This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Post-market outcome of an extract of traditional Cretan herbs on upper respiratory tract infections: a pragmatic, prospective observational study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 5 December 2016
Accepted: 18 September 2017
Published: 21 September 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Dec 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bernhard Uehleke|
|1 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maique Biavatti|
|6 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Marilena Anastasaki|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Maique Biavatti|
|14 Sep 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Marilena Anastasaki|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|14 Sep 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Sep 2017||Editorially accepted|
|21 Sep 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12906-017-1978-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.