Skip to main content

Table 2 Participants in GP focus groups

From: ‘Trying to put a square peg into a round hole’: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals’ views of integrating complementary medicine into primary care for musculoskeletal and mental health comorbidity

Code

Attitude to CAMa

CAM practitioner?

Deprivation in practice area (as reported by the GP)

Ethnicity

Practice location

A1

Neutral

No

Average

White

Semi-rural

A2

In favour

No

Deprived

Mixed race (Asian/Caucasian)

Urban

A3

Neutral but open

Yes, anthroposophic medicine

Mixed

Non-White

Urban

A4

In favour

Yes, acupuncture (British Medical Acupuncture Society, BMAS)

Deprived

White

Urban

A5

In favour

Previously (acupuncture, homeopathy)

Average

White

Semi-rural/ suburban

A6

Opposed to NHS funded CAM

No

Fairly deprived

White

Urban

A7

Mixed (depends on therapy)

Yes, acupuncture (BMAS)

Not deprived

White

Urban

A8

In favour

No

Not deprived

White

Semi urban

A9

Mixed (depends on therapy, payment etc)

No

Some deprivation

White

Urban

A10

In favour

No

Students

White

Urban

B1

Previously sceptical, becoming more open

No (acupuncture provided at surgery)

Deprived

White

Rural

B2

Neutral

No

Data missing

White

Locum

B3

Sceptical

No

Locum

White

Variety

B4

Open-minded but depends on the evidence

No (acupuncture provided at surgery)

Lower deprivation

Non-White

Suburban

B5

Data missing

No

Mixed

White

Data missing

B6

Data missing

Yes, acupuncture

Data missing

Data missing

Data missing

C1

Neutral

No

Affluent

White

Rural/urban

C2

In favour (if evidence-based)

No

Pockets of deprivation

White

Semi-rural

C4

Sceptical/neutral

No

Deprived

White

Urban

C5

Sceptical (but open to persuasion)

No

Mixed

White

Urban

  1. aThis is the respondent’s response to asking in an email “We are hoping that the focus groups comprise people with a diversity of opinion - would you say in general you are in favour of CAM, opposed to CAM or simply neutral?”