This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Polarity directed optimization of phytochemical and in vitro biological potential of an indigenous folklore: Quercus dilatata Lindl. ex Royle
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 15 November 2016
Accepted: 27 July 2017
Published: 3 August 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ahmed Abdel Moneim|
|15 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Talal Ahmad Aburjai|
|14 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bratati De|
|25 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Madiha Ahmed|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|25 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Madiha Ahmed|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|19 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|27 Jul 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Madiha Ahmed|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|27 Jul 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Jul 2017||Editorially accepted|
|3 Aug 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12906-017-1894-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.