Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
8 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
15 Aug 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudio Lima |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
15 Aug 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
9 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jackson Almeida |
22 Sep 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Waldecy Lucca Jr |
9 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudio Lima |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
9 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
9 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudio Lima |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
9 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
13 Nov 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudio Lima |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
13 Nov 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
28 Feb 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shao-Nong Chen |
10 Apr 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudio Lima |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
10 Apr 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
11 Apr 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shao-Nong Chen |
21 Jun 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Claudio Lima |
Resubmission - Version 8 | ||
21 Jun 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 8 |
5 Jul 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Shao-Nong Chen |
Resubmission - Version 9 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 9 | |
Publishing | ||
17 Jul 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
28 Jul 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-13-195 |
You can find further information about peer review here.