Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparison of the main components and bioactivity of Rhus verniciflua Stokes extracts by different detoxification processing methods

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Feb 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mokrish Ajat
21 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irfan A. Rather
28 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nenad Vukovic
31 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmed Abdel Moneim
27 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Seon-Ok Lee
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Irfan A. Rather
12 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nenad Vukovic
18 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ahmed Abdel Moneim
11 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Seon-Ok Lee
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Seon-Ok Lee
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
10 Aug 2018 Author responded Author comments - Seon-Ok Lee
Resubmission - Version 5
10 Aug 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
22 Aug 2018 Editorially accepted
30 Aug 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12906-018-2310-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement