Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
6 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
6 Feb 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Nahin |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
6 Feb 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
1 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dan Cherkin |
4 Mar 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronny Bell |
30 Jul 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Nahin |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
30 Jul 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
14 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dan Cherkin |
23 Aug 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Ronny Bell |
3 Oct 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Richard Nahin |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
3 Oct 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
11 Oct 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
22 Oct 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-193 |
You can find further information about peer review here.