Subjective perceived impact of Tai Chi training on physical and mental health among community older adults at risk for ischemic stroke: a qualitative study
- Guohua Zheng†1View ORCID ID profile,
- Zhenyu Xiong†2,
- Xin Zheng2,
- Junzhe Li2,
- Tingjin Duan3,
- Dalu Qi3,
- Kun Ling3 and
- Lidian Chen4Email author
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 2 October 2016
Accepted: 17 March 2017
Published: 20 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|2 Oct 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|9 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Scott Mist|
|17 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ronald Glick|
|5 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Zhenyu Xiong|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Guohua Zheng|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Guohua Zheng|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|17 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|20 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12906-017-1694-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.