Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An assessment of the use of complementary and alternative medicine by Korean people using an adapted version of the standardized international questionnaire (I-CAM-QK): a cross-sectional study of an internet survey

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Mar 2018 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ju Ah Lee
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrian Liem
3 May 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sara Quandt
15 Jun 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ju Ah Lee
Resubmission - Version 3
15 Jun 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrian Liem
5 Jul 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sara Quandt
18 Jul 2018 Author responded Author comments - Ju Ah Lee
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Jul 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Jul 2018 Editorially accepted
13 Aug 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12906-018-2294-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement