Skip to main content

Table 4 Estimated regression coefficients from separate mixed-effects regression models of physiological covariates over time

From: Association of lumbar spine stiffness and flexion-relaxation phenomenon with patient-reported outcomes in adults with chronic low back pain – a single-arm clinical trial investigating the effects of thrust spinal manipulation

Physiological variablesa

 

Est.

SE

p

Lumbar spine stiffness

 Palpatory

  GS (N/mm) at L3

Intercept

5.51

0.71

<0.001

Visit

−0.048

0.020

0.02

  GSV (N/mm)

Intercept

0.84

0.62

0.18

Visit

−0.036

0.018

0.04

  nGSV

Intercept

0.13

0.11

0.27

Visit

−0.003

0.003

0.29

 Hand-held

  GS (N/mm) at L3

Intercept

13.28

0.83

<0.001

Visit

−0.003

0.025

0.91

  GSV (N/mm)

Intercept

1.78

0.65

0.01

Visit

−0.014

0.019

0.47

  nGSV

Intercept

0.05

0.08

0.52

Visit

−0.002

0.002

0.47

 Automated

  GS (N/mm) at Ant.

Intercept

8.49

0.79

<0.001

Visit

0.006

0.022

0.78

 Flexion-relaxation ratio

  Flexion FRR

Intercept

16.42

2.45

<0.001

Visit

0.091

0.073

0.22

  Extension FRR

Intercept

41.65

5.20

<0.001

Visit

0.036

0.150

0.81

  Asymmetry in flexion FRR

Intercept

1.38

0.29

<0.001

Visit

−0.008

0.008

0.33

  Asymmetry in extension FRR

Intercept

1.70

0.30

<0.001

Visit

−0.001

0.009

0.89

  1. GS global stiffness, L3 the 3rd lumbar segment, Ant. the most anterior point of the lumbar curvature in a prone posture, GSV global stiffness variation among five lumbar segments, nGSV normalized global stiffness variation (unitless), FRR flexion-relaxation ratio (unitless) pooled together for both EMG acquisition systems, Est. estimated regression coefficients from corresponding regression models over 3 assessment time points (at baseline, after 2 weeks, and after 6 weeks), SE standard error
  2. aAll models adjusted for sex, age and BMI