This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Prevalence, patterns, and perceived value of complementary and alternative medicine among HIV patients: a descriptive study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 9 October 2016
Accepted: 15 August 2017
Published: 23 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|9 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Owen-Smith|
|18 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Muhammad Ayaz|
|23 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Mandreker Bahall|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amanda Owen-Smith|
|7 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kandala Ngianga|
|27 Jun 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Mandreker Bahall|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jun 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jul 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kandala Ngianga|
|27 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Mandreker Bahall|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Aug 2017||Editorially accepted|
|23 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12906-017-1928-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.