Peer Review reports
From: How might acupuncture work? A systematic review of physiologic rationales from clinical trials
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
29 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
30 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Howard Moffet |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
30 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
31 Mar 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Howard Moffet |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Mar 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
24 Apr 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Klaus Linde |
12 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Howard Moffet |
12 Jun 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vitaly Napadow |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
12 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
15 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Howard Moffet |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
15 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
16 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Howard Moffet |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
16 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
22 Jun 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Klaus Linde |
25 Jun 2006 | Author responded | Author comments - Howard Moffet |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
25 Jun 2006 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
30 Jun 2006 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Vitaly Napadow |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
Publishing | ||
7 Jul 2006 | Editorially accepted | |
7 Jul 2006 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-6-25 |
You can find further information about peer review here.