Skip to main content

Table 2 Effects of increasing age and different treatments on the body weights (g) of ICR mice

From: Characterization, evaluation of nutritional parameters of Radix isatidis protein and its antioxidant activity in D-galactose induced ageing mice

Group

Week

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Normal control

21.26 ± 1.18

26.60 ± 1.57

29.50 ± 1.02

32.32 ± 1.30

36.33 ± 1.25

38.34 ± 1.57

40.08 ± 1.60

42.77 ± 1.15

Model control

21.49 ± 1.24

26.59 ± 2.62

29.74 ± 1.28

32.40 ± 1.14

36.51 ± 1.32

35.68 ± 1.65d

35.04 ± 0.92d

34.19 ± 1.16d

Positive control

21.38 ± 1.05

26.77 ± 1.11

28.41 ± 1.67

32.33 ± 2.23

35.99 ± 2.62

36.54 ± 1.59ac

39.02 ± 2.39b

41.59 ± 2.92b

RIP (25 mg/kg)

21.26 ± 0.75

26.08 ± 1.43

27.67 ± 1.24ac

31.08 ± 1.57

33.86 ± 2.47ac

36.14 ± 2.42ac

38.00 ± 2.84bc

40.65 ± 1.25b

RIP (50 mg/kg)

21.56 ± 0.69

26.26 ± 0.85

30.85 ± 1.27

32.18 ± 0.84

35.54 ± 2.38

37.83 ± 2.89c

38.63 ± 3.06bc

40.12 ± 3.01b

RIP(100 mg/kg)

21.12 ± 1.43

26.82 ± 1.09

31.16 ± 1.24

33.73 ± 1.91

36.79 ± 1.57

37.81 ± 2.47c

38.27 ± 2.98bc

41.12 ± 2.16b

  1. Results are given as mean body weights ± standard deviation (S.D.) (n = 10) and evaluated by one-way ANOVA followed by the Duncan’s multiple-range tests. Differences were considered to be statistically significant if P < 0.05
  2. a P < 0.05, compared with model group
  3. b P < 0.01, compared with model group
  4. c P < 0.05, compared with normal group
  5. d P < 0.01, compared with normal group