This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The utilization of traditional Chinese medicine in patients with dysfunctional uterine bleeding in Taiwan: a nationwide population-based study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 24 May 2017
Accepted: 18 August 2017
Published: 29 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 May 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chichiu Wang|
|30 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fataneh Hashem Dabaghian|
|13 Aug 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yi-Rong Lin|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Aug 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Aug 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chichiu Wang|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|29 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12906-017-1939-1|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.