Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Inhibitory effect of purple rice husk extract on AFB1-induced micronucleus formation in rat liver through modulation of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine volume 19, Article number: 237 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Rice husk, a waste material produced during milling, contains numerous phytochemicals that may be sources of cancer chemopreventive agents. Various biological activities of white and colored rice husk have been reported. However, there are few comparative studies of the cancer chemopreventive effects of white and colored rice husk.

Methods

This study investigated the cancer chemopreventive activities of two different colors of rice husk using in vitro and in vivo models. A bacterial mutation assay using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100 was performed; enzyme induction activity in murine hepatoma cells was measured, and a liver micronucleus test was performed in male Wistar rats.

Results

The white rice husk (WRHE) and purple rice husk (PRHE) extracts were not mutagenic in Salmonella typhimurium TA98 or TA100 in the presence or absence of metabolic activation. However, the extracts exhibited antimutagenicity against aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and 2-amino-3,4 dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinolone (MeIQ) in a Salmonella mutation assay. The extracts also induced anticarcinogenic enzyme activity in a murine Hepa1c1c7 hepatoma cell line. Interestingly, PRHE but not WRHE exhibited antigenotoxicity in the rat liver micronucleus test. PRHE significantly decreased the number of micronucleated hepatocytes in AFB1-initiated rats. PRHE contained higher amounts of phenolic compounds and vitamin E than WRHE in both tocopherols and tocotrienols as well as polyphenol such as cyanidin-3-glucoside, protocatechuic acid and vanillic acid. Furthermore, PRHE increased CYP1A1 and 1A2 activities while decreasing CYP3A2 activity in the livers of AFB1-treated rats. PRHE also enhanced various detoxifying enzyme activities, including glutathione S-transferase, NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase and heme oxygenase.

Conclusions

PRHE showed potent cancer chemopreventive activity in a rat liver micronucleus assay through modulation of phase I and II xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes involved in AFB1 metabolism. Vitamin E and phenolic compounds may be candidate antimutagens in purple rice husk.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common cancer worldwide. The most prominent factors associated with HCC include hepatitis B and C viral infection, chronic and heavy alcohol consumption, and fungal toxin contamination. Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is a mycotoxin produced by Aspergillus species fungi; the toxin may possibly contaminate human foods. AFB1 is the most potent hepatocarcinogen in humans and animals; the toxin is capable of inducing mutations in specific vital genes in hepatocytes, leading to cancer initiation [1]. Xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes (XMEs) in the liver can either activate or detoxify environmental chemicals that are involved in the initiation stage of carcinogenesis [2]. The Salmonella mutation assay and micronucleus tests are the standard tests for detecting genotoxic carcinogens [3]. Among the micronucleus tests, the rat liver micronucleus assay is considered as a reliable test for genotoxicants, since the liver is a major source of XMEs [4]. Both bacterial mutation assays and micronucleus tests have been modified for assessing antigenotoxicity of natural products.

The usage of phytochemicals is one of the strategies for decreasing the incidence of various types of cancer. Numerous studies have shown that natural products, both the edible and inedible parts, can act as cancer chemopreventive agents [5]. The secondary metabolites in plants such as phenolic compounds, carotenoids, triterpenoids, alkaloids, and organosulfur compounds are synthesized to protect the plants from hazards in environment; these compounds are also beneficial to animals for preventing diseases. Cancer chemopreventive agents can be divided into two main groups categorized by their mode of action. The first, blocking agents, can inhibit DNA mutation and cancer initiation by modulation of either detoxifying enzymes or the DNA-repairing system. The second, suppressing agents, can delay the development of carcinogenesis by influencing cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis [6].

Rice husk, a waste product from the rice milling process, contains high amounts of phenolic compounds and displays greater biological activity than other parts of rice [7]. Numerous studies have found that rice husk presented antioxidant [7], anti-inflammatory [8] and anti-diabetic activities [9]. White rice husk presented antitumor activity on various cancer cells and inhibited the release of inflammatory cytokines [10, 11]. Since colored rice has become popular due to its beneficial effects on health, the use of colored rice husk waste has also increased. Our previous studies reported that the hydrophilic extracts of purple rice husk extracts presented antimutagenicity against several environmental mutagens in a bacterial model [12]. Moreover, the purple rice husk extracts showed anticlastogenicity against types of hepatocarcinogen-induced micronucleated hepatocyte formation through modulation of detoxifying enzymes [13, 14]. Some phenolic compounds, including anthocyanins, have been proposed to be the anticarcinogens involved; however, the non-phenolic compounds, including gamma-oryzanol and vitamin E, are also suggested as chemopreventive agents. Based on these observations, rice husk is considered as a source of phytochemicals that may exhibit protective activity against carcinogenesis.

At present, there are no reports comparing the chemopreventive properties of white and purple rice husk. Therefore, this study aimed to assess mutagenicity and antimutagenicity of white and purple rice husk extracts using a Salmonella mutation assay and a rat liver micronucleus test. The inhibitory mechanism of effective rice husk extract through xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme systems was also evaluated.

Methods

Chemicals and reagents

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and sodium azide (NaN3) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). 2-Amino-3,4 dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinolone (MeIQ), 2-aminoanthracene (2-AA) and 2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)-acrylamide (AF-2) were purchased from Wako Pure Chemicals (Osaka, Japan). Collagenase type IV and 4′-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) were obtained from Gibco/ Invitrogen Corp. (Carlsbad, USA). The phenolic acid, flavonoid and anthocyanin standards for chemical analysis were high performance liquid chromatography grade. All other chemicals were at least analytical grade.

Sample extraction

The husks of white rice (San-pah-tawng 1 variety) and purple rice (Kum Doisaket variety) were obtained from rice milling processes at the Mae Hia Agricultural Research Station, Chiang Mai University in August – November 2015. A Genetic stock number (G.S. No.) of San-pah-tawng 1 is 10,479 and deposit at Pathum Thani Rice Research Center, Rice Research and Development Division, Pathum Thani, Thailand. The G.S. Number of Kum Doisaket is under identification. One hundred grams of each rice husk variety were soaked in a liter of absolute methanol at room temperature for 3 days. After filtration using a vacuum pump, the remaining part was re-extracted following the same procedure. Pooled filtrates were concentrated under reduced pressure and vacuum dried to obtain white rice husk extract (WRHE) and purple rice husk extract (PRHE). The extracts were kept at − 20 °C for subsequent experiments.

Phytochemical contents analysis

Total phenolic compounds and flavonoid content of rice husk extracts were spectrophotometrically determined using the Folin-Ciocalteu technique and aluminium chloride colorimetric method, respectively [14].

The phenolic acids in rice husk extracts were analyzed using reverse-phase HPLC as modified from Chen et al. [15]. The assay conditions were carried out on a reverse-phase C18 column (Agilent 4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) and analyzed using an Agilent HPLC 1260. Gradient elution was done using 3% acetic acid in water and methanol eluents of different compounds. The flow rate and injected volume were 1 ml/min and 10 μl, respectively. The absorbances at 260, 280 and 320 nm were monitored. Phenolic acids contents were defined and calculated using calibration curves of gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, 4-hydroxybenzoic acid, chlorogenic acid, vanillic acid, syringic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, and ellagic acid. Flavonoid contents were analyzed using reverse-phase HPLC according to Engida et al. with minor modification [16]. The mobile phase consisted of 1% acetic acid in water (A) and 1% acetic acid in methanol (B). Catechin, epicatechin, rutin, quercetin, luteolin, and apigenin were used as the reference standards. The amounts of anthocyanins were analyzed using HPLC conditions as described previously [17]. The amounts of cyanidin-3-glucoside, cyanidin-3-rutinoside, peonidin-3-glucoside and malvidin-3-glucoside were measured using the calibration curves of these external standards.

The γ-oryzanol content in rice husk extracts was examined using a Halo column (0.21 mm × 150 mm, 0.27 μm) and a Hewlett Packard 1100. The mobile phase consisted of 0.5% acetic acid in acetonitrile, methanol and dichloromethane (45:40:15, v/v/v). The flow rate of isocratic elution was 0.1 ml/min, and detection was made at a wavelength of 325 nm [17]. The amount of vitamin E was assayed using a normal phase VertiSep™ UPS silica column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5.0 μm), and the mobile phase was composed of hexane, isopropanol, ethyl acetate and acetic acid (97.6: 0.8: 0.8: 0.8, v/v/v/v). The flow rate was 1.0 ml/min, and the analysis was performed at excitation and emission wavelengths of 294 and 326 nm, respectively. The tocopherols (α, β, γ and δ forms) and tocotrienols (α, γ and δ forms) were measured using the calibration curves of external standards [18].

Salmonella mutation assay

Mutagenicity and antimutagenicity tests were performed using Salmonella typhimurium TA98 and TA100 in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (±S9) according to Nilnumkhum et al. [13]. The bacterial tester strains were kindly supplied by Dr. Kei-ichi Sugiyama, National Institute of Health, Tokyo, Japan. The 2-AA and AF-2 were used as standard mutagens in the presence and absence of metabolic activation, respectively. The number of revertant colonies was expressed as the mutagenic index (the revertant colonies of the test compound divided by the number of spontaneous revertant colonies). If the mutagenic index was more than 2, the test sample was identified as a possible mutagen.

For the antimutagenicity test, AFB1 and MeIQ were used as positive mutagens in strains TA98 and TA100, respectively, in the presence of S9 mix. AF-2 and NaN3 were used as positive mutagens in strains TA98 and TA100, respectively, in the absence of S9 mix. The number of revertant colonies was counted by comparing with the specific positive control. The percentage of inhibition was calculated as described previously [19].

NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase (NQO) induction activity in a hepatoma cell line

The NQO-inducing activity was determined in murine hepatoma cells according to Insuan et al. [17]. Briefly, approximately 10,000 cells/well of Hepa1c1c7 cells (ATCC CRL-2026) were seeded onto 96-well plates in alpha minimal essential medium (α-MEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml), and incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24 h. The cells were treated with various concentrations of rice husk extracts (0–50 μg/ml) for 24 h. DMSO (0.4%) was used as a negative control, and β-naphthoflavone (0.05 μg/ml) was used as a positive control. Cell density was determined by crystal violet staining, and NQO activity was measured at 620 nm. The concentration required to double the specific activity (CD) value was used as a measure of inducer potency of rice husk extracts.

Genotoxicity and antigenotoxicity of rice husk extracts in rat liver

Male Wistar rats (50–70 g weight) were purchased from the National Laboratory Animal Center, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. Rats were maintained in controlled environments at a temperature of 25 ± 1 °C under a 12 h dark-light cycle and two rats per cage. Water and standard pellet diet were provided ad libitum. The treatment protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University (30/2558).

A rat liver micronucleus test was used to determine mutagenicity and antimutagenicity of rice husk extracts in rats. To determine the mutagenic effect of rice husk extracts, male Wistar rats were randomly divided into 5 groups as shown in Fig. 1a. Group 1 received 5% Tween 80 orally as a negative control group. Groups 2 and 3 were fed with WRHE, while groups 4 and 5 were fed with PRHE at concentrations of 50 and 500 mg/kg bw, respectively. These concentrations were 10 and 100 fold lower than of LD50 value of PRHE (unpublished data).

Fig. 1
figure 1

The protocols for (a) genotoxicity and (b) antigenotoxicity of rice husk extracts in rats

Full size image

Partial hepatectomy was performed to amplify mutated hepatocytes. The derived liver was used for xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme activities analysis. The operation was performed after anesthesia by 4% isoflurane mixed with oxygen inhalation in a closed system until rats were recumbent with loss of righting reflex. Then, anesthesia was rapidly transferred to a nose cone mask to maintain 2% isoflurane in oxygen. Four days after hepatectomy, rats were euthanized by 4% isoflurane mixed with oxygen inhalation in a closed system for at least 5 min at room temperature. Single hepatocytes were isolated via the 2-step collagenase perfusion method [14]. The hepatocytes were stained with DAPI and counted under a fluorescence microscope (× 400), at least 2000 hepatocytes per rat. The scoring criteria of micronucleus hepatocytes were round shape, distinctly stained the same as the main nucleus, and 1/4 lesser diameter than the main nucleus.

To investigate antimutagenicity of rice husk extracts, rats were randomly divided into 5 groups (Fig. 1b). Group 1 was orally fed with 5% Tween 80 as a positive control group. The various doses of WRHE and PRHE were administrated to groups 2–3 and groups 4–5, respectively. All rats were intraperitoneally injected with 200 μg/kg bw of AFB1 on days 21 and 25 to induce micronucleated hepatocyte formation. All rats were subjected to partial hepatectomy and liver perfusion. The hepatocytes were stained with DAPI and counted under a fluorescence microscope as described above.

Preparation of liver cytosolic and microsomal fractions

Rat liver from partial hepatectomy was homogenized in homogenizing buffer and centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was then centrifuged at 30,000 rpm for 60 min at 4 °C to obtain a clear supernatant and pellet as cytosolic and microsomal fractions, respectively. The protein concentration of each fraction was examined by the Lowry method using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a standard.

Determination of xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme activities in rat liver

The activities of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1, 1A2 and 3A2 were determined by methoxyresorufin-O-demethylation (MROD), ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylation (EROD) and erythromycin N-demethylation (ENDM) methods, respectively, according to Suwannakul, et al. [20]. The activities of CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 were measured with a spectrofluorometer at excitation and emission wavelengths of 520 and 590 nm, respectively, and were expressed as fmol/min/mg protein. The activity of CYP3A2 was measured at a wavelength 405 nm and was expressed as pmol/min/mg protein.

The activity of NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase (CPR) was investigated according to the rate of cytochrome c reduction as described by Punvittayagul et al. [21]. The activity was measured at 550 nm and was calculated using a molar coefficient of 21 mM− 1 cm− 1. The activity was expressed as units/mg protein.

The glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity was analyzed according to Sankam et al. [14]; 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene was used as a substrate, and the activity was recorded at 340 nm. The activity was calculated by using a molar coefficient of 9.6 M− 1 cm− 1 and was expressed as units/mg protein.

The UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) activity was determined according to Summart and Chewonarin with minor modification [22]; p-nitrophenol was used as a substrate. The activity was measured at an OD of 405 nm and was expressed as units/mg protein.

The NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase (NQO) activity was determined as described previously with minor modification [21]; 2,6 dichlorophenol-indophenol (DCPIP) was used as an electron acceptor. The reduction of DCPIP was measured at an OD of 600 nm and was calculated by using a molar coefficient of 2.1 × 104 M− 1 cm− 1. The activity was expressed as units/mg protein.

The activity of heme oxygenase (HO) was measured according to Punvittayagul et al. [21]. Hemin was used as a substrate. The enzyme activity was measured at ODs of 460 and 530 nm and was expressed as nmol/min/mg protein.

Statistical analysis

The results of the Salmonella mutation assay were expressed as mean ± SEM. The other data were given as mean ± SD. The significance of differences between groups was determined by one-way ANOVA, and P < 0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

Phytochemical contents of rice husk extracts

The phytochemical contents of rice husk extracts are shown in Table 1. Purple rice husk extract (PRHE) contained an approximately three fold higher content of total phenolic compounds, including flavonoids, than white rice husk extract (WRHE). The major phenolic acids in PRHE were vanillic acid, p-coumaric acid and protocatechuic acid, whereas p-coumaric acid and vanillic acid were the main phenolics found in WRHE. Moreover, anthocyanins, including cyanidin-3-glucoside and peonidin-3-glucoside, were only present in the PRHE. In addition, WRHE contained higher amounts of γ–oryzanol, while PRHE contained higher amounts of vitamin E. The major isoform of vitamin E in rice husk extracts was γ–tocotrienol. However, δ–tocotrienol was not detected in either rice husk extract.

Table 1 Chemical constituents in methanol extracts of rice husk
Full size table

Mutagenicity and antimutagenicity of rice husk extracts in the Salmonella mutation assay

WRHE and PRHE did not increase the number of revertant colonies in S. typhimurium TA98 or TA100 when compared with the negative control in both the presence and absence of metabolic activation. In addition, various concentrations of rice husk extracts ranging from 40 to 5000 μg/plate did not exhibit cytotoxicity to S. typhimurium (Additional file 1: Table S1). The results suggested that WRHE and PRHE were not mutagenic in the bacterial model.

The highest concentration of rice husk extract used in the antimutagenicity assay was a non-cytotoxic dose, 1000 μg/plate. In the presence of metabolic activation, WRHE and PRHE decreased the number of revertant colonies induced by AFB1 in S. typhimurium TA 98 and by MeIQ in S. typhimurium TA100 in a dose-dependent manner. The percentages of inhibition are shown in Fig. 2. However, rice husk extracts had a weak inhibitory effect on the direct mutagens AF-2 and NaN3 in the absence of metabolic activation (Additional file 1: Table S2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Antimutagenicity of rice husk extracts against (a) aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) and (b) 2-amino-3,4 dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoline (MeIQ) using the Salmonella mutation assay. Values expressed as mean ± SEM. WRHE: white rice husk extract; PRHE: purple rice husk extract

Full size image

NQO induction activity of rice husk extracts

Rice husk extracts showed a dose-dependent induction of NQO activity in Hepa1c1c7 cells (Fig. 3). The CD values (the concentration that induces doubling of NQO activity) of WRHE and PRHE were 19.63 ± 1.70 and 18.06 ± 2.41 μg/ml, respectively. The results indicated that rice husk extracts induced anticarcinogenic enzyme activity.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effect of rice husk extracts on NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase inducing activity in the Hepa1c1c7 hepatoma cell line. Values expressed as mean ± SD. WRHE: white rice husk extract; PRHE: purple rice husk extract

Full size image

Genotoxicity and antigenotoxicity of rice husk extracts in rat liver

The genotoxic and antigenotoxic effects of rice husk extracts are summarized in Table 2. The treatments of 50 and 500 mg/kg bw of WRHE and PRHE for 28 days did not increase the incidence of micronucleated hepatocytes, binucleated hepatocytes or the mitotic index when compared with the control group. These results demonstrated that rice husk extract was not genotoxic to rats.

Table 2 Genotoxicity and antigenotoxicity of rice husk extracts in rat liver
Full size table

We evaluated the antigenotoxic effects of rice husk extracts against AFB1-induced micronucleus formation in rat liver. AFB1 significantly increased the number of micronucleated hepatocytes, binucleated hepatocytes and mitotic cells compared to the negative control group. Interestingly, oral administration of 50 and 500 mg/kg bw of PRHE significantly diminished the number of micronucleated hepatocytes in AFB1-initiated rats with inhibition of 42.3 and 44.7%, respectively. WRHE slightly reduced the number of micronucleated hepatocytes induced by AFB1 but showed no significant difference when compared with the AFB1 treated group. These results suggested that PRHE was more efficient than WRHE in inhibiting genotoxicity induced by AFB1.

Effect of rice husk extracts on the activity of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in rat liver

Table 3 shows that the low dose (50 mg/kg bw) of PRHE significantly decreased the activity of CYP3A2, while the low dose of WRHE did not affect either phase I or II enzymes. In addition, the high dose (500 mg/kg bw) of WRHE significantly decreased the activity of CYP3A2, whereas the high dose of PRHE significantly enhanced CYP1A1 activity and decreased the activity of NQO. Neither WRHE nor PRHE influenced the activities of CYP1A2, CPR, GST, UGT or HO.

Table 3 Effect of rice husk extracts on xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme activities in the liver of rats
Full size table

PRHE at doses of 50 and 500 mg/kg bw inhibited micronucleated hepatocyte formation initiated by AFB1. The treatment with AFB1 alone significantly reduced the activities of CYP1A2 and HO but induced CPR, GST and NQO activities compared with the negative control. The low dose of PRHE significantly increased the activities of CYP1A1, CYP1A2, GST, NQO and HO compared with the AFB1 alone group. Moreover, high dose of PRHE significantly decreased CYP3A2 and increased HO activities in rat liver. However, neither AFB1 alone nor AFB1 combined with PRHE affected the activity of the UGT enzyme. The results are summarized in Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of purple rice husk extract on activities of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in the liver of AFB1-initiated rats. (a) phase I xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, (b) phase II xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes. Values expressed as mean ± SD, n = 6. AFB1: aflatoxin B1; PRHE: purple rice husk extract; CYP: cytochrome P450; CPR: cytochrome P450 reductase; GST: glutathione S-transferase; UGT: UDP-glucuronyltransferase; NQO: NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase; HO: heme oxygenase. * Significant difference from control group (p < 0.05). # Significant difference from AFB1-treated group (p < 0.05)

Full size image

Discussion

Prevention of DNA mutation is one of the chemopreventive approaches to reducing cancer incidence [6]. Not only anthocyanins but also some non-anthocyanin phenolic compounds and non-phenolic compounds have been identified as cancer chemopreventive agents. The Salmonella mutation assay and NQO induction assay were used as cancer chemoprevention screening methods of rice husk extracts. Results showed that both WRHE and PRHE suppressed AFB1- and MeIQ-induced mutagenesis in Salmonella. These mutagens need CYP450 to express their genotoxicity. The extracts also enhanced the activity of an anticarcinogenic enzyme, NAD(P)H-quinone oxidoreductase, in a murine hepatoma cell line. There was no significant difference between WRHE and PRHE in both in vitro assays. Therefore, we further determined the antimutagenicity of both rice husk extracts against AFB1 treated rats. PRHE (but not WRHE) exhibited antimutagenicity in the livers of AFB1-treated rats. This may indicate that the antigenotoxicity of the rice husk extracts depended on xenobiotic metabolism.

Phytochemicals are secondary metabolites such as phenolic acids, flavonoids, alkaloids and terpenoids that are produced by plants and that exhibit various biological and pharmacological activities [5]. In this study, the cancer chemopreventive activity of PRHE was stronger than that of WRHE. PRHE not only contained anthocyanins that gave the purple husk its dark color but also contained higher amounts of vitamin E and phenolic compounds. Several studies reported that tocopherols and tocotrienols could inhibit colon, prostate, mammary and lung tumorigenesis in animal models [23,24,25]. Phenolic compounds including anthocyanins have also been shown to possess antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities [26, 27]. Our previous study found that vanillic acid, which is a predominant phenolic acid in purple rice husk, presented antimutagenicity against AFB1-initiated rat hepatocarcinogenesis [13]. Vanillic acid has also exhibited anticancer activities against several cancer cell lines [28]. Moreover, some anthocyanins, including cyanidin-3-glucoside, decreased tumor numbers in azoxymethane-induced colon cancer [29]. This study also showed that protocatechuic acid, a major metabolite of anthocyanins, was present in colored rice husk but not in white rice husk. Protocatechuic acid inhibited cancer cell growth and exerted pro-apoptotic and anti-proliferative effects in different tissues [30]. Although γ-oryzanol exhibited cancer chemopreventive activity [23], the level found in WRHE, which was higher than in PRHE in this study, might not reach the antimutagenic dose for inhibiting micronucleus formation in the initiation stage of AFB1-induced hepatocarcinogenesis. Vitamin E was presumably one of lipophilic chemopreventive agents present in purple rice husk, while cyanidin and peonidin glucosides, protocatechuic acid and vanillic acid were the candidate hydrophilic antimutagens in purple rice husk.

AFB1, the most mutagenic and carcinogenic form of aflatoxin, is principally metabolized by CYP1A2 and 3A2 in the rat liver to form AFB1–8,9-epoxide. The epoxide can bind with guanine in DNA, resulting in AFB1-N7-guanine and AFB1-formamidopyrimidine. These adducts provoke DNA mutations, particularly in codons 12 and 13 of ras oncogenes, leading to hepatocellular carcinoma formation in rats [31]. AFB1 is also metabolized by several CYP families to hydroxylated metabolites such as AFM1 and AFQ1 that are less toxic. In this study, we found that the patterns of several phase I and II metabolizing enzyme activities differed from those observed in other studies of AFB1 metabolism [32, 33]. This may have been due to differences in the timing of AFB1 administration.

PRHE significantly decreased micronucleated hepatocyte formation initiated by AFB1 in rats. GST plays a major role in the detoxification pathway of AFB1, and we found that PRHE induced the activity of GST and other detoxifying enzymes, including NQO and HO. These effects could prevent the ultimate AFB1 accumulation and reduce either DNA or protein adduct formation. GST, NQO and HO are regulated by NF-E2 related factor 2 (Nrf-2), a transcription factor that is important in the maintenance of cellular antioxidant responses and xenobiotic metabolism [34]. It has been suggested that some phytochemicals in PRHE may up-regulate Nrf-2 expression, resulting in induction of detoxifying and antioxidant enzymes that contribute to AFB1 detoxification. Several studies have shown that phenolic acids, flavonoids and anthocyanins can activate the cellular antioxidant system via the Nrf-2 signaling pathway [35].

Miao et al. reported that the transcription of Nrf2-regulated genes is directly modulated by aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), which regulates transcription of CYP1A families [36]. This interaction represents a cross-talk between AhR and Nrf2 pathways, thereby contributing to more effective phase I and II enzyme activities. It is possible that PRHE affected these two pathways, resulting in increased activity of CYP1As and phase II enzymes. PRHE may protect against AFB1-induced mutagenesis in the rat liver through enhancement of the CYP1A family, which would accelerate production of epoxide and hydroxylated metabolites as the substrates for the further phase and induction of detoxifying and antioxidant enzymes to eliminate polar AFB1 metabolites. Nevertheless, the antimutagenicity of PRHE against AFB1 in the rat liver was not dose dependent, and the responses to xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes varied. Furthermore, both rice husk extracts scarcely altered hepatic metabolizing enzymes of rats in physiological conditions. It is possible that the phytochemicals in PRHE might present hormetic responses, with low doses protecting against cellular stress by induction of Nrf-2 and AhR downstream target genes, while high doses may contribute to triggering of initiated cell death [37].

Conclusions

Purple rice husk extract exhibited potent cancer chemopreventive properties using in vitro and in vivo assessment. It ameliorated AFB1-induced micronucleus formation in rat liver via modulation of some xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes involving in AFB1 metabolism. Vitamin E and phenolic compounds including anthocyanins might act as antimutagens in purple rice husk.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

2-AA:

2-aminoanthracene

AFB1 :

Aflatoxin B1

AhR:

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor

BNH:

Binucleated hepatocytes

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

CPR:

NADPH-cytochrome P450 reductase

CYP:

Cytochrome P450

DAPI:

4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole

DCPIP:

2,6-dichlorophenol-indolephenol

ENDM:

Erythromycin-N-demethylation

EROD:

Ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylation

FBS:

Fetal bovine serum

GST:

Glutathione S-transferase

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HO:

Heme oxygenase

HPLC:

High performance liquid chromatography

MNH:

Micronucleated hepatocytes

MROD:

Methoxyresorufin-O-demethylation

NQO:

NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreduxtase

Nrf-2:

NF-E2 related factor 2

PH:

Partial hepatectomy

PRHE:

Puple rice husk extract

UGT:

UDP-glucuronosyltransferase

WRHE:

White rice husk extract

XMEs:

Xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes

α – MEM:

alpha minimal essential medium

References

  1. Murphy PA, Hendrich S, Landgren C, Bryant CM. Food mycotoxins: an update. J Food Science. 2006;71:R51–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Omiecinski CJ, Vanden Heuvel JP, Perdew GH, Peters JM. Xenobiotic metabolism, disposition, and regulation by receptors: from biochemical phenomenon to predictors of major toxicities. Toxicol Sci. 2011;120:S49–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bajpayee M, Pandey AK, Parmar D, Dhawan A. Current status of short-term tests for evaluation of genotoxicity, mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity of environmental chemicals and NCEs. Toxicol Mech Meth. 2005;15:155–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Suzuki H, Shirotori T, Hayashi M. A liver micronucleus assay using young rats exposed to diethylnitrosamine: methodological establishment and evaluation. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;104:299–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neergheen VS, Bahorun T, Taylor EW, Jen L-S, Aruoma OI. Targeting specific cell signaling transduction pathways by dietary and medicinal phytochemicals in cancer chemoprevention. Toxicology. 2010;278:229–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. De Flora S, Ferguson LR. Overview of mechanisms of cancer chemopreventive agents. Mutat Res. 2005;591:8–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Butsat S, Siriamornpun S. Antioxidant capacities and phenolic compounds of the husk, bran and endosperm of Thai rice. Food Chem. 2010;119:606–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim SP, Yang JY, Kang MY, Park JC, Nam SH, Friedman M. Composition of liquid rice hull smoke and anti-inflammatory effects in mice. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:4570–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang JY, Kang MY, Nam SH, Friedman M. Antidiabetic effects of rice hull smoke extract in alloxan-induced diabetic mice. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60:87–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee SC, Chung I-M, Jin YJ, Song YS, Seo SY, Park BS, et al. Momilactone B, an allelochemical of rice hulls, induces apoptosis on human lymphoma cells (Jurkat) in a micromolar concentration. Nutr Cancer. 2008;60:542–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin C-M, Huang S-T, Liang Y-C, Lin M-S, Shih C-M, Chang Y-C, et al. Isovitexin suppresses lipopolysaccharide-mediated inducible nitric oxide synthase through inhibition of NF-kappa B in mouse macrophages. Planta Med. 2005;71:748–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Punvittayagul C, Sringarm K, Chaiyasut C, Wongpoomchai R. Mutagenicity and antimutagenicity of hydrophilic and lipophilic extracts of Thai northern purple rice. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:9517–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nilnumkhum A, Punvittayagul C, Chariyakornkul A, Wongpoomchai R. Effects of hydrophilic compounds in purple rice husk on AFB1-induced mutagenesis. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2017;13:171–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sankam P, Punvittayagul C, Sringam K, Chaiyasut C, Wongpoomchai R. Antimutagenicity and anticlastogenicity of glutinous purple rice hull using in vitro and in vivo testing systems. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2013;9:169–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen H, Zuo Y, Deng Y. Separation and determination of flavonoids and other phenolic compounds in cranberry juice by high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 2001;913:387–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Engida AM, Kasim NS, Tsigie YA, Ismadji S, Huynh LH, Ju Y-H. Extraction, identification and quantitative HPLC analysis of flavonoids from sarang semut (Myrmecodia pendan). Ind Crop Prod. 2013;41:392–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Insuan O, Chariyakornkul A, Rungrote Y, Wongpoomchai R. Antimutagenic and antioxidant activities of Thai rice brans. J Cancer Prev. 2017;22:89–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang S-H, Ng L-T. Quantification of tocopherols, tocotrienols, and γ-oryzanol contents and their distribution in some commercial rice varieties in Taiwan. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:11150–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Inboot W, Taya S, Chailungka A, Meepowpan P, Wongpoomchai R. Genotoxicity and antigenotoxicity of the methanol extract of Cleistocalyx nervosum var. paniala seed using a Salmonella mutation assay and rat liver micronucleus tests. Mol Cell Toxicol. 2012;8:19–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Suwannakul N, Punvittayagul C, Jarukamjorn K, Wongpoomchai R. Purple rice bran extract attenuates the aflatoxin B1-induced initiation stage of hepatocarcinogenesis by alteration of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:3371–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Punvittayagul P, Wongpoomchai R, Taya S, Pompimon W. Effect of pinocembrin isolated from Boesenbergia pandurata on xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes in rat liver. Drug Metab Lett. 2011;5:1–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Summart R, Chewonarin T. Purple rice extract supplemented diet reduces DMH- induced aberrant crypt foci in the rat colon by inhibition of bacterial β-glucuronidase. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:749–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Henderson AJ, Ollila CA, Kumar A, Borresen EC, Raina K, Agarwal R, et al. Chemopreventive properties of dietary rice bran: current status and future prospects. Adv Nutr. 2012;3:643–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ju J, Picinich SC, Yang Z, Zhao Y, Suh N, Kong A-N, et al. Cancer-preventive activities of tocopherols and tocotrienols. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:533–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu J, Lau EY-T, Chen J, Yong J, Tang KD, Lo J, et al. Polysaccharopeptide enhanced the anti-cancer effect of gamma-tocotrienol through activation of AMPK. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014;14:303–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Bowen-Forbes CS, Zhang Y, Nair MG. Anthocyanin content, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties of blackberry and raspberry fruits. J Food Comp Anal. 2010;23:554–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Masella R, Santangelo C, Archivio MD, LiVolti G, et al. Protocatechuic acid and human disease prevention: biological activities and molecular mechanisms. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19:2901–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Spilioti E, Jaakkola M, Tolonen T, Lipponen M, Virtanen V, Chinou I, et al. Phenolic acid composition, antiatherogenic and anticancer potential of honeys derived from various regions in Greece. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94860–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang L-S, Stoner GD. Anthocyanins and their role in cancer prevention. Cancer Lett. 2008;269:281–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Yip ECH, Chan ASL, Pang H, Tam YK, Wong YH. Protocatechuic acid induces cell death in HepG hepatocellular carcinoma cells through a c-Jun N-terminal kinase-dependent mechanism. Cell Biol Toxicol. 2006;22:293–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wild CP, Gong YY. Mycotoxins and human disease: a largely ignored global health issue. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31:71–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Farombi EO, Adepoju BF, Ola-Davies OE, Emerole GO. Chemoprevention of aflatoxin B1-induced genotoxicity and hepatic oxidative damage in rats by kolaviron, a natural bioflavonoid of Garcinia kola seeds. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2005;14:207–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Miyata M, Takano H, Q.Guo L, Nagata K, Yamazoe Y. Grapefruit juice intake dose not enhance but rather protects against aflatoxin B1-induced liver DNA damage through a reduction in hepatic CYP3A activity. Carcinogenesis. 2004;25:203–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Luna–López A, González-Puertos VY, López-Diazguerrero NE, Königsberg M. New considerations on hormetic response against oxidative stress. J Cell Commun Signal. 2014;8:323–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith RE, Tran K, Smith CC, McDonald M, Shejwalkar P, Hara K. The role of the Nrf2/ARE antioxidant system in preventing cardiovascular diseases. Diseases. 2016;4:34–53.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Miao W, Hu L, Scrivens PJ, Batist G. Transcriptional regulation of NF-E2 p45-related factor (NRF2)expression by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-xenobiotic response element signaling pathway: direct cross-talk between phase I and II drug-metabolizing enzymes. J Biol Chem. 2005;280:20340–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mattson MP. Hormesis and disease resistance: activation of cellular stress response pathways. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2008;27:155–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Faculty of Medicine Research Fund and Chiang Mai University and Functional Food Research Center for Well-being, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand for technical support and management. We would like to thank Dr. Dale E. Taneyhill for editing the manuscript for English.

Funding

1. This research was financially supported by National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) (2016/218666) for all experiments.

2. Graduate Student Supportive Fund, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University (2558–2561) provided Ph.D. scholarship for Arpamas Chariyakornkul.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand

    Arpamas Chariyakornkul & Rawiwan Wongpoomchai

  2. Research Affairs, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50100, Thailand

    Charatda Punvittayagul

  3. Functional Food Research Center for Well-being, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand

    Charatda Punvittayagul & Rawiwan Wongpoomchai

  4. Functional Food Research Unit, Science and Technology Research Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand

    Sirinya Taya

Authors
  1. Arpamas Chariyakornkul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Charatda Punvittayagul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sirinya Taya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rawiwan Wongpoomchai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RW participated in the design of the study, data interpretion and manuscript preparation. AC performed all experiments, data analysis, interpretion and manuscript preparation. CP and ST assisted in the rat liver micronucleus test. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

AC is a Ph.D. candidate, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University.

CP is a researcher at Research Affairs, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University.

ST is a researcher at Functional Food Research Unit, Science and Technology Research Institute, Chiang Mai University.

RW is an assistant professor at Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rawiwan Wongpoomchai.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This research was conducted following institutional and national guidelines. The animal experimental designs were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University (30/2558).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional file

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Mutagenicity of rice husk extracts in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100 in the absence and presence of metabolic activation. Values expressed as mean ± SEM. 2AA: 2-aminoanthracene; AF2: 2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide; WRHE: white rice husk extract; PRHE: purple rice husk extract. Table S2. Antimutagenicity of rice husk extracts in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98 and TA100 in the absence of metabolic activation. Values expressed as mean ± SEM. AF2: 2-(2-furyl)-3-(5-nitro-2-furyl)acrylamide; NaN3: sodium azide; WRHE: white rice husk extract; PRHE: purple rice husk extract. (DOCX 20 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chariyakornkul, A., Punvittayagul, C., Taya, S. et al. Inhibitory effect of purple rice husk extract on AFB1-induced micronucleus formation in rat liver through modulation of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes. BMC Complement Altern Med 19, 237 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2647-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-019-2647-9

Keywords

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us