Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Antioxidant and anticancer activities of Trigonella foenum-graecum, Cassia acutifolia and Rhazya stricta

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine201818:240

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-018-2285-7

  • Received: 28 March 2018
  • Accepted: 11 July 2018
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Here, we determined in vitro antioxidant activity, total phenols and flavonoids and evaluated antiproliferative activity of three medicinal plant extracts: Trigonella foenum-graecum (Fenugreek), Cassia acutifolia (Senna) and Rhazya stricta (Harmal).

Methods

The leaves of the three medicinal plants were extracted with 70% ethanol. Antioxidant activities of the extracts were determined by using DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) assay. Total flavonoid and phenolic contents were determined using colorimetric assays. MTT assay was used to estimate the antiproliferative activities of the extracts against human hepatoma (HepG2) cancer cell line. In addition, the effects of R. stricta extract on cell cycle, colony formation, and wound healing of HepG2 cells and tube formation of HUVEC cells were assessed.

Results

Percentage inhibition of DPPH scavenging activity were dose-dependent and ranged between (89.9% ± 0.51) and (28.6% ± 2.07). Phenolic contents ranged between (11.5 ± 0.013) and (9.7 ± 0.008) mg GAE/g while flavonoid content ranged between (20.8 ± 0.40) and (0.12 ± 0.0.01) mg QE/g. Antiproliferative results of the extracts were found to be consistent with their antioxidant activity. Among the extracts evaluated, that of R. stricta showed the best antioxidant, antiproliferative and antimetastatic activities at low concentration. It also inhibited the colony-formation capacity of HepG2 cells and exhibited antiangiogenic activity. Cell cycle analysis showed significant arrest of cells at G2/M phase 12 and 48 h after treatment and significant arrest at G1/S phase after 24 h of treatment. Consistent data were observed in western blot analysis of protein levels of Cdc2 and its cyclin partners.

Conclusions

These findings introduce R. stricta as a potentially useful anti-metastatic agent and a novel potential anti-tumour agent for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment.

Keywords

  • Antioxidants
  • Anticancer
  • Medicinal plants
  • Traditional medicine
  • Rhazya stricta

Background

Free radicals are mainly produced by oxidation processes and they have an important role in the processes of food spoilage and chemical materials degradation. They also contribute to human disorders such as aging-associated diseases, cardiovascular diseases, cancer and inflammatory diseases [1, 2]. Free radicals may also cause a depletion of the immune system antioxidants, a change in the gene expression and may induce the synthesis of abnormal proteins. About 5% or more of the inhaled oxygen (O2) is converted to reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as O2, H2O2, and OH radicals. ROS represents the major type of free radicals in any biological system. They are produced through the mitochondrial electrons transport chain [2, 3].

Antioxidants are used to neutralize the effects of free radicals. Thus, they protect humans against infection and degenerative diseases. Antioxidants can be classified into two major categories, natural and synthetic. Synthetic antioxidants include butylated hydroxy anisole (BHA), butylated hydroxyl toluenes (BHT), tertiary butylated hydroquinone and gallic acid esters. These antioxidants effectively inhibit oxidation, may serve as chelating agents such as ethylene diamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA), and can bind metals reducing their contribution to the process [4]. However, antioxidants are thought to cause or promote negative health effects such as mutagenesis and carcinogenesis in humans [5]. Therefore, there is a strong trend to replace the synthetic with naturally occurring antioxidants that can prevent free radical-related diseases [4, 6].

Natural antioxidants help in controlling the formation of free radicals and activated oxygen species or they can inhibit their reaction with biological structures [7]. These antioxidants include antioxidative enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase, and small nonenzymatic antioxidant molecules, such as glutathione and vitamins C and E [8]. Many herbs and spices (rosemary, thyme, oregano, sage, basil, pepper, clove, cinnamon, nutmeg, and saffron), and plant extracts (tea, grapeseed, and lemon balm) contain antioxidant components [911].

In this study, three hydroalcoholic extracts of traditionally medicinal plants used in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) were evaluated for their antioxidant activities, phenol and flavonoid contents. These plants are, Trigonella foenum-graecum, locally known as “Helba”, Cassia acutifolia, commonly known as “Holoul” and Rhazya stricta which is locally called “Harmal”.

T. foenum-graecum seeds are traditionally used as herbal medicine for their carminative, tonic, aphrodisiac and anticancer effects [1214]. The leaves of C. acutifolia is frequently used in folk medicine as a purgative for a long time [15]. The extracts of R. stricta leaves are traditionally used for the treatment of various disorders such as diabetes, sore throat, helminthiasis, inflammatory conditions and rheumatism [16].

Available treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma are mainly limited to invasive hepatectomy or chemotherapy. However, the attention has shifted in recent years to natural-based products for candidate anticancer therapeutics. In the present study, the antiproliferative effects of Trigonella foenum-graecum, Cassia acutifolia, and Rhazya stricta on hepatoma cell line HepG2 were investigated. The use of HepG2 cells to test the cytotoxic effects of a wide range of drugs has been well documented, due to their wide availability, well-differentiation, and drug metabolizing activity [17].

Despite playing a key role in cellular processes, free radicals pose a threat to cells by damaging DNA, proteins, and cellular membranes, leading to onset of many diseases including cancer [18, 19]. Thus, by decreasing free radicals and oxidative stress, antioxidants play a role in ameliorating DNA damage, reducing the rate of abnormal cell division, and decreasing mutagenesis [20]. Therefore, many antioxidant-rich plants possess anticancer activity [2123].

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been recognized to be involved in several stages of angiogenesis in malignant diseases by its multi-functional effects in activating and integrating signalling pathway networks [24]. VEGF signalling blockade reduces new vessel growth and leads to endothelial cell apoptosis. Therefore, using tyrosine kinase inhibitors or VEGF/VEGF receptor (VEGFR) antibodies to inhibit crucial angiogenic steps is a practical therapeutic strategy when treating neovascularisation diseases [25]. A potent angiogenesis inhibitor known as E7820, has been shown to reduce integrin α 2 mRNA expression and inhibit basic fibroblast growth factor/VEGF-induced HUVEC proliferation and tube formation [26, 27]. Integrin α 2β 1/α 1β 1 expression is reportedly regulated by VEGF and an inhibitory antibody against α 2β 1/α 1β 1 has been shown to inhibit angiogenesis and tumour growth in VEGF-overexpressing tumour cells [28, 29]. Therefore, we investigated here the effect of R. stricta leaves extract on angiogenesis utilizing HUVEC tube formation assay; as it showed the most promising antiproliferative activity. In addition, this work was set to determine the in vitro antioxidant activity, total phenols and flavonoids, anticancer activities of tested plants with special interest in R. stricta.

Methods

Chemicals

All solvents were analytical grade. Agilent Cary 60 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer was used in all spectrophotometric measurements. Ascorbic acid, ferric chloride, aluminium chloride, potassium acetate, quercetin, DPPH reagent, Folin-Ciocalteau reagent, gallic acid, sodium carbonate, methanol and ethanol were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Millipore deionized water was used throughout. Thiazolyl Blue Tetrazolium Bromide (Sigma Aldrich, USA), Dimethyl Sulfoxide (Sigma Aldrich, USA).

Plant samples

Dried leaves of C. acutifolia, R. stricta and T. foenum-graecum were purchased from the local market. The taxonomic authentication of all the plants was carried out by Dr. Fatima Al-Ansari at the Biology Department, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University. Voucher specimens were deposited at the herbarium of the Biology Department (voucher reference numbers: BA2018–1, BA2018–2, BA2018–3).

Preparation of plant extracts

The leaves of the medicinal plants were crushed separately in a grinder. A sample of 10 g of each plant was extracted with 150 mL of 70% ethanol and 30% water as it showed the best extraction yield [30]. The crushed plants were macerated for 48 h at 4 °C. The resulting mixture was then filtered under vacuum and concentrated under reduced pressure in a rotary evaporator at 40 °C. The extracts were further dried using a TELSTAR CRYODOS freeze dryer machine then kept at − 20 °C for further analysis. A solution of 30 mg/mL of each plant was prepared in 50% ethanol for the following tests.

Determination of total polyphenol content

The total phenolic content (TPC) was determined by using the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent [31]. A 10% solution was prepared from the stock solution (30 mg/mL) using 50% ethanol. 100 μl of this solution was mixed with 200 μl of the Folin-Ciocalteau reagent and 2 mL of de-ionized water then incubated at room temperature for 3 min. A sample of 20% aqueous sodium carbonate (w/w, 1 mL) was then added to the mixture. The total polyphenols were determined after 1 h of incubation at room temperature. A negative control sample was also prepared using the same procedure. The absorbance of the resulting blue colour was measured at 765 nm. Results were expressed in mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per g dry weight of plant material using an equation obtained from gallic acid calibration curve. The samples were analyzed in triplicate.

Free-radical scavenging activity

The antioxidant activity of the extracts was assessed based on their ability to scavenge the stable 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical as described previously [32]. Various concentrations of the three extracts in methanol were prepared (0.15 to 1.5 mg/mL). A methanolic solution of DPPH (3.8 mL, 60 μg/mL) was rapidly mixed with the plant extract (200 μl, 30 mg/mL) in a test tube, with methanol serving as the blank sample and a control was also assayed simultaneously. The contents of the tubes were swirled then allowed to stand for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. The absorbance was measured at 517 nm in a spectrophotometer. The scavenging ability of the plant extract was calculated using this equation: DPPH Scavenging activity (%) = [(Abs control–Abs sample)]/ (Abs control)] × 100, where Abs control is the absorbance of DPPH + methanol; Abs sample is the absorbance of DPPH radical + sample (sample or standard). The EC50 value (μg/mL), the effective concentration at which DPPH· radicals are scavenged by 50%, was determined graphically. The total antioxidant activity was expressed as ascorbic acid equivalent/g dry extract. The assay was done in triplicates.

Determination of total flavonoids

The total flavonoids content in the extracts was determined using the aluminium chloride colorimetric method [33]. A known concentration (600 μg/mL) of each extract in methanol was prepared. A 500 μl of the extracts were mixed separately with 0.1 mL of 10% (w/v) aluminium chloride solution, 0.1 mL of 1 M potassium acetate solution, 1.5 mL of methanol and 2.8 mL of distilled water. The solutions were thoroughly mixed and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was measured at 415 nm using a spectrophotometer. The total flavonoids content was determined using a standard curve with quercetin (1 to 25 μg/mL) as the standard. The mean of three readings was used and expressed as mg of quercetin equivalents (QE)/ g of the dry extract.

Cell culture

A human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-derived cell line (HepG2) was cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 1% antibiotic cocktail and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 humidified incubator. Cells were passaged every 2–3 days using 0.25% trypsin-EDTA.

Cytotoxicity assay

HepG2 were seeded at a density of 5000 cells/well in a 96-well plate, and were allowed to attach overnight. Thereafter, cells were treated with various concentrations of the plants extracts for 24 h. To assess the cytotoxic effect of the three plants extracts, MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltratrazolium bromide) assay was carried out. Briefly, cells treated with the plant extracts were exposed to tetrazolium MTT at a concentration of 5 mg/mL. Viable active cells reduced yellow MTT salt to insoluble purple formazan, which was dissolved using DMSO. The absorbance of the coloured solution was measured at a wavelength of 570 nm using Epoch microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek). The obtained absorbance at 570 nm of both control and treated cells was used to calculate percentage of cell viability. Assuming 100% viability in control cells, percentage of treated cells viability will be calculated accordingly:
$$ \mathrm{Percent}\ \mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{viable}\ \mathrm{cells}=\left(\mathrm{Abs}.\mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{treated}\ \mathrm{cells}/\mathrm{Abs}.\mathrm{of}\ \mathrm{control}\ \mathrm{cells}\right)\times 100 $$

Assessment of morphological changes

HepG2 were seeded at a density of 0.25 × 106 cells/ well in a 6-well plate, and were allowed to attach overnight. After which, cells were treated without (0 μg, control) or with increasing concentrations of R. stricta (10, 20, 30, 50, 70 μg) for 24 h. The morphology of the cells was assessed after being fixed and stained with 0.5% crystal violet using bright-field microscopy (200 x magnification, scale = 200 μm).

Colony formation assay

To assess the effects of R. stricta on cell survival, the colony formation assay was carried out in vitro. Briefly, HepG2 cells were seeded at a density of 1000 cells/ well in a 6-well plate, and were incubate for 24 h to allow attachment. The second day, the cells were treated without (0 μg, control) or with increasing concentrations (10, 20, 30 μg) of the extract for 24 h. After which, the media was replaced with fresh complete growth media without the extract, and cells were left to incubate until visible colonies were formed; while changing the media every 3–4 days. The experiment was carried out in triplicates. Colonies were fixed with absolute methanol, then stained with 0.5% crystal violet. Results are represented as the percentage of the well area that is covered by colonies (colony area percentage). Analysis has been carried out using ImageJ plugin ColonyArea [34]. In addition, an absorption-based method was carried out to validate the earlier results, by which the absorption of the crystal violet dye in each well is measured after being dissolved. Briefly, the samples that had been analysed using ImageJ were subjected to 10% acetic acid solution, then were placed on an orbital shaker for 15 min. After which, 100 μL of each triplicate sample was transferred to a 96-well plate (in triplicates), and absorbance was measured using Epoch microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek).

Wound-healing assay

To assess the ability of HepG2 to migrate after the treatment with R. stricta, wound-healing assay was carried out in vitro. Cells were seeded at a density of 0.5 × 106/ well in 6-well plate, and were allowed to attach overnight. A scratch in the cell monolayer was made using a sterile plastic pipetting tip, and then the monolayer was washed with PBS. The cells were treated without (0 μg) or with 20, 30 μg of the extract. Images were taken at 0, 24, 48, 72 h using bright-field microscopy (40 x magnification). Analysis was carried out using ImageJ, percent of open area was calculated according to the following formula [Tx = T24, T48, or T72 (at time 24, 48, or 72 h, respectively]: Percent of open area = (open area at Tx/ open area at T0) X 100.

Experiment was carried out in triplicates, data is representative of 3 random regions in each triplicate of each sample.

Cell cycle analysis

Effect of R. stricta extract on cell cycle progression of HepG2 cells was analysed as previously described [35]. Cells were treated without or with 30 μg of R. stricta extract at different time intervals (6 – 48 h), collected by trypsinization, washed twice with PBS, fixed in 70% ethanol, treated with RNase, stained with propidium iodide and then cell cycle distribution was analysed in BD Accuri C6 cytometer and software (BD Biosciences, USA).

Western blotting

HepG2 were seeded at a density of 1 × 106 in 60 mm dish and allowed to attach overnight. Cells were treated without or with 30 μg of extract for 6, 12, 24, 48 h. Cells were lysed and total protein was quantified using BCA. 20 μg of total protein was separated on SDS-PAGE, transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes that were blocked using 5% BSA TBST. Primary antibodies against Cdc2 (1:000; cell signalling), p-Cdc2 (1:1000; cell signalling), Cyclin B1 (1:1000; cell signalling), Cyclin A1 (1:000; Abcam) were used. GAPDH (1:15000; Abcam) was used as loading control. Proteins were detected using LI-COR C-DiGit Chemiluminescence Western Blot Scanner.

Matrigel capillary tube formation

96-well plate was coated with Matrigel matrix (Corning, NY, USA) at 50 ul/well and allowed to polymerize for 60 min at 37 °C. HUVEC cells were then seeded on the Matrigel at a concentration of 2 × 104 cells/well without (0 μg) or with (10, 20, 30 μg) R. stricta extract. After incubation for 18 h, tubules were imaged using an inverted microscope and analyzed with ImageJ software.

Statistical analysis

All data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments. Correlation analysis of antioxidants versus the total phenolic and flavonoid contents were carried out using the regression analysis, with GraphPad Prism 6.0 and Microsoft Excel 2016. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference.

Results and discussion

Medicinal plants have been of great interest as a source of natural antioxidants used for health promotion. The therapeutic activity of plants is mostly due to their biologically active polyphenolic substances, mostly flavonoids and phenolic acids. These substances exhibit antioxidant, anti-lipoxygenase and anticancer activities. The present study elaborates on the antioxidant activity, polyphenolic and flavonoid contents of three folk plants from the UAE; T. foenum-graecum, C. acutifolia and R. stricta. The antiprolifrative effect of such plants was studied against human cancer cells HepG2 in an attempt to find a correlation with the antioxidant activity of those extracts that are based on their phenolic and flavonoid contents.

Plant extraction

Different solvents have been used in the literature for the preparation of plant extracts [36]. In this study, we used 70% ethanol as the extraction solvent. The amorphous solid of the leave extracts under investigation was obtained by complete evaporation of ethanol/water. The yield of each extract was calculated as w/w percent yield. The yields of T. foenum-graecum, C. acutifolia and R. stricta extracts were 25, 23 and 30% respectively.

Total polyphenol content of the extracts

Polyphenols are aromatic secondary plant metabolites and are widely spread throughout plants. They have been associated with colour, sensory qualities, and nutritional and antioxidant properties of food [37]. It is reported that there is a strong relationship between total polyphenol contents and antioxidant activity. The hydroxyl groups in phenols have a strong scavenging ability for free radicals. Therefore, the total polyphenol contents of plants may directly contribute to their antioxidant activity [32, 38]. The Folin-Ciocalteau reagent is commonly used in the literature to determine phenolic compounds. This reagent reacts with phenolic compounds and gives a blue colour complex that absorbs radiation and allows quantification [39]. The total phenolic content for the ethanolic extracts of C. acutifolia, R. stricta and T. foenum-graecum was determined by the Folin-Ciocalteau method using gallic acid as a standard. The calibration curve showed linearity for gallic acid in the range of 0.5–26 μg/mL, with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.984. R. stricta contained the highest total polyphenols (11.5 ± 0.013 mg GAE/g extract), followed by C. acutifolia (10.8 ± 0.025 mg GAE/g extract) and T. foenum-graecum (9.7 ± 0.008 mg GAE/g extract) (Fig. 1). Belguith-Hadriche et al. [40] reported the total phenolic content of various extracts of T. foenum-graecum ranged between 9.42 ± 0.50 in hexane and 78.1 ± 0.90 mg GAE/g dry weight extracts in methanol. A study conducted in Saudi Arabia showed the total phenolic content of R. stricta extracts ranged between 62.5 ± 0.2 and 66.63 ± 0.03 mg GAE/g extract [41].
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Total phenolic content of T. foenum-graecum (Tf), C. acutifolia (Ca) and R. stricta (Rs) extracts determined by the Folin-Ciocalteau assay and calculated as mg GAE/g extract based on dry weight. Results are the average of triplicates ± SD

The DPPH radical scavenging activity

The antioxidant activity of each plant was also assessed based on its ability to reduce the stable DPPH radical according to the method reported by Lim [32]. The DPPH radical (DPPH) is a stable radical and has the ability to accept an electron or hydrogen radical and form a stable diamagnetic molecule producing a colour change from blue to yellow [42]. The colour change of DPPH has been widely used to measure the radical scavenging activity because of its stability, simplicity, and reproducibility [43]. The free radical scavenging capacity of the ethanolic extracts of the three plants were assayed based on the remaining amount (%) of DPPH as a function of time (30 min). The total antioxidant activity was expressed as ascorbic acid equivalent/g dry extract.

The calibration curve of ascorbic acid showed linearity in the range of 5–20 μg/mL, with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.994. The percentage inhibitions of DPPH scavenging activity in all the extracts were dose-dependent (Fig. 2). The DPPH scavenging activity by the T. foenum-graecum extract was (89.7% ± 1.54) at 1.5 mg/mL and (28.6% ± 2.07) at 0.15 mg/mL. DPPH of C. acutifolia was (86.3% ± 0.64) at 1.5 mg/mL and (30.0% ± 1.37) at 0.15 mg/mL while that of R. stricta was (89.9% ± 0.51) at 1.5 mg/mL and (28.7% ± 1.27) at 0.15 mg/mL. The results showed that there is no clear difference between the obtained DPPH scavenging activities of the three extracts. These results are almost in agreement with their total polyphenol contents. Consequently, the antioxidant activity of these plants might be related to their contents of phenolic compounds.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

DPPH radical scavenging activities of the tested extracts

In addition, the DPPH radical scavenging ability of the extracts was evaluated as EC50 (μg/mL) value. The smallest EC50 values indicates the best free radical scavenging activity. The highest scavenging activity was exerted by R. stricta (EC50 = 241.8 μg/mL) which contained the highest amount of total polyphenol content (11.5 μg/mL), followed by C. acutifolia (EC50 = 244.8, TPC = 10.8 μg/mL). The lowest radical scavenging activity was exhibited by the T. foenum-graecum extract (EC50 = 245.9, TPC = 9.7 μg/mL). The relationship between total phenol content and free radical scavenging activity (using EC50) was also studied using linear regression analysis (Fig. 3a). The results showed a significant negative correlation (R2 = − 0.856, P-value < 0.05) between EC50 (DPPH· scavenging) and total phenolic content suggesting that the presence of the phenolic compounds contributed significantly to the antioxidant activity of the tested plants. These results are consistent with previous works that showed a liner correlation between the total phenolic content and the reducing antioxidant capacity of some plant extracts [32, 38, 44].
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Linear correlations between the amount of total phenols and DPPH· radical scavenging activity (a) and between the flavonoid content and DPPH· radical scavenging activity (b)

Total flavonoid contents

Flavonoids are a class of secondary plant phenolics. Flavonoids and their derivatives have a wide range of biological actions including anticancer activity. The anticancer activity of flavonoids is attributed to their potent antioxidant effects which include metal chelation and free-radical scavenging activities [45]. Flavonoids present in herbs were found to significantly contribute to their antioxidant properties [44]. The flavonoid content was obtained using aluminium chloride assay which based on the formation of a complex between the aluminium ion, Al (III), and the carbonyl and hydroxyl groups of flavones and flavonols that produce a yellow colour [46]. Flavonoid content was calculated from the regression equation of quercetin calibration curve and was expressed as quercetin equivalents. The calibration curve showed linearity in the range of 1–25 μg/mL, with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.999.

Figure 4 shows the flavonoids contents in all the extracts. Using the standard curve generated by quercetin, the total flavonoids content of the T. foenum-graecum extract was (14.6 ± 0.21 mg QE/g), whereas, the C. actutifolia extract was (20.8 ± 0.40 mg QE/g) and finally that of R. stricta was (9.2 ± 0.22 mg QE/g).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Flavonoids content of the tested extracts

The relationship between the total flavonoids content and the free radical scavenging activity (using EC50) was studied using linear regression analysis (Fig. 3b). The results showed a positive correlation (R2 = 0.460, P-value < 0.05) between EC50 (DPPH scavenging) and total flavonoids content. The obtained correlation was moderate suggesting that other compounds maybe participating in the radical scavenging activity of these plant extracts.

Effects of extracts on cell viability in HepG2 cells

HCC remains among the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide [47, 48]. Although therapeutic approaches for advanced HCC are limited to the use of multikinase inhibitors, such as sorafenib, only modest survival benefits have clinically been reported. Thus, identifying new compounds with promise antitumor activity against HCC is exceedingly needed [48, 49]. Natural products, especially from plants, are often better tolerated than their synthetic analogs used in cancer treatments [50]. They contain a wide spectrum of bioactive secondary metabolites that are the foundation of the recently introduced notion of broad-spectrum integrative approach for cancer prevention and treatment [51].

Effects of tested extracts were investigated against human hepatoma (HepG2) cancer cell line. A dose-dependent reduction in cell viability was reported in cells treated with all tested extracts (Fig. 5). The IC50 values of extracts ranged from 30 μg/mL to 200 μg/mL. Treatment with R. stricta significantly enhanced the mortality of cancer cells at the lowest concentration (30 μg/mL). T. foenum-graecum was however less potent with IC50 of 200 μg/mL where 50% of HepG2 cancer cells were eradicated at 200 μg/mL. A fenugreek-enriched diet decreased colon tumour incidence and hepatic lipid peroxidation in liver cancer-induced rats in addition to increasing the endogenous antioxidant activities in liver [52]. Li et al. [53] showed that diosgenin, fenugreek’s main active ingredient, down regulated the expression of various STAT3-regulated genes, inhibited proliferation and potentiated the apoptotic effects of paclitaxel and doxorubicin, suggesting that diosgenin could be a novel and potential treatment option for HCC and other cancers. Therefore, the role of fenugreek extract and its active principals as supplements in diet-based preventive/therapeutic strategies to improve health care continues to be a fast growing field of research. The correlation between the antioxidant activities (free radical scavenging activity) and the anticancer activities (cell viability) of C. acutifolia, R. stricta and T. foenum-graecum extracts was studied using linear regression analysis. The results showed a significant positive correlation (R2 = − 0.933, 0.997 and 0.797, P-value < 0.05) for C. acutifolia, R. stricta and T. foenum-graecum extracts respectively.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5

Assessment of the cytotoxic effects of Trigonella foenum-graecum (Helba), Cassia acutifolia (Holoul), and Rhazya stricta (Harmal) extracts on HepG2 in vitro. a MTT assay results of HepG2 cells viability after treatment with increasing concentrations of Helba and Holoul for 24 h. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, ***P < 0.0001 b MTT assay results of HepG2 cells viability after treatment with increasing concentrations of R. stricta extract for 24 h. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, ***P < 0.0001 c Assessment of morphological changes of HepG2 cells after treatment with increasing concentrations of R. stricta extract for 24 h. Cells were fixed and stained with crystal violet (scale bar = 200 μm). d Cell cycle progression of HepG2 cells after treatment with R. stricta extract at a dose of 30 μg over a period of 48 h. e Quantitative distribution of HepG2 cells in different phases of the cell cycle at different time intervals (*P < 0.05) f Immunoblot analysis of cell cycle regulatory proteins in HepG2 cells after treatment with R. stricta extract at a dose of 30 μg over a period of 48 h

At a concentration range of (100–200 μg/mL) Cassia acutifolia’s extract was similarly cytotoxic to HepG2 cells. Alkaloids extracted from Senna species reduced cell viability in a concentration-dependent manner of different tumour cell lines including HepG2 [49]. Senna alkaloids showed important antiproliferative activity on HepG2 cells that was mediated by ERK inactivation and down-regulation of cyclin D1 expression. Similarly, extracts of different cassia species were able to inhibit growth of colorectal (DLD1), among other, human cancer cell lines [54]. Thus, Senna’s extract may represent a potential new antitumor and/or adjuvant treatment against liver and colorectal cancer and further investigations should be conducted to unravel its molecular mechanism. R. stricta’s extract was by far the most effective cytotoxic agent tested at the present study at as little as 30 μg/mL. The δ-tocopherol and alkaloid fraction of R. stricta’s leaves extract have been shown to delay many angiogenic and inflammatory activities and to inhibit cell viability of HepG2, hence potentially useful against cancer [55, 56]. As R. stricta extract showed the most promising antiproliferative activity, its antiproliferative effects were tested against other GI cell line. The present study also showed that R. stricta extract inhibited cell proliferation in colorectal cancer cells (HCT116), in a dose -dependent manner (Additional file 1: Figure S1). To get insight into the molecular effects of R. stricta on HepG2 cells, its effect on cell cycle progression was analysed. R. stricta treatment induced arrest of cells in the G2/M phase (12 and 48 h time points) and in G1/S phase (24 h time point) (Fig. 5d and e). This cell cycle arrest reflects the cytotoxic effects of R. stricta on HepG2 cells where the cells are arrested at these phases to repair the toxic lesions induced by R. stricta or to be removed by death pathways such as apoptosis. The significant increase of the fraction of cells in G2/M after long term treatment (48 h) may indicate permanent arrest of cells in this phase (quiescence). These findings are consistent with western blot data, where cell cycle promoting proteins cdc2 and its cyclin partners (cyclin A1 and cyclin B1) are down regulated post R. stricta treatment (Fig. 5f). Cdc2 activity is regulated through two mechanisms, first by binding to its cyclin partners [57], and second by being phosphorylated at Tyr15, and subsequently inhibited [58, 59]. Cdc2/cyclin complexes contribute to cell cycle progression through phosphorylation of target proteins [60]. As shown, Cdc2, and its partners cyclin A and cyclin B were downregulated in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 5f). In addition, treatment with R. stricta extract resulted in a slight increase in Tyr15 phosphorylated Cdc2 (Fig. 5f).

R. stricta extract inhibited the colony formation of HepG2 cells

This assay measures the ability of tumour cells to survive and grow to form colonies after treatment with cytotoxic agents. To assess clonogenicity, cells were plated onto 6-well plates and incubated with 0.0, 10, 20, and 30 μg of R. stricta extract and treated cultures were maintained in culture for an additional 10 days to allow formation of colonies [61, 62]. The results from that assay showed that R. stricta extract inhibited the colony formation of HepG2 cells in a dose-dependent manner (0, 10, 20, 30 μg). ImageJ analysis results were consistent with results obtained from the absorption-based method where R. stricta extract also inhibited the survival of HepG2 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6a and b).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6

Rhazya stricta extract inhibits colony forming ability and wound healing of HepG2 cells in a dose-dependent manner. a Representative images of HepG2 colonies after treatment with increasing concentrations of R. stricta extract. b Percent of area occupied by colonies in treated and non-treated wells (representative of triplicate samples; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.005, ***P < 0.0001) and absorbance of each treated and non-treated wells (representative of 3 biological triplicates, each in triplicate; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, ***P < 0.0001). c Representative images and quantification (three regions of three biological triplicates; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.001, ***P < 0.0001) of wound-healing assay results of HepG2 cells treated without or with 20 and 30 μg of R. stricta extract

R. stricta extract inhibits the migration ability of HepG2 cells

Many cancer patients die of tumour mobilization which often lead to metastatic foci in distant part/s of the body. Therefore, attempts to prevent or slowdown progression and metastasis of cancer cells are crucial [63]. Earlier study showed that R. stricta extract exerts potent anti-cancer ability against human breast cancer [64]. To date, however, limited information is available regarding R. stricta extract effect on cell migration in any cancer type. The potential role of R. stricta extract on HepG2 cells’ migration was assessed using wound healing assay. Cell migration was inhibited in a dose-dependent manner (0, 20 and 30 μg) starting from 24 to 72 h post R. stricta extract treatments compared to the control (Fig. 6c).

R. stricta extract inhibits endothelial cell tube formation

Cell migration and invasion are crucial steps in various physiological processes such as morphogenesis, angiogenesis, wound healing and inflammation [65]. Invasion and migration are critical events for tumour progression and tumour recurrence [66, 67]. HUVEC cells had greater numbers of branching tube networks after 18 h of incubation with no R. stricta extract (Fig. 7a). This tube branching was attenuated by R. stricta extract treatments in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 7b and c). Colony formation results demonstrate that colony numbers in all dose groups were decreased. These results suggest that R. stricta extract reduced cell migration and colony formation capacity in HepG2 cancer cells. R. stricta extract may, therefore, be introduced as a novel agent to treat/prevent HCC and as a single agent or in combination with other drugs. It would also be of interest to identify R. stricta extract bioactive molecules and assess their effects against cancer, particularly HCC. Further studies are currently underway to identify and characterize R. stricta extract bioactive ingredients and to unravel their molecular mechanism against cancer.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7

Rhazya stricta extract inhibits tube formation in HUVECs on Matrigel in a dose-dependent manner. Photographs of tube formation in HUVECs on Matrigel after incubation with or without R. stricta extract at 18 h. Cells were treated with R. stricta extract at a series of concentrations (10 μg; b, 20 μg; c, 30 μg; d) or DMSO vehicle (control; a) for 18 h

The obtained antiproliferative results of the three extracts against HepG2 cancer cell line were found to be consistent with their antioxidant activity, free radical scavenging ability and phenolic content. Out of the three extracts, R. stricta showed considerable antiprolifrative activity at low concentration and was the most potent among the tested plants with IC50 = 30 μg/mL. In addition, R. stricta showed the highest total polyphenols (11.5 ± 0.013 mg GAE/g extract). It has also the most percentage inhibitions of DPPH scavenging activity (89.9% ± 0.51) at 1.5 mg/ml and (28.7% ± 1.27) at 0.15 mg/ml. This indicates that the antiproliferative effect of the three extracts, in particular R. stricta, may be attributed to their antioxidant polyphenolic and flavonoid contents. Phenolic compounds have been found to counteract cancer either by means of antioxidant effect or by inhibiting the formation of carcinogenic metabolites that damage the vital biomolecules [68].

Finally, the investigated UAE plants have shown a strong reducing antioxidant capacity and free radical scavenging ability. These findings validate the use of these plants in folk medicine for the treatment of certain diseases. Oxidative cell damage events are frequently correlated with the oxidative stress. We show here that both of those properties are present in the ethanolic extract of R. stricta, which has significant antiproliferative activity and a great antioxidant activity. The results reported here are very promising indicators for the potential application of this plant for preventive and therapeutic purposes.

Conclusions

In conclusion, natural antioxidants have many important applications in health promotion, food preservation, food flavouring and cosmetics. They are preferred over synthetic antioxidants because they are safer for consumption and more environmentally friendly. The present study investigates the antioxidant activity and polyphenolic content of three medicinal plants from the UAE. We found extracts rich in antioxidants and in polyphenols, which merit further investigations. Of the extracts evaluated, that of R. stricta (Harmal) showed the greatest antioxidant, antiangiogenic and antiproliferative activities, a discovery that makes this species a promising source of anticancer agent development especially for colon and liver cancers, and hence worthy of further investigation. Isolation of active compounds and exploring their mode of action against tumours by using in vivo experimental models would make an important future study.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a start-up grant (Grant 31S 215), Division of Research and Graduate Studies, UAEU and an individual research grant (Grant 31S 188), College of Science, UAEU to the PI: Dr. Bayan Al-Dabbagh and by Zayed Bin Sultan Centre for Health Sciences (ZCHS) grant number 31R050 for Dr. Amr Amin.

Funding

This work was supported by a start-up grant (Grant 31S 215), Division of Research and Graduate Studies, UAEU and an individual research grant (Grant 31S 188), College of Science, UAEU to the PI: Dr. Bayan Al-Dabbagh and by Zayed Bin Sultan Centre for Health Sciences (ZCHS) grant number 31R050 for Dr. Amr Amin.

Availability of data and materials

“The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.”

Authors’ contributions

BA and AA designed the research. BA, IAE, AAH, RA and RE performed the experiments. SSA participated in the interpretation of the results. BA and AA analyzed the data and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Chemistry, College of Science, UAE University, PO Box 15551, Al Ain, UAE
(2)
Department of Biology, College of Science, UAE University, PO Box 15551, Al Ain, UAE
(3)
Zoology Department, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
(4)
Department of Pharmacy Practice and Pharmacotherapeutics, Sharjah Institute for Medical Research and College of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE

References

  1. Aruoma OI. Free radicals, antioxidants and international nutrition. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 1999;8:53–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gupta VK, Sharma SK. Plants as natural antioxidants. Nat Prod Rad. 2006;5:326–34.Google Scholar
  3. Magder S. Reactive oxygen species: toxic molecules or spark of life? Crit Care. 2006;10:208.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Brewer MS. Natural antioxidants: sources, compounds, mechanisms of action, and potential applications. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2011;10:221–47.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Lu LY, Ou N, Lu Q-B. Antioxidant induces DNA damage, cell death and mutagenicity in human lung and skin normal cells. Sci Rep. 2013;3:3169.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Soobrattee MA, Neergheen VS, Luximon-Ramma A, Aruoma OI, Bahorun T. Phenolics as potential antioxidant therapeutic agents: mechanism and actions. Mutat Res. 2005;579:200–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaudière J, Ferrari-Iliou R. Intracellular antioxidants: from chemical to biochemical mechanisms. Food Chem Toxicol. 1999;37:949–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fridovich I. Fundamental aspects of reactive oxygen species, or what's the matter with oxygen? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;893:13–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Hinneburg I, Damien Dorman HJ, Hiltunen R. Antioxidant activities of extracts from selected culinary herbs and spices. Food Chem. 2006;97:122–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Amin A, Hamza AA, Bajbouj K, Ashraf SS, Daoud S. Saffron: a potential candidate for a novel anticancer drug against hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2011;54:857–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamza AA, Ahmed MM, Elwey HM, Amin A. Melissa officinalis protects against doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in rats and potentiates its anticancer activity on MCF-7 cells. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0167049.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Xue WL, Li XS, Zhang J, Liu YH, Wang ZL, Zhang RJ. Effect of Trigonella foenum-graecum (fenugreek) extract on blood glucose, blood lipid and hemorheological properties in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2007;16(Suppl 1):422–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Amin A, Alkaabi A, Al-Falasi S, Daoud SA. Chemopreventive activities of Trigonella foenum graecum (fenugreek) against breast cancer. Cell Biol Int. 2005;29:687–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. El Bairi K, Ouzir M, Agnieszka N, Khalki L. Anticancer potential of Trigonella foenum graecum: cellular and molecular targets. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;90:479–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Seethapathy GS, Ganesh D, Kumar JUS, Senthilkumar U, Newmaster SG, Ragupathy S, et al. Assessing product adulteration in natural health products for laxative yielding plants, Cassia, Senna, and Chamaecrista, in southern India using DNA barcoding. Int J Legal Med. 2015;129:693–700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Elkady AI. Crude alkaloid extract of Rhazya stricta inhibits cell growth and sensitizes human lung cancer cells to cisplatin through induction of apoptosis. Genet Mol Biol. 2013;36:12–21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Faqi AS. A comprehensive guide to toxicology in preclinical drug development: Academic Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  18. Diplock AT, Charuleux JL, Crozier-Willi G, Kok FJ, Rice-Evans C, Roberfroid M, et al. Functional food science and defence against reactive oxidative species. Br J Nutr. 1998;80:S77–S112.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Valko M, Leibfritz D, Moncol J, Cronin MT, Mazur M, Telser J. Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39:44–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Shigenaga MK, Ames BN. Oxidants and mitogenesis as causes of mutation and cancer: the influence of diet. Basic Life Sci. 1993;61:419–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenwell M, Rahman P. Medicinal plants: their use in anticancer treatment. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2015;6:4103.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Alam AHMK, Hossain ASMS, Khan MA, Kabir SR, Reza MA, Rahman MM, et al. The Antioxidative Fraction of White Mulberry Induces Apoptosis through Regulation of p53 and NFκB in EAC Cells. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0167536.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Islam S, Nasrin S, Khan MA, Hossain ASMS, Islam F, Khandokhar P, et al. Evaluation of antioxidant and anticancer properties of the seed extracts of Syzygium fruticosum Roxb. growing in Rajshahi, Bangladesh. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13:142.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Carmeliet P. Angiogenesis in life, disease and medicine. Nature. 2005;438:932.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bar J, Goss GD. Tumor vasculature as a therapeutic target in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:609–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Keizer RJ, Funahashi Y, Semba T, Wanders J, Beijnen J, Schellens J, et al. Evaluation of α 2-integrin expression as a biomarker for tumor growth inhibition for the investigational integrin inhibitor E7820 in preclinical and clinical studies. AAPS J. 2011;13:230–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Mita M, Kelly KR, Mita A, Ricart AD, Romero O, Tolcher A, et al. Phase I study of E7820, an oral inhibitor of integrin α-2 expression with antiangiogenic properties, in patients with advanced malignancies. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:193–200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Senger DR, Perruzzi CA, Streit M, Koteliansky VE, de Fougerolles AR, Detmar M. The α1β1 and α2β1 integrins provide critical support for vascular endothelial growth factor signaling, endothelial cell migration, and tumor angiogenesis. Am J Pathol. 2002;160:195–204.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Senger DR, Claffey KP, Benes JE, Perruzzi CA, Sergiou AP, Detmar M. Angiogenesis promoted by vascular endothelial growth factor: regulation through α1β1 and α2β1 integrins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:13612–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Amzad Hossain M, Shah MD. A study on the total phenols content and antioxidant activity of essential oil and different solvent extracts of endemic plant Merremia borneensis. Arab J Chem. 2015;8:66–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventós RM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent: Methods Enzymol Academic Press; 1999. p. 152–78.Google Scholar
  32. Lim YY, Quah EPL. Antioxidant properties of different cultivars of Portulaca oleracea. Food Chem. 2007;103:734–40.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Chang C-C, Yang M-H, Wen H-M, Chern J-C. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Anal. 2002;10:178–82.Google Scholar
  34. Guzmán C, Bagga M, Kaur A, Westermarck J, Abankwa D. ColonyArea: an ImageJ plugin to automatically quantify Colony formation in Clonogenic assays. PLoS One. 2014;9:e92444.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Saleh E, El-Awady R, Anis N. Predictive markers for the response to 5-fluorouracil therapy in cancer cells: constant-field gel electrophoresis as a tool for prediction of response to 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Oncol Lett. 2013;5:321–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Khan MA, Rahman AA, Islam S, Khandokhar P, Parvin S, Islam MB, et al. A comparative study on the antioxidant activity of methanolic extracts from different parts of Morus alba L. (Moraceae). BMC Res Notes. 2013;6:24.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Robbins RJ. Phenolic acids in foods: an overview of analytical methodology. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:2866–87.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wojdyło A, Oszmiański J, Czemerys R. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in 32 selected herbs. Food Chem. 2007;105:940–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Pontis JA, LAMAd C, SJRd S, Flach A. Color, phenolic and flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity of honey from Roraima, Brazil. Food Sci. Technol (Campinas). 2014;34:69–73.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Belguith-Hadriche O, Bouaziz M, Jamoussi K, Simmonds MS, El Feki A, Makni-Ayedi F. Comparative study on hypocholesterolemic and antioxidant activities of various extracts of fenugreek seeds. Food Chem. 2013;138:1448–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Bukhari NA, Al-Otaibi RA, Ibhrahim MM. Phytochemical and taxonomic evaluation of Rhazya stricta in Saudi Arabia. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017;24:1513–21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Robards K, Prenzler PD, Tucker G, Swatsitang P, Glover W. Phenolic compounds and their role in oxidative processes in fruits. Food Chem. 1999;66:401–36.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Kitts DD, Wijewickreme AN, Hu C. Antioxidant properties of a north American ginseng extract. Mol Cell Biochem. 2000;203:1–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Shan B, Cai YZ, Sun M, Corke H. Antioxidant capacity of 26 spice extracts and characterization of their phenolic constituents. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:7749–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Amin A, Mousa M. Merits of anti-cancer plants from the Arabian gulf region. Cancer Ther. 2007;5:55–66.Google Scholar
  46. Popova M, Bankova V, Butovska D, Petkov V, Nikolova-Damyanova B, Sabatini AG, et al. Validated methods for the quantification of biologically active constituents of poplar-type propolis. Phytochem Anal. 2004;15:235–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Amin A, Hamza AA, Daoud S, Khazanehdari K, Hrout AA, Baig B, et al. Saffron-based Crocin prevents early lesions of liver Cancer: in vivo, in vitro and network analyses. Recent Pat Anticancer Drug Discov. 2016;11:121–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu C-T, Tsai Y-T, Lai J-N. Demographic and medication characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine users among colorectal cancer survivors: a nationwide database study in Taiwan. J Tradit Complement Med. 2016;7:188–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Pereira RM, Ferreira-Silva GA, Pivatto M, Santos Lde A, Bolzani Vda S, Chagas de Paula DA, et al. Alkaloids derived from flowers of Senna spectabilis, (−)-cassine and (−)-spectaline, have antiproliferative activity on HepG2 cells for inducing cell cycle arrest in G1/S transition through ERK inactivation and downregulation of cyclin D1 expression. Toxicol In Vitro. 2016;31:86–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural products as sources of new drugs from 1981 to 2014. J Nat Prod. 2016;79:629–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Block KI, Gyllenhaal C, Lowe L, Amedei A, Amin ARMR, Amin A, et al. Designing a broad-spectrum integrative approach for cancer prevention and treatment. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015;35(Supplement):S276–304.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  52. Devasena T, Venugopal MP. Fenugreek seeds modulate 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced hepatic oxidative stress during colon carcinogenesis. Ital J Biochem. 2007;56:28–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Li F, Fernandez PP, Rajendran P, Hui KM, Sethi G. Diosgenin: a steroidal saponin, inhibits STAT3 signaling pathway leading to suppression of proliferation and chemosensitization of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett. 2010;292:197–207.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Chandra P, Pandey R, Kumar B, Srivastva M, Pandey P, Sarkar J, et al. Quantification of multianalyte by UPLC–QqQLIT–MS/MS and in-vitro anti-proliferative screening in Cassia species. Ind Crop Prod. 2015;76:1133–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Nehdi IA, Sbihi HM, Tan CP, Al-Resayes SI. Seed oil from Harmal (Rhazya stricta Decne) grown in Riyadh (Saudi Arabia): a potential source of δ-tocopherol. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2016;20:107–13.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  56. El Gendy MAM, Ali BH, Michail K, Siraki AG, El-Kadi AOS. Induction of quinone oxidoreductase 1 enzyme by Rhazya stricta through Nrf2-dependent mechanism. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;144:416–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Brown NR, Noble ME, Endicott JA, Johnson LN. The structural basis for specificity of substrate and recruitment peptides for cyclin-dependent kinases. Nat Cell Biol. 1999;1:438–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. McGowan CH, Russell P. Human Wee1 kinase inhibits cell division by phosphorylating p34cdc2 exclusively on Tyr15. EMBO J. 1993;12:75.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  59. Wells NJ, Watanabe N, Tokusumi T, Jiang W, Verdecia MA, Hunter T. The C-terminal domain of the Cdc2 inhibitory kinase Myt1 interacts with Cdc2 complexes and is required for inhibition of G (2)/M progression. J Cell Sci. 1999;112:3361–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Enserink JM, Kolodner RD. An overview of Cdk1-controlled targets and processes. Cell Div. 2010;5:11–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Gach K, Grądzka I, Wasyk I, Męczyńska-Wielgosz S, Iwaneńko T, Szymański J, et al. Anticancer activity and radiosensitization effect of methyleneisoxazolidin-5-ones in hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells. Chem Biol Interact. 2016;248:68–73.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Rafehi H, Orlowski C, Georgiadis GT, Ververis K, El-Osta A, Karagiannis TC. Clonogenic assay: adherent cells. J Vis Exp. 2011;49:2573.Google Scholar
  63. Jiang WG, Sanders AJ, Katoh M, Ungefroren H, Gieseler F, Prince M, et al. Molecular, biological and clinical perspectives. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015;35(Supplement):S244–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Baeshen NA, Elkady AI, Abuzinadah OA, Mutwakil MH. Potential anticancer activity of the medicinal herb, Rhazya stricta, against human breast cancer. Afr J Biotechnol. 2012;11:8960–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  65. Bozzuto G, Ruggieri P, Molinari A. Molecular aspects of tumor cell migration and invasion. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2010;46:66–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Alur I, Dodurga Y, Secme M, Elmas L, Bagci G, Goksin I, et al. Anti-tumor effects of bemiparin in HepG2 and MIA PaCa-2 cells. Gene. 2016;585:241–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Lavictoire SJ, Parolin DA, Klimowicz AC, Kelly JF, Lorimer IA. Interaction of Hsp90 with the nascent form of the mutant epidermal growth factor receptor EGFRvIII. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:5292–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Hocman G. Chemoprevention of cancer: phenolic antioxidants (BHT, BHA). Int J BioChemiPhysics. 1988;20:639–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement