Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Effects of acupoint-stimulation for the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea compared with NSAIDs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 19 RCTs

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Seung-Hun Cho
8 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marjan Khajehei
19 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chien Li-Wei
22 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yang Xu
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
22 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marjan Khajehei
6 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chien Li-Wei
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chien Li-Wei
5 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yang Xu
Resubmission - Version 4
5 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
26 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yang Xu
Resubmission - Version 5
26 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
9 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Yang Xu
Resubmission - Version 6
9 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
11 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
31 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12906-017-1924-8

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement