Complementary and conventional providers in cancer care: experience of communication with patients and steps to improve communication with other providers
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hyangsook Lee|
|7 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jenny Wilkinson|
|12 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Trine Stub|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hyangsook Lee|
|15 May 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jenny Wilkinson|
|29 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Trine Stub|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|31 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12906-017-1814-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.