Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Validity of a Cochrane Systematic Review and meta-analysis for determining the safety of vitamin E

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Dec 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Cook-Mills
27 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Qing Jiang
19 Jun 2016 Author responded Author comments - Chris Oliver
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Jun 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Cook-Mills
25 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Chris Oliver
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Cook-Mills
22 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Chris Oliver
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Cook-Mills
12 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Chris Oliver
Resubmission - Version 5
12 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
21 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Cook-Mills
13 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Chris Oliver
Resubmission - Version 6
13 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
2 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
16 Aug 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12906-017-1906-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement