equipments used for plant extraction are of standard analytical grade, and include an oven, scissors, weighing balance, glass fibre, Soxhlet extractor, rotovapour (Bachi Rotavapor R200, Switzerland), freeze-drier (Virtis FreezeMobile 12SL, SA), 0.45 μm filter paper (Schleicher & Schuell MicroScience, SA) and a −85°C freezer (Snijder Scientific, SA).

Animals

Healthy male SHR weighing 250–400 g and aged less than 4 months old were used. The SHR were obtained from the Animal Unit of the University of Cape Town, Cape Town (CPT), SA; housed in the animal room of the School of Pharmacy, UWC; and allowed feed and water ad-libitum. The animal room temperature was kept at 24°C, with a 12:12-h light–dark cycle.

Materials and equipments used in the in- vivo experiments

BP transducer (AD Instruments, CPT, SA), BP amplifier (ML117 AD Instruments, CPT, SA), PowerLab 4/20 T (AD Instruments, Lasec, CPT, SA), computer desktop unit, temperature probe (AD Instruments, Lasec, CPT, SA), Chart 5.0 for Windows software (AD Instruments, Lasec, CPT, SA), Ascor AP 22 syringe pump (United Scientific, CPT, SA), heated rat operating table (BioScience, CPT, SA), overhead lamp, bulldog clamps, 0.5 mm (arterial and venous) cannula, three-way tap, syringe, threads, oxygen mask, surgical scissors and cotton wool.

Chemicals and drugs used in the in-vivo experiments

Sodium chloride (Adcock Ingram, SA), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Merck Chemicals, SA), 0.1% heparin sodium (1000 iu/ml, Intramed, SA), 6% sodium pentobarbitone (Kyron Laboratories, Johannesburg, SA). 0.9% Sodium chloride [16] and/or DMSO [17], were respectively used as vehicle to obtain homogenous dilution of A. gangetica, heparin, and the unknown drug. All drugs, except where otherwise indicated, were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, SA. ANG I and ANG II which have potential antagonistic effect to that of A. gangetica, were used as negative controls of A. gangetica[6, 7, 18]. Fresh solutions were made at the beginning of each experiment. Chemicals, after having been diluted were kept in ice during the course of the experiment to keep them stable.

Animal preparation and recording of experimental parameters assessed

After the induction of anesthesia with sodium pentobarbitone (40 mg/kg) intraperitoneally, the rat was placed in a supine position on a heated operating table to maintain the temperature of the body temperature at ±37°C. A temperature probe was inserted into the rectum and used to measure the core temperature via the amplifier connected to the PowerLab® and monitored with a computer throughout the experiment. Tracheotomy was performed and a tube placed in the trachea for easy breathing. Rats were supplied with oxygen through a facial-oxygen mask to keep the air environment surrounding the tracheal cannula rich in oxygen. The external jugular vein and the femoral artery were cannulated with catheters containing normal saline/heparin solution in the ratio of 9 ml to 1 ml, for the intravenous infusion of known drugs and/or the ALE of A. gangetica. In experiments where A. gangetica was co-administered with a control drug, both external jugular veins were cannulated for simultaneous intravenous administration. One of the femoral arteries was cannulated for measurement of arterial BP [19]. BP was measured as systolic pressure (SBP), diastolic pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP). Both BP and HR were monitored continuously on a computer running the Chart 5 software (AD Instruments, Lasec CPT, SA) through a BP transducer linking the arterial cannula to a PowerLab® via a BP amplifier. Randomized doses of drugs and extract were administered during the study.

Dissolution and infusion of drugs

All drugs and plant extract were dissolved in 0.9% NS and administered per rat body weight in a volume not higher than 0.5 ml per dose. DMSO (2 to 3 drops) was added to the plant extracts for homogenous dilution and filtered before administration. Drugs were infused at a rate based on the body weight and dose over 3 minutes using an Ascor AP 22 syringe pump. The results were recorded within 3 minutes and drugs flushed with 0.5 ml normal saline. The BP was allowed to stabilize for 10 to 15 minutes, before further doses were infused. Six rats were used for each set of experiments.

Experimental protocol

Time zero (0) to twenty (20) minutes, the SHR was collected from the animal room and anaesthetized. While waiting for the anesthesia to take effect, all equipments were checked to see if they are properly set up. Catheters were heparinised. Tracheal tube was inserted into the trachea and the cannulation of the jugular vein and femoral artery done. Subsequently, the recording of the experimental parameters began.

Time twenty one (21) to forty (40) minutes, the animal was allowed to recover from the surgical procedure. Drugs and/or extract to be administered were diluted.

Time forty one (41) minutes, the animal was stable and the first dose infused.

Time forty five (45) to sixty (60) minutes, flushing was done, followed by recovery of the animal from drug effect, until initial base line was reached. Subsequent doses were then infused using the same procedure as that of the first dose.

Experimental conditions of the animals

To ascertain that the haemodynamic, respiratory and metabolic conditions of the rats were stable during the course of experiments, initial recordings of the cardiovascular parameters (SBP, DBP, MAP and HR) to be assessed during the study were done in a separate group of control SHRs over 3 hours, time much longer than the one needed for each experiment. During that period, no drug or plant extract was administered to the animal. Furthermore, in randomly selected rats, arterial blood sample (10 μl) was taken at the beginning (just after surgical preparation of the animal), and at the end of each experiment. Samples obtained were immediately sent in ice pack to PathCare Laboratory (Vet laboratory, Bellville, SA) for arterial blood gaz tests.

Statistical analysis

The results obtained are presented as mean values (± SEM). Statistical significance between means was calculated using the Student’s t-test and p value <0.05 was considered significant.

Ethics considerations

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the UWC (Ethics approval reference number 09/9/5) and was conducted according to the UWC rules and regulations in terms of animal experiments; and the European Community guidelines (EEC Directive of 1986; 86/609/EEC).

Results

Experimental conditions

No statistically significant difference was observed in the SBP, DBP, MAP, HR, respiratory rate and arterial blood gaz test results during 3 hours the experiments were conducted.

Effect of A.gangetica on BP and HR in SHR

A. gangetica (10–400 mg/kg) significantly (<0.01), and dose-dependently decreased the maximum BP values obtained when compared to their respective values at baseline. A. gangetica also produced significant (<0.05) reductions in HR which were not dose-dependent (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Effect of A. gangentica on BP (a) and HR (b). Values are presented as mean ±. SEM. * indicates statistical significance.

Effect of angiotensin I on the BP and HR in SHR

ANG I (3.1–100 μg/kg) significantly (<0.01), and dose-dependently increased the maximum BP values obtained when compared to their respective values at baseline. ANG I only produced significant (<0.05) change in HR at the 3rd and 2nd highest doses (25 and 50 μg/kg respectively, Figure 2).
Figure 2

Effect of angiotensin I on BP (a) and HR (b). Values are presented as mean ±. SEM. * indicates statistical significance.

Effect of angiotensin I co-infused with A.gangetica on BP and HR in SHR

The effects of ANG I (3.1 - 100 μg/kg) on the SBP, DBP, and MAP was significantly (p<0.001) inhibited by co-infusion with A. gangentica (200 mg/kg). The effect of ANG I on the HR was also significantly inhibited by A.gangetica (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Effect of ANG I co-infused with A. gangetica on the SBP (a), DBP (b), MAP (c), and HR (d). Values are presented as mean ± SEM. * indicates statistical significance.

Effect of angiotensin II on BP and HR in SHR

ANG II (3.1 – 50.0 μg/kg) significantly increased the SBP, DBP, and MAP in a dose-dependent fashion (Figure 4).
Figure 4

Effect of angiotensin II on BP (a) and HR (b). Values are presented as mean ± SEM. * indicates statistical significance.

Effect of angiotensin II co-administered with A.gangetica on the BP and HR in SHR

As shown in Figure 5, co-administration of A. gangetica (200 mg/kg) and ANG II (3.1 – 50.0 μg/kg), significantly (p<0.01) decreased the hypertensive effect of ANG II on the SBP, MAP and DBP, as well as its tachycardic effect.
Figure 5

Effect of ANG II co-infused with A. gangetica on the SBP (a), DBP (b), MAP (c), and HR (d). Values are presented as mean ± SEM. * indicates statistical significance.

Discussion

Effect of Asystasia gangetica on the blood pressure and heart rate

The results obtained in this study demonstrate that the ALE of A. gangetica decreases the BP in a dose dependent manner in SHR. The hypotensive effect observed (Figure 1) is concordant with the previous findings of Ramesar et al.[12] that both aqueous and methanol extracts of A. gangetica exhibited ACE inhibitory activity of 20% and 51% respectively in-vitro.

Effect of angiotensin I on the blood pressure and heart rate

The increase in BP is due to the direct vasoconstrictory actions of ANG II produced from ANG I in the presence of ACE in-vivo[20, 21]. Meanwhile, the increase in HR is due to significant potentiation of the sympathetic activity, as well as a direct excitatory action in the heart produced by high levels of ANG II [18, 2227]. The decrease in the effect of ANG I on the HR at the dose ≥ 100 μg/kg may simply be down to Ang II shifting the operating ‘set-point’ for the regulation of sympathetic outflow to a higher BP [24, 28].

Is the hypotensive effect of A.gangetica mediated by the inhibition of ACE?

The significant reductions in SBP, DBP and MAP produced by co-infusing the ALE of A. gangetica with ANG I (Figure 3) when compared to the BP values observed with infusing ANG I alone (Figure 2) can be attributed to A. gangetica inhibiting the conversion of ANG I into ANG II, a powerful vasoconstrictor [2932]. The significant reductions in HR observed with the co-infusion of A. gangetica with increasing doses of ANG I (Figure 3), as opposed to the absence of change, or even significant increases observed at some doses with the infusion of ANG I alone (Figure 2), could be attributed to lesser quantities of ANG II being produced. Since the dose of A. gangetica is fixed, it is expected that less ANG II can be produced at the lower doses of ANG I, while more ANG II can be formed at the higher doses.

Are angiotensin II receptors involved in the mechanism of action of Asystasia gangetica?

ANG II significantly increased the BP (Figure 4), due to the activation of ANG II receptors (AT IA) in the vascular smooth muscle cells, resulting in increased vasoconstriction, decreased renal blood flow and renal tubular sodium re-uptake, increased aldosterone and vasopressin secretion [3036]. The co-administration of the ALE of A. gangetica with ANG II (Figure 5) significantly inhibited the effect of ANG II alone (Figure 4) on BP. This antihypertensive effect was associated with significant reductions in HR. This gives more credence to the opinion that A. gangetica contain chemical compounds, which act by blocking the actions of ANG II at its various receptors mentioned above.

Limitations of the study

The angiotensin II (AT1) receptor mediates all of the known physiological actions of ANG II in the cardiovascular, renal, neuronal, endocrine, hepatic and other target cells [29, 33, 3739]. Therefore, it is important to investigate the specific action (s) of the crude ALE, and its constituents at each target cell, as well as, the involvement of the alpha-1, beta-1, and presynaptic alpha-2 adrenoceptors; cholinergic receptors and calcium channels in the mechanism of action of A. gangetica.

Conclusions

A. gangetica decreases the blood pressure and heart rate in SHR. This action might be secondary to inhibition of ACE and the ANG II receptors. It may also involve a direct inhibitory action on the heart muscle.

Authors’ information

PM has a PhD in Pharmacology, MMed in Cardiology, MBChB in medicine and B.Sc in human biology. PM is currently Professor of Pharmacology in the School of Pharmacy, University of the Western Cape, South Africa.

IR has a PhD in Pharmaceutical Sciences, M.Sc and B.Sc Honours degrees in Human Physiology. IR is currently a Senior Lecturer in Physiology, at the National University of Science and Technology, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe.

Abbreviations

A. gangetica: 

Asystasia gangentica

ACE: 

Angiotensin I converting enzyme

ALE: 

Aqueous leaf extract

ANG I: 

Angiotensin I

ANG II: 

Angiotensin II

AT1: 

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor

BP: 

Blood pressure

Bpm: 

Beats per minute

DBP: 

Diastolic blood pressure

DMSO: 

Dimethylsulfoxide

HR: 

Heart rate

MAP: 

Mean arterial pressure

mmHg: 

Millimetres of mercury

SBP: 

Systolic blood pressure

SEM: 

Standard error of mean

SHR: 

Spontaneously hypertensive rats

UWC: 

University of the Western Cape.

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The authors will like to acknowledge the assistance of Jo-anna Amunjela, Deon Hanse, Grace Hikumwah, Fazlyn Hoedemaker, Mantso Motsoaole, Paul Mwandingi, Xolani Sambo, and Vinesh Jeavan in the extraction of the crude aqueous leaf extract of A. gangetica, the care of the SHR used, and during the in-vivo experiments.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Discipline of Pharmacology, School of Pharmacy, University of the Western Cape
(2)
Division of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, National University of Science and Technology

References

  1. Gurib-Fakim A: Medicinal plants: Traditions of yesterday and drugs of tomorrow. Mol Aspects Med. 2006, 27 (1): 1-93. 10.1016/j.mam.2005.07.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Samuelsson G: Drugs of Natural Origin: a Textbook of Pharmacognosy. 2004, Stockholm: Swedish Pharmaceutical PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Balick MJ, Cox PA: Plants, People, and Culture: the Science of Ethnobotany. 1997, New York: NY Scientific American LibraryGoogle Scholar
  4. Scriba GE, Sweetman SC: Martindale: The complete drug reference. Chromatographia. 2011, 74 (7–8): 647-648.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Volpe M, Tocci G: Rationale for triple fixed-dose combination therapy with an angiotensin II receptor blocker, a calcium channel blocker, and a thiazide diuretic. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2012, 8: 371-380.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Tocci G, Paneni F, Passerini J, Volpe M: Triple combination therapy to improve blood pressure control: experience with olmesartan-amlodipine-hydrochlorothiazide therapy. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012, 13 (18): 2687-2697. 10.1517/14656566.2012.745510.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Laurent S, Schlaich M, Esler M: New drugs, procedures, and devices for hypertension. Lancet. 2012, 380 (9841): 591-600. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60825-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Carvalho MF, Romano-Lieber NS, Bergsten-Mendes G, Secoli SR, Ribeiro E, Lebrao ML, Duarte YA: Polypharmacy among the elderly in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil - SABE Study. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2012, 15 (4): 817-827. 10.1590/S1415-790X2012000400013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dunn SP, Holmes DR, Moliterno DJ: Drug-drug interactions in cardiovascular catheterizations and interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012, 5 (12): 1195-1208. 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.10.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee VW, Pang KK, Hui KC, Kwok JC, Leung SL, Yu DS, Lee DT: Medication adherence: Is it a hidden drug-related problem in hidden elderly?. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013, 13 (4): 978-985. 10.1111/ggi.12042.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Adeyemi OO, Aigbe FR, Uyaiabasi NG: Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of the aqueous stem and leaf extract of Asystasia gangetica (Linn) T. Anderson. Nig Q J Hosp Med. 2011, 21 (2): 129-134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ramesar S, Baijnath H, Govender T, Mackraj I: Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor activity of nutritive plants in KwaZulu-Natal. J Med Food. 2008, 11 (2): 331-336. 10.1089/jmf.2007.569.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Akah PA, Ezike AC, Nwafor SV, Okoli CO, Enwerem NM: Evaluation of the anti-asthmatic property of Asystasia gangetica leaf extracts. J Ethnopharmacol. 2003, 89 (1): 25-36. 10.1016/S0378-8741(03)00227-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kokwaro JO: Medicinal plants of east Africa. 2009, University of Nairobi Press, 478-3Google Scholar
  15. Sudhakar M, Rao CV, Rao PM, Raju DB, Venkateswarlu Y: Antimicrobial activity of Caesalpinia pulcherrima, Euphorbia hirta and Asystasia gangeticum. Fitoterapia. 2006, 77 (5): 378-380. 10.1016/j.fitote.2006.02.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Suzuki A, Kagawa D, Ochiai R, Tokimitsu I, Saito I: Green coffee bean extract and its metabolites have a hypotensive effect in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Hypertension Research: Official Journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension. 2002, 25 (1): 99-107. 10.1291/hypres.25.99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Mackraj I, Ramesar S, Singh M, Govender T, Baijnath H, Singh R, Gathiram P: The in vivo effects of Tulbhagia violacea on blood pressure in a salt-sensitive rat model. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008, 117 (2): 263-269. 10.1016/j.jep.2008.01.040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Isaacson JS, Reid IA: Importance of endogenous angiotensin II in the cardiovascular responses to sympathetic stimulation in conscious rabbits. Circulation research. 1990, 66 (3): 662-671. 10.1161/01.RES.66.3.662.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hearse DJ, Sutherland FJ: Experimental models for the study of cardiovascular function and disease. Pharmacol Res. 2000, 41 (6): 597-603. 10.1006/phrs.1999.0651.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pende A, Dallegri F: Renin-angiotensin antagonists: therapeutic effects beyond blood pressure control?. Curr Pharm Des. 2012, 18 (7): 1011-1020. 10.2174/138161212799436575.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Bakris GL: Are There Effects of Renin–Angiotensin System Antagonists Beyond Blood Pressure Control?. Am J Cardiol. 2010, 105 (suppl): 21A-29A.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumagai K, Reid IA: Angiotensin II exerts differential actions on renal nerve activity and heart rate. Hypertension. 1994, 24 (4): 451-456. 10.1161/01.HYP.24.4.451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Averill DB: Neurochemical and peptidergic pathways of the baroreflex arc in the medulla oblongata: an introduction. Brain Res Bull. 2000, 51 (2): 103-105. 10.1016/S0361-9230(99)00236-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Averill DB, Diz DI: Angiotensin peptides and baroreflex control of sympathetic outflow: pathways and mechanisms of the medulla oblongata. Brain Res Bull. 2000, 51 (2): 119-128. 10.1016/S0361-9230(99)00237-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Diz DI, Garcia-Espinosa MA, Gallagher PE, Ganten D, Ferrario CM, Averill DB: Angiotensin-(1–7) and Baroreflex Function in Nucleus Tractus Solitarii of (mRen2) 27 Transgenic Rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2008, 51 (6): 542-548. 10.1097/FJC.0b013e3181734a54.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Hilzendeger AM, da Costa Goncalves AC, Plehm R, Diedrich A, Gross V, Pesquero JB, Bader M: Autonomic dysregulation in ob/ob mice is improved by inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme. J Mol Med. 2010, 88 (4): 383-390. 10.1007/s00109-009-0569-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Arnold AC, Shaltout HA, Gilliam-Davis S, Kock ND, Diz DI: Autonomic control of the heart is altered in Sprague–Dawley rats with spontaneous hydronephrosis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011, 300 (6): H2206-H2213. 10.1152/ajpheart.01263.2010.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Veerasingham SJ, Raizada MK: Brain renin-angiotensin system dysfunction in hypertension: recent advances and perspectives. Br J Pharmacol. 2003, 139 (2): 191-202. 10.1038/sj.bjp.0705262.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Toda N, Ayajiki K, Okamura T: Interaction of endothelial nitric oxide and angiotensin in the circulation. Pharmacol Rev. 2007, 59 (1): 54-87. 10.1124/pr.59.1.2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Skrbic R, Igic R: Seven decades of angiotensin (1939–2009). Peptides. 2009, 30 (10): 1945-1950. 10.1016/j.peptides.2009.07.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Marchesi C, Paradis P, Schiffrin EL: Role of the renin-angiotensin system in vascular inflammation. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2008, 29 (7): 367-374. 10.1016/j.tips.2008.05.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Ferrario CM: Role of angiotensin II in cardiovascular disease therapeutic implications of more than a century of research. Journal of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System: JRAAS. 2006, 7 (1): 3-14. 10.3317/jraas.2006.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Unger T: Stoppelhaar M: Rationale for Double Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockade. Am J Cardiol. 2007, 100 (3, Supplement 1): S2-S31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Kobori H, Nangaku M, Navar LG, Nishiyama A: The intrarenal renin-angiotensin system: from physiology to the pathobiology of hypertension and kidney disease. Pharmacol Rev. 2007, 59 (3): 251-287. 10.1124/pr.59.3.3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Fujiwara Y, Tanoue A, Tsujimoto G, Koshimizu TA: The roles of V1a vasopressin receptors in blood pressure homeostasis: a review of studies on V1a receptor knockout mice. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2011, 16 (1): 30-34. Epub 2011View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Shimizu F, Kasai T, Takamata A: Involvement of central angiotensin II type 1 receptors in LPS-induced systemic vasopressin release and blood pressure regulation in rats. J Appl Physiol(Bethesda, Md: 1985). 2009, 106 (6): 1943-1948. 10.1152/japplphysiol.90516.2008.Google Scholar
  37. Siragy HM: Angiotensin II compartmentalization within the kidney: effects of salt diet and blood pressure alterations. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2006, 15 (1): 50-53. 10.1097/01.mnh.0000196148.42460.4f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Navar LG, Harrison-Bernard LM, Imig JD, Wang CT, Cervenka L, Mitchell KD: Intrarenal angiotensin II generation and renal effects of AT1 receptor blockade. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN. 1999, 10 (Suppl 12): S266-S272.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Head GA: Role of AT1 receptors in the central control of sympathetic vasomotor function. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol Suppl. 1996, 3: S93-S98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/13/283/prepub

Copyright

© Mugabo and Raji; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement