Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
27 Apr 2003 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 3 | |
3 Jun 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - - Tajuddin |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Jun 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
30 Jun 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Srinivas Nammi |
14 Jul 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Martin |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
6 Aug 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - - Tajuddin |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
6 Aug 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 8 | |
28 Aug 2003 | Author responded | Author comments - - Tajuddin |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
28 Aug 2003 | Submitted | Manuscript version 9 |
16 Sep 2003 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - William Martin |
Resubmission - Version 10 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 10 | |
Publishing | ||
20 Oct 2003 | Editorially accepted | |
20 Oct 2003 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-3-6 |
You can find further information about peer review here.