Skip to main content

Table 4 Percentage of treatment options and rating scores associated with each treatment option

From: Alternative or complementary attitudes toward alternative and complementary medicines

Categorical variables (% per raws)

Strictly conventional (C)

Weak complementary (W)

Strong complementary (S)

Alternative

frequency of relapse

high

9.45

64.24

21.44

4.87

low

9.40

60.96

23.30

6.34

intensity of symptoms

high

9.48

64.79

20.88

4.84

low

9.37

60.40

23.86

6.37

type of illness

mental

10.23

61.54

21.58

6.65

somatic

8.62

63.65

23.16

4.56

education level

<  9 years

10.61

62.21

23.26

3.92

O level

8.44

62.42

24.51

4.63

A level

9.28

61.50

22.17

7.06

University and above

10.25

63.78

19.96

6.01

employment status

working

8.85

62.85

22.87

5.43

pupil / student

12.90

54.26

23.94

8.91

retired

9.40

65.27

18.69

6.64

unemployed

5.77

71.39

21.63

1.20

other

12.50

60.74

22.66

4.10

Linear variables

Strictly conventional (C)

Weak complementary (W)

Strong complementary (S)

Alternative

distress

M

5.19

5.50

5.18

4.39

(range 1–7)

SD

(1.30)

(1.25)

(1.36)

(1.49)

treatability

M

2.85

2.92

2.78

2.14

(range 1–5)

SD

(0.73)

(0.67)

(0.69)

(0.75)

social stigma

M

2.44

2.38

2.25

2.15

(range 1–5)

SD

(0.92)

(0.90)

(0.93)

(0.89)

belief in efficacy of

M

1.63

2.04

2.48

2.40

complementary treatments (range 1–5)

SD

(0.67)

(0.66)

(0.66)

(0.86)

belief in efficacy of

M

3.12

3.27

3.01

2.32

conventional treatments (range 1–5)

SD

(0.74)

(0.61)

(0.67)

(0.92)