Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for treating acute cerebral infarction: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Shi Liu
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nidal Jaradat
28 Jan 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - MichaƂ Bijak
7 Feb 2018 Author responded Author comments - Shi Liu
Resubmission - Version 3
7 Feb 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tetsuhiro Yoshino
18 Feb 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yogendra Nayak
2 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Shi Liu
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
4 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yogendra Nayak
13 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tetsuhiro Yoshino
15 Mar 2018 Author responded Author comments - Shi Liu
Resubmission - Version 5
15 Mar 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Mar 2018 Editorially accepted
3 Apr 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12906-018-2178-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement