Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Antihyperlipidemic and antiperoxidative effect of Diasulin, a polyherbal formulation in alloxan induced hyperglycemic rats

BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)20055:14

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-5-14

Received: 10 December 2004

Accepted: 22 June 2005

Published: 22 June 2005



This study was undertaken to investigation the effect of Diasulin, a poly herbal drug composed of ethanolic extract of ten medicinal plants on blood glucose, plasma insulin, tissue lipid profile, and lipidperoxidation in alloxan induced diabetes.


Ethanolic extract of Diasulin a, poly herbal drug was administered orally (200 mg/kg body weight) for 30 days. The different doses of Diasulin on blood glucose and plasma insulin in diabetic rats were studied and the levels of lipid peroxides [TBARS, and Hydroperoxide] and tissue lipids [cholesterol, triglyceride, phospholipides and free fatty acids] were also estimated in alloxan induced diabetic rats. The effects were compared with glibenclamide.


Treatment with Diasulin and glibenclamide resulted in a significant reduction of blood glucose and increase in plasma insulin. Diasulin also resulted in a significant decrease in tissue lipids and lipid peroxide formation. The effect produced by Diasulin was comparable with that of glibenclamide.


The decreased lipid peroxides and tissue lipids clearly showed the antihyperlipidemic and antiperoxidative effect of Diasulin apart from its antidiabetic effect.


Diabetes mellitus is syndrome, initially characterized by a loss of glucose homeostasis resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action both resulting impaired metabolism of glucose and other energy- yielding fuels such as lipids and protein [1]. Experimental diabetes in animals has provided considerable insight into the physiologic and biochemical derangement of the diabetic state. Many of the derangement have been characterized in hyperglycemic animals. Significant changes in lipid metabolism and structure also occur in diabetes [2]. In these cases the structural changes are clearly oxidative in nature and are associated with development of vascular disease in diabetes [3]. In diabetic rats, increased lipidperoxidation was also associated with hyperlipidemia [4]. Liver, an insulin dependent tissue that plays a pivotal role in glucose and lipid homeostasis and it is severely affected during diabetes [5]. Liver and kidney participates in the uptake, oxidation and metabolic conversion of free fatty acids, synthesis of cholesterol, phospholipids, and triglycerides. During diabetes, a profound alteration in the concentration and composition of lipids occurs.

Despite the great strides that have been made in the understanding and management of diabetes, the disease and disease related complications are increasing unabated [6]. Inspite of the presence of known antidiabetic medicine in the pharmaceutical market, remedies from medicinal plants are used with success to treat this disease [7]. Many traditional plant treatments for diabetes are used throughout the world. Plant drugs [8] and herbal formulation [911] are frequently considered to be less toxic and more free from side effects than synthetic one. Based on the WHO recommendations hypoglycemic agents of plant origin used in traditional medicine are important [12]. The attributed antihyperglycemic effects of these plants is due to their ability to restore the function of pancreatic tissues by causing an increase in insulin output or inhibit the intestinal absorption of glucose or to the facilitation of metabolites in insulin dependent processes. Hence treatment with herbal drugs has an effect on protecting β-cells and smoothing out fluctuation in glucose levels [13, 14]. In general, there is very little biological knowledge on the specific modes of action in the treatment of diabetes, but most of the plants have been found to contain substances like glycosides, alkaloids, terpenoids, flavonoids etc., that are frequently implicated as having antidiabetic effects [15]. In the traditional system of Indian medicine, plant formulation and combined extracts of plants are used as drug of choice rather than individual. Various herbal formulations such as diamed [16], coagent db [17] and hyponidd [18], are well known for their antidiabetic effects. Diasulin is a poly herbal drug composed of ten medicinal plants (Table 1), which are already reported for their antidiabetic activity. In our previous study, we have demonstrated the antidiabetic effect of Diasulin in alloxan diabetic rats [19]. The present investigation was undertaken to study the effect of the potential antidiabetic herbal formulation, Diasulin on lipidperoxidation and tissue lipid profile in alloxan diabetic rats. The effects produced by this drug on different parameters were compared with glibenclamide, a reference drug.
Table 1

Diasulin (Composition and concentration)

SI. No

Botanical name

Common name


Part used

Concentration (mg/dL)


Cassia auriculata

Tanner's cassia





Coccinia indica

Little gourd





Curcuma longa






Emblica officinalis

Indian gooseberry





Gymnema sylvestre

Ram's horn





Momordica charantia

Bitter gourd





Scoparia dulcis

Sweet broom weed


Whole Plant



Syzigium cumini






Tinospora cardifolia

Gulancha tinospora





Trigonella foenum graecum






Experimental animals

Male Wistar rats of body wt. 180–200 g were obtained from central Animal House, Raja Muthiah Medical College, Annamalai University. The animals were fed on standard pellet diet (Hindustan Lever, Mumbai, India) and water ad libitum. The rats used in the present study were maintained in accordance with guidelines of the National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Hyderbad, India and the study approved by the ethical committee (Vide No: 88, 2002).

Drug and chemicals

Ethanolic extract of ten medicinal plants, which are involved in preparation of Diasulin, was a gift from herbal remedies, Pondicherry, India.

The residual extracts of the antidiabetic plants were mixed and named as Diasulin was prepared (Table 1) on the basis of an ayurvedic antidiabetic formulation proposed by Pandey et al. (1995) [20]. 500 g of each plant (chopped into small pieces) was extracted individually were, soaked overnight in 1.5 litres of 95% ethanol. This suspension was filtered and the residue was resuspended in an equal volume of 95% ethanol for 48 h and filtered again. The two filtrates were pooled and the solvents were evaporated in a rotavapor at 40° – 50°C under reduced pressure and lyophilized. Alloxan monohydrate was purchased from BDH Chemicals, Poole, England. Enzyme linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) kit for insulin assay was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim, Germany. All other biochemicals used in this experiment were purchased from Sigma Chemical Company Inc., St Louis, Mo, and USA. The chemicals were analytical grade.

Drug administration

Diasulin was suspended in distilled water and administered orally through intragastric tube at the following doses of 50, 100 and 200-mg/kg body weight.

Experimental induction of diabetes in rats

The rats were injected intraperitoneally with alloxan monohydrate dissolved in sterile normal saline at a dose of 150 mg/kg body wt [21]. After 2 weeks, rats with moderate diabetes having glycosuria (indicated by Benedict's qualitative test) and hyperglycemia (i.e. with a blood glucose of 200–300 mg/dl) were used for the experiment.

Experimental design

In the experiment, a total of 42 rats (30 diabetic surviving rats, 12 normal rats) were used. The rats were divided into seven groups of six rats each after the induction of alloxan diabetes. Group1: Normal treated rats. Group2: Normal rats given aqueous solution of Diasulin (200 mg/kg body weight) daily using an intragastric tube for 30 days. Group 3: Diabetic control rats. Group 4: Diabetic rats given aqueous solution of Diasulin (50 mg /kg body weight) daily using an intragastric tube for 30 days. Group 5: Diabetic rats given aqueous solution of Diasulin (100 mg /kg body weight) daily using an intragastric tube for 30 days. Group 6: Diabetic rats given aqueous solution of Diasulin (200 mg /kg body weight) daily using an intragastric tube for 30 days. Group 7: Diabetic rats given aqueous solution of glibenclamide (600 μg/kg body weight) daily using an intragastric tube for 30 days.

At the end of 30 days, all the rats were killed by decapitation under pentobarbitone sodium (60 mg/kg) anaesthesia. Blood was collected in tubes containing potassium oxalate and sodium fluoride solution for the estimation of blood glucose and plasma was separated for the assay of insulin. Liver and kidney were immediately dissected out, washed in ice-cold saline to remove the blood. The tissues were weighed and 10% tissue homogenate was prepared with 0.025 M Tris – Hcl buffer, pH 7.5. After centrifugation at 200 rpm for 10 min, the clear supernatant was used to measure thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and hydroperoxides. For the determinations of lipids the liver and kidney tissues were weighed and lipids were extracted from tissues by the method of Folch et al [22] using chloroform – methanol mixture (CHCl3: MeOH)(2:1 v/v).

Biochemical analysis

Estimation of blood glucose and plasma insulin

Blood glucose was determined by the O-toluidine method [23]. Plasma insulin was assayed by ELISA, using Boeheringer- Mannheim Kit with a Boeheringer analyser ES300.

Estimation of lipid peroxidation

Lipid peroxidation in liver and kidney were estimated colorimetrically by thiobarbituric acid reactive substances TBARS and hydroperoxides by the method of Niehius and Samuelsson [24] and Jiang et al. [25], respectively. In brief, 0.1 ml of tissue homogenate (Tris-Hcl buffer, pH 7.5) was treated with 2 ml of (1:1:1 ratio) TBA-TCA-HCl reagent (thiobarbituric acid 0.37%, 0.25 N HCl and 15% TCA) and placed in water bath for 15 min, cooled. The absorbance of clear supernatant was measured against reference blank at 535 nm.

0.1 ml of tissue homogenate was treated with 0.9 ml of Fox reagent (88 mg butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), 7.6 mg xylenol orange and 9.8 mg ammonium ion sulphate were added to 90 ml of methanol and 10 ml 250 mM sulphuric acid) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The color developed was read at 560 nm colorimetrically. Hydroperoxides was expressed as mM/100 g tissue.

Estimation of lipids

Lipids were extracted from tissues by the method of Folch et al [22] using chloroform – methanol mixture (CHCl3: MeOH) (2:1 v/v). The total cholesterol was estimated by the method of zlatkis et al [26]. To 0.1 ml of the lipid extract, 9.9 ml of ferric chloride-acetic acid reagent was added and allowed to stand for 15 min and then centrifuged. To 5 ml of the supernatant, add 3 ml of Conc. H2So4. The colour developed was read after 20 min at 560 nm against a reagent blank. Values were expressed as mg/100 g tissue.

Triglycerides were estimated by the method of foster and Dunn [27]. To an aliquot of lipid extract, evaporated to dryness. 0.1 ml of methanol was added followed by 4 ml of isopropanol. 0.4 g of alumina was added to all the tubes and shaken well for 15 min. Centrifuged and then 2 ml of the supernatant was transferred to labeled tubes. The tubes were placed in a water bath at 65°C for 15 min for saponification after adding 0.6 ml of the saponification reagent followed by 0.5 ml of acetyl acetone reagent. After mixing, the tubes were kept in a water bath at 65°C for 1 h, the contents were cooled and absorbance was read at 420 nm. The triglyceride content was expressed as mg/100 g tissue.

Phospholipid content was determined by the method of Zilversmit et al [28]. To 0.1 ml of lipid extract, added 1 ml of 5 N H2SO4 and 1 ml of concentrated nitric acid and digested to a colourless solution. The phosphorus content in the extract was determined by the method of Fiske and Subba Row [29]. The values were expressed as g/100 g tissue.

Free fatty acids were estimated by the method of Falholt et al [30]. 0.1 ml of lipid extract was evaporated to dryness. 1 ml of phosphate buffer, 6 ml of extraction solvent and 2.5 ml of copper reagent were added. All the tubes were shaken vigorously. 200 mg of activated silicic acid was added and left aside for 30 min. The tubes were centrifuged and 3 ml of the copper layer was transferred to another tube containing 0.5 ml of diphenyl carbazide and mixed carefully. The absorbance was read at 550 nm immediately. The amount of free fatty acids was expressed as mg/100 g tissue.

Statistical analysis

The data for various biochemical parameters were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the group means were compared by Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT). Values were considered statistically significant when at p < 0.05 [31].


Table 2 shows the level of blood glucose and plasma insulin in control and experimental animals. There was a significant elevation in blood glucose level with significant decrease in plasma insulin levels in alloxan diabetic rats, compared with normal rats. Administration of Diasulin and glibenclamide tended to bring blood glucose and plasma insulin towards near normal levels. The effect of Diasulin at 200 mg /kg was significantly better than 50 and 100 mg/kg, therefore the higher dose was used for further biochemical studies. The administration of Diasulin and glibenclamide to normal rats showed a significant effect in lowering blood glucose and increasing plasma insulin.
Table 2

Changes in blood glucose and plasma insulin levels of control and experimental animals


fasting blood glucose (mg/dL)

Plasma insulin (μU / mL)


81.58 ± 2.40a

11.18 ± 0.74 a


81.58 ± 2.40a

11.18 ± 0.74 a

Diabetic control

265.00 ± 24.40b

3.55 ± 0.38 c

Diabetic + Diasulin (50 mg/kg)

210.80 ± 14.26c

5.61 ± 0.48d

Diabetic + Diasulin (100 mg/kg)

158.33 ± 11.00d

6.03 ± 0.41d

Diabetic + Diasulin (200 mg/kg)

104.16 ± 6.70e

7.05 ± 0.64e

Diabetic + Glibenclamide (600 μg/kg)

111.60 ± 9.86e

6.32 ± 0.55de

Values are given as mean ± S.D for 6 rats in each group.

Values not sharing a common superscript letter differ significantly at p < 0.05 (DMRT).

Duncan procedure, Range for the level 2.89, 3.03, 3.13, 3.20, 3.25.

Diabetic control was compared with normal, p < 0.001.

Experimental groups were compared with diabetic control, * p < 0.001.+ + +, > 2% sugar, ++; -2% sugar; +, -1%

Table 3 represents the concentration of TBARS and hydroperoxides in tissues of control and experimental animals. There was a significant elevation in tissue TBARS and hydroperoxides during diabetes, when compared to the corresponding control group. Administration of Diasulin and glibenclamide tends to bring the values to near normal.
Table 3

Changes in levels of Tbars and hydroperoxides in liver and kidney of control and experimental animals


TBARS (mM / 100 g tissue)

Hydro peroxide (mM / 100 g tissue)







0.73 ± 0.066a

0.845 ± 0.07a

71.42 ± 4.61a

53.56 ± 4.61a

Normal + Diasulin (200 mg/ kg)

0.72 ± 0.079a

0.785 ± 0.065a

69.63 ± 6.09a

52.40 ± 3.90a

Diabetic control

1.77 ± 0.06b

1.565 ± 0.105b

102.37 ± 6.41b

75.35 ± 4.46b

Diabetic + Diasulin (200 mg/kg)

0.88 ± 0.053c

0.970 ± 0.072c

78.56 ± 5.83c

61.89 ± 6.07c

Diabetic + Glibenclamide (600 μg/kg)

0.93 ± 0.088c

1.00 ± 0.086c

80.90 ± 5.32c

63.16 ± 6.30c

Values are given as mean ± S.D for 6 rats in each group.

Values not sharing a common superscript letter differ significantly at p < 0.05 (DMRT).

Duncan procedure, Range for the level 2.95, 3.09, 3.20.

Table 4 and 5 shows the levels of cholesterol, triglycerides, free fatty acids and phospholipids in liver and kidney of control and experimental rats respectively. Liver and kidney of diabetic rats showed significantly increased levels of cholesterol, triglycerides, free fatty acids and phospholipids, when compared with normal rats. In rats treated with Diasulin and glibenclamide there was a significant decrease in the content of cholesterol, triglycerides, free fatty acids and phospholipids in both the tissues, when compared with diabetic control rats.
Table 4

Changes in levels of cholesterol, free fatty acids, triglycerides and phospholipids in liver of control and experimental animals


Cholesterol (mg/100 g wet tissue)

Free fatty acids (mg/100 g wet tissue)

Triglycerides (mg/100 g wet tissue)

Phospholipids (mg/100 g wet tissue)


328.90 ± 18.90a

606.10 ± 21.76a

344.50 ± 23.20a

1598.00 ± 19.30a

Normal + Diasulin (200 mg/ kg)

321.25 ± 5.74a

601.93 ± 19.00a

341.10 ± 21.00a

1593.10 ± 24.10a

Diabetic control

517.33 ± 13.10b

921.60 ± 44.60b

622.50± 18.80b

1858.60 ± 18.70b

Diabetic + Diasulin (200 mg/kg)

421.75 ± 17.54c

769.16± 13.30c

456.25 ± 17.30c

1718.80 ± 14.40c

Diabetic + Glibenclamide(600 μg/kg)

445.00 ± 9.79c

802.80 ± 53.77c

530.80 ± 35.70d

1769.30 ± 17.60c

Values are given as mean ± S.D for 6 rats in each group.

Values not sharing a common superscript letter differ significantly at p < 0.05 (DMRT).

Duncan procedure, Range for the level 2.95, 3.09, 3.20.

Table 5

Changes in levels of cholesterol, free fatty acids, triglycerides and phospholipids in kidney of control and experimental animals


Cholesterol (mg/100 g wet tissue)

Free fatty acids (mg/100 g wet tissue)

Triglycerides (mg/100 g wet tissue)

Phospholipids (mg/100 g wet tissue)


375.90 ± 16.58a

434.01 ± 11.50a

282.50 ± 14.70a

1447.60 ± 26.90a

Normal + Diasulin (200 mg/ kg)

371.08 ± 8.28a

432.51 ± 11.60a

278.75 ± 14.60a

1442.50 ± 43.30a

Diabetic control

546.90 ± 23.80b

743.00 ± 25.70b

501.10 ± 34.10b

2041.50 ± 33.69b

Diabetic + Diasulin (200 mg/kg)

435.20 ± 12.18c

556.80 ± 38.50c

382.90 ± 9.28c

1684.00 ± 28.80c

Diabetic + Glibenclamide (600 μg/kg)

449.90 ± 13.49c

600.30 ± 33.40d

438.66 ± 39.30d

1819.30 ± 34.70d

Values are given as mean ± S.D for 6 rats in each group.

Values not sharing a common superscript letter differ significantly at p < 0.05 (DMRT).

Duncan procedure, Range for the level 2.95, 3.09, 3.20.


Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common chronic disease and is associated with hyperlipidemia and co-morbidities such as obesity, hypertension. Hyperlipidemia is a metabolic complications of both clinical and experimental diabetes [32]. Alloxan, a beta cytotoxin, induces "chemical diabetes" (alloxan diabetes) in a wide variety of animal species by damaging the insulin secreting pancreatic -cell, resulting in a decrease in endogenous insulin release, which paves the ways for the decreased utilization of glucose by the tissues [33]. In our study, we have observed that Diasulin decreases blood glucose in alloxan diabetic rats. The possible mechanism of action of extract could be correlated with the reminiscent effect of the hypoglycemic sulphonylureas that promote insulin secretion by closure of K+-ATP channels, membrane depolarization and stimulation of Ca2+ influx, an initial key step in insulin secretion. In this context, number of other plants has also been reported to have antihyperglycemic and insulin stimulatory effects [34, 35]. Like the plant extract, glibenclamide also produced significant reduction in blood glucose levels of alloxan diabetic rats. Since alloxan is known to destroy pancreatic β-cells, the present findings appear to be in consonance with the earlier suggestion of Jackson and Bressler [36] that sulphonylureas have extra- pancreatic antihyperglycemic mechanism of action secondary to their insulin secreting effect and the attendant glucose uptake into, and utilization by, the tissues.

Apart from the regulation of carbohydrate metabolism, insulin also plays an important role in the metabolism of lipids. Insulin is potent inhibitor of lipolysis. Since it inhibits the activity of the hormone sensitive lipases in adipose tissue and suppresses the release of free fatty acids [37]. During diabetes, enhanced activity of this enzyme increases lipolysis and releases more free fatty acids in to the circulation [38]. Increased fatty acids concentration also increases the β-oxidation of fatty acids, producing more acetyl CoA and cholesterol during diabetes.

In normal condition, insulin increases the receptor-mediated removal of LDL-cholesterol and decreased activity of insulin during diabetes causes hypercholestrolemia. Hypercholestrolemia and hypertriglycridemia have been reported to occur in diabetic rats [39]. The increased concentration of cholesterol could result in a relative molecular ordering of the residual phospholipids resulting in a decrease in membrane fluidity [40]. The increased concentration of free fatty acids in liver and kidney may be due to lipid breakdown and this may cause increased generation of NADPH, which results in the activation of NADPH dependent microsomal lipid peroxidation. Liver and kidney phospholipids were increased in diabetic control rats. Phospholipids is present in cell membrane and make up vast majority of the surface lipoprotein forming a lipid bilayer that acts as an interface with both polar plasma environment and non-polar lipoprotein of lipoprotein core [41]. Phospholipids are vital part of biomembrane rich in PUFA, which are susceptible substrate for free radicals such as O2 •- and OH radicals [42]. Increased phospholipids levels in tissues were reported by [43, 44] in streptozotocin diabetic rats. Administration of Diasulin decreased the levels of tissue free fatty acids and phospholipids.

Accumulation of triglycerides is one of the risk factors in Coronary Heart Disease (CHD). The significant increase in the level of triglycerides in liver and kidney of diabetic control rats may be due to the lack of insulin. Since under normal condition, insulin activates the enzyme lipoprotein lipase and hydrolysis triglycerides [45]. Diasulin reduces triglycerides in tissues of alloxan-induced diabetic rats and may prevent the progression of CHD.

The results show increased lipid peroxidation in the tissues (liver and kidney) of diabetic control group. Previous studies have reported that there was an increased lipid peroxidation in liver, kidney and brain of diabetic rats [46, 47]. This may be because the tissues contain relatively high concentration of easily peroxidizable fatty acids. Liver during diabetes, showed a relatively severe impairment in antioxidant capacity than kidney. The kidney exhibits a characteristic pattern of changes during diabetes [48]. The increase in oxygen free radicals in diabetes could be primarily due to increase in blood glucose levels, which upon autoxidation generate free radicals and secondarily due to the effects of diabetogenic agent alloxan [49]. In diabetes, hypoinsulinaemia increases the activity of the enzyme, fatty acyl coenzyme, coenzyme A oxidase, which initiates β-oxidation of fatty acids resulting in lipid peroxidation [50, 51] Increased lipid peroxidation impairs membrane functions by decreasing membrane fluidity, and changing the activity of membrane-bound enzymes [51]. Its products (lipid radicals and lipid peroxide) are harmful to the cells in the body and are associated with atherosclerosis and brain damage [51]. Administration of Diasulin and glibenclamide reduced the lipid peroxidative markers in liver and kidney tissues of diabetic rats. This indicates that Diasulin inhibit oxidative damage due to the antiperoxidative effect of ingredients present in Diasulin. This could be correlated with previous study that reported that Cassia auriculata [52, 53], Syzigium cumini [54, 55]Tinospora cardifolia [56], and Scoparia dulcis [57] (ingredients of Diasulin) have antiperoxidative and antihyperlipidemic effect of diabetic animals.

Antidiabetic and antihyperlipidemic effect of Diasulin may be due to the effect of active constituents of different plants, viz, alkaloid and pectins from Coccinia indica [58] alkaloids from Tinospora cordifolia [59], emlicanin A and B from Emblica officinalis [60], trigonelline and scopoltin from Trigonella foenum graecum [61], alkaloid-6-methoxybenzoxazolinone and terpenoids such as scoparic acids A,B,C and scopadulcic acid A and B from 'scoparia dulcis' [62], which may be responsible for scavenging free radicals liberated by alloxan in diabetic rats.

On the basis of above results, it could be concluded that Diasulin, a combination of ten herbal plants exert a significant antihyperlipidemic and antiperoxidative effect. This could be due to different types of active principles, each with a single or a diverse range of biological activities, which serves as a good adjuvant in the present armamentarium of antidiabetic drug.


The liver and kidney exhibits numerous morphological and functional alterations during diabetes. Since both diabetes and hyperlipidemia are considered to be major risk factors for the premature atherosclerosis and essentially all the cholesterol in atherosclerotic plaques is derived from that of circulatory cholesterol. The antihyperlipidemic and antiperoxidative effect of Diasulin in particular could be considered as of possible therapeutic value.


Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Annamalai University


  1. Scheen JA: Drug treatment of non- insulin dependent diabetes mellitus in the 1990s. Achievements and future development. Drug. 1997, 54: 355-368.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sochar M, Baquer NZ, Mclean P: Glucose under utilization in diabetes. Comparative studies on the changes in the activities of enzymes of glucose metabolism in rat kidney and liver. Mol Physiol. 1985, 7: 51-68.Google Scholar
  3. Baynes JW, Thrope SR: Role of oxidative stress in diabetic complications. Diabetes. 1999, 48: 1-4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Morel DW, Chisolm GM: Antioxidant treatment of diabetic rats inhibits lipoprotein oxidation and cytotoxicity. J Lipid Res. 1989, 30: 1827-1834.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Seifter S, England S: Energy metabolism. The Liver; Biology and Pathology. Edited by: Arias I, Papper M, Schacter D. 1982, New York, Reven Press, 219-249.Google Scholar
  6. Tiwari AK, Madhusudana Rao J: Diabetes mellitus and multiple therapeutic approaches of phytochemicals: Present status and future prospects. Curr Sci. 2002, 83: 30-38.Google Scholar
  7. Bhattaram VA, Ceraefe M, Kohlest C, Vest M, Deundorf H: Pharmacokinetics and bioavailabitlity of herbal medicinal products. Phytomed. 2002, 9: 1-36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Bailey CJ, Day C: Traditional treatments for diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1989, 12: 553-564.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mitra SK, Gopumadhavan S, Muralidhar TS, Anturlikar SD, Sujatha MB: Effect of a herbomineral preparation D-400 in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 1996, 54: 41-46. 10.1016/0378-8741(96)01439-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Annapurna A, Kanaka , Mahalakshmi D, Murali Krishna K: Antidiabetic activity of a polyherbal preparation (tincture of punchparna) in normal and diabetic rats. Indian J Exp Biol. 2001, 39: 500-502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bhattacharya SK, Satyan KS, Chakrbarti A: Effect of Trasina, an Ayurvedic herbal formulation, on pancreatic islet superoxide dismutase activity in hyperglycaemic rats. Indian J Exp Biol. 1997, 35: 297-299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. The WHO Expert Committee on Diabetes Mellitus. Technical Report Series 646, Geneva, and World Health Organisation. 1980
  13. Jia W, Gao WY, Xiao PG: Antidaibetic drugs of plant origin used in China: Composition, pharmacology and hypoglycemic mechanisms. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2003, 28: 108-113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Elder C: Ayurveda for diabetes mellitus: a review of the biomedical literature. Altern Ther Health Med. 2004, 10: 44-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Loew D, Kaszkin M: Approaching the problem of bioequivalence of Herbal Medicinal Products. Phytother Res. 2002, 16: 705-711. 10.1002/ptr.1248.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pari L, Ramakrishnan R, Venkateswaran S: Antihyperglycaemic effect of Diamed, an herbal formulation in experimental diabetes in rats. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2001, 53: 1139-1143. 10.1211/0022357011776397.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Pari L, Saravanan G: Antidiabetic effect of coagent db, a herbal drug in alloxan induced diabetes mellitus. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C. 2002, 131: 19-25. 10.1016/S1532-0456(01)00259-9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Subash Babu P, Prince PSM: Antihyperglycemic and antioxidant effect of hyponidd an ayurvedic herbomineral formulation in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2004, 56: 1435-1442. 10.1211/0022357044607.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pari L, Saravanan R: Antidiabetic effect of Diasulin, an herbal drug, on blood glucose, plasma insulin and hepatic enzymes of glucose metabolism in hyperglycemic rats. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2004, 6: 286-292. 10.1111/j.1462-8902.2004.0349.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pandey VN, Rajagopalan SS, Chowdhorry DP: An effective ayurvedic hypoglycemic formulation. J Res Ayur Sid. 1995, 16: 1-14.Google Scholar
  21. Katsumata K, Katsumata y, Ozawa T, Katsumata K: Potentiating effects of combined usage of three sulfonylurea drugs on the occurrence of alloxan diabetic rats. Horm Metab Res. 1999, 25: 125-126.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Folch J, Lees M, Solane SGH: A simple method for isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J Biol Chem. 1957, 226: 497-509.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Sasaki T, Matsy S, Sonae A: Effect of acetic acid concentration on the colour reaction in the O-toluidine boric acid method for blood glucose estimation. Rinshbokagaku. 1972, 1: 346-353.Google Scholar
  24. Niehius WG, Samuelsson D: Formation of Malondialdehyde from phospholipid arachidonate during microsomal lipidperoxidation. Eur J Biochem. 1968, 6: 126-130. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1968.tb00428.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Jiang ZY, Hunt JV, Wolft SD: Ferrous ion oxidation in the presence of xylenol orange for detection of lipid hydroperoxide in low density lipoprotein. Anal Biochem. 1992, 202: 384-389. 10.1016/0003-2697(92)90122-N.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zlatkis A, Zak B, Boyle GJ: A method for the determination of serum cholesterol. J Clin Med. 1953, 41: 486-492.Google Scholar
  27. Foster JB, Dunn RT: Stable reagents for determination of serum triglyceride by colorimetric condensation method. Clin Chim Acta. 1973, 19: 338-340.Google Scholar
  28. Zilversmit BB, Davis AK: Micro determination of plasma phospholipids by TCA precipitation. J Lab Clin Med. 1950, 35: 155-160.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fiske CH, Subbarow J: The colorimetric determination of Phosphorus. J Biol Chem. 1925, 66: 375-400.Google Scholar
  30. Falholt K, Falholt W, Lund B: An assay colorimetric method for routine determination of free fatty acids in plasma. Clin Chim Acta. 1973, 46: 105-111. 10.1016/0009-8981(73)90016-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Duncan BD: Multiple range test for correlated and heteroscedastic means. Biometrics. 1957, 13: 359-364.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Bierman EL, Amaral JAP, Balknap BH: hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 1975, 25: 509-515.Google Scholar
  33. Omamoto H, Ucgigata Y, Hiroskitckan : STZ and alloxan induces DNA strand breaks and poly (ADPribose) synthatase in pancreatic islets. Nature. 1981, 294: 284-286. 10.1038/294284a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Venkateswaran S, Pari L: Effect of Coccinia indica on blood glucose, insulin and hepatic key enzymes in experimental diabetes. Pharm Biol. 2002, 40: 165-170.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Latha M, Pari L: Antihyperglycaemic effect of Cassia auriculata in experimental diabetes and its effects on key metabolic enzymes involved in carbohydrate metabolism. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2003, 30: 38-43. 10.1046/j.1440-1681.2003.03785.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Jackson JE, Bressler R: Clinical pharmacology of sulphonylurea hypoglycemic agents: part 1. Drugs. 1981, 22: 211-245.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Loci AS, Shaabha M, Khazraji AL, Husain A, Twaija A: Hypoglycemic effect of a valuable extract of artemicisia herb Alba II. Effect of a valuable extract on some blood parameters in diabetic animals. J Ethnopharmacol. 1994, 43: 167-171. 10.1016/0378-8741(94)90038-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Agardh CD, Bjorgell P, Nilson EP: The effect of tolbutamide on lipoproteins, and lipoproteinlipase and hormone sensitive lipase. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1999, 46: 99-108. 10.1016/S0168-8227(99)00088-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Bopanna KN, Kannan J, Sushma G, Balaraman R, Rathod SP: Antidiabetic and antihyperlipidemic effect of neem seed, kernal powder on alloxan diabetic rabbits. Ind J Pharmacol. 1997, 29: 162-167.Google Scholar
  40. Dario G, Antonio C, Giuseppe P: Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Diabetes Care. 1996, 19: 257-267.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Cohn RM, Roth KS: Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism. Biochemistry and disease. 1996, Williams and Wilkins Publishers, Baltimore, 280-Google Scholar
  42. Ahmed M, Shikha HA, Sadhu SK, Rahman MT, Datta BK: Diuretic, and anti-inflammatory principle from Scoparia dulcis. Pharmazie. 2001, 56: 657-660.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Venkateswaran S, Pari L, Saravanan G: Effect of Phaseolus vulgaris on circulatory antioxidants and lipids in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Med Food. 2002, 5: 97-104. 10.1089/109662002760178186.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pari L, Amarnath satheesh M: Antidiabetic Effect of Boerhavia diffusa : Effect on Serum and Tissue Lipids in Experimental Diabetes. J Med Food. 2004, 7: 472-476. 10.1089/jmf.2004.7.472.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Frayn KN: Insulin resistance and lipid metabolism. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1993, 4: 197-204.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  46. Latha M, Pari L: Preventive effects of Cassia auriculata L. flowers on brain lipid peroxidation in rats treated with streptozotocin. Mol Cell Biochem. 2003, 243: 23-28. 10.1023/A:1021697311150.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Ananthan R, Latha M, Ramkumar KM, Pari L, Baskar C, Narmatha Bai V: Antidiabetic Effect of Gymnema montanum Leaves: Effect on lipid peroxidation induced Oxidative stress in experimental diabetes. Nutrition. 2004, 6: 379-386.Google Scholar
  48. Aragno M, Tamagno E, Gatto V, Brignardello E, Parola S, Danni O, Boccuzzi G: Dehydroepiandrosterone protects tissues of streptozotocin-treated rats against oxidative stress. Free Rad Biol Med. 1999, 26: 1467-1474. 10.1016/S0891-5849(99)00012-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Szkudelski T: The mechanism of alloxan and streptozotocin action in b cells of the rat pancreas. Physiol Res. 2001, 50: 536-546.Google Scholar
  50. Oberley LW: Free radicals and diabetes. Free Radic Biol Med. 1988, 5: 113-124. 10.1016/0891-5849(88)90036-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Baynes JW: Reactive oxygen in the aetiology and complications of diabetes. Drug, Diet and Disease, Mechanistic Approach to Diabetes. Edited by: Ioannides C, Flatt PR. 1995, Hertfordshive: Ellis Horwood limited, 2: 230-31.Google Scholar
  52. Pari L, Latha M: Antidiabetic activity of Cassia auriculata flowers: Effect on lipidperoxidation in streptozotocin diabeties rats. Pharm Biol. 2002, 40: 512-517.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Pari L, Latha M: Effect of Cassia auriculata flowers on blood sugar levels, serum and tissue lipids in Streptoszotocin diabetic rats. Sing Med J. 2002, 43: 617-621.Google Scholar
  54. Prince PSM, Menon VP: Hypoglycemic activity of Syzigium cumini seeds; effect on lipid peroxidation in alloxan diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmcol. 1998, 61: 1-7. 10.1016/S0378-8741(98)00002-6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Prince PSM, Kamalakkannan N, Menon VP: Antidiabetic and antihyperlipidaemic effect of alcoholic Syzigium cumini seeds in alloxan induced diabetic albino rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 91: 209-13. 10.1016/j.jep.2003.11.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Prince PSM, Menon VP, Gunasekaran G: Hypolipidimic action of Tinnospora coradifolia root extract in alloxan diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 1999, 14: 4-16.Google Scholar
  57. Latha M, Pari L: Modulatorry effect of Scoparia dulcis in oxidative stress-induced lipidperoxidation in streptozotocin diabetic rats. J Med Food. 2003, 6: 379-386. 10.1089/109662003772519958.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Hossain MZ, Shibib BA, Rahman R: Hypoglycemic effect of coccinia indica; inhibition if key gluconeogenic enzyme, glugose-6-phosphate. Indian J Biol. 1992, 30: 418-420.Google Scholar
  59. Prince PSM, Menon VP, Pari L: Antioxidant action of Tinosfora cordifolia root extract in alloxan diabetic rats. Phytother Res. 2002, 15: 213-218.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  60. Aruna Bhattacharya, chatterjee A, hosal S, Sail K: Antioxidant activity of active tannoid principles of Emblica officinalis (amala). Indian J Exp Biol. 1999, l37: 676-680.Google Scholar
  61. Jachak Sanja: Herbal drugs as antidiabetics. An overview. CRIPS. 2002, 3: 2-Google Scholar
  62. Pari L, Latha L: Protective role of scopari dulcis plant extract on brain antioxidant status and lipidperoxidation in STZ diabetic male wistar rats. BMC Compliment Altern Med. 2004, 4: 16-10.1186/1472-6882-4-16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  63. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Saravanan and Pari; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.