Skip to main content

Table 3 Details of the treatment options selected by the participants by type of illness

From: Alternative or complementary attitudes toward alternative and complementary medicines

Treatment options selected in participants with

All illnesses

Mental illnesses

Somatic illnesses

N

(%)

N

(%)

N

(%)

Single choice options

1- Strictly conventional

43

(10.2)

65

(11.2)

49

(8.7)

2- Weak complementary

319

(75.8)

402

(69.3)

408

(72.1)

3- Strong complementary

50

(11.9)

83

(14.3)

93

(16.6)

4- Alternative

9

(2.1)

30

(5.2)

15

(2.7)

Total

421

(100.0)

580

(100.0)

565

(100.0)

Two choice options

1 + 2

51

(12.9)

37

(13.1)

44

(14.2)

1 + 3

1

(0.3)

1

(0.4)

3

(1.0)

1 + 4

6

(1.5)

5

(1.8)

7

(2.3)

2 + 3

291

(73.5)

200

(70.9)

214

(68.8)

2 + 4

33

(8.3)

21

(7.5)

27

(8.7)

3 + 4

14

(3.5)

18

(6.4)

16

(5.1)

Total

396

(100.0)

282

(100.0)

311

(100.0)

Three choice options

1 + 2 + 3

11

(14.1)

5

(14.3)

6

(26.1)

1 + 2 + 4

22

(28.2)

7

(20.0)

5

(21.7)

1 + 3 + 4

2

(2.6)

1

(2.9)

0

(0.0)

2 + 3 + 4

43

(55.1)

22

(62.9)

12

(52.2)

Total

78

(100.0)

35

(100.0)

23

(100.0)

All combinations including

Strictly conventional

97

(20.3)

58

(18.2)

65

(19.5)

Weak complementary

455

(95.2)

294

(92.2)

308

(92.2)

Strong complementary

366

(76.6)

249

(78.1)

251

(75.2)

Alternative

124

(25.9)

76

(23.8)

67

(20.1)

  1. Note: N indicate the number of participants who selected the distinct presented options/combinations of treatment. This number refers to all clinical vignettes (column All illnesses), to mental illnesses only (column Mental illnesses) or to somatic illnesses only (column Somatic illnesses)
  2. The lower part of the table indicates the total number of participants that selected combinations of treatment including one of the existing options (either strictly conventional, weak complementary, strong complementary and alternative) at least once