Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Phenolic profile and biological properties of the leaves of Ficus vasta Forssk. (Moraceae) growing in Egypt

  • Maria Fernanda Taviano1Email author,
  • Khaled Rashed2,
  • Angela Filocamo3, 1,
  • Francesco Cacciola4,
  • Paola Dugo1, 5, 6,
  • Luigi Mondello1, 5, 6,
  • Carlo Bisignano4,
  • Rosaria Acquaviva7,
  • Manuela D’Arrigo1 and
  • Natalizia Miceli1
Contributed equally
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine201818:161

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-018-2210-0

Received: 15 January 2018

Accepted: 17 April 2018

Published: 16 May 2018

Abstract

Background

Ficus vasta Forssk. (Moraceae) is traditionally used for the treatment of various ailments; nonetheless, this species has been poorly studied to date. This work aimed to characterize the phenolic profile and to evaluate the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of a hydroalcoholic extract obtained from F. vasta leaves collected in Egypt.

Methods

The phenolic profile of the extract was characterized by HPLC-PDA/ESI-MS. The antioxidant properties were examined by different in vitro systems: DPPH test, reducing power and metal chelating activity assays. Moreover, the ability of the extract to protect Escherichia coli growth and survival from H2O2-induced oxidative stress was evaluated. The potential toxicity was investigated using Artemia salina lethality bioassay. Finally, the antimicrobial properties against a representative set of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains and the yeast C. albicans were assayed by standard methods.

Results

By HPLC-PDA/ESI-MS analysis 12 compounds belonging to the groups of phenolic acids and flavonoids were identified. The extract exhibited strong radical scavenging activity in DPPH test (IC50 = 0.0672 ± 0.0038 mg/mL), reducing power (3.65 ± 0.48 ASE/mL) and chelating activity (IC50 = 0.801 ± 0.007 mg/mL). A total protection against H2O2-induced damage on E. coli was observed. No toxicity against A. salina was found (LC50 > 1000 μg/mL). The extract exhibited bacteriostatic activity against almost all the bacteria tested (MICs: 250–62.5 μg/mL).

Conclusions

The obtained results demonstrate the potential of F. vasta leaves as safe sources of natural antioxidant and antimicrobial compounds.

Keywords

Ficus vasta Forssk.Phenolic profileAntioxidant activityOxidative stress in Escherichia coli Antimicrobial activity Artemia salina Leach

Background

Medicinal plants are considered as potential sources for drug development and many novel products. Nonetheless, such plants should be investigated to better understand their properties, safety, and efficiency. Currently, many researchers are looking for newer, effective, and safe antioxidants, in order to use them in foods and pharmaceutical preparations to replace the synthetic ones, which have been reported to be dangerous for human health. Medicinal plants are the major source of chemical compounds exhibiting antioxidant activity. Particularly, a direct relationship between antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds has been demonstrated in many studies [14].

Recently, there is an increased frequency of multiple drug resistance in human pathogenic microorganism due to indiscriminate use of commercial antimicrobial drugs commonly used to treat various diseases. Therefore, there is an interest in developing alternative antimicrobial drugs for the treatment of infections obtained from various sources such as medicinal plants. Phytochemicals have become the target of a great number of researches focused on the discovery of potentially safe and effective antimicrobials. Plant based antimicrobials either unaided or in combination with antibiotics may be an effective approach to deal with the global antimicrobial resistance. Among plant bioactive compounds, polyphenols are well documented to have microbicide activities against a great number of pathogenic bacteria [5].

The genus Ficus L. (Moraceae) comprises about 800 species and 2000 varieties of woody trees, shrubs and vines known as fig trees [6]. Several members of this genus are being used in folk medicine all over the world for a wide range of ailments of the gastrointestinal tract, central nervous, endocrine, and reproductive systems, as well as infectious disorders like tuberculosis, respiratory and skin diseases [79].

Ficus vasta Forssk. is a very large tree growing over 25 m tall, with spreading rounded crown. Leaves are alternate, spirally arranged, quite stiff, rough to the touch, almost circular (8–25 × 4–23 cm), margin entire, tip rounded but often with a blunt point, base rounded, heart shaped; usually glabrescent above, glabrescent, puberulous, hirsute or velutinous below [10].

This species is widespread throughout the dry north and eastern Africa, Sudan, Ethiopia, Saudi Arabia, Uganda and Tanzania. In Sudan the poultice of burned F. vasta leaves and barks was used as anti-tumor [11]. The leaves are traditionally used for the treatment of rheumatisms, pains and intestinal worms [12].

Although many species from the genus Ficus were subjected to phytochemical and pharmacological investigations, to the best of our information F. vasta has been poorly studied to date. Qualitative preliminary phytochemical analysis of Egyptian F. vasta leaves, using standard chemical tests, revealed the presence of carbohydrates, tannins, flavonoids, coumarins, and triterpenes [12]. Moreover, various phytoconstituents such as β-sitosterol, stigmasterol, lupeol, ursolic acid and some flavonoids were isolated and identified from F. vasta aerial parts [13]. Concerning biological activities, very few studies have been carried out on the leaves of this species [10, 14].

Thus, the present work was undertaken to characterize the phenolic profile and to investigate the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of a hydroalcoholic extract obtained from the leaves of F. vasta collected in Egypt, never studied before.

Methods

Chemicals and reagents

LC-MS grade water (H2O), acetonitrile (ACN), gallic acid, catechin, naringenin, chlorogenic acid, apigenin, rutin, kaempferol and quercetin were obtained from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). LC-MS grade acetic acid was attained from Riedel-de Haën (Seelze, Germany); methanol (MeOH) from Baker Analysed Reagent; Ferrous chloride (FeCl2) was obtained from Carlo Erba (Milan, Italy). Müeller Hinton Broth (MHB), Sabouraud Dextrose Agar (SDA), and Luria-Bertani (LB) broth medium were supplied from Oxoid (Basingstoke, UK), RPMI 1640 from Gibco Laboratories (Grand Island, NY). Unless indicated otherwise, all chemicals were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy).

Plant material and extraction procedure

Ficus vasta leaves were collected in May from Al-Zohiriya garden, Giza, Egypt. The plant was identified by Dr. Mohammed El-Gebaly, Department of Botany, National Research Centre (NRC) and by Mrs. Tereeza Labib, consultant of Plant Taxonomy at the Ministry of Agriculture and director of Orman Botanical Garden, Giza, Egypt. A voucher specimen was deposited in the herbarium of Al-Zohiriya garden, Giza, Egypt, under accession number n° FN-2604.

The air dried and powdered F. vasta leaves (200 g) were extracted with 80% MeOH at room temperature several times under continuous shaking until exhaustion by maceration process. The extractive solutions were pooled, filtrated, and evaporated to dryness by rotary evaporator (40°C). The yield of F. vasta extract, referred to 100 g of dried leaves, was 13.00%.

Phytochemical investigations

Identification of flavonoid compounds by paper chromatography

F. vasta hydroalcoholic extract was subjected to paper chromatography (Whatman No.1) using three different solvent systems as n-butanol:acetic acid:water (BAW 4:1:5, upper layer), 15% acetic acid, and water. By comparison with standard compounds some flavonoids were identified. Then, each band was cut, and the compounds were dissolved in a mixture of MeOH/H2O, purified over Sephadex LH-20 and identified by UV, 1H-NMR and MS analyses [15, 16].

Identification of phenolic compounds by HPLC-PDA/ESI-MS

HPLC-PDA/ESI-MS analyses were performed on a Prominence LC system (Shimadzu, Milan, Italy) equipped with photo diode array (PDA) and mass spectrometry (MS) (LCMS-2020, Shimadzu) detection. Data acquisition was performed by Shimadzu LabSolution software ver. 5.53.

For chromatographic separations, an Ascentis Express C18 column (15 cm × 4.6 mm I.D.) packed with 2.7 μm partially porous particles, was employed (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). The injection volume was 5 μL, and the mobile phase consisted of water/acetic acid (0.1%) at pH = 3 (solvent A) and ACN/acetic acid (0.1%) (solvent B), respectively in the following linear gradient mode: 0 min, 0% B; 5 min, 5% B; 15 min, 10% B; 30 min, 20% B; 60 min, 50% B; 70 min, 100% B; 71 min, 0% B. The mobile phase flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, and it was splitted to 0.3 mL/min prior to MS detection. PDA wavelength range was 210–400 nm and the chromatograms were extracted at 280 and 350 nm.

The extract (10 mg) was dissolved in DMSO (1 mL) and filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane filters (Whatman, Clifton, USA).

Phenolics identification was carried out by the complementary information provided by chromatographic retention times, PDA and mass spectra, and further supported by comparison to existing literature data [13].

The quantitative determination of each compound was carried out by means of the external standard method using gallic acid (λ = 270), catechin (λ = 278), naringenin (λ = 283), chlorogenic acid (λ = 325), apigenin (λ = 330), rutin (λ = 355), kaempferol (λ = 365) and quercetin (λ = 370) as reference compounds in a concentration range of 1–100 ppm. With three different concentration levels. Triplicate injections were made for each level, and a linear regression was generated. The calibration curves with the external standards were obtained using concentration (mg/L) with respect to the area obtained from the integration of the PDA peaks at a wavelength of 270 nm for benzoic acid-like, 278 nm for flavan-3-ol-like, 283 nm for flavanone-like, 325 nm for cinnamic acid-like, 330 nm for flavone-glycoside-like, 354 nm for flavonol-glycoside-like and flavanone-glycoside-like, 365 nm for flavone-like and 370 nm for flavonol-like compounds. The results were obtained from the average of three determinations and are expressed as mg/g dried extract ± percent relative standard deviation (%RSD).

Antioxidant activity

Free radical scavenging activity

The free radical scavenging activity of F. vasta extract was evaluated using the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) test, according to the protocol previously reported [17]. An aliquot (0.5 mL) of 80% MeOH solution containing different amounts of the extract (0.0125–0.2 mg/mL) was added to 3 mL of daily prepared methanol DPPH solution (0.1 mM). The optical density change at 517 nm was measured, 20 min after the initial mixing, with a model UV-1601 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu). Butylated Hydroxytoluene (BHT) was used as reference. The scavenging activity was measured as the decrease in absorbance of the samples versus DPPH standard solution. The results were obtained from the average of three independent experiments, and are reported as mean radical scavenging activity percentage (%) ± SD. The results are also expressed as mean 50% Inhibitory Concentration (IC50) ± standard deviation (SD), determined graphically by interpolation of the dose-response curve; lower IC50 value indicates higher antioxidant activity.

Measurement of reducing power

The reducing power of F. vasta extract was evaluated by spectrophotometric detection of Fe3+-Fe2+ transformation method, as previously reported [18]. Different amounts of the extract (0.0125–0.2 mg/mL) in 1 mL solvent were mixed with 2.5 mL of phosphate buffer (0.2 M, pH 6.6) and 2.5 mL of 1% potassium ferrycyanide [K3Fe(CN)6]. The mixture was incubated at 50 °C for 20 min. The resulting solution was cooled rapidly, mixed with 2.5 mL of 10% trichloroacetic acid, and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The resulting supernatant (2.5 mL) was mixed with 2.5 mL of distilled water and 0.5 mL of 0.1% fresh ferric chloride (FeCl3), and the absorbance was measured at 700nm after 10 min; the increased absorbance of the reaction mixture indicates an increase in reducing power. As blank, an equal volume (1 mL) of water was mixed with a solution prepared as described above. Ascorbic acid and BHT were used as reference standards. The results were obtained from the average of three independent experiments, and are expressed as mean absorbance values ± SD. The reducing power was also expressed as ascorbic acid equivalent (ASE/mL); when the reducing power is 1 ASE/mL, the reducing power of 1 mL extract is equivalent to 1 μmol ascorbic acid.

Ferrous ions (Fe2+) chelating activity

The Fe2+ chelating activity of F. vasta extract was estimated by measuring the formation of the Fe2+-ferrozine complex, according to the method previously reported [18]. Briefly, different concentrations of the extract (0.0125–0.2 mg/mL) in 1 mL solvent were mixed with 0.5 mL of methanol and 0.05 mL of 2 mM FeCl2. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 0.1 mL of 5 mM ferrozine. Then the mixture was shaken vigorously and left standing at room temperature for 10 min. The absorbance of the solution was measured spectrophotometrically at 562 nm. The control contains FeCl2 and ferrozine, complex formation molecules. Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) was used as reference standard The results were obtained from the average of three independent experiments and are reported as mean inhibition of the Fe2+-ferrozine complex formation (%) ± SD and IC50 ± SD.

Protective effect on Escherichia coli under peroxide stress

The ability of F. vasta extract to protect bacterial growth and survival from the oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was evaluated according the protocol described by Smirnova et al. [19], with some modifications. Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was obtained from the Department of Scienze Chimiche Biologiche Farmaceutiche ed Ambientali, University of Messina, in-house culture collection (Messina, Italy). Bacteria were grown overnight in LB medium. The overnight suspension was centrifuged (10 min at 3500 rpm), resuspended in LB fresh medium to obtain a final optical density at 600 nm (OD600) = 0.1, and then grown aerobically at 37 °C with shaking at 150 rpm. In mid-log phase (OD600 = 0.6) bacteria were centrifuged and the OD600 adjusted to 0.2 value with fresh medium. The bacteria suspension was then aliquoted and F. vasta extract (1 mg/mL) and reference standard quercetin (0.2 mM) were added. Two control groups (Ctr), with and without H2O2 treatment, were included. After 30–40 min, when OD600 reached a value equal to 0.4, in order to establish the ability of F. vasta extract to exert protection against E. coli growth inhibition induced from oxidative stress bacteria were treated with H2O2 (2 mM), and the growth was monitored every 20 min for 3 h.

For survival studies, the bacteria (OD600 = 0.4) were exposed for 30 min to a higher concentration of H2O2 (10 mM), which caused bactericidal effect. Then an aliquot of each sample was diluted in 0.9% NaCl to obtain serial dilutions (1:10). Each sample was poured onto LB-agar plates and incubated at 37 °C; after 24 h the number of viable colonies was counted to estimate the cell survival. The percentage (%) of survival was calculated according to the formula: (colony forming units (CFU) of H2O2 treated culture/CFU of untreated Ctr) × 100 [20].

The results were obtained from the average of three independent experiments and are expressed as mean absorbance ± SD and surviving (%) ± SD for protective effect on E. coli growth and survival, respectively. Statistical comparisons of the data were performed by Student’s t-test for unpaired data. P-values lower than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Artemia salina lethality bioassay

The potential toxicity of F. vasta extract was investigated using brine shrimp (Artemia salina Leach) lethality bioassay, according to the method previously reported [21]. The extract was tested at different concentrations (10–1000 μg/mL). Ten brine shrimp larvae, taken 48 h after initiation of hatching in artificial seawater, were transferred to each sample vial, and artificial seawater was added to obtain a final volume of 5 mL. After 24 h of incubation at 25–28 °C, the vials were observed using a magnifying glass, and surviving larvae were counted. The assay was carried out in triplicate, and median lethal concentration (LC50) values were determined using the probit analysis method. Extracts with LC50 higher than 1000 μg/mL are considered non-toxic.

Antimicrobial activity

Microbial strains and culture conditions

The following strains were used as indicators for the antimicrobial testing and were obtained from the Department of Scienze Chimiche Biologiche Farmaceutiche ed Ambientali, University of Messina (Italy), in-house culture collection: Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, Escherichia coli ATCC 10536, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 13932, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15442, Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 13311, Salmonella enterica (Wild type), Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, and Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228 were grown at 37 °C in MHB; the yeast Candida albicans ATCC 10231 was grown at 35 °C on SDA.

Antimicrobial testing

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal and fungicidal concentration (MBC and MFC) values of F. vasta extract were determined using the in broth microdilution method according to the protocols recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [22, 23].

Cultures of bacterial strains and C. albicans were prepared overnight in MHB and RPMI 1640, respectively; microorganism suspensions were therefore adjusted with sterile medium to give 1 × 106 for bacteria and 1 × 104 CFU/mL for C. albicans. The extract was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (1%) and MHB to obtain a final concentration of 1 mg/mL. Two-fold serial dilutions were prepared in a 96-well plate. The tested concentrations ranged from 500 to 0.49 μg/mL. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration (μg/mL) of extract which completely inhibit the visible growth of microorganisms in broth after 24 h of incubation for bacteria and 48 h for C. albicans. All experiments were performed in triplicate on three independent days. Positive and negative controls were also included.

Results

Phytochemical investigations

Identification of flavonoid compounds by paper chromatography

Chromatographic separation of F. vasta extract allowed the identification of some flavonoid compounds, namely luteolin, quercetin, vitexin, quercetin-3-O-β-galactoside and rutin. Their structures were elucidated on the basis of, UV, 1H-NMR, and MS analyses. The spectral information is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Spectroscopic analyses of the flavonoid compounds isolated from F. vasta leaves hydroalcoholic extract

Compound

Physical state

1H-NMR data

UV data

MS data

Luteolin

Yellow powder

1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): δ ppm 12.9 (1H, s, 5-OH), 7.4 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz,, H-6′), 7.38 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz, H-2′), 6.85 (1H, d, J = 8 Hz, H-5′), 6.6 (1H s, H-3), 6.4 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz, H-8), 6.15 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz, H-6)..

 

EI-MS: m/z 286

Quercetin

Yellow powder

 

UV λmax (MeOH): 255, 267, 371; (NaOMe): 270, 320, 420; (AlCl3): 270, 455; (AlCl3/HCl): 264, 303sh, 315sh, 428; (NaOAc): 257, 274, 318, 383; (NaOAc/H3BO3): 259, 387.

EI–MS: m/z 302.

Vitexin

Yellow amorphous powder

1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): δ 8.04 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, H-2′,6′), 6.88 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H, H-3′,5′), 6.42 (s, 1H, H-3), 6.74 (s, 1H, H-6), 4.65 (d, J = 9.6 Hz,1H, H-1).

UV λmax (MeOH): 269, 331; (NaOMe): 279, 325 (sh), 391; (AlCl3): 276, 303 (sh), 346, 382; (AlCl3/HCl): 277; 303, 343, 380 (NaOAc): 278, 387 (NaOAc/H3BO3): 270, 319, 346.

ESI-MS m/z: 433 [M + H]+.

Quercetin 3-O-β-galactoside

Yellow crystals

1H-NMR (DMSO-d6, 400 MHz): δ 7.78 (1H, dd, J = 2, 8.5 Hz, H-6′), 7.54 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz, H-2′), 6.82 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-5′), d 6.42 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz, H-8), 6.24 (1 H,d, J = 2 Hz, H-6), 5.5 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1″).

 

(−)ESI-MS: m/z 463 [M-H].

Quercetin 3-O-rutinoside (Rutin)

Yellow powder

1H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ ppm 7.54 (2H, m, H-2′/6′), 6.85 (1H, d, J = 9 Hz, H-5′), 6.38 (1H, d, J = 2.5 Hz, H-8), 6.19 (1H, J = 2.5 Hz, H-6), 5.35 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, H-1″), 4.39 (1H, s, H-1″‘), 3.90–3.20 (m, remaining sugar protons), 0.99 (3H, d, J = 6 Hz, H-6″‘).

UV λmax (MeOH): 258, 269, 361; (NaOMe): 276, 322, 416; (AlCl3): 232, 276, 302, 366; (AlCl3/HCl): 232, 276, 302, 366; (NaOAc): 284, 306, 381; (NaOAc/H3BO3): 261, 312, 376.

 

Identification of phenolic compounds by HPLC-PDA/ESI-MS

The quali-quantitative characterization of the phenolic compounds present in the F. vasta leaves extract was accomplished by HPLC-PDA/ESI-MS. Baseline compound separation was achieved on the employed fused-core C18 stationary phase; as far as detection is concerned on-line coupling to PDA and MS detection provided complementary information for reliable identification purposes. The analysis revealed the presence of 12 compounds, 2 out of them belonging to the group of phenolic acids (77.09 mg/g extract) and 10 to flavonoids (135.98 mg/g extract). The flavonol quercetin-3-galactoside was found to be the main phenolic compound detected in the extract (81.5 mg/g ± 0.88% RSD), followed by gallic acid (76.36 mg/g ± 2.70% RSD) and isoquercitrin (22.5 mg/g ± 2.02% RSD) (Fig. 1, Table 2).
Figure 1
Fig. 1

HPLC-PDA chromatograms of the phenolic compounds, extracted at 280 nm (a) and 350 nm (b) wavelengths, of F. vasta leaves hydroalcoholic extract. For peak identification, see Table 2

Table 2

HPLC-PDA/ESI-MS (negative ionization mode) polyphenolic fingerprint of Ficus vasta leaves extract

No.

tR (min)

Molecular Formula

[M-H]

UV/Vis (nm)

Compound

Class

mg/g extract

RSD (%)

1

6.8

C7H6O5

169, 125

210, 270

Gallic acid

Benzoic acid-like acid

76.36

2.70

2

9.7

C15H14O6

289

205, 278

Catechin

Flavan-3-ol-like

6.53

1.87

3

12.6

C16H18O9

353, 191

215, 325

Chlorogenic acid

Cinnamic acid-like

0.73

1.73

4

16.8

C15H12O5

271

283

Naringenin

Flavanone-like

5.84

1.30

5

26.0

C27H30O16

601, 301

254, 354

Rutin

Flavonol-glycoside-like

9.33

1.38

6

26.2

C21H20O12

463, 301

254, 354

Isoquercitrin

Flavonol-glycoside-like

22.50

2.02

7

28.4

C27H32O14

579, 271

254, 354

Naringin

Flavanone-glycoside-like

1.20

3.56

8

29.0

C21H20O12

463, 301

257, 354

Quercetin-3-galactoside

Flavonol-glycoside-like

81.75

0.88

9

30.2

C21H20O10

431, 269

270, 330

Vitexin

Flavone-glycoside-like

0.64

2.95

10

33.4

C21H20O11

447, 285

256, 346

Kaempferol-3-glucoside

Flavonol-glycoside-like

6.72

4.93

11

35.3

C15H10O7

301

370

Quercetin

Flavonol-like

0.98

0.81

12

36.4

C15H10O7

285

265, 365

Luteolin

Flavone-like

0.49

3.31

Column: Ascentis Express C18, 15 cm × 4.6 mm, 2.7 μm d.p. (ESI, negative ionization mode; when observed, secondary fragment ions are reported).Values are expressed as the mean ± S.D. (n = 3)

Antioxidant activity

Free radical scavenging activity

The results of DPPH assay are shown in Fig. 2a. F. vasta extract displayed strong radical scavenging effect, dose-dependent, which reached about 90% inhibition at the concentration of 0.15 mg/mL. The activity of the extract was higher than that of the standard BHT, as indicated also by the IC50 values (0.0672 ± 0.0038 mg/mL and 0.0821 ± 0.0009 mg/mL, respectively).
Figure 2
Fig. 2

Free radical scavenging activity (DPPH test) (a) and reducing power (b) of F. vasta leaves hydroalcoholic extract. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3)

Measurement of reducing power

F. vasta extract exhibited reducing power, that increased in a dose-dependent manner; the activity resulted lower than that of BHT, as confirmed by ASE/mL values (3.65 ± 0.48 ASE/mL and 1.97 ± 0.08 ASE/mL) (Fig. 2b).

Ferrous ions (Fe2+) chelating activity

In the Fe2+ chelating activity assay F. vasta extract showed mild, dose-dependent, effect (data not shown). As confirmed by the IC50 values, the chelating ability of the extract resulted much lower than that of the standard EDTA (0.801 ± 0.007 mg/mL and 0.0067 ± 3.98 E-05 mg/mL, respectively).

Protective effect on Escherichia coli under peroxide stress

In a preliminary experiment we established that F. vasta extract does not inhibit the growth of E. coli at the dose of 1 mg/mL under the experimental conditions utilized in this protocol, thus we tested the extract at the concentration of 1 mg/mL to evaluate its protective ability against the bacteriostatic and bactericidal effects of H2O2. As shown in Fig. 3, F. vasta extract displayed noticeable protective effect on E. coli growth under oxidative stress. Addition of 2 mM H2O2 resulted in a 60-min growth arrest of E. coli into the Ctr group. In the culture pretreated with quercetin (0.2 mM), addition of H2O2 did not inhibit bacterial growth. The pretreatment with F. vasta extract (1 mg/mL) provoked a strong protection against H2O2-induced damage, statistically significant at all time points compared to Ctr group treated with H2O2 (P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001). Further, the cell growth of the culture treated with F. vasta extract notably exceeded that of quercetin group at 20, 40 and 60 min.
Figure 3
Fig. 3

Protective effect of F. vasta leaves hydroalcoholic extract on Escherichia coli growing under peroxide stress. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical differences compared to control group with H2O2 treatment (Ctr + H2O2) are noted with asterisk (**P < 0.001, ***P < 0.0001)

The results of protective effect on E. coli survival are shown in Fig. 4. After 30 min, an elevated loss of viability in the Ctr culture treated with 10 mM H2O2 (approximately 68% survival) compared to untreated Ctr was observed. In the culture pretreated with F. vasta extract, high survival (approximately 110%) was maintained in the presence of 10 mM H2O2, statistically significant compared to Ctr culture treated with H2O2 (P < 0.0001); even in this case the observed effect was higher than that of quercetin.
Figure 4
Fig. 4

Protective effect of F. vasta leaves hydroalcoholic extract on Escherichia coli survival under peroxide stress. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Statistical differences compared to control group with H2O2 treatment (Ctr + H2O2) are noted with asterisk (***P < 0.0001)

Artemia salina lethality bioassay

F. vasta extract did not display any toxicity against brine shrimp larvae (LC50 > 1000 μg/mL).

Antimicrobial activity

The antimicrobial properties of F. vasta extract were tested against a representative set of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains and the yeast C. albicans, according to the protocols recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [19, 20]. The MIC values of F. vasta extract are shown in Table 3.
Table 3

The MIC values of F. vasta leaves extract

Gram positive bacteria

MIC (μg/mL)

Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633

>  500

Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 13932

125.0

Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213

62.5

Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228

62.5

Gram negative bacteria

 

Escherichia coli ATCC 10536

250.0

Escherichia coli ATCC 25922

250.0

Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 15442

>  500

Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 13311

250.0

Salmonella enterica (Wild type)

250.0

Yeast

 

Candida albicans ATCC 10231

>  500

After 24 h of exposure [20], the extract was effective against almost all the bacteria tested, with the exception of B. subtilis and P. aeruginosa (MIC > 500 μg/mL). The extract showed higher efficacy towards Gram-positive than Gram-negative bacteria, with S. aureus and S. epidermidis being the most sensitive strains (MIC: 62.5 μg/mL). None of the tested strains were inhibited by DMSO (maximum 0.5% v/v), used as negative control (data not shown). The MBC values indicated that the inhibitory effect of F. vasta extract was bacteriostatic within the concentrations tested (MBC >  500 μg/mL). Finally, no activity was detected against C. albicans (MIC > 500 μg/mL).

Discussion

In this work we report for the first time the quali-quantitative characterization of the phenolic compounds present in the hydroalcoholic extract obtained from F. vasta leaves collected in Egypt. HPLC-PDA/ESI-MS analysis revealed the presence of phenolic acids and flavonoids.

Phenolic compounds are well known for their antioxidant properties by acting either as free radical scavengers, reducing agents or metal chelators [24]. Flavonoids and phenolic acids represent the largest classes of plant phenolics; phytochemicals from these classes were found to have excellent antioxidant activity in both in vitro and in vivo investigations [25].

Antioxidant activity, especially of phytocomplexes, cannot be evaluated satisfactorily by a simple antioxidant test, but it is strongly suggested the use of various methods in order to acquire a more complete antioxidant profile. In these assays, plant extracts are generally assessed for their function as reducing agents, hydrogen donors, singlet oxygen quenchers or metal chelators, after which they are classified as primary (chain-breaking) and secondary (preventive) antioxidants [25]. Thus, three in vitro assays based on fundamentally different approaches and mechanisms were used to screen the antioxidant potential of F. vasta extract: the primary antioxidant properties were examined using the DPPH and the reducing power assays, and the secondary antioxidant ability was determined by measuring the Fe2+ chelating activity. Antioxidants can deactivate radicals by two major mechanisms: hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) and single electron transfer (SET); for DPPH test recently a combination of these two reactions, HAT and SET, was suggested to occur, whereas reducing power is recognized as electron transfer based method [2527].

The results of antioxidant tests showed that F. vasta extract possesses primary antioxidant properties; these effects could depend mainly on the presence of flavonoids and phenolic acids, particularly quercetin-3-galactoside and gallic acid, which are present in high amounts in the extract. Previous studies demonstrated the strong radical scavenging properties of these compounds, as well as their ferric reducing ability [2830]. Abdelwahed et al. [31] demonstrated that gallic acid adopt a hydrogen donating mechanism to scavenge the DPPH radical and it is even more effective than Vitamin E.

In order to investigate the antioxidant efficacy of F. vasta extract in a biological setting, the ability to protect bacterial growth and survival from the oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) was evaluated on Escherichia coli. This microbial model is utilized as an effective system to establish the antioxidant properties of medicinal plant extracts or pure compounds [32]; it is easier in terms of experimental operation, lower in cost compared to cellular antioxidant activity assays, and more biologically relevant than the in vitro measurements of antioxidant activity.

The obtained results showed that F. vasta extract displayed noticeable protective effects on E. coli growth under oxidative stress. These results are similar to those previously reported for different extracts of Potentilla fruticosa L., tested at the same concentration of F. vasta extract and under the same experimental conditions [33]. Oktyabrsky et al. [34] previously demonstrated the protective effect of several plant extracts on E. coli survival in the presence of high concentrations of H2O2 (10 mM); from a comparison of the results F. vasta extract showed a greater activity, displaying total protection against oxidative damage.

The protective effects of some polyphenols, as quercetin and catechin, on growth and survival of E. coli under peroxide stress has been previously reported [19]; thus, it can be hypothesized that the polyphenols contained in F. vasta extract are the main responsible for the observed activities.

In order to achieve a safe treatment with plant products, numerous research studies have recently been focused on the toxicity of medicinal plants. The brine shrimp (Artemia salina Leach) lethality bioassay has been established as a safe, practical and cheap method employed for preliminary assessment of toxicity and have been used for detection of fungal toxins, plant extract toxicity, heavy metals and pesticides [21]. According to Clarkson’s toxicity criterion for the toxicity assessment of plant extracts, those with LC50 above 1000 μg/mL are considered as non-toxic [35]. F. vasta extract was found to be non-toxic against brine shrimps.

In the last decade, there has been growing interest in the use of plant extracts with low toxicity as sources of natural antimicrobial substances; particularly, the antimicrobial properties of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds were described [3638].

F. vasta extract extract exhibited bacteriostatic activity against almost all the Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria tested, particularly against S. aureus and S. epidermidis.

Our results disagree with those of a previous work, which reported the lack of antibacterial properties of a 80% MeOH extract of F. vasta aerial parts against S. aureus, S. epidermidis, E. coli and P. aeruginosa, as evaluated by the disk-diffusion method [13]; nonetheless, the extract was tested at the dose of 1.19 μg only, and this could explain the disaccording results.

It can be hypothesized that the antimicrobial properties of F. vasta extract could depend on the presence of phenolic compounds. Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial species might have different sensitivities against the phenolics contained in F. vasta extract because of the difference in their membrane structure and associated cell wall differences. Many of the phenolic compounds were found to be effective against Gram-positive bacteria, whereas they showed no activity or negligible activity against Gram-negative bacteria. The partial hydrophobicity of some phenolic compounds allows them to act efficiently at the membrane-interface of Gram-positive bacteria, this causes the loss of membrane integrity and the dissipation of the proton motive force [39].

It is known that both flavonoids and phenolic acids are effective antimicrobial agents against a wide array of microorganisms [5, 40]. Liu et al. [41] previously reported that quercetin and luteolin showed a broad antimicrobial spectrum of activity on microorganisms including bacteria and fungi, whereas the glycoside derivatives such as quercetin 3-O-β-D-glucoside (isoquercitrin) exhibited relatively weak antimicrobial activity. Other authors showed that quercetin 3-O-glucoside didn’t display any antibacterial efficacy [42].

The antibacterial activity of some phenolic acids such as gallic against Gram-positive (S. aureus and L. monocytogenes) and Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli and P. aeruginosa) was demonstrated; these compounds were found to be more efficient against the reported bacteria than conventional antibiotics such as gentamicin and streptomycin [43]. It was reported that gallic acid could restrain the growth of many bacteria, including methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, MRSA, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, and S. typhi [44]. Based on these statements, gallic acid, contained in high amount in the extract, could be the main component responsible of the observed effects.

Conclusions

This study is the first report on the characterization of the phenolic profile and the evaluation of antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the leaves of Ficus vasta Forssk. growing in Egypt. The results of our investigations showed that F. vasta extract possesses strong primary antioxidant properties, as well as antibacterial efficacy, particularly against the Gram-positive tested strains. Besides, the extract showed no toxicity against brine shrimp larvae.

These findings contribute to an increase in knowledge about this species, demonstrating the potential of Ficus vasta leaves as safe sources of natural antioxidant and antimicrobial compounds.

Abbreviations

ACN: 

acetonitrile

ASE: 

ascorbic acid equivalent

BHT: 

Butylated Hydroxytoluene

CFU: 

colony forming unit

DMSO: 

dimethyl sulfoxide

DPPH: 

2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl

EDTA: 

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid

H2O2

hydrogen peroxide

IC50

mean 50% Inhibitory Concentration

LB: 

Luria-Bertani

LC50

median lethal concentration

MBC: 

minimum bactericidal concentration

MeOH: 

methanol

MFC: 

minimum fungicidal concentration

MHB: 

Müeller Hinton Broth

RSD: 

relative standard deviation

SDA: 

Sabouraud Dextrose Agar

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Foundation “Prof. Antonio Imbesi”. The authors also gratefully thank Dr. Mohammed El-Gebaly, Department of Botany, National Research Centre (NRC) and by Mrs. Tereeza Labib, consultant of Plant Taxonomy at the Ministry of Agriculture and director of Orman Botanical Garden, Giza, Egypt, for identification of plant material.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets for supporting the outcomes of the study are included in the article.

Authors’ contributions

MFT and NM designed the study and wrote the manuscript. KR, FC, PD, and LM carried out the phytochemical studies; MFT, NM, and RA performed the antioxidant and toxicity experiments; AF, CB, and MD the antimicrobial experiments. All the authors revised the article critically and gave approval of the final version.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Biologiche, Farmaceutiche ed Ambientali, University of Messina, Polo Annunziata, Messina, Italy
(2)
Pharmacognosy Department, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt
(3)
Foundation “Prof. Antonio Imbesi”, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
(4)
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Odontoiatriche e delle Immagini Morfologiche e Funzionali, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
(5)
Scienze dell’Alimentazione e della Nutrizione Umana, Università Campus Biomedico di Roma, Rome, Italy
(6)
Chromaleont s.r.l., c/o Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche, Biologiche, Farmaceutiche ed Ambientali, University of Messina, Polo Annunziata, Messina, Italy
(7)
Dipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco, sezione Biochimica, Catania, Italy

References

  1. Acquaviva R, Menichini F, Ragusa S, Genovese C, Amodeo A, Tundis R, Loizzo MR, Iauk. Antimicrobial and antioxidant properties of Betula aetnensis Rafin. (Betulaceae) leaves extract. Nat Prod Res 2013a;27(4–5):475–479.Google Scholar
  2. Acquaviva R, Di Giacomo C, Vanella L, Santangelo R, Sorrenti V, Barbagallo L, Genovese C, Mastrojeni S, Ragusa S, Iauk L. Antioxidant activity of extracts of Momordica foetida Schumach. Et Thonn. Molecules. 2013b;18(3):3241–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Hatami T, Emami SA, Miraghaee SS, Mojarrab M. Total phenolic contents and antioxidant activities of different extracts and fractions from the aerial parts of Artemisia biennis Willd. Iran J Pharm Res. 2014;13(2):551–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Dai J, Mumper RJ. Plant phenolics: extraction, analysis and their antioxidant and anticancer properties. Molecules. 2010;15(10):7313–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowan MM. Plant products as antimicrobial agents. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(4):564–82.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahmed F, MKK A, Abedin Z, Karim AA. Traditional uses and pharmacological potential of Ficus exasperata Vahl. Sys Rev Pharm. 2012;3(1):15–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Abdel-Hameed E-SS. Total phenolic contents and free radical scavenging activity of certain Egyptian Ficus species leaf samples. Food Chem. 2009;114(4):1271–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Alqasoumi SI, Basudan OA, Al-Rehaily AJ, Abdel-Kader MS. Phytochemical and pharmacological study of Ficus palmata growing in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Pharm J. 2014;22(5):460–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tkachenko H, Buyun L, Terech-Majewska E, Osadowski Z. In vitro antimicrobial activity of ethanolic extracts obtained from Ficus spp. leaves against the fish pathogen Aeromonas hydrophila. Arch Pol Fish. 2016;24:219–30.Google Scholar
  10. Raju NJ, Yesuf EA, Bekele M, Wabe NT. Investigation of in vitro anthelmintic activity of Ficus vasta leaves. Asian J pharm Biol Res. 2011;1(4):454–8.Google Scholar
  11. Mosa EO, Justin DD, Hamam SB, Mohamed EAO, Saad MHA. Evaluation of phytochemical and antimicrobial activities of some sudanese medicinal plants. World. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2014;3(12):1769–76.Google Scholar
  12. Rashed K, Anthonissen R, Cappoen D, Verschaeve L. Phytochemical composition and potential genotoxic effects of important Egyptian medicinal plants. Phcog Commn. 2015;5(3):207–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Rashed K, Ono L. Evaluation of cytotoxicity, anti-herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and antibacterial activities of Ficus vasta and phytoconstituents. Int Curr Pharm J. 2013;3(1):211–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Osman ME, Yassen HH, Deng JD, Mustafa RO, Hussein SM. General phytochemical screening and antioxidant activity of some Sudanese medicinal plants. J Forest Prod Ind. 2014;3(6):292–5.Google Scholar
  15. De Souza KC, Schapoval EE, Bassani VL. LC determination of flavonoids: separation of quercetin, luteolin and 3-O-methylquercetin in Achyrocline satureioides preparations. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2002;28(3–4):771–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fathiazad F, Delazar A, Amiri R, Sarker SD. Extraction of flavonoids and quantification of rutin from waste tobacco leaves. Iran J Pharm Res. 2006;3:222–7.Google Scholar
  17. Taviano MF, Filocamo A, Ragusa S, Cacciola F, Dugo P, Mondello L, et al. Phenolic profile, antioxidant and cytotoxic properties of polar extracts from leaves and flowers of Isatis tinctoria L. (Brassicaceae) growing in Sicily. Plant Biosyst. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2017.1338629.
  18. Miceli N, Filocamo A, Ragusa S, Cacciola F, Dugo P, Mondello L, et al. Chemical characterization and biological activities of phenolic-rich fraction from cauline leaves of Isatis tinctoria L. (Brassicaceae) growing in Sicily, Italy. Chem Biodivers. 2017;14(8):1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Smirnova GV, Samoylova ZY, Muzyka NG, Oktyabrsky ON. Influence of polyphenols on Escherichia coli resistance to oxidative stress. Free Rad Biol Med. 2009;46:759–68.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Schurig-Briccio LA, Farías RN, Rodríguez-Montelongo L, Rintoul MR, Rapisarda VA. Protection against oxidative stress in Escherichia coli stationary phase by a phosphate concentration-dependent genes expression. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2009;483:106–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Taviano MF, Marino A, Trovato A, Bellinghieri V, Melchini A, Dugo P, et al. Juniperus oxycedrus L. subsp. oxycedrus and Juniperus oxycedrus L. subsp. macrocarpa (Sibth. & Sm.) ball. “Berries” from Turkey: comparative evaluation of phenolic profile, antioxidant, cytotoxic and antimicrobial activities. Food Chem Toxicol. 2013;58:22–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of Yeasts, 3rd ed. Approved standard M27-A3. In: Wayne (PA): clinical and laboratory standards institute; 2008.Google Scholar
  23. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically, 9th ed. Approved standard M07-A9. In: Wayne (PA): clinical and laboratory standards institute; 2012.Google Scholar
  24. Chua LS, Hidayathulla S. Phytochemical profile of fresh and senescent leaves due to storage for Ficus deltoidea. Plant Biosyst. 2017;151(1):74–83.Google Scholar
  25. Kasote DM, Katyare SS, Hegde MV, Bae H. Significance of antioxidant potential of plants and its relevance to therapeutic applications. Int J Biol Sci. 2015;11(8):982–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Prior RL, Wu X, Schaich K. Standardized methods for the determination of antioxidant capacity and phenolics in foods and dietary supplements. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53:4290–302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Csepregi K, Neugart S, Schreine M, Hideg É. Comparative evaluation of total antioxidant capacities of plant polyphenols. Molecules. 2016;21(2), 208:1–16.Google Scholar
  28. Parejo I, Viladomat F, Bastida J, Schmeda-Hirschmann G, Burillo JS, Codina C. Bioguided isolation and identification of the non-volatile antioxidant compounds from fennel (Foeniculum vulgare mill.) waste. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52(7):1890.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang Y, Wang D, Yang L, Zhou D, Zhang J. Purification and characterization of flavonoids from the leaves of Zanthoxylum bungeanum and correlation between their structure and antioxidant activity. PLOS ONE. 2014;9(8):e105725. 1–11View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Badhani B, Sharma N, Kakkar R. Gallic acid: a versatile antioxidant with promising therapeutic and industrial applications. RSC Adv. 2015;5:27540–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Abdelwahed A, Bouhlel I, Skandrani I, Valenti K, Kadri M, Guiraud P, et al. Study of antimutagenic and antioxidant activities of Gallic acid and 1,2,3,4,6-pentagalloylglucose from Pistacia lentiscus. Confirmation by microarray expression profiling Chem Biol Interact. 2007;165(1):1–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Smirnova GV, Vysochina GI, Muzyka NG, Samoylova ZY, Kukushkina TA, Oktyabrsky ON. Evaluation of antioxidant properties of medical plants using microbial test systems. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;26(12):2269–76.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Yu D, Pu W, Li D, Wang D, Liu Q, Wang Y. Phenolic compounds and antioxidant activity of different organs of Potentilla fruticosa L. from two main production areas of China. Chem Biodivers. 2016;13(9):1140–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Oktyabrsky O, Vysochina G, Muzyka N, Samoilova Z, Kukushkina T, Smirnova G. Assessment of anti-oxidant activity of plant extracts using microbial test systems. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;106(4):1175–83.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Clarkson C, Maharaj VJ, Crouch NR, Grace OM, Pillay P, Matsabisa MG, Bhagwandin N, Smith PJ, Folb PI. In vitro antiplasmodial activity of medicinal plants native to or naturalized in South Africa. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;92(2–3):177–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. del Carmen Villalobos M, Serradilla MJ, Martín A, Ordiales E, Ruiz-Moyanoa S, de Guía Córdoba M. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of natural phenolic extract from defatted soybean flour by-product for stone fruit postharvest application. J Sci Food Agric. 2016;96(6):2116–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. dos Reis Albuquerque AdJ, de Freitas e Silva PM, de Almeida Cavalcante ALF, Sampaiop FC. Polyphenols as a source of antimicrobial agents against human pathogens. In: Extracts P, editor. Giordano A, Costs A. New York (USA): Nova Science Publishers, Inc.; 2013. p. 275–94.Google Scholar
  38. Bisignano C, Filocamo A, Faulks RM, Mandalari G. In vitro antimicrobial activity of pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) polyphenols. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2013;341(1):62–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Davidson PM. Chemical preservatives and natural antimicrobial compounds. In: Beuchat LR, Montville TJ, editors. Doyle MP. Food Microbiology. Fundamentals and Frontiers. Washington DC (USA): ASM Press; 2001. p. 611–6.Google Scholar
  40. Cushnie TPT, Lamb AJ. Recent advances in understanding the antibacterial properties of flavonoids. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38(2):99–107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Liu H, Mou Y, Zhao J, Wang J, Zhou L, Wang M, et al. Flavonoids from Halostachys caspica and their antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Molecules. 2010;15(11):7933–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Razavi SM, Zahri S, Zarrini G, Nazemiyeh H, Mohammadi S. Biological activity of quercetin-3-O-glucoside, a known plant flavonoid. Bioorg Khim. 2009;35(3):414–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Daglia M. Polyphenols as antimicrobial agents. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2012;23(2):174–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Fu L, Lu W, Zhou X. Phenolic compounds and in vitro antibacterial and antioxidant activities of three tropic fruits: persimmon, guava, and sweetsop. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1–9.Google Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement