Table 2 Traditional AHP Saaty weight method, and with conversion to consistency evaluation
Traditional AHP Saaty Scale | Converted to consistency evaluation | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Importance on scale | Definition | Consistency degree between CPG and Clinical Practice(%) | Score in the system |
1 | Compared to B, A is of equal importance | 50 | 1 |
3 | Compared to B, A is slightly more important | 62.5 | 3 |
5 | Compared to B, A is more important | 75 | 5 |
7 | Compared to B, A is much more important | 87.5 | 7 |
9 | Compared to B, A is extremely important | 100 | 9 |
2, 4, 6, 8 | Compared to B, A is important with an intermediate value between the two judgments | – | 2, 4, 6, 8 |
1/3 | Compared to A, B is slightly more important | 37.5 | 1/3 |
1/5 | Compared to A, B is more important | 25 | 1/5 |
1/7 | Compared to A, B is much more important | 12.5 | 1/7 |
1/9 | Compared to A, B is extremely important | 0 | 1/9 |
1/2,1/4,1/6,1/8 | Compared to A, B is important with intermediate values between the two judgments | – | 1/2,1/4,1/6,1/8 |