Table 4 Mc, and Tm are compared to Tr and the aqueous extract is compared to ethanol extract when the model is fitted. Tr was more sensitive than Mc (p<0.002) and more sensitive than Tm (p<0.035) to the antifungal activity of C. gynandra. Comparing the aqueous extract and ethanol extract, there was no statistically significant difference in the effect of extract on fungal strains (p=0.8960). However, dilution had a strongly significant effect on the outcome (p<0.0001)
Parameter | Estimate | Standard Error | Wald Chi-Square | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mc | 3.16 | 1.03 | 9.38 | 0.002* |
Tm | 1.93 | 0.92 | 4.47 | 0.035* |
Aqueous extract | −0.10 | 0.72 | 0.02 | 0.896 |
Dilution | −57.11 | 14.32 | 15.90 | <0.0001* |