Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Banhabaekchulchunma-tang, a traditional herbal formula attenuates absolute ethanol-induced gastric injury by enhancing the antioxidant status

  • In-Sik Shin1,
  • Woo-Young Jeon1,
  • Hyeun-Kyoo Shin1,
  • Sin-Woo Cha2 and
  • Mee-Young Lee1Email author
BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)201313:170

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-13-170

Received: 5 April 2013

Accepted: 8 July 2013

Published: 12 July 2013



Banhabaekchulchunma-tang (hange-byakujutsu-tenma-to in Japanese and banxia-baizhu-tianma-tang in Chinese) is a mixture of fourteen herbs. It is used traditionally for the treatment of anemia, anorexia, general weakness, and female infertility in China, Japan, and Korea. In this study, we investigated the protective effects of a Banhabaekchulchunma-tang water extract (BCT) against ethanol-induced acute gastric injury in rats.


Gastric injury was induced by intragastric administration of 5 mL/kg body weight of absolute ethanol to each rat. The positive control group and the BCT group were given oral doses of omeprazole (50 mg/kg) or BCT (400 mg/kg), respectively, 2 h prior to the administration of absolute ethanol. The stomach of each animal was excised and examined for gastric mucosal lesions. To confirm the protective effects of BCT, we evaluated the degree of lipid peroxidation, the level of reduced glutathione (GSH), and the activities of the antioxidant enzymes catalase, glutathione-S-transferase, glutathione peroxidase, and glutathione reductase in the stomach. In addition, we conducted an acute toxicity study to evaluate the safety of BCT according to OECD guideline.


BCT reduced ethanol-induced hemorrhage, hyperemia, and loss of epithelial cell in the gastric mucosa. BCT reduced the increased lipid peroxidation associated with ethanol-induced acute gastric lesions, and increased the mucosal GSH content and the activities of antioxidant enzymes. In addition, BCT did not cause any adverse effects at up to 5000 mg/kg.


These results indicate that BCT protects the gastric mucosa against ethanol-induced gastric injury by increasing the antioxidant status. We suggest that BCT could be developed as an effective drug for the treatment of gastric injury caused by alcohol intake.


Banhabaekchulchunma-tang Herbal formula Ethanol Gastric injury Antioxidant


Oxidative stress is closely related to the pathogenesis of various diseases and it is postulated to play a crucial role in the development of gastric mucosal injuries induced by ethanol in rats [1]. Oxidative stress is induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by the xanthine-xanthine oxidase system and activated neutrophils, which leads to tissue lipid peroxidation. When combined with gastric secretions this leads to damage and cellular death, which can result in hemorrhage, erosion, ulcers, and loss of gastric mucosa [2]. To protect tissues from the damage induced by oxidative stress, cells contain antioxidant defense systems including catalase, glutathione (GSH), glutathione-S-transferase (GST), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione reductase (GR) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) [3]. The antioxidant defense system protects against the oxidative stress induced by ethanol intake by scavenging oxygen-derived free radicals directly or increasing levels of radical scavengers, such as sulfhydryl compounds [4]. Several researchers have investigated the effects of many herbal medicines in protection against ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injuries by focusing on increases in the antioxidant defense system. Indeed, previous studies have demonstrated such increases with several herbal medicines, such as Argyreia speciosa, Orthosiphon stamineus, Pithecellobium jiringa, and propolis [58].

Banhabaekchulchunma-tang (BCT) is a traditional polyherbal mixture that is used clinically in Asia as a remedy for hypertension and headaches [9]. Thus, several researchers have investigated the vasodilatory effects of BCT [911]. However, there have been evaluations of other pharmacological effects of BCT. The composition of BCT is as follows: Pinelliae Tuber, Citri Unshius Pericarpium, Hordei Fructus Germinatus, Atractylodis Rhizoma Alba, Massa Medicata Fermentata, Poria Sclerotium, Atractylodis Rhizoma, Gastrodiae Rhizoma, Gingen Radix, Astragali Radix, Alismatis Rhizoma, Zingiberis Rhizoma, Phellodendri Cortex, Zingiberis Rhizoma Crudus. The crude herbs also have anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and gastroprotective effects [1219]. Based on the properties of the individual herbs, we hypothesized that BCT may protect the gastric mucosa from oxidative stress induced by ethanol administration by enhancing the antioxidant system. Therefore, we evaluated the protective effect of BCT against ethanol-induced acute gastric injury in rats.


Preparation of BCT

The BCT was prepared in our laboratory (Table 1) from a mixture of chopped crude herbs. Befores performing the study, the identity of each crude herb was confirmed by Professor Je-Hyun Lee of Dongguk University (Cyeongju, Korea). BCT was extracted in distilled water at 100°C for 2 h. The solution was evaporated to dryness and freeze-dried (Extraction yield: 17.6%).
Table 1

Composition of BCT

Latin name

Amount (g)


Pinelliae tuber



Citri unshius pericarpium



Hordei fructus germinatus



Atractylodis rhizoma alba



Massa medicata fermentata



Poria sclerotium



Atractylodis rhizoma



Gastrodiae rhizoma



Ginseng radix



Astragali radix



Alismatis rhizoma



Zingiberis rhizoma



Phellodendri cortex



Zingiberis rhizoma crudus



Total amount



Acute toxicity study

Male and female five week old Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats were purchased from a specific pathogen-free facility at the Orient Bio Co. (Seoul, Korea) and were used after one week of quarantine and acclimatization. All animals were housed in a room maintained at 23 ± 3°C with a relative humidity of 50%, artificial lighting from 08:00 to 20:00 and with 10 to 20 air changes per hour. The animals were fed a commercial pellet diet (PMI Nutrition International, VA, USA) and sterilized tap water ad libitum following UV irradiation and filtration. The acute toxicity study was performed in compliance with the test guidelines of the Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA) under the Good Laboratory Practice Regulations for Nonclinical Laboratory Studies. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Korea Institute of Toxicology (accredited by AALAC International, 1998).

In the preliminary study, a single oral administration of BCT did not induce any toxic effects at a dose level up to 5,000 mg/kg. Based on this results, a dose of 5,000 mg/kg was selected as the limited dose, as recommended by OECD test guidelines. Ten rats from each sex were assigned randomly to two groups with five rats in each group, and the animals received a single 5,000 mg/kg dose by gavage. The vehicle control rats received an equivalent volume of distilled water. After oral administration, all abnormal clinical signs were recorded before and after dosing at least twice a day. The body weight was measured on the day of dosing (Day 1) immediately before treatment, and on Days 2, 4, 8, and 15. On the scheduled termination date (Day 15), all surviving animals were anesthetized using carbon dioxide and sacrificed by exsanguination from the aorta. Complete gross postmortem examinations were performed on all animals.

Ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injuries

Specific pathogen-free male SD rats that weighed 200–250 g (aged six weeks) were purchased from Deahan Biolink Co., Ltd. (Chungbuk, Korea) and used after one week of quarantine and acclimatization. The animals were kept in a room at 23 ± 3°C with a relative humidity of 50% under a controlled 12 h/12 h light/dark cycle. The rats were given standard rodent chow and sterilized tap water ad libitum. All experimental procedures were performed in compliance with the NIH Guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and the National Animal Welfare Law of Korea.

Acute gastric lesions were induced by intragastric administration of absolute ethanol, according to a previously described method [20]. Twenty eight rats were allocated to four groups and fasted for 18 h before the experiment. The rats in the control group were given phosphate buffered saline (PBS) orally (5 mL/kg body weight) and the absolute ethanol group (EtOH group) received absolute ethanol (5 mL/kg body weight) by oral gavage. Rats in the positive control group were given omeprazole (50 mg/kg body weight) by oral administration 2 h prior to the administration of absolute ethanol. Omeprazole was used as a positive control drug because it possesses anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities and has been used widely for the treatment of gastritis. The BCT dose was based on the preliminary study. In the preliminary study, BCT was administered to SD rats at dose levels of 200 and 400 mg/kg. A greater reduction in gastric mucosal lesions was detected in 400 mg/kg treated animals compared with 200 mg/kg treated animals during macroscopic examinations. The fourth group received BCT (400 mg/kg body weight) 2 h prior to absolute ethanol administration.

Gross gastric mucosa findings

Animals were sacrificed with an overdose of 50 mg/kg pentobarbital, which was administered 1 h after they received the absolute ethanol treatment. The stomach was removed from each animal, and opened along the greater curvature. The tissue was rinsed gently in PBS. The stomach was stretched out on a piece of cork with the mucosal surface facing upward and it was examined in the standard position for gastric mucosal lesions. Photographs of hemorrhagic erosions in the stomach were captured using Photometric Quantix digital camera. Quantitative analysis of gastric mucosal injury index was determined the representative photographs using an image analyzer (Molecular Devices, Inc., CA, USA). After the gastric lesions were photographed, the stomach tissue was stored at −70°C before biochemical analysis.

Biochemical analysis

The stomach tissue was cut into small pieces and homogenized (1/10 w/v) with tissue lysis/extraction reagent and a protease inhibitor (Sigma, MI, USA). The homogenates were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C to precipitate any cell debris and the supernatant was used to measure the levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), GSH, catalase, GST, GPx, and GR. The total protein was determined using a protein assay reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories).

Lipid peroxidation was estimated by determining the MDA content using a thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) assay kit (BioAssay Systems, CA, USA). In brief, a 100 μL aliquot of homogenate was mixed with 100 μL of 10% trichloroacetic acid and incubated for 15 min on ice. The mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min at 4°C and 200 μL of the supernatant was mixed with 200 μL of thiobarbituric acid and incubated at 100°C for 60 min. After the mixture cooled, the absorbance was measured at 535 nm. The results were expressed as nmol of MDA/mg protein. The levels of reduced GSH were measured using a GSH assay kit (Cayman, AnnArbor, MI, USA), which involved an optimized enzymatic recycling method and GR. The sulfhydryl group of GSH reacts with 5,5-ditho-bis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB) and produces yellow colored 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoic acid (TNB). A mixed disulfide, GSTNB (between GSH and TNB), is also produced that is reduced by GR to recycle GSH, thereby producing more TNB. The rate of TNB production is directly proportional to this recycling reaction which is in turn directly proportional to the concentration of GSH in the sample. The absorbance of TNB at 410 nm was used to estimate the amount of GSH in the sample. The GSH level was expressed as μmol/mg protein.

The GST activity was determined by measuring the conjugation of 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) with reduced GSH using a GST assay kit (Cayman). Conjugation is accompanied by an increase in the absorbance at 340 nm and the rate of increase is directly proportional to the GST activity in the sample. The GPx activity was measured indirectly via a coupled reaction with GR using a GPx assay kit (Cayman). Oxidized GSH, which is produced after the reduction of hydroperoxide by GPx, is recycled to its reduced state by GR and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH). The oxidation of NADPH to NADP+ is accompanied by a decrease in the absorbance at 340 nm. The GR activity was determined by measuring the rate of NADPH oxidation using a GR assay kit (Cayman). The oxidation of NADPH to NADP+ is accompanied by a decrease in the absorbance at 340 nm. The catalase activity was measured based on the peroxidatic function of catalase using a catalase assay kit (Cayman). This method is based on the reaction of the enzyme with methanol in the presence of an optimal concentration of hydrogen peroxide. The formaldehyde produced is measured colorimetrically at 540 nm with 4-amino-3-hydrazino-5-mercapto-1,24-triazole (Purpald) as the chromogen. The activities of catalase, GST, GPx, and GR, were expressed as U/mg protein.


The glandular surface of the stomach was examined histologically. Tissue samples were preserved in 10% buffered formalin and processed for paraffin block preparation. Sections that measured about 4 μm in thickness were cut and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The extent of gastric mucosal injury was evaluated using light microscopy by an experienced histologist who was blinded to the treatment regimen. The histopathological changes were assessed to previousely described criteria [21].

Statistical analysis

The data are expressed as means ± the standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical significance was determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA). If a test detected a significant difference between groups, the data were analyzed by a multiple comparisons procedure using Dunnett’s test. Statistical analyses were performed using SYSTAT version 10. The levels of significance were set as p < 0.05 and p < 0.01.


Acute toxicity study of BCT

We conducted an acute toxicity study of BCT to investigate the safety of oral BCT administration. There were no significant differences in the body weight changes of the control and BCT treatment groups for both genders (Figure 1). Throughout the study period, no treatment-related deaths or clinical signs were detected. In addition, BCT treatment did not cause any gross pathological findings in all groups at necropsy.
Figure 1

Body weight changes in animals treated with BCT at dose levels of 0 () and 2,000 mg/kg () in males and 0 (), and 2,000 (Δ) mg/kg in females. There were no significant differences in the body weights of the BCT treated and control groups.

Effects of BCT on ethanol-induced acute gastric injury

Gross examination of the gastric mucosa showed that the EtOH group had gastric mucosal injuries such as hemorrhage and hyperemia (Figure 2A), whereas no abnormalities or lesions were found in the normal control group. In contrast, the omeprazole treated group had attenuated gastric mucosal injuries compared with the EtOH group. The BCT treated group also had attenuated gastric injuries compared with the EtOH group and the omeprazole treated group. In quantitative analysis of gastric mucosal injury index, the BCT treated group also exhibited a significant reduction in gastic mucosal injury index compared with the EtOH group (Figure 2B). In the histopathological examinations, the EtOH group exhibited hemorrhages and the loss of gastric mucosa from the stomach tissue (Figure 3). By contrast, the omeprazole and BCT treated groups experienced reduced acute gastric damage induced by absolute ethanol, such as hemorrhages and loss of the gastric mucosa.
Figure 2

BCT attenuates gastric mucosa injury induced by absolute ethanol treatment. (A) Representative photographs of the gastric mucosa, (B) quantitative analysis for gastric mucosal injury. Absolute ethanol induced hemorrhages and hyperemia in the gastric mucosa. By contrast, BCT attenuated the gastric mucosal injury induced by absolute ethanol. In quantitative analysis, BCT reduced the elevated gastric injury index induced by absolute ethanol treatment. NC, normal control; EtOH, absolute ethanol treatment group; Ome, absolute ethanol + omeprazole (50 mg/kg); BCT, absolute ethanol + BCT (400 mg/kg). ##Significantly different at p < 0.01 compared with the control group, *Significantly different at p < 0.05 compared with the EtOH group.
Figure 3

Histopathology of the gastric mucosa. Absolute ethanol induced hemorrhagic and the loss of gastric epithelial cells (magnification: ×200). By contrast, BCT attenuated the gastric mucosal injuries induced by absolute ethanol.

Effects of BCT on lipid peroxidation and GSH in ethanol induced gastric mucosal injury

The concentration of MDA, an end product of lipid peroxidation, was greater in the EtOH group (13.3 ± 0.59 μmol/mg protein, p < 0.01) than the normal controls (10.1 ± 0.66 μmol/mg protein) (Figure 4A). The MDA level in BCT pretreated group significantly lower (9.7 ± 1.89 μmol/mg protein, p < 0.01) compared with the EtOH group. The omeprazole-treated group (8.73 ± 1.08 μmol/mg protein, p < 0.01) also had a significant reduction compared with the EtOH group.
Figure 4

BCT decreases the gastric MDA concentration and increases the GSH contents in gastric tissue. (A) MDA concentration, (B) GSH contents. Absolute ethanol-induced the elevated MDA and reduced GSH contents in gastric tissue. By contrast , BCT significantly reduced the MDA and increased GSH contents in gastric tissue. Each bar represents the mean ± SEM for six rats. ##Significantly different at p < 0.01 compared with the control group, **Significantly different at p < 0.01 compared with the EtOH group.

In contrast to the MDA results, the GSH content in the stomachs of the EtOH group (32.3 ± 0.45 μmol/mg protein, p < 0.01) was significantly lower than that in the control group (46.0 ± 0.92 μmol/mg protein), while that of the BCT pretreated group (38.5 ± 1.54 μmol/mg protein, p < 0.01) was higher than that of the EtOH group (Figure 4B).

Effects of BCT on antioxidant enzymes in ethanol induced gastric mucosal injury

As shown in Figure 5A, the catalase activity in the EtOH group (238.1 ± 11.46 U/mg protein, p < 0.01) was lower than that in the control group (326.2 ± 13.00 U/mg protein). However, the BCT treatment produced a significant increase (299.6 ± 19.75 U/mg protein, p < 0.05) in the catalase activity compared with the EtOH group. The omeprazole-treated group (287.9 ± 7.56 U/mg protein, p < 0.05) also exhibited a significantly increased catalase activity compared with the EtOH group. The GST (53.4 ± 2.40 U/mg protein, p < 0.01) and GPx activities (74.4 ± 2.99 U/mg protein, p < 0.01) increased markedly in the BCT-treated group compared with the EtOH group (40.9 ± 1.79 U/mg protein and 55.1 ± 1.97 U/mg protein in GST and GPx, respectively), as well as the catalase activity (Figure 5B and C). In addition, the GR activity in the BCT-treated group (70.5 ± 1.79 U/mg protein, p < 0.05) was higher than that in the EtOH group (56.0 ± 2.55 U/mg protein) (Figure 5D). The SOD activity increased to a greater extent in the BCT-treated group (28.7 ± 2.39 U/mg protein) compared with the EtOH group (22.8 ± 1.20 U/mg protein), but the difference was not significant (Figure 5E).
Figure 5

BCT enhances the activities of antioxidant enzymes in gastric tissue. (A) catalase, (B) GST, (C) GPx, (D) GR, (E) SOD. Absolute ethanol significantly reduced the activities of antioxidant enzymes, including catalase, GST, GPx GR and SOD in gastric tissue. However, administration of BCT markedly increased the activities of antioxidant enzymes. ##Significant difference at P < 0.01 compared with the control group, *,**Significantly different at p < 0.05 and < 0.01 compared with the EtOH group, respectively.


The gastric mucosa is exposed to various stimuli including ethanol, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, bacteria, and viruses. In particular, ethanol intake caused excessive oxidative stress, which induces gastric mucosal damage such as hemorrhage, edema, erosion, ulceration, and loss of epithelial cells. These features were consistent with the gastric lesions induced by absolute ethanol administration in this study. By contrast, the administration of BCT reduced the acute gastric injuries, decreased the MDA levels, and increased the levels of antioxidants including GSH, catalase, GST, GPx, GR, and SOD.

An acute gastric injury model induced by factors that play a role in gastric disorder etiopathogenesis was used to investigate the protective effects of novel materials [22, 23]. It is known that stress, alcohol, and steroidal/nonsteroidal inflammatory drugs are some of the factors that increase gastric injury including hemorrhage, erosion, and ulceration [24]. The roles of ROS in the pathogenesis of ethanol induced gastric injury have been demonstrated. ROS cause tissue damage and their levels are reduced by antioxidant defense systems including GSH, catalase, GPx, GR, SOD, and GST [2527]. These defense systems protect the stomach tissue from the increased ROS production induced by ethanol intake. The gastric injury induced by ethanol intake begins with the formation of lipid radicals in the cell membranes, which damages and destroys the cell membranes [25]. GSH is an endogenous antioxidant component and its activity is related to the thiol group of cysteine in its structure [24]. GSH reacts with peroxides and toxic oxygen radicals such as the hydroxyl ion and singlet oxygen to protect cells from injury [28]. In this study, administration of BCT exhibited a singfincant reduction in the MDA level, a lipid peroxidation product compared with the animals given ethanol (EtOH group). In contrast, the GSH levels were significantly decreased in the EtOH group compared with the normal control, whereas the BCT treated group had higher GSH levels than the EtOH group. These differences are compatible with previous studies [21, 27, 29].

The levels of enzymatic antioxidant defense components such as catalase, GST, GPx, GR, and SOD were decreased by ethanol intake. By contrast, administration of BCT increased the activities of antioxidant enzymes compared with the EtOH group. SOD is an important antioxidant enzyme that converts superoxide to hydrogen peroxide and oxygen [30]. Thus, it protects aginst the oxidative stress induced in cells and tissues by various stimuli. In addition, catalase catalyzes the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide to water and oxygen, which protects aginst damage to cells and tissues [31]. GST catalyzes the conjugation of GSH via a sulfhydryl group to the electrophilic centers of a wide variety of substrates [24]. These processes detoxify endogenous toxic materials such as peroxidized lipids. GPx is an enzyme with peroxidase activity, which reduces lipid hydroperoxides and free hydrogen peroxide to water [26]. GR is an important antioxidant enzyme that reduces glutathione disulfide to the sulfhydryl form of GSH [32]. Many previous studies have demonstrated that ethanol intake caused reductions in the antioxidant defense system and that several antioxidant materials protect the cells and tissue against toxic materials by enhancing the antioxidant defense system [21, 24, 29]. These reports agree with the results of the present study except for results of SOD. In this study, oral administration of absolute ethanol notably decreased the activities of antioxidant enzymes, but administration of BCT significantly elevated the activities of enzymes in gastric tissue. Although BCT did not significantly incrased SOD activity; however, the lack of an increase in SOD activity may reflect a lack of substrate for this enzyme [22]. Thus, our findings indicate that BCT administration can protect the gastric mucosa from ethanol induced injury by enhancing the antioxidant defense system. The protective effects of BCT were confirmed by gross pathological and histopathological examinations of stomach tissues. Ethanol-induced gastric lesions are characterized by hemorrhage, erosion, ulceration, and hyperemia. In our study, we observed gastric mucosal changes in animals treated with absolute ethanol, whereas the extent of the changes was reduced in animals treated with BCT and ethanol compared with animals treated with ethanol alone. Based on these observations, oral administration of BCT appears to attenuate ethanol-induced acute gastric injury.

In addition, we evaluated the safety of BCT in an acute toxicity study. BCT did not cause any adverse effects in animals at up to 5000 mg/kg. The information obtained from the acute toxicity study is useful for determining the safety of the test material to protect human health. Thus, our results indicate that BCT may be a very safe material.


BCT reduced the histopathological changes in stomach tissue induced by ethanol intake due to decreased lipid peroxidation and enhancement of the antioxidant defense system. These findings indicate that BCT can protect against ethanol induced gastric injury by enhancing the antioxidant defense system. We suggest that BCT may be a useful material for treating acute gastric injury.



This study was part of a project (The Evidence Based Medicine for Herbal Formula) funded by the Herbal Medicine EBM Research Center at the Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine.

Authors’ Affiliations

Basic Herbal Medicine Research Group, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine
Department of Nonclinical Studies, Korea Institute of Toxicology


  1. Hamaishi K, Kojima R, Ito M: Anti-ulcer effect of tea catechin in rats. Bio Pharm Bull. 2006, 29: 2206-2213. 10.1248/bpb.29.2206.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Rao CV, Vijayakumar M: Protective effect of (+)-catechin against gastric mucosal injury induced by ischaemia-reperfusion in rats. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2007, 59: 1103-1107. 10.1211/jpp.59.8.0007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Sener-Muratoglu GS, Paskaloglu K, Arbak S, Hurdag C, Ayanoglu-Dulger G: Protective effects of famotidine, omeprazole, and melatonin against acetylsalicylic acid-induced gastric damage in rats. Dig Dis Sci. 2001, 46: 318-30. 10.1023/A:1005652815921.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Silva MI, Moura BA, Neto MR, Tome Ada R, Rocha NF, de Carvalho AM, Macedo DS, Vasconcelos SM, de Sousa DP, Viana GS, de Sousa FC: Gastroprotective activity of isopulegol on experimentally induced gastric lesions in mice: investigation of possible mechanism of action. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2009, 380: 233-245. 10.1007/s00210-009-0429-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Liu CF, Lin CC, Lin MH, Lin YS, Lin SC: Cytoprotection by propolis ethanol extract of acute absolute ethanol-induced gastric mucosal lesions. Am J Chin Med. 2002, 30: 245-254. 10.1142/S0192415X02000387.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Yam MF, Ang LF, Salman M, Ameer OZ, Lim V, Ong LM, Ahmad M, Asmawil MZ, Basir R: Orthosiphon stamineus leaf extract protects against ethanol-induced gastropathy in rats. J Med Food. 2009, 12: 1089-1097. 10.1089/jmf.2008.0005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jaiswal SK, Rao CV, Sharma B, Mishra P, Das S, Dubey MK: Gastroprotective effect of standardized leaf extract from Argyreia speciosa on experimental gastric ulcers in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 137: 341-344. 10.1016/j.jep.2011.05.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Ibrahim IA, Qader SW, Abdulla MA, Nimir AR, Abdelwahab SI, Al-Bayaty FH: Effects of Pithecellobium jiringa ethanol extract against ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injuries in Sprague–Dawley rats. Molecules. 2012, 17: 2796-2811. 10.3390/molecules17032796.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Shin HM, Morgan KG: Vasodilation by banhabackchulchunmatang, a Chinese medicine, is associated with negative modulation of PKCα activation and NO production. Life Sci. 2003, 74: 723-732. 10.1016/j.lfs.2003.06.040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Maclean W, Lyttleton J: Phelgm Damp. Clinical handbook of internal medicine. 2002, Campbeltown, Australia: University of Western Sydney Macarthur, 548-551. 2Google Scholar
  11. Lee HJ, Seong YJ, Moon KJ, Kim JB, Kim GW, Shin HM: Enhanced vasorelaxation of banhabackchulchunma-tang and involved mechanism. Kor J Oreintal Physiol Pathol. 2005, 19: 1311-1316.Google Scholar
  12. Sakurai T, Sugawara H, Saito K, Kano Y: Effects of the acetylene compound from Atractylodes rhizome on experimental gastric ulcers induced by active oxygen species. Biol Pharm Bull. 1994, 17: 1364-1368. 10.1248/bpb.17.1364.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee YS, Han OK, Park CW, Yang CH, Jeon TW, Yoo WK, Kim SH, Kim HJ: Pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression and nitric oxide regulation of aqueous extracted Astragali radix in RAW 264.7 macropharge cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 100: 289-294. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.03.009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Li CQ, He LC, Jin JQ: Atractylenolide I and atractylenolide III inhibit lipopolysaccharide-induced TNF-alpha and NO production in macrophages. Phytoher Res. 2007, 21: 347-353. 10.1002/ptr.2040.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Rhyu DY, Kang KS, Sekiya M, Yokozawa T: Antioxidant effect of Wen-Pi-Tang and its component crude drugs on oxidative stress. Am J Chin Med. 2007, 35: 127-137. 10.1142/S0192415X07004680.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Yeo M, Kim DK, Cho SW, Hong HD: Ginseng, the root of Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer, protects enthanol-induced gastric damages in rat through the induction of cytoprotective heat-shock protein 27. Dig Dis Sci. 2008, 53: 606-613. 10.1007/s10620-007-9946-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hwang SM, Lee YJ, Kang DG, Lee HS: Anti-inflammatory effect of Gastrodia elata rhizome in human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Am J Chin Med. 2009, 37: 395-406. 10.1142/S0192415X09006916.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim YO, Kim HJ, Kim GS, Park HG, Lim SJ, Seong NS, Ham YW, Lee SD, Jang KH, Jung KH, Chung JH, Kang SA: Panax ginseng protects against global ischemia injury in rat hippocampus. J Med Food. 2009, 12: 71-76. 10.1089/jmf.2007.0614.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Rios JL: Chemical constituents and pharmacological properties of Poria cocos. Planta Med. 2011, 77: 681-691. 10.1055/s-0030-1270823.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Robert A, Nezamis JE, Lancaster C, Hanchar AJ: Cytoprotection by prostaglandins in rats. Prevention of gastric necrosis produced by alcohol, HCl, NaOH, hypertonic NaCl, and thermal injury. Gastroenterol. 1979, 77: 433-443.Google Scholar
  21. Lee MY, Shin IS, Jeon WY, Seo CS, Ha H, Huh JI, Shin HK: Protective effect of Bojungikki-tang, a traditional herbal formula, against alcohol-induced gastric injury in rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 142: 346-353. 10.1016/j.jep.2012.04.043.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bilici D, Suleyman H, Banoglu ZN, Kiziltunc A, Avci B, Ciftcioglu A, Bilici S: Melatonin prevents ethanol-induced gastric mucosal damage possibly due to its antioxidant effect. Dig Dis Sci. 2002, 47: 856-861. 10.1023/A:1014764705864.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jainu M, Devi CS: Gastroprotective action of Cissus quadrangularis extract against NSAID induced gastric ulcer: role of proinflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress. Chem Biol Interact. 2006, 161: 262-270. 10.1016/j.cbi.2006.04.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Cadirci E, Suleyman H, Aksoy H, Halici Z, Ozgen U, Koc A, Ozturk N: Effects of Onosma armeniacum root extract on ethanol-induced oxidative stress in stomach tissue of rats. Chem Biol Interact. 2007, 170: 40-48. 10.1016/j.cbi.2007.06.040.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Halliwell B, Aeschbach R, Loliger J, Aruoma OI: The characterization of antioxidants. Food Chem Toxicol. 1995, 33: 601-617. 10.1016/0278-6915(95)00024-V.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Zamora Rodriguez ZB, Conzalez Alvarez R, Guanche D, Merino N, Hemandez Rosales F, Menendez Cepero S, Alonso Gonzalez Y, Schulz S: Antioxidant mechanism in involved in the gastroprotective effects of ozonized sunflower oil in ethanol-induced ulcers in rats. Mediators Inflamm. 2007, 200 (7): 65873-Google Scholar
  27. Oyagi A, Ogawa K, Kakino M, Hara H: Protective effects of a gastrointestinal agent containing Korean red ginseng on gastric ulcer models in mice. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010, 10: 45-10.1186/1472-6882-10-45.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Vasanthkumar M, Parameswari RP, Vijaya Kumar V, Sangeetha MK, Gayathri V, Balaji Raghvendran H, Chamundeeswari D, Vasanthi HR: Anti-ulcer role of herbomineral Siddha drug – Thamira parpam on experimentally induced gastric mucosal damage in rats. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2010, 29: 161-173. 10.1177/0960327109357217.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lemos LM, Martins TB, Tanajura GH, Gazoni VF, Bonaldo J, Strada CL, Silva MG, Dall’oglio EL, de Sousa Junior PT, Martins DT: Evaluation of antiulcer activity of chrmanone fraction from Calophyllum brasiliesnse Camb. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012, 141: 432-439. 10.1016/j.jep.2012.03.006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Devi RS, Narayan S, Vani G, Shyamala Devi CS: Gastroprotective effect of Terminalia arjuna bark on diclofenac sodium induced gastric ulcer. Chem Biol Interact. 2007, 167: 71-83. 10.1016/j.cbi.2007.01.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Chelikani P, Fita I, Loewen PC: Diversity of structures and properties among catalases. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2004, 61: 192-208. 10.1007/s00018-003-3206-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Farias-Silva E, Cola M, Calvo TR, Barbastefano V, Ferreira AL, De Paula Michelatto D, de Almeida AC A, Hiruma-Lima CA, Vilegas W, Brito AR: Antioxidant activity of indigo and its preventive effect against ethanol-induced DNA damage in rat gastric mucosa. Planta Med. 2007, 73: 1241-1246. 10.1055/s-2007-981613.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Shin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.