Skip to main content

Table 2 Serum level of growth factors and relative expression levels of the genes at baseline of study and 8 weeks after the intervention in women with BBT who received BV supplementation (BV group) versus placebo juice consumers

From: The effects of Berberis vulgaris consumption on plasma levels of IGF-1, IGFBPs, PPAR-γ and the expression of angiogenic genes in women with benign breast disease: a randomized controlled clinical trial

  

Baseline (n = 80)

 

8-weeks follow-up (n = 80)

Absolute treatment effect

Relative treatment effects

Variable

n

Mean

S.D.

Pa

n

Mean

S.D.

Pa

Mean

95%CI

Pc

 

IGF-1d(ng/ml)

 Control

40

187.8

94.6

N/A

40

105.0

57.1

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1.00

BV

40

193.1

93.2

0.80

40

87.6

44.3

0.13b*

−6.0

[(−32.4)-20.3]

0.411

0.84

IGFBP1e(ng/ml)

 Control

40

7.8

9.8

N/A

40

11.2

11.5

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1.00

BV

40

5.9

5.8

0.30

40

9.5

13.3

0.55

−1.7

[(−5.12)-1.57]

0.295

1.03

IGFBP3f(ng/ml)

 Control

40

3454.3

937.8

N/A

38

1942.5

955.1

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

1.00

BV

40

3514.9

1127.7

0.79

40

2016.2

1215.7

0.76*

111.1

[(− 260)-480]

0.553

1.02

Relative gene expressions

n

Mean g

S.E.M.

Pa

n

Mean

S.E.M.

Pa

Mean

95%CI

Pc

 

PPAR-gamma

 Control

26

8.03

3.62

N/A

34

5.08

1.42

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A**

BV

33

0.72

0.37

0.05

33

4.27

3.58

0.83

−4.0

[(−10.74)-2.68]

0.233

N/A

Hif-1α

 Control

26

1.89

0.67

N/A

34

1.10

0.41

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

BV

27

1.41

0.47

0.56

23

0.54

0.19

0.23

−0.46

[(−1.80)-0.88]

0.495

N/A

VEGF

 Control

28

0.46

0.25

N/A

34

4.54

0.63

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

BV

37

5.85

2.87

0.07

23

1.90

0.62

0.68

3.52

[(−0.62)-7.66]

0.094

N/A

  1. All data are expressed in geometric mean ± standard deviation (S.D.) and also mean ± standard error of the mean (S.E.M.). N/A: not applied to this model. The number of samples (n) was accompanied with some missings in evaluation the relative expression levels (2**ΔCt) because of extra Cts (> 40)
  2. a Independent sample t-test was performed between group
  3. b Paired t-test was performed to compare within changes in intervention group during the study. * Statistical significant difference in within group analysis. **Variations caused not to calculate the relative treatment effects.c Repeated measure of ANOVA was carried out in the main effect of model.d Insulin-like growth factor binding protein (Log. transformed data was used in analysis).e Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1. f Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3. g Data are expressed based on the values analyzed in independent-sample t-test.f Relative expression levels was calculated based on 2 (−ΔCt). h Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma. i Hypoxia-inducible factors. j Vascular edothelial growth factor