Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

In vitro characterization and in vivo toxicity, antioxidant and immunomodulatory effect of fermented foods; Xeniji™

  • Noraisyah Zulkawi1,
  • Kam Heng Ng1,
  • Rizi Zamberi2, 3,
  • Swee Keong Yeap4,
  • Dilan Satharasinghe5,
  • Indu Bala Jaganath3,
  • Anisah Binti Jamaluddin3,
  • Sheau Wei Tan2,
  • Wan Yong Ho6,
  • Noorjahan Banu Alitheen2, 7 and
  • Kamariah Long3Email author
BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:344

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1845-6

Received: 19 November 2016

Accepted: 20 June 2017

Published: 30 June 2017

Abstract

Background

Xeniji, produced by fermenting various types of foods with lactic acid bacteria and yeast, has been commonly consumed as functional food. However, nutrition value, bioactivities and safety of different fermented products maybe varies.

Methods

Organic acid and antioxidant profiles of Xeniji fermented foods were evaluated. Moreover, oral acute (5 g/kg body weight) and subchronic toxicity (0.1, 1 and 2 g/kg body weight) of Xeniji were tested on mice for 14 days and 30 days, respectively. Mortality, changes of body weight, organ weight and serum liver enzyme level were measured. Liver and spleen of mice from subchronic toxicity study were subjected to antioxidant and immunomodulation quantification.

Results

Xeniji was rich in β-carotene, phytonadione, polyphenol, citric acid and essential amino acids. No mortality and significant changes of body weight and serum liver enzyme level were recorded for both oral acute and subchronic toxicity studies. Antioxidant level in the liver and immunity of Xeniji treated mice were significantly upregulated in dosage dependent manner.

Conclusion

Xeniji is a fermented functional food that rich in nutrients that enhanced antioxidant and immunity of mice.

Graphical abstract

Xeniji that rich in β-carotene, phytonadione, polyphenol, citric acid and essential amino acids promote antioxidant and immunity in mice without causing toxic effect.

Keywords

Lactic acid bacteriaYeastOrganic acidAntioxidantT cells

Background

Rapid expansion of scientific study has shown the role of diet in preventing and controlling chronic diseases particularly non-communicable diseases. Population who practice diet that rich in fruits and vegetables are recorded with lower rate of chronic diseases [1]. This effect maybe contributed by the polyphenols that present in the fruits and vegetables. Polyphenols are antioxidants that scavenged oxidative stress in the cells. The polyphenols in fruits and vegetables have been reported with various properties including antioxidant, anti-tumor and protection against cardiovascular disease [2]. Although fresh fruits and vegetables are good source of polyphenols [2], short shelf life and convenience to the consumers have limit the consumption of fruits and vegetables. Fermentation is one of the commonly used food processing methods to preserve and prolong shelf life for foods and vegetables. Moreover, fruits and vegetables fermented by yeast or lactic acid bacteria were also reported with enhance polyphenols and antioxidants [3, 4]. Thus, fermented fruits and vegetables are functional foods that may exert positive effects on maintenance of overall good health [5].

Fermented natural food is a common functional food in Japan produced by fermenting fruits and vegetable using lactic acid bacteria and yeast [6]. It was reported as a convenient functional food to supply sufficient and more digestible dietary nutrients [7]. In Japan, fermented foods, such as plant-based paste, Manda and Xeniji, that produced by fermenting various food ingredients including fruits, vegetables, herbs, mushrooms, seaweed, pulse, cereals with lactic acid bacteria have been widely consumed as health supplement [6, 8]. Xeniji is one of the commercial available fermented food that commonly consumed in Japan and Malaysia. However, the nutritional value, in vivo toxicity and bioactivities of Xeniji were yet to be reported. Although it is fermented using similar food ingredients and lactic acid bacteria as other commercial available fermented food, it is important to profile its nutrients as different types of fermented products may possess different level of antioxidant when fermenting by different source of carbohydrate [9]. In addition, over consumed of functional foods that rich in polyphenols may associate with some mild adverse effects [2]. Thus, it is important to profile the nutrients of the Xeniji. Previous study on other fermented food were carried out using rodent model [8, 1015]. This study has also been validated in the in vivo mice model regarding safety and efficacy of Xeniji.

Methods

Preparation of fermented food

Commercial available Xeniji™ was provided by Elken Sdn Bhd, Malaysia. It was prepared by fermenting multiple food ingredients using commercial lactic acid bacteria (Table 1) for a period of 3 years and 6 months. Then, 1 g of Xeniji was weighed and mixed with the 1 mL of water followed by shaking at 400 rpm for 1 h. The sample was then centrifuged for 10 min 10,000 rpm at room temperature and the supernatant was recovered. The supernatant was concentrated using the rotary evaporator for further analysis.
Table 1

Materials of fermented fruits and vegetables, Xeniji™

 

Material name

Content

Sugar

Brown sugar, Galacto-oligosaccharide (GOS) and Oligosaccharide

67.2%

Fruits

Prunus domestica L. (Prune), Fragaria x ananassa (Strawberry), Malus domestica (Apple), Vitis pione (Grape), Prunus persica (Peach), Citrus unshiu (Mandarin orange), Mulberry, Cherry blossom paste, Citrus junos (Yuzu), Diospyros kaki (Persimmon), Actindia chinensis (Kiwi), Fortunella japonica (Kumquat), Citrus limon (Lemon), Vaccinium corymbosum (Blueberry), Myrica rubra (Artubus), Pyrus pyrifola (Pear), Prunus mume (Ume), Citrus iyo (Iyo-orange), Ficus carica (Fig), Rubus buergeri (Raspberry) and Rubus fruticosus (Blackberry)

18.0%

Vegetables and wild herbs

Angelica keiskei (Folium) (Angelica keiskei leaf powder), Perilla frutescens (Perilla), Cucurbita maxima (Pumpkin), Raphanus sativus (Japanese radish), Spinacia oleracea (Spinach), Daucus carota var. Sativus (Carrot), Brassica oleracea, acephala (Kale), Hordeum vulgare L. (Barley grass), Corchorus olitorius (Jew’s mallow), Lycopersicon esculentum (Tomato), Cucumis sativus (Cucumber), Plantago asiatica (Plantain), Sasa veitchii (Stripped bamboo), Equisetum arvense (Field horsetail), Eriobotrya japonica (Loquat leaf), Brassia oleracea var. Capitata (Cabbage), Salanum melongena (Eggplant), Apium graveolens var. Dulce (Celery), Capsicum annuum (Sweet pepper), Mormodica charantia (Bitter melon), Brassica rapa chinensis (Bok Choi), Nelumbo nucifera (Radix) (Lotus root), Curcuma longa (Turmeric), Brassica oleracea var. italica (Broccoli), Zingiber officinale (Ginger), Petroselinum crispum cv (Parsley), Asparagus officinalis var. Altilis (Asparagus) and Oentanthe stolonifera (Japanese Parsley)

7.4%

Mushrooms

Ganoderma lucidum (Reishi), Lentinula edodes (Shiitake mushroom), Auricularia polytricha (Jew’s ear), Grifola frondosa (Maitake mushroom)

1.3%

Seaweed

Ascophyllum nodosum (Kelp), Laminaria japonica Areschoug (Kombu), Undaria pinnatifida suringer (Wakame), Fucus evanescens (Fucus), Sargassum fusiforme setchell (Hijiki)

1.6%

Pulse and Cereals

Glycine max (Soybean), Theobroma cacao (Cocoa), Zea mays L. (Sweet Corn), Oryza sativa (Rice)

4.4%

Lactic acid bacteria species

Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus curvatus, Lactobacillus paracasei, Lactobacillus pentosus, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactococcus lactis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Pediococcus acidilactici, Pediococcus pentosaceus

0.1%

Total phenolic content (TPC) of Xeniji

Total phenolic content of Xeniji was performed using Folin-Ciocalteu methodology according to the method by Thaipong et al. [16]. Briefly, 1 mL of the extracts were added with 5 mL of diluted Folin-Ciocalteu reagent and 4 mL of the 7.5% sodium carbonate solution further kept for 2 h at room temperature in dark. After that, absorbance was measured at 725 nm using spectrophotometer (Eppendorf, USA). Gallic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was used to generate standard curve and the results were expressed as μg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g extract.

Total flavonoid content (TFC)

Total flavonoid content of Xeniji was determined by the aluminum chloride colorimetric method [17]. In brief, 1 mL of extract was mixed with 4 mL distilled water and then, 0.3 ml 10% AlCl3 solution was added after 5 mins of incubation and the mixture was allowed to stand for 6 mins. Then, 2 mL of 1 N NaOH solution was added and the final volume of the mixture was brought to 10 mL with distilled water. The mixture was allowed to stand for 15 mins and the absorbance was measured at 510 nm. The TFC was calculated from a calibration curve and the result was expressed as mg quercetin equivalent/gram extract.

Ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP)

The FRAP assay was done according to Mohamad et al. [18] with some modifications. The fresh working solution was prepared by mixing 25 mL of 300 mM acetate buffer (pH 3.6), 2.5 mL of 10 mM TPTZ solution, and 2.5 mL of 20 mM FeCl3.6H2O solution. The sample extract (150 uL) was allowed to react with 2.85 mL of the FRAP solution for 30 min in the dark condition. Readings of the coloured product (ferrous tripyridyltriazine complex) were then taken at 593 nm. Results were expressed in mg ascorbic acid equivalent (AAE)/g extract.

Reverse phase chromatography profiling of organic acids

The organic acids were separated and quantified by reversed phase chromatography with external calibration graphs (Table 2). Organic acids in the sample were separated on an Extrasil ODS column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) and the detector was set at λ = 210 nm and λ = 245 nm. Determination of organic acids was carried out at isocratic conditions at 45 °C, using a mobile phase of 50 mM phosphate solution (6.8 g potassium dihydrogen phosphate in 900 mL water, pH 2.8). The flow rate of the mobile phase was set at 0.7 mL/min.
Table 2

Retention time, concentration ranges of lineal response and correlation coefficient for standard organic acids

Organic acid standard

Rt (min)

Concentration ranges (ppm)

Equation

R2

Oxalic

3.884

1750–350

Y = 7585.1×-72,810

0.9937

Tartaric

4.148

5000–1000

Y = 2914.9×-2758

0.9942

Ascorbic

5.295

1750–350

Y = 8327.7×-7497.5

0.9921

Lactic

5.857

15,000–3000

Y = 769.58× + 4607

0.9939

Acetic

6.334

10,000–2000

Y = 253.82× + 2571

0.9991

Citric

6.953

10,000–2000

Y = 405.19× + 1826.9

0.9953

Succinic

9.052

10,000–2000

Y = 428.23× + 321.26

0.9936

Kojic

11.31

500–100

Y = 56,358×-22,343

0.9913

Ultra-performance liquid chromatography profiling of amino acid

Amino acids (9 essential and 9 none-essential amino acids) and gamma amino butyric acids (GABAs) contents were determined using ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) as described by Koh et al., [19]. Extracts of fermented paste were filtered with 0.22 μM nylon syringe filter. Then, a total of 10 μL filtrated fermented pastes were further derivatized with 70 μL of AccQ-TagTM Ultra borate buffer and mixed vigorously. Then, 20 μL of AccQTM Fluor reagent was added, and the mixture was vortexed for a while before being heated at 55 °C for 10 min, followed by 1 μL injection of the mixture into the UPLC system. The amino acid profile of fermented paste was obtained using AccQ-TagTM Ultra column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 1.7 μM) at a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min with column temperature controlled at 55 °C under the UV spectra of 260 nm. The gradient elution consists of AccQ-TagTM Ultra Eluent A (ACN:FA:Ammonium;10:6:84) and AccQ-TagTM Ultra Eluent B (ACN:FA;98:2). Gradient elution was conducted as follows: 0 to 0.54 min, maintained at 99.9% A; 0.54 to 5.74 min, linear gradient from 99.9 to 90.9% A; 5.74 to 7.74 min, linear gradient from 90.9 to 78.8% A; 7.74 to 8.50 min, linear gradient from 78.8 to 40.4% A and hold for 0.3 min at 40.4% A; 8.80 to 8.90 min, linear gradient from 40.4 to 99.9% A and then maintained at 99.9% for another 2.1 min. All analyses were performed in triplicates. The UPLC profile, which was used for the standardization of the samples throughout the study is shown in Additional file 1: Fig. S1.

High-performance liquid chromatography profiling of vitamin

Vitamin-A (beta carotene and retinol), −B1, −B2, −B3, −B5, −B6, −B7, −B9, −C, −D2, −D3, −E (alpha-tocopherol) and K1 were detected using HPLC by qualified laboratory testing company (ALS Technichem (M) Sdn Bhd, Malaysia).

Animal

The study was conducted according to the guidelines and was approved by the Institution of Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM/IACUC/AUP-R097/2014). A total of 26 male Balb/c mice (aged 6 weeks old) were purchased from animal house, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). Both acute and subchronic toxicity studies were started when the animal were acclimatised until 8 weeks old. The mice were house in plastic cage (n = 3), using commercial sawdust bedding, fed with distilled water and standard pellets (Crude protein 21%, crude fibre 5%, crude fat 3%, moisture 13%, ash 8%, calcium 0.8%, phosphorus 0.4%) (Gold Coin, Malaysia) ad libitum under housing condition 22 °C, 12 h of day/dark light cycles.

Acute toxicity test

Male Balb/c mice (n = 6) at weight approximate 21 g were separated into 2 groups; which are normal control that fed once with water (n = 3) and treated group fed with 5 g/kg body weight of plant-based fermented paste (Xeniji 5.0) (n = 3) by oral gavage using stainless steel gavage needle with volume 0.20 mL. The mice were monitor until day 14, recorded for body weight, anesthetised with isoflurane, and euthanised by cervical dislocation. Then, kidney, liver and spleen weight were recorded, serum was collected and liver enzyme markers: aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were evaluated using Hitachi 902 Automatic Analyzer (Hitachi, Japan) using reagents from Roche (Germany).

Subchronic toxicity test

Male Balb/c mice (n = 20) at weight approximate 21 g were separated into 4 groups (n = 5 per group); which are normal control that oral fed daily with water and treated groups oral fed daily with either 0.1, 1.0 or 2.0 g/kg body weight of plant-based fermented paste by oral gavage using stainless steel gavage needle with volume 0.20 mLAfter 30 days of treatment, body weight was recorded and all mice were anesthetised with isoflurane, and euthanised by cervical dislocation. Then, serum, kidney, liver and spleen were collected from normal and Xeniji treated mice, washed and separated into 2 parts. One part of liver and spleen were stored in RNA later for quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) assay, while another part was meshed using 70 μm cell strainer (SPL, Korea) to prepare liver and spleen homogenate [18] for liver antioxidant quantification and T/NK cell immunophenotyping, respectively. Spleen was washed initially with lysis buffer (8 g NH4Cl, 1 g Na2EDTA, 0.1 g KH2PO4, pH 7.4) to remove red blood cells and finally with PBS to clean splenocytes [20].

Serum biochemical analysis

Serum was collected and liver enzyme markers: aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were evaluated using Hitachi 902 Automatic Analyzer (Hitachi, Japan) using reagents from Roche (Germany).

Quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) of antioxidant genes in liver and cytokines in spleen

Total RNA from the liver and spleen were extracted using RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The concentration and purity of extracted RNA were measured Biospectrometer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), and cDNA was subsequently synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using NEXscript cDNA synthesis kit (NEX Diagnostics, Korea) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. Primers for target genes GSTA2, GCLM [21], IL-2, IL-18, and house-keeping gene β-actin [21] were listed in Table 3. Quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using NEXpro qPCR Evagreen Master Mix (NEX Diagnostics, Korea) by CFX96 Real Time PCR system (Biorad, USA) with the following steps: 95 °C for 2 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 45 s and acquisition of fluorescent signal. The specificity and efficiency of primers were confirmed by qRT-PCR melt curve and standard curve analyses (Additional file 2: Fig. S2). Expression of target genes in the treatment groups and control group was normalised using the β-actin and the fold change in the expression of each target gene was calculated by the efficiency-corrected method using ratio = 2-ΔΔCq [21].
Table 3

Primer sequences for qRT-PCR gene expression study

Gene

Primer sequence (5′–3′)

Forward

Reverse

GCLM

AATCAGCCCCGATTTAGTCAGG

CCAGCTGTGCAACTCCAAGGAC

GSTA2

CGCCACCAAATATGACCTCT

CCTGTTGCCCACAAGGTAGT

IL-2

TGAGTCAGCAACTGTGGTGG

GCCCTTGGGGCTTACAAAAAG

IL-18

GGGCACCCTAGCTCATGTTT

GCACAAGACGTGTGAGGAGA

β-actin

TCCTTCCTGGGCATGGAG

AGGAGGAGCAATGATCTTGATCTT

Liver antioxidant and nitric oxide (NO) quantification

Antioxidant level in the liver of normal control and Xeniji treated mice were determined by evaluating FRAP, GSH, MDA and NO quantification. FRAP and MDA assays were performed according to the previously published method [18]. In addition, GSH and NO levels in the liver were quantified using Glutathione assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and Griess reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturers’ protocols.

Spleen T and NK cell immunophenotyping

Harvested splenocytes were stained with either 1 μg of CD3-FITC (AB24948, Abcam, USA), CD4-PE (AB86859, Abcam, USA) and CD8-Cy5 (AB39850, Abcam, USA) or 1 μg of CD3-FITC (AB24948, Abcam, USA) and NK1.1-APC (AB25352, Abcam, USA) for 30 min. Then, splenocytes were washed twice with PBS and subjected to flow cytometry analysis using BD FACSCalibur (BD, USA).

Serum IL-2, IL-12, IL-18 and IFN-γ quantification

IL-2, IL-12, IL-18 and IFN-γ cytokines levels in the serum were tested using ELISA kits according to manufacturer’s protocol (R&D system, USA).

Statistical analysis

Means and standard deviation from five mice per groups (each with three technical replicates) were calculated using excel for all experiments. Significant difference (p < 0.05) between the normal and Xeniji treated groups for all experiments was tested using one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post-hoc Duncan analysis using SPSS version 20.

Results

Antioxidant, organic acids and amino acids profiles of Xeniji

Xeniji fermented food was recorded with higher total phenolic content (5.12 ± 0.02 mg GAE/g extract) and total flavonoid content (1.18 ± 0.01 mg QE/g extract). Present of these antioxidant polyphenol and flavonoid have contributed to in vitro antioxidant activity, as detected by FRAP assay (Table 4). On the other hand, citric acid was the highest organic acid detected in Xeniji. This was followed by succinic acid, acetic acid and oxalic acid, which were approximately 10 times lower concentration than citric acid. In terms of amino acid profile, Xeniji was detected with all nine essential amino acid (total concentration of essential amino acid: 65.25 mg/100 g Xeniji), seven none-essential amino acid (total concentration of none-essential amino acid: 27.05 mg/100 g Xeniji) and moderate level of nonprotein amino acid GABA (0.50 mg/100 g Xeniji). Total concentration of essential amino acid in Xeniji was 2.4 times higher than none-essential amino acid, with aspartic acid (28 mg/100 g Xeniji) was recorded as the most highly detected amino acid. Xeniji contains high amount of vit-A (5050 μg/100 g samples). In addition, vit-B9, vit-c, vit-D3 and vit-K1 were also detected in Xeniji.
Table 4

Antioxidant, organic acids and amino acids profiles of Xeniji

  

Xeniji water extract

Antioxidant profile

Total phenolic content (TPC)

5.12 ± 0.02

(mg GAE/g extract)

Total flavonoid content (TFC)

1.18 ± 0.01

(mg QE/g extract)

FRAP

3.30 ± 0.01

(mg AAE/g extract)

Organic acids profile (mg/g sample)

Oxalic acid

2.69 ± 0.07

 

Lactic acid

1.02 ± 0.22

 

Acetic acid

2.96 ± 0.32

 

Citric acid

31.01 ± 1.40

 

Succinic acid

3.55 ± 0.20

 

Kojic acid

0.04 ± 0.001

Amino acids (mg/100 g samples)

Alanine a

8.50 ± 0.02

 

Arginine a

0.65 ± 0.07

 

Aspartic acid a

28.00 ± 0.14

 

Cysteine a

0.55 ± 0.03

 

Glutamic acid a

1.85 ± 0.07

 

Glycine a

8.20 ± 0.28

 

Proline a

13.25 ± 0.12

 

Serine a

0.65 ± 0.02

 

Tyrosine a

3.60 ± 0.14

 

Asparagine b

n.d.

 

Glutamine a

n.d.

 

Histidine b

n.d.

 

Isoleucine b

5.75 ± 0.71

 

Leucine b

6.75 ± 0.02

 

Lysine b

0.90 ± 0.14

 

Methione b

0.85 ± 0.06

 

Phenylalanine b

3.40 ± 0.28

 

Threonine b

1.05 ± 0.07

 

Tryptophan b

n.d.

 

Valine b

8.35 ± 0.71

Nonprotein amino acid (mg/100 g samples)

Gamma amino butyric acid (GABA)

0.50 ± 0.01

Vitamin (μg/100 g samples)

A (β-carotene)

5050.00

A (Retinol)

n.d.

B1

n.d.

B2

n.d.

B3

n.d.

B5

n.d.

B6

n.d.

B7

n.d.

B9

2.20

C

13.70

D2

n.d.

D3

10.60

E (Alpha-tocopherol)

n.d.

K1 (Phytonadione)

74.70

aNon-essential amino acids (NEAA); bEssential amino acids (EAA); ± standard error; n.d. = not detected

Acute toxicity test

Although Xeniji was rich in nutrients, before evaluated the in vivo bioactivities, the in vivo acute and subchronic toxicity were performed to confirm safety of this product. Acute toxicity test at 5 g/kg body weight (BW) did not observe with mortality, sign and symptom of toxicity, changes of body weight (BW) and organ weight (Table 5) throughout the 14 days of incubation period. In addition, biochemical analysis on serum liver enzyme profile (AST, ALT and ALP) reveal that there were no significant differences (p < 0.05) between the normal control and Xeniji 5 g/kg BW fed mice (Table 5).
Table 5

Body weight, organ weight and serum liver enzyme profile of normal and 5 g/kg body weight of Xeniji treated mice for acute toxicity study

 

Normal

Xeniji (5 g/kg BW)

Day 0 BW (g)

20.21 ± 1.23

22.53 ± 1.29

Day 14 BW (g)

21.06 ± 0.73

23.02 ± 1.86

Liver weight (g)

1.41 ± 0.09

1.59 ± 1.86

Kidney weight (g)

0.51 ± 0.03

0.53 ± 0.04

Spleen weight (g)

0.14 ± 0.02

0.21 ± 0.01

Liver/BW ratio

0.0517

0.0537

Kidney/BW ratio

0.0187

0.0179

Spleen/BW ratio

0.0049

0.0069

ALT (U/L)

66.83 ± 2.33

63.40 ± 3.59

ALP (U/L)

69.75 ± 3.41

75.10 ± 6.77

AST (U/L)

108.32 ± 3.79

112.87 ± 3.41

Creatinine (μmol/L)

46.00 ± 3.56

46.00 ± 2.67

No significant different was observed at p < 0.05 and p < 0.001

Subchronic toxicity test

For subchronic toxicity test, mice were orally fed with 0.1 g, 1.0 g or 2.0 g/kg BW of Xeniji daily for 30 days. After the treatment period, all Xeniji treated mice were survived without sign and symptom of toxicity, changes of body weight (BW), organ weight and serum liver enzyme profile were observed (Table 6).
Table 6

Body weight, organ weight and serum liver enzyme profile of normal and 5 g/kg body weight of Xeniji treated mice for 30 days of subchronic toxicity study

 

Normal

Xeniji 0.1

Xeniji 1.0

Xeniji 2.0

Day 0 BW (g)

20.42 ± 0.125

18.96 ± 0.271

19.96 ± 1.297

19.67 ± 1.145

Day 28 BW (g)

24.52 ± 1.370

22.91 ± 1.023

23.93 ± 1.837

23.52 ± 1.116

BW gain (g)

4.10 ± 1.245

3.96 ± 0.752

3.97 ± 0.541

3.86 ± 0.029

Liver/BW ratio

0.04 ± 0.005

0.04 ± 0.001

0.04 ± 0.004

0.04 ± 0.009

Kidney/BW ratio

0.01 ± 0.001

0.01 ± 0.001

0.01 ± 0.001

0.01 ± 0.001

Spleen/BW ratio

0.003 ± 0.000

0.003 ± 0.000

0.003 ± 0.000

0.003 ± 0.000

Glucose (mmol/L)

5.50 ± 0.99

5.40 ± 0.07

5.13 ± 0.76

5.00 ± 0.41

ALT (U/L)

53.68 ± 3.32

44.62 ± 1.83*#

44.33 ± 4.76*

43.55 ± 2.21*#

ALP (U/L)

72.33 ± 3.84

72.67 ± 3.37

79.67 ± 4.80

78.83 ± 1.89

AST (U/L)

103.97 ± 4.15

108.32 ± 2.10

108.04 ± 2.93

107.21 ± 5.83

Creatinine (μmol/L)

43.50 ± 0.40

42.00 ± 0.40

43.00 ± 0.95

42.50 ± 0.21

*and #indicates a significant difference compared with the normal control group at p < 0.05 and p < 0.001

In vivo antioxidant profile

Mice from subchronic toxicity were also subjected to antioxidant level detection to understand the benefit of Xeniji treatment in promoting antioxidant defence in the healthy subjects. Based on the qRT-PCR assay, all Xeniji treated mice were recorded with higher expression level of GCLM and GSTA2 comparing to normal control mice. However, comparing among all the tested concentration, only Xeniji 2.0 treatment significantly (>2 fold change) upregulated expression of both GCLM and GSTA2 genes in the liver (Fig. 1a and b). Overexpression of GCLM and GSTA2 were correlated to higher antioxidant level indicated by higher level of liver GSH (Fig. 2b) and FRAP activity (Fig. 2a) of Xeniji treated mice, particularly at concentration of 1 and 2 g/kg bw. Higher level of liver antioxidant at Xeniji 1.0 and 2.0 treated mice also contributed to reduction of oxidative stress in the liver indicating by the lower level of lipid peroxidation (Fig. 2c) and nitric oxide (Fig. 2d).
Fig. 1

Differential expression of (a) GCLM and (b) GSTA2 genes related to Nrf-2 antioxidant pathway on normal and Xeniji (0.1, 1 and 2 g/kg body weight) treated mice. The expression of target genes (±SEM) were normalised to β-actin and the normal group was used as control for comparison. Fold change >2 comparing to normal control group was considered as significant*

Fig. 2

a Total antioxidant capacity by quantified FRAP level; b GSH level; c lipid peroxidation MDA level and d NO level in liver of normal and Xeniji (0.1, 1 and 2 g/kg body weight) treated mice. *indicates a significant difference compared with the normal control group, p < 0.05

In vivo cytokine profile

Besides the antioxidant level, immunity of the Xeniji treated healthy mice was also determined by evaluating the serum cytokines level, spleen T and NK cell population and cytotoxicity of splenocytes on Yac-1 cells. Expression IL-12 and IL-18 cytokine genes in the spleen were evaluated using qRT-PCR. All concentration of Xeniji was able to significantly (>2 fold changes) enhanced IL-12 (Fig. 3a) and IL-18 (Fig. 3b) expression in the spleen as compared to the normal healthy mice. Upregulation of IL-12 and IL-18 gene expression have contributed to the higher level of serum IL-2, IL-12, IL-18 and IFN-γ for the Xeniji 1.0 and 2.0 treated mice (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3

Differential expression of (a) IL-12 and (b) IL-18 genes in spleen of normal and Xeniji (0.1, 1 and 2 g/kg body weight) treated mice. The expression of target genes (±SEM) were normalised to β-actin and the normal group was used as control for comparison. Fold change >2 comparing to normal control group was considered as significant*

Fig. 4

Serum (a) IL-2; (b) IL-12; (c) IL-18 and (d) IFN-γ level in liver of normal and Xeniji (0.1, 1 and 2 g/kg body weight) treated mice. *indicates a significant difference compared with the normal control group, p < 0.05

Immunophenotyping of CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+ and NK1.1

Population of T and NK cells in the spleen of normal and Xeniji treated mice were evaluated using flow cytometer. Mice treated with at all tested concentration of Xeniji were recorded with higher percentage of both CD3+CD4+ and CD3+CD8+ population, in dosage dependent manner. On the other hand, only Xeniji 2.0 was able to significantly increased NK cells population comparing to the normal control (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5

Immunophenotyping of splenic CD3+CD4+, CD3+CD8+ and CD3+NK1.1+ population by flow cytometer. * indicates a significant difference compared with the normal control group, p < 0.05

Cocultivation of splenocytes with YAC-1 cells

YAC-1 cells are known to sensitive to cytolytic activity of NK cells. To further validate the immunostimulatory effect of Xeniji, splenocytes harvested from untreated and Xeniji treated mice were co-culture with YAC-1 cells at ratio 2:1. When compared to normal mice, only splenocytes harvested from mice treated with Xeniji 1.0 and 2.0 significantly (p < 0.05) possessed higher cytotoxicity on YAC-1 cells (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6

Cytotoxicity of splenocytes on YAC-1 cells at ratio 2 to 1. * indicates a significant difference compared with the normal control group, p < 0.05

Discussion

Fruits and vegetables are good source of nutrients and phytochemicals, while fermentation is one of the important method to preserve fruits and vegetables that generally have short shelf life. These fermented fruits and vegetables were reported as source of polyphenols [22], which contributed to various bioactivities including antioxidant and immune stimulation [23]. Lactic acid bacteria fermented fruits and vegetables are natural product that commonly consumed in Japan [6, 8]. In Japan, fermented food paste that produced by fermenting fruits, vegetables and herbs has been commonly consumed as functional food [6, 8]. Nutritional value and bioactivities of some of the fermented food pastes have been previously reported [6, 8]. Xeniji is a fermented food paste that produced by fermenting fruits, herbs, mushroom and vegetables. Studies using other fermented food paste [6, 8] cannot directly represent the nutritional value, bioactivities and safety of all fermented foods as different ingredients and microbes used in the fermentation contributed to different level of nutrient and bioactivities of different fermented products [9]. Although fermented foods are generally considered safe, they may still associated with some risk factors [24]. In addition, over-consumption of polyphenols that commonly available in fermented foods may also cause some mild adverse effects [2]. Thus, it is important to evaluate the nutritional value, toxicity and in vivo antioxidant and immunomodulatory effects of Xeniji, which were yet to be determined.

Xeniji was rich in total phenolic and organic acids particularly citric acid, which is similar with the nutritional profile of another type of fermented food, plant based paste [6]. Fruits and vegetables were known as source of polyphenol antioxidant and citric acid [25, 26]. Thus, use of multiple fruits and vegetables as ingredient for fermentation contributed to high content of polyphenol and citric acid that directly contribute to the antioxidant effect of Xeniji. Besides antioxidant, Xeniji was also recorded with high content of essential amino acids and vitamins particularly β-carotene. Fermentation was known to reduce non-digestible carbohydrates and enrich the content of various nutrients including essential amino acids [27]. More particularly, cereal, which was one of the ingredients in fermentation of Xeniji, was able to digest by lactic acid bacteria to synthesise essential amino acids and vitamins [28]. In addition, GABA, which is the nonprotein amino acid that present in some medicinal plant such as Zingiber officinale [29], which was one of the food ingredient used in the preparation of Xeniji was also detected. Besides from the source plant, lactic acid that used in the fermentation of Xeniji was also reported as major GABA producing microorganism [30]. As Xeniji was rich in antioxidant and nutrient, the safety and efficacy were further tested in vivo.

Acute and subchronic toxicity evaluation are the studies that recommended by Organization of Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) guideline for testing on the toxicity of chemicals including food. In this experiment, rate of mortality, body weight change, and serum liver enzyme markers were the parameters that commonly measured [31]. In this study, Xeniji did not observed with mortality and abnormality in both acute and subchronic toxicity up to 5 and 2 g/kg body weight, respectively. In addition, no significant change was observed in the body weight, organ weight and serum liver enzyme profile. This result indicated that Xeniji did not caused acute and subchronic toxic effect up to 5 and 2 g/kg body weight, respectively. These results have supported that lactic acid bacteria and yeast fermented fruits and vegetables are generally safe to be consumed [24, 32].

In vitro antioxidant study has shown that Xeniji possess antioxidant effect similar to another fermented foods PBP [6], which was contributed by the present of polyphenols and citric acid. In this study, the antioxidant level in the liver of normal and Xeniji treated mice were evaluated by FRAP, GSH, MDA and NO quantifications. Liver harvested from Xeniji treated mice were recorded with higher level of FRAP total antioxidant associated with reduction of MDA and NO levels in dosage dependent level. Glutamate-cysteine ligase complex modifier subunit (GCLM) and glutathione S-transferases 2 (GSTA2) were genes under nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) antioxidant pathways. These genes involved in production and utilisation of GSH [33]. In this study, expression of both GCLM and GSTA2 genes were upregulated in the liver of Xeniji treated mice particularly at concentration 2 μg/mL indicating that Xeniji was effective in stimulating generation and utilisation of GSH, which subsequently contributed to the promotion of total antioxidant activity in the liver. This effect may further contribute to the inhibition of lipid peroxidation and NO as previous report has shown that GSH also help to suppresse the reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species [34].

Besides activation of antioxidant level, fermented foods were also found with immunomodulatory effect [35] including activation on cytotoxicity of mice natural killer (NK) and lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells [12]. In this study, the immunomodulatory effect of normal and Xeniji treated mice were tested by measuring T/NK cells population, serum cytokines level and splenocyte cytotoxicity on YAC-1 cells. Xeniji treatments were found with significantly increase of both splenic helper (CD3+CD4+) and cytolytic (CD3+CD8+) T lymphocytes population in dosage dependent manner. On the other hand, population of splenic NK cells were only found significantly increased in the Xeniji 2.0 treated mice. This result show that Xeniji mainly activating T lymphocyte. Moreover, Xeniji treated mice were also found with higher level of serum IL-12, IL-18 and IFN-γ. IL-12 and IL-18 are cytokines that produced mainly by antigen presenting cells and macrophages [36]. IL-12 and IL-18 synergistically promote proliferation and IFN-γ production of both CD4 and CD8 T cells [36, 37]. Our results show that higher population of CD4 and CD8 T cells in Xeniji treated mice maybe contributed mainly by the activation of IL-12 and IL-18 production. On the other hand, Xeniji 1.0 and 2.0 were found significantly upregulated the serum IL-2 level. IL-2 is cytokine that produced mainly by CD4+ T cells and activates cytolytic activity of NK cells [38]. In this study, splenocyte harvested from mice treated with Xeniji 1.0 and 2.0 were recorded with significantly higher level of cytotoxicity on YAC-1 cells, which is sensitive to killing of NK cells [39]. Activation of NK cells cytotoxicity in Xeniji 1.0 and 2.0 treated mice maybe directly contributed by the higher level of IL-2.

Conclusions

This study has shown that Xeniji was rich in β-carotene, phytonadione, polyphenol, citric acid and essential amino acid that enhance the antioxidant level and strengthen immunity in dosage dependent manner without causing acute and subchronic toxicity. As Xenji enhance antioxidant and immunity of healthy subjects, it maybe a potential nutraceutical agent to prevent and ameliorate infectious or oxidative induced diseases.

Abbreviations

ALP: 

Alkaline phosphatase

ALT: 

Alanine transaminase

ANOVA: 

One-way analysis of variance

AST: 

Aspartate aminotransferase

BW: 

Body weight

GABA: 

Gamma amino butyric acid

GCLM: 

Glutamate-cysteine ligase complex modifier subunit

GSTA2: 

Glutathione S-transferases2

IACUC: 

Institution Animal Care and Use Committee

LAK: 

Lymphokine-activated killer

MDA: 

Malondialdehyde

NK: 

Natural killer

NO: 

Nitric oxide

Nrf2: 

Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2

PBP: 

Plant-based fermented paste

RT-qPCR: 

Reverse transcriptase-quantitative real time PCR

UT: 

untreated

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Dr. Kamariah Long would like to thanks Elken Sdn Bhd for awarding the research grant.

Funding

This study was supported by Elken Sdn Bhd.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data and materials are within the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

SKY, KL, NBA designed the experiment; ABJ, KL profiled and standardised the Xeniji; IBJ perform HPLC fingerprinting of Xeniji; NZ, NKH, RZ, SKY performed the experiment; DS, WYH, SWT performed the qRT-PCR, NZ, NKH provide Xeniji and consumables for the study. NZ, NKH, SKY, NBA, KL prepared the manuscript. All authors have gone through and approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This work was approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), UPM (R045/2016) and was performed in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals prepared by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), UPM (Malaysia).

Consent for publication

All the authors listed in this manuscript have read and approved the final version for publication.

Competing interests

NZ and NKH from Elken Sdn Bhd, Malaysia, which funded this study. Other authors in this article declare no conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Elken Sdn Bhd
(2)
Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia
(3)
Biotechnology Research Centre, Malaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute (MARDI)
(4)
China-ASEAN College of Marine Sciences, Xiamen University Malaysia
(5)
Department of Basic Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine & Animal Science, University of Peradeniya
(6)
School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus
(7)
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Science, Universiti Putra Malaysia

References

  1. WHO J, Consultation FE. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 2003; 916(i-viii).Google Scholar
  2. Scalbert A, Manach C, Morand C, Remesy C, Jimenez L. Dietary polyphenols and the prevention of diseases. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2005;45:287–306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Curiel JA, Pinto D, Marzani B, Filannino P, Farris GA, Gobbetti M, et al. Lactic acid fermentation as a tool to enhance the antioxidant properties of Myrtus communis berries. Microb Cell Factories. 2015;14:67.Google Scholar
  4. Eom SH, Lee DS, Kang YM, Son KT, Jeon YJ, Kim YM. Application of yeast Candida utilis to ferment Eisenia bicyclis for enhanced antibacterial effect. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2013;171:569–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Granato D, Branco GF, Nazzaro F, Cruz AG, Faria JAF. Functional foods and nondairy probiotic food development: trends, concepts and products. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2010;9:292–302.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Kuwaki S, Nakajima N, Tanaka H, Ishihara K. Plant-based paste fermented by lactic acid bacteria and yeast: functional analysis and possibility of application to functional foods. Biochem Insights. 2012;5:21–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Ohira I, Nakae T. The isolation and identification of lactic acid bacteria from naturally fermented wild plants and fruits. Jpn J Dairy Food Sci. 1987;36:69–75.Google Scholar
  8. Kim JH, Park MK, Lee JY, Okuda H, Kim S, Hwang WI. Antioxidant and antitumor effects of Manda. Biochem Arch. 1998;14:211–9.Google Scholar
  9. Nishidai S, et al. Kurosu, a traditional vinegar produced from unpolished rice, suppresses lipid peroxidation in vitro and in mouse skin. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2000;64:1909–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kawai M, Matsuura S. Manda suppresses emotional stress-induced stomach ulcers in rats. Int J Stress Manag. 1997;4:63–9.Google Scholar
  11. Kawai M, Matsuura S, Asanuma M, Ogawa N. Manda, a fermented natural food, suppresses lipid peroxidation in the senescent rat brain. Neurochem Res. 1998;23:455–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hwang WI, Hwang YK, Lee JY, Lee JY, Okuda H. Antitumor and immunopotentiating effects of Manda enzyme. Nat Prod Sci. 1996;2:29–36.Google Scholar
  13. Kim DC, Hwang WI, In MJ. In vitro antioxidant and anticancer activities of extracts from a fermented food. J Food Biochem. 2003;27:449–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Shimada T, Motonaga C, Matsuura S, Takagaki M, Ashida T, Okano T, et al. Effects of a fermented vegetable product on fat deposition and bone metabolism in ovariectomized rats. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol. 2004;50:422–5.Google Scholar
  15. Marotta F, Yadav H, Pathak S, Minelli E, Signorelli P, Lorenzetti A, et al. Inhibition of human breast cancer cell growth and enzymatic activity by a fermented nutraceutical. An in vitro and in vivo study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009;1155:273–7.Google Scholar
  16. Thaipong K, Boonprakob U, Crosby K, Cisneros-ZevallosL BDH. Comparison of ABTS, DPPH, FRAP and ORAC assays for estimating antioxidant activity from guava fruit extracts. J Food Compos Anal. 2006;19:669–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Chang C, Yang M, Wen H, Chern J. Estimation of total flavonoid content in propolis by two complementary colorimetric methods. J Food Drug Anal. 2002;10:178–82.Google Scholar
  18. Mohamad NE, Yeap SK, Lim KL, Yusof HM, Beh BK, Tan SW, et al. Antioxidant effects of pineapple vinegar in reversing of paracetamol-induced liver damage in mice. Chin Med. 2015;10:3.Google Scholar
  19. Koh SP, Jamaluddin A, Alitheen NB, Mohd Ali N, Mohd Yusof H, Long K. Nutritional values of tempe inoculated with different strains of Rhizopus: its γ–aminobutyric acid content and antioxidant property. J Trop Agric Food Sc. 2012;40(2):181–92.Google Scholar
  20. Yeap SK, Omar AR, Ali AM, Ho WY, Beh BK, Alitheen NB. Immunomodulatory effect of Rhaphidophora korthalsii on natural killer cell cytotoxicity. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:786487.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Karthivashan G, Arulselvan P, Tan SW, Fakurazi S. The molecular mechanism underlying the hepatoprotective potential of Moringa oleifera leaves extract against acetaminophen induced hepatotoxicity in mice. J Funct Foods. 2015;17:115–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Manach C, Scalbert A, Morand C, Remesy C, Jimenez L. Polyphenols: food sources and bioavailability. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:727–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Swain MR, Anandharaj M, Ray RC, Rani RP. Fermented fruits and vegetables of Asian: a potential source of probiotics. Biotechnol Res Int. 2014;2014:250424.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Nout MJR. Fermented foods and food safety. Food Res Int. 1994;27:291–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Kranz S. Bolling. B Sugars and citric acid differently modulate DPPH antioxidant activity in polyphenol-rich fruit juices FASEB. 2015;29:922.14.Google Scholar
  26. Pandey KB, Rizvi SI. Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants in human health and disease. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2009;2:270–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Ray M, Ghosh K, Singh S, Mondal KC. Folk to functional: an explorative overview of rice-based fermented foods and beverages in India. J Ethn Foods. 2016;3:5–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. KohajDova Z, Karovicova J. Fermentation of cereals for specific purpose. J Food Nutr Res. 2007;2:51–7.Google Scholar
  29. Anju P, Moothedath I, Shree ABR. Gamma amino butyric acid accumulation in medicinal plants without stress. Anc Sci Life. 2014;34:68–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Dhakal R, Bajpai VK, Baek KH. Production of gaba (v-aminobutyric acid) by microorganisms: a review. Braz J Microbiol. 2012;43:1230–41.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Almanca CCJ, Saldanha SV, Sousa DR, Trivilin LO, Nunes LC, Porfirio LC, et al. Toxicological evaluation of acute and sub-chronic ingestion of hydroalcoholic extract of Solanum cernuum Vell. In mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;138:508–12.Google Scholar
  32. Nyambane B, Thari WM, Wangoh J, Njage PMK. Lactic acid bacteria and yeasts involved in the fermentation of Amabere amaruranu, a Kenyan fermented milk. Food Sci Nutr. 2014;2:692–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Gorrini G, Harris IS, Mak TW. Modulation of oxidative stress as an anticancer strategy. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2013;12:931–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rodrigo R, Libuy M, Feliu F, Hasson D. Oxidative stress-related biomarkers in essential hypertension and ischemia-reperfusion myocardial damage. Dis Markers. 2013;35:773–90.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Tamang JP, Shin DH, Jung SJ, Chae SW. Functional properties of microorganisms in fermented foods. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:578.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Tominaga K, Yoshimoto T, Torigoe K, Kurimoto M, Matsui K, Hada T, et al. IL-12 synergizes with IL-18 or IL-1β for IFN-γ production from human T cells. Int Immunol. 2000;12:151–60.Google Scholar
  37. Teixeira LK, Fonseca BP, Vieira-de-Abreu A, Barboza BA, Robbs BK, Bozza PT, et al. IFN-gamma production by CD8+ T cells depends on NFAT1 transcription factor and regulates Th differentiation. J Immunol. 2005;175:5931–9.Google Scholar
  38. Nelson, B.H. IL-2, regulatory T cells, and tolerance. J Immunol 2004;172:3983–3988.Google Scholar
  39. Huntington ND, Vosshenrich CA, Di Santo JP. Developmental pathways that generate natural-killer-cell diversity in mice and humans. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:703–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement