Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Prevalence, patterns, and perceived value of complementary and alternative medicine among cancer patients: a cross-sectional, descriptive study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Agnete Kristoffersen
3 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ian Pagano
10 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Monica Robotin
13 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Mandreker Bahall
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Agnete Kristoffersen
14 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Monica Robotin
10 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mandreker Bahall
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Monica Robotin
19 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Agnete Kristoffersen
3 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mandreker Bahall
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Monica Robotin
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
22 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
30 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12906-017-1853-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement