Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A critical integrative review of complementary medicine education research: key issues and empirical gaps

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
14 Feb 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
20 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Alastair Gray
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lezleyanne Hanna
7 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Adam Burke
7 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Alastair Gray
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Nov 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lezleyanne Hanna
19 Feb 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sa'ed Zyoud
24 Feb 2019 Author responded Author comments - Alastair Gray
Resubmission - Version 4
24 Feb 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Feb 2019 Editorially accepted
20 Mar 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12906-019-2466-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement