Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Pharmacological potential of Bidens pilosa L. and determination of bioactive compounds using UHPLC-QqQLIT-MS/MS and GC/MS

  • Garima Singh1,
  • Ajit Kumar Passsari1,
  • Pratibha Singh2,
  • Vincent Vineeth Leo1,
  • Sarathbabu Subbarayan1,
  • Brijesh Kumar2,
  • Bhim Pratap Singh1,
  • Hauzel lalhlenmawia3 and
  • Nachimuthu Senthil Kumar1Email author
BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:492

Received: 2 August 2017

Accepted: 10 November 2017

Published: 16 November 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
2 Aug 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
23 Sep 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sitesh Bachar
26 Oct 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shruti Shukla
28 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Garima Singh
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Garima Singh
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
10 Nov 2017 Editorially accepted
16 Nov 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12906-017-2000-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Biotechnology, Mizoram University, Aizawl, India
SAIF, CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR-CDRI), Lucknow, India
Department of Pharmacy, Regional Institute of Paramedical and Nursing Sciences, Aizawl, India