|
Study
|
Database
|
Criterion 1
|
Criterion 2
|
Criterion 3
|
Criterion 4
|
Criterion 5
|
Criterion 6
|
Criterion 7
|
Criterion 8
|
Criterion 9
|
Criterion 10
|
Criterion 11
|
Criterion 12
|
Total Score
|
|---|
|
Alcantara & Leach 2015 [36]
|
MEDLINE
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
CT
|
Y
|
CT
|
N
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
9 / 12
|
|
Bussières et al. 2015 [37]
|
MEDLINE
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
N
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
11 / 12
|
|
Leach & Gillman 2011 [50]
|
CINAHL
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
12 / 12
|
|
Roecker et al. 2013 [53]
|
MEDLINE
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
CT
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
11 / 12
|
|
Schneider et al. 2015 [51]
|
MEDLINE
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
CT
|
Y
|
CT
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
10 / 12
|
|
Tilburt et al. 2009 [52]
|
Embase
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
12 / 12
|
|
Walker et al. 2013 [38]
|
MEDLINE
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
N
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
Y
|
11 / 12
|
- Legend:
- Criterion 1. Did the study address a clearly focused question/issue?
- Criterion 2. Is the research method (study design) appropriate for answering the research question?
- Criterion 3. Is the method of selection of the subjects (employees, teams, divisions, organisations) clearly described?
- Criterion 4. Did the sampling strategy avoid selection bias?
- Criterion 5. Was the sample of subjects representative with regard to the population to which the findings referred?
- Criterion 6. Was the sample size based on pre-study considerations of statistical power?
- Criterion 7. Was a satisfactory response rate (≻40%) achieved?
- Criterion 8. Are the measurements (questionnaires) likely to be valid and reliable?
- Criterion 9. Were appropriate statistical tests applied?
- Criterion 10. Are confidence intervals given for the main results?
- Criterion 11. Have the confounding factors been accounted for?
- Criterion 12. Can the results be applied to your organisation?
- Yes = Y; Cannot tell = CT; No = N
