Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Comparative efficacy of Chinese herbal injections for treating chronic heart failure: a network meta-analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
1 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kai-Huan Wang
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kai-Huan Wang
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
5 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yong Hyeon Baek
12 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tetsuhiro Yoshino
14 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wendy Wong
17 Dec 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kai-Huan Wang
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Dec 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tetsuhiro Yoshino
27 Dec 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Yong Hyeon Baek
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
14 Jan 2018 Editorially accepted
31 Jan 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12906-018-2090-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement