Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: ‘Trying to put a square peg into a round hole’: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals’ views of integrating complementary medicine into primary care for musculoskeletal and mental health comorbidity

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Apr 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Jun 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Isabelle Gaboury
13 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hyun-Ju Seo
6 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Deborah Sharp
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Aug 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hyun-Ju Seo
18 Sep 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Cherkin
25 Sep 2018 Author responded Author comments - Deborah Sharp
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Sep 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Oct 2018 Author responded Author comments - Deborah Sharp
Resubmission - Version 4
5 Oct 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
9 Oct 2018 Editorially accepted
29 Oct 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12906-018-2349-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement