Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Characterization and mechanisms of anti-influenza virus metabolites isolated from the Vietnamese medicinal plant Polygonum chinense

Contributed equally
BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:162

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1675-6

Received: 6 January 2017

Accepted: 10 March 2017

Published: 21 March 2017

Abstract

Background

Polygonum chinense Linn. is a common medicinal plant in Southeast Asia and has been used in traditional medicine in Vietnam. The plant contains phytochemicals with various biological properties; however, its antiviral effect has not yet been demonstrated. This study was aimed to evaluate the anti-influenza virus activity of crude extracts of P. chinense, to characterize antiviral metabolites therefrom and to investigate their mechanisms of antiviral action.

Methods

The methanol (MeOH) extract and organic solvent layers of P. chinense were prepared by extraction and partition with relevant solvents. The ethyl acetate (EtOAc) layer showing antiviral activity was chromatographed repeatedly on SiO2 and Sephadex LH-20 columns to give eight pure metabolites. Their chemical structures were determined by NMR and MS spectral data. Anti-influenza virus activity of the eight metabolites against virus strains A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1, PR8), A/Hong Kong/8/68 (H3N2, HK) and B/Lee/40 (Lee) was evaluated on the basis of cytopathic effect (CPE) and plaque inhibition assays. Time-of-addition, confocal microscopy and neuraminidase inhibition assay were performed for mode-of-action studies of active ingredients.

Results

The MeOH extract of P. chinense showed anti-influenza virus activity with EC50 values ranging from 38.4 to 55.5 μg/mL in a CPE inhibition assay. Among the eight pure metabolites isolated from P. chinense, ellagic acid (PC5), methyl gallate (PC7) and caffeic acid (PC8) significantly inhibited viral replication in a dose-dependent manner in both plaque inhibition and CPE inhibition assays with EC50 values ranging from 14.7 to 81.1 μg/mL and CC50 values higher than 300 μg/mL. Mode-of-action studies suggested that PC5 and PC7 suppress virus entry into or replication in cells, while PC8 targets influenza viral neuraminidase, even oseltamivir-resistant one.

Conclusion

These results demonstrated that P. chinense and its metabolites possess effective anti-influenza virus activities. The botanical materials of P. chinense could be a promising multitargeted inhibitor of influenza A and B viruses and applied to development of a novel herbal medicine.

Keywords

AntiviralInfluenza virus Polygonum chinense Ellagic acidMethyl gallateCaffeic acid

Background

Influenza virus is an enveloped virus with negative-strand, eight-segmented RNA genomes, belonging to the Orthomyxoviridae family. Each viral segment is encapsidated by a virus-encoded nucleoprotein (NP), called viral ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) [1]. Influenza virions are pleomorphic, roughly spheroidal and approximately 100 nm in diameter [2]. The viral envelope is distinguished by a lipid bilayer containing three transmembrane proteins—hemagglutinin (HA), neuraminidase (NA), and matrix protein 2 (M2, ion channel) on the outside and matrix protein 1 (M1) beneath the membrane. The virus causes pandemics and annual influenza epidemics. Influenza outbreaks result in morbidity and mortality in the human population and commonly occur during winter, or the rainy season in tropical countries [3, 4].

Pharmaceutical ingredients can be classified into two groups: NA inhibitors, such as oseltamivir and zanamivir, and M2 inhibitors, such as amantadine and rimantadine. These have been approved and used to treat and prevent influenza infections. The NA inhibitors are effective against both influenza A and B viruses, while the M2 inhibitors are effective only against influenza A virus [5]. However, long-term use of these drugs is limited by their toxicity and emergence of resistance [6]. Therefore, the development of new, low-toxic anti-influenza viral drugs is required.

Polygonum chinense (P. chinense) Linn. belonging to the family Polygonaceae is a common medicinal plant found in China, India, Japan and Southeast Asian countries. In Vietnam, the plant is widespread nationwide, especially in open forest and highland [7]. This plant has been used in traditional medicine for skin infectious diseases such as eczema and zona, indigestion, gastroenteritis and hepatitis, as well as for healing inflammatory wounds or insect stings and snakebites [7, 8]. Several phytochemistry studies of P. chinense have been revealed that the plant contains terpenoids, alkaloids, flavonoids, tannins, steroids and glycosides [810]. Aqueous leaf extract of P. chinense possesses gastroprotective activity [11]. Its methanol (MeOH) extract showed antimicrobial, antioxidant and cytotoxic activities in vitro [8, 12]. Ethanol extract and isolated bioactive substances exerted antidiarrheal effects [13]. However, its antiviral potential has not been investigated. During screening of plant extracts against influenza viruses, we found that the methanol extract of P. chinense exhibited antiviral activity. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to examine the antiviral activities of its crude extracts against influenza virus strains A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1, PR8), A/Hong Kong/8/68 (H3N2, HK) and B/Lee/40 (Lee), to isolate and identify effective metabolites and to investigate their mechanisms of action.

Methods

Chemicals and reagents.

Silica gel 60 Å grade (particle sizes 15–40 μm and 40–63 μm) for column chromatography was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Sephadex LH-20 beads (size 25–100 μm) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) plates (silica gel 60 F254, thickness 0.2 mm) were obtained from Merck. Chemical spots on TLC plates after development were detected using p-anisaldehyde-sulfuric acid (AS) and ferric chloride staining reagents, together with I2 vapor. All solvents were distillated and purified before use.

Plant material

P. chinense samples were collected at Nhu Xuan in Thanh Hoa province, Vietnam. Whole plant was dried in the darkness and ground before extraction. Plant species were identified by Dr. Tran The Bach (Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam). A voucher specimen of the plant (No TL-CNHD.ĐT.048/13–15) was deposited in the R&D Center of Bioactive Compounds, Vietnam Institute of Industrial Chemistry, Vietnam.

Extract preparation and isolation of pure compounds

Dried and powdered P. chinense (10 kg) was extracted with MeOH at room temperature and concentrated to dryness in a rotary evaporator under reduced pressure at below 40 °C. The MeOH extract (224 g) was suspended in 2 L of distillated water and consecutively partitioned with equal volumes of ethyl acetate (EtOAc) and butanol (BuOH).

The EtOAc layer (95.2 g) was separated on a Sephadex LH-20 (130 g, 70–100 μm, Sigma-Aldrich; 3.0 cm × 70 cm) with MeOH eluent. The fractions that showed similar TLC patterns were combined to yield more homogenous samples, Frs. 1 to 9. Fr. 2 (13.6 g) which contains a main component at Rf 0.83 on TLC (developed with EtOAc:MeOH 20:1 and showing a positive reaction with ferric chloride stain) was separated on a silica gel column [146 g silica gel 60 Å (40–63 μm), 3.4 × 40 cm] and was eluted with a dichloromethane (DCM)-acetone stepwise gradient (100: 1 to 100% acetone), yielding additional 12 fractions, Frs. 21 to 212. Fr. 26 contained a main compound and was crystalized with acetone to give crystals of PC1. Fr. 3 (7.2 g) was applied to a SiO2 column [142 g silica gel 60 Å (40–63 μm), 3.4 × 40 cm, packed with H:EtOAc (5:5, v/v)] and was eluted with a n-Hexane (H): EtOAc stepwise gradient (5:5 to 1:9 and EtOAc: MeOH 20:1 v/v, 500 mL each step) to produce five fractions, Frs. 31 to 35. Fr. 33 was further chromatographed on a silica gel column [SiO2 60 Å (15–40 μm), 2.0 × 45 cm] using DCM:MeOH (9:1, v/v) to give Fr. 34, which contained crystals of compound PC3. Compound PC4 was isolated from Fr. 35 by chromatography using silica gel [63 g, silica gel 60 Å (40–63 μm), 2.0 × 50 cm] and eluting with a H:EtOAc stepwise gradient (7:3 to 1:9, v/v) and mixtures of EtOAc:MeOH (50:1, 30:1, 20:1 and 8:2, 7:3, v/v, 150 mL each step). Fr. 31 was also isolated using a silica gel column [SiO2 60 Å (15–40 μm), 2.0 × 45 cm] with a stepwise gradient elution of H:EtOAc (10:1 to 3:7; 10% gradient and 100% EtOAc), yielding compound PC7. A portion of Fr. 4 (1.23 g) was subjected to column chromatography using a silica gel column [37 g SiO2 60 Å (40–63 μm), 3.0 × 45 cm] with eluting solvents of EtOAc: acetone (10:1, v/v, 200 mL) and DCM:MeOH (20:1, v/v, 400 mL), yielding three fractions, Frs. 41 to 43. PC2 was crystallized from the third fraction, Fr. 43. Fr. 6 (20 g) was applied to a Sephadex LH-20 column [100 g, 70–100 μm, Sigma-Aldrich; 2.2 × 60 cm] and eluted with MeOH to give five fractions, Frs. 61–65. Fr. 63 was chromatographed using silica gel and mixtures of E:MeOH (30: and 25:1) to furnish PC8. Compound PC5 was purified from Fr. 5 (4 g) using a Sep-pak C18 reverse-phase column and elution with a water-MeOH mixture with a MeOH proportion increasing from 70:30 to 100% MeOH.

A portion of Fr.1 (9.8 g) was separated on a silica gel [100 g silica gel 60 Å (40–63 μm), 4.0 × 45 cm] column and eluted using mixtures of H:acetone (98:2; 500 mL) and DCM:MeOH (95:5; 400 mL) to give seven fractions, Frs. 11 to 17. Frs. 13 and 14, which exhibited similar TLC patterns, were pooled into Fr. 134 (2.6 g) and then chromatographed on a silica gel column [70 g silica gel 60 Å (40–63 μm), 3.0 × 45 cm] with a mixture of H:acetone (8:2), yielding compound PC6.

Structure determination and characterization of the isolated compounds

The chemical structures were determined by spectroscopic methods, including electrospray ionization (ESI)-mass spectroscopy (MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and by comparison of their spectral data with values reported previously [12, 16]. The ESI-MS spectra of the purified compounds were recorded by LC-MS (Agilent 1100 Series LC/MSD Trap XCT Plus, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA). The 1H and 13C NMR, COSY, HMQC and HMBC spectra were recorded in deuterated NMR solvents using a Bruker AMX-500 FT-NMR spectrometer (Bruker Analytische Messtechnik Gmbh, Rheinstetten, Germany).

PC1 (Quercetin): ESI-MS (positive) (m/z) 303 [M + H]+, 1H–NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ), δ (ppm): 6.183 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.403 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-8), 6.88 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-5′), 7.535 (1H, dd, J = 2.5, 8.5 Hz, H-8′), 7.67 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2′); 13C–NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ), δ(ppm): 93.308 (C8), 98.138(C6), 102.976 (C10), 115.028(C2’), 116.2 (C5′), 119.938 (C6’), 121.917(C1′), 135.683 (C3), 145.016 (C3’), 146.774 (C2), 147.662 (C4’), 156.098 (C9), 160.682 (C5), 163.837 (C7), 175.8 (C4).

PC2 (Protocatechuic acid methyl ester): ESI-MS (negative) (m/z) 167.01 [M-H], 1H–NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d 6 ), δ (ppm): 3.801 (3H, s, −OCH 3), 6.893 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-5); 7.435 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.5 Hz, H-2), 7.493 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6); 13C–NMR (125 MHz, acetone-d 6 ), δ (ppm): 51.84 (−OCH3), 115.74 (C2), 117.14 (C5), 122.83 (C1), 123.26 (C6), 145.62 (C3), 150.77 (C4), 167.07 (COO).

PC3 (Gallic acid): ESI-MS (positive) (m/z) 339.0 [2 M–H], 193 [M + Na]+; 1H–NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD-d 4 ), δ (ppm): 7.076 (2H, s, H-2,6); 13C–NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD -d 4 ), δ (ppm): 110.32 (C2, 6), 122.02 (C1), 139.33 (C4), 146.38 (C3, 5), 170.49 (COOH).

PC4 (Quercitrin): The compound was identified as quercetin 3-O-rhamnoside (also known as quercitrin) by comparison with an authentic sample (Rf 0.54) on a TLC plate using an E:A:M (40: 1:1, v/v/v) developing solvent and detected using the appropriate stains: AS and ferric chloride.

PC5 (Ellagic acid): ESI-MS (positive) (m/z) 325[M + Na]+, ESI-MS (negative) m/z 301 [M-H], 1H–NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d 6), δ (ppm): 2.08–4.5 (s, −OH); 7.483 (2H, s, H-5,5′); 13C–NMR (500 MHz, DMSO- d 6), δ (ppm): 107.470 (C1,1’), 110.200 (C5,5’), 112.072 (C6,6′), 136.274 (C2, 2′), 139.377 (C3, 3′), 147.920 (C4, 4′), 158.728 (C7, 7′).

PC6 (β-Sitosterol): 1H–NMR (500 MHz, CDC13-d), δ (ppm): 0.69 (3H, s, H-18), 0.803 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H-27), 0.826 (3H, d, J = 4.0 Hz, H-26), 0.845 (3H, t, J = 2.0 Hz, H-29), 0.925 (3H, d, J = 4.0 Hz, H-21), 1.008 (3H, s, H-19), 2.282–1.071 (28H, m), 2.305 (2H, m), 3.486 (1H, m, H-3), 5.347 (1H, brs, H-6); 13C–NMR (125 MHz, CDC13-d), δ (ppm): 11.989 (C29), 12.215 (C24), 18.918 (C28), 19.180 (C19), 19.523 (C27), 19.945 (C26), 21.222 (C11), 23.215 (C23), 26.251 (C21), 28.376 (C16), 29.313 (C25), 31.779 (C2), 32.049 (C7), 32.049 (C8), 34.095 (C20), 36.279 (C18), 36.642(C10), 37.401 (C1), 39.923 (C12), 42.423 (C4), 42.460 (C13), 45.985 (C22), 50.286 (C9), 56.212 (C17), 56.911 (C14), 56.911 (C15), 71.908(C3), 121.817 (C6), 140.908(C5).

PC7 (Methyl gallate): ESI-MS (positive) m/z 185 [M + H]+, 1H–NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD-d 6), δ (ppm): 3.825 (3H, s, −OCH 3); 7.067 (2H, s, H-2, 6); 13C–NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD-d 6), δ (ppm): 52.250 (−OCH3); 110.044 (C2, 6), 121.449 (C1), 139.703 (C4), 146.441 (C3, 5), 169.007 (COO).

PC8 (Caffeic acid): 1H–NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD-d 4 ), δ (ppm): 6.24 (1H, d, J = 16 Hz, H-8), 6.80 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-5), 6.94 (1H, dd, J = 10.5 Hz, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6), 7.06 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-2), 7.55 (1H, d, J = 15.5 Hz, H-7); 13C–NMR (125 MHz, CD3OD-d 4 ), δ (ppm): 115.104 (C2), 115.513 (C8), 116.488 (C5), 122.840 (C6), 127.803 (C1), 146.763 (C3), 147.038 (C7), 149.418 (C4), 171.022 (COOH).

Cells, viruses and antiviral agents

Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells and 293 T cells were purchased from ATCC (Rockville, MD) and maintained in minimum essential medium (MEM; Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and in Dulbecco’s minimal essential medium (DMEM; Invitrogen), respectively, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Invitrogen) at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Influenza viruses PR8, HK and Lee were obtained from ATCC. Influenza A viral strains (PR8 and HK) were amplified by infection of 10-day-old chicken eggs at 37 °C for 3 days and influenza B virus (Lee) by infection of MDCK cells under serum-free conditions. Viruses were partially purified from harvested egg allantoic fluid or cell culture supernatant by centrifugation at 3000 rpm for 5 min. Viral titers were determined by HA assay or plaque assay, and stocks were stored at −70 °C before use. Antiviral agents, ribavirin (RBV) (Sigma-Aldrich) and oseltamivir carboxylate (OSV-C; US Biological, Swampscott, MA) were used as control compounds. The test extracts and purified compounds, with the exception of the water layer which was dissolved in water, were dissolved in DMSO to 40 mg/mL and stored at −20 °C.

Rescue of PR8 virus with the H275Y mutation in NA

DNAs derived from eight-segmented PR8 genomic RNAs were individually cloned into a vector harboring convergent RNA polymerase I and II promoters using a universal primer and genome-specific primers, generating pVP-PB2, −PB1, −PA, −HA, −NP, −NA, −M and -NS [1719]. Their sequences were compared to those in GenBank (accession numbers AB671295 for PB2, KC866596.1 for PB1, KC866595.1 for PA, AB671289.1 for HA, KC866598.1 for NP, CY033579.1 for NA, EF467824.1 for M and EF467817 for NS, respectively). Using the plasmid pVP-NA, a histidin-to-tyrosin mutation at amino acid 275 (H275Y) was introduced with a primer (5′-GAATGCACCTAATTTTTACTACGAGGAATGTTC-3′: sequences corresponding to the mutant tyrosin in bold) and its complementary one. The QuickChange II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene, LA Jolla, CA) were used to generate pVP-NA(H275Y). For production of PR8 virus with the NA mutation H275Y [rgPR8(H275Y)] by a reverse genetics system, 293 T cells were co-trasfected with pVP-NA(H275Y) and the rest seven pVP plasmids [17]. The rescued virus from the culture supernatants was propagated into embryonated chicken eggs and viral titer was determined as mentioned above.

Cytopathic effect (CPE) inhibition assay

Cell viability was measured according to our previous report [20]. In brief, MDCK cells were seeded in 96-well plates and grown until 100% confluence. Cells were mock-infected or infected with influenza virus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.001 for 1 h at 35 °C under serum-free conditions. Unabsorbed virus was removed by washing with PBS, and threefold serial dilutions of compounds dissolved in MEM with 2 μg/mL TPCK-trypsin were added to each well. On day 3 postinfection (p.i.), cell viability was measured using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT; Sigma-Aldrich). After reading the absorbance at 540/690 nm, the half maximal cytotoxic concentration (CC50) and the half maximal effective concentration (EC50) were calculated using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). The selectivity index (S.I.) is the ratio of CC50 to EC50.

Plaque inhibition assay

MDCK cells seeded in 48-well plates were infected with the influenza viruses at an MOI of 0.001 for 1 h at 33 °C (PR8) or 35 °C (HK and Lee). Test compounds and reference antiviral compounds were serially diluted in overlay medium [MEM containing 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose (CMC; Sigma) and 2 μg/mL TPCK-trypsin]. After washing with PBS, the cells were treated with the compounds in the overlay medium for 3 days at the temperature used for virus infection. Viral plaques were counted by staining with crystal violet [20].

Time-of-addition

To determine when the purified materials, PC5, PC7 and PC8, express their anti-influenza viral activity, MDCK cells were treated with increasing concentrations (from 4 to 100 μM) of each compound for 2 h before (pre-treatment), during (co-treatment) or after (post-treatment) PR8 infection [40 plaque forming units (PFU) per well in 48-well plates] at 37 °C. After washing with PBS, cells were incubated with overlay medium for 3 days at 33 °C and stained with crystal violet to count the number of viral plaques.

Confocal microscopy

Confluently grown MDCK cells in 4-well slides were infected with the influenza viruses at an MOI of 1 for 4 h in the presence either of 1 mM PC5, PC7 or PC8, or of 10 μM epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), which was used as a control to block viral entry [19]. After fixation and permeabilization, cells were blocked with 10% goat serum and 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS. Viral NP was detected with mouse anti-NP antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and Alex Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen). Nuclei were stained with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

NA inhibition assay

Twenty-five microliters of PR8 or rgPR8(H275Y) (2 × 105 PFU/mL) in PBS were mixed with an equal volume of 3-fold serially diluted PC5, PC7, PC8 (from 6 mM to 80 μM) or OSV-C (from 60 to 0.8 nM) in PBS in 96-well plates. After addition of 50 μL 200 μM NA-fluor fluorescent substrate (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), the reaction was incubated at 37 °C for 1 h and stopped with 100 μL of stop solution. The fluorescent intensity was measured with excitation at 350 nm and emission at 450 nm.

Statistical analysis

Statistically significant differences were determined using two-tailed Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results and discussion

Screening of antiviral activities in extracts from P. chinense

The anti-influenza viral activity of MeOH extract and organic solvent layers from P. chinense was evaluated by CPE inhibition assay. Cell viability was measured using MTT to estimate the CC50 and EC50 values before and after infection of MDCK cells with PR8, HK and Lee (Table 1). As expected, OSV-C (an NA inhibitor) and RBV (a viral polymerase inhibitor) efficiently inhibited the replication of all viral strains tested, confirming the reliability of the assay. MeOH extract of P. chinense showed moderate inhibition of influenza viruses: EC50 values were 55.0 μg/mL for PR8, 38.8 μg/mL for HK and 55.5 μg/mL for Lee. The EtOAc layer derived from the MeOH extract by liquid-liquid partitioning exhibited EC50 values of 46.9, 23.2 and 50.8 μm/mL, respectively. Moreover, the MeOH extract and EtOAc layer were not cytotoxic to MDCK cells at the highest concentration used, 300.0 μg/mL. The BuOH layer also displayed antiviral efficacy similar to EtOAc layer. However, the aqueous layer showed limited or no activity.
Table 1

Antiviral activity of the crude extracts of P. chinense against influenza viruses in the CPE reduction assay

Sample

CC50 a

EC50 b (S.I.c)

Unit

PR8d

HKe

Leef

MeOH extract

> 300.0

55.0 (> 5.5)

38.4 (> 7.8)

55.5 (> 5.4)

μg/mL

Water layer

> 300.0

175.8 (>1.7)

68.5 (> 4.4)

212.1 (> 1.4)

μg/mL

BuOH layer

> 300.0

45.9 (> 6.5)

18.3 (> 16.4)

70.1 (> 4.3)

μg/mL

EtOAc layer

> 300.0

46.9 (> 6.4)

23.2 (> 13.0)

50.8 (> 5.9)

μg/mL

OSV-Cg

> 100.0

0.38 (> 263.2)

0.005 (> 20,000)

1.2 (> 83.3)

μM

RBVh

> 100.0

49.9 (> 2.0)

20.5 (> 4.9)

26.6 (>3.8)

μM

aCC50, 50% cell toxicity concentration; bEC50, 50% effective concentration; cS.I., selectivity index = CC50/EC50; dPR8, A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1); eHK, A/Hong Kong/8/68 (H3N2); fLee, B/Lee/40; gOSV-C, oseltamivir carboxylate; hRBV, ribavirin

Isolation and identification of substances from P. chinense

Using repeated chromatographic processes, eight substances, PC1 to PC8, were further isolated from the EtOAc layer (Fig. 1). Compound PC1 was purified as yellow crystals from Fr. 2. The ESI-MS (positive) spectrum of PC1 showed a pseudo-molecular ion peak [M + H]+ at m/z 303; this suggested it to have a molecular formula of C15H10O7. The 1D–NMR spectrum of PC1 showed five 1H–NMR peaks, presenting aromatic proton signals in the down-field region and 15 carbon signals with characteristics of a C6-C3-C6 structure in the 13C–NMR spectrum. By comparison of the 1D–NMR data of PC1 with those in the literature, PC1 was identified as quercetin [15].
Fig. 1

Chemical structures of substances isolated from P. chinense. PC1: quercetin; PC2: protocatechuic acid methyl ester; PC3: gallic acid; PC4: quercitrin; PC5: ellagic acid; PC6: β-sitosterol; PC7: methyl gallate; and PC8: caffeic acid

Compounds PC2, PC3, PC5 and PC7 were determined from their 13C–NMR spectra as derivatives of gallic acid with six aromatic carbon signals and a carbonyl group. The molecular weight and formula of PC3 were determined to be 170 and C7H6O5, respectively (339.0 [2 M–H]in ESI-MS-negative; 193 [M + Na]+ in ESI-MS-positive). Compound PC3 was identical to gallic acid on the basis of 1D–NMR data analysis and comparison with those in the literature [16]. Compound PC7 was identified as methyl gallate, which has a molecular formula of C8H8O5 (m/z 185 [M + H]+ in ESI-MS) and showed patterns of proton and carbon signals similar to those of gallic acid (PC3), with the exception of signals at 3.825 ppm (3H, s, −OCH 3) in 1H–NMR and 52.250 ppm (−OCH3) in 13C–NMR, suggesting a methoxy group. Compound PC2 was identical to protocatechuic acid methyl ester, and was obtained as white crystals. Its molecular formula was deduced to be C8H8O4 from a [M-H] pseudo-molecular ion peak at m/z 167.01 in ESI-MS. The 13C–NMR spectrum of PC2 was similar to that of PC7; it also revealed the presence of eight carbon signals, comprising a carbonyl group at 167.07 ppm, a methoxy at 51.84 ppm and six aromatic carbons from 115.74 to 150.77 ppm including three methine groups at 115.74, 117.14 and 123.26 ppm. In comparison with the 1H–NMR data of PC7, PC2 revealed a further two aromatic methines. Moreover, the 1H–NMR spectrum of PC2 presented three aromatic protons at 7.435 (1H, dd, J = 2.0, 8.5 Hz, H-2), 6.893 (1H, d, J = 8.5 Hz, H-5), 7.493 (1H,d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6), and a methoxy group at 3.801 (3H, s, −OCH3), which corresponds to a methyl ester bond based on a cross-peak at 3.801 ppm and 167.07 ppm in HMBC. PC5 was identified as ellagic acid and was obtained as an amorphous solid with the structural formula C14H6O8 based on pseudo-molecular ion peaks at m/z 325 [M + Na]+ in ESI-MS (positive mode) and m/z 301 [M-H] in ESI-MS (negative mode). The chemical structure of PC5 was determined by comparison with 1H- and 13C–NMR data published previously [12].

Compound PC8 was purified from Fr. 6 as an amorphous solid. Its chemical structure was identical to that of caffeic acid on the basis of 1H- and 13C–NMR data analysis and comparison of these data with those in the literature [13]. Compounds PC4 and PC6 were identified by comparing their Rf values with those of authentic compounds that were spotted and developed on the same TLC. PC4 was identified as quercitrin (quercetin 3-rhamnoside) and contained a minor gallic acid impurity. Therefore, this compound was not tested in our bioassays. The 1H- and 13C–NMR spectra of PC6 were compared with those reported previously [14]. Among eight compounds isolated from P. chinense, PC6 was identified as β-sitosterol, while the others were related to flavonoid and phenolic metabolites found commonly in the Polygonaceae family [10, 13, 15]. All PC compounds, except for PC4, have been reported to possess antifungal, antioxidant and other pharmaceutical properties [13, 16]. In this study, it was aimed to investigate anti-influenza virus activities of the P. chinense constituents systematically and their mode-of-action.

Anti-influenza virus activity of isolated compounds

To study the in vitro anti-influenza virus effects of the isolated substances, CPE inhibition assay was performed (Table 2 and Fig. 2). As reported in previous studies [21, 22], PC1 showed anti-influenza A virus activity with an EC50 of 12.6 μg/mL and 13.1 μg/mL for PR8 and HK, respectively, without cytotoxicity at 300 μg/mL (Table 2). This result was in agreement with the report by Wu et al. [22], in which quercetin revealed broad-spectrum inhibitory activity against influenza A viruses such as PR8, A/FM-1/47/1 (H1N1) and A/Aichi/2/68 (H3N2) by interaction with the viral HA2 subunit. However, in our study, the compound induced overgrowth of uninfected MDCK cells, resulting in 150–160% increases in cell viability at 100 and 300 μg/mL (Fig. 2). This undesirably increased optical density was likely not due to the colorimetric properties of PC1, as it was not detected in MTT-based viability tests of other cells, such as Vero (African green monkey kidney cell line), MT4 (human T-cell line) or HuT 78 (human T-cell lymphoma cell line), in the presence of PC1 (data not shown). It was expected that PC1 non-specifically stimulated cell viability of MDCK cells. PC6 displayed marginal or no anti-influenza activity and cytotoxicity to MDCK cells, with a CC50 value of 300 μg/mL (Table 2 and Fig. 2). Accordingly, PC1 and PC6 were excluded from further antiviral assays.
Table 2

Antiviral activity of substances isolated from P. chinense against influenza viruses in the CPE reduction assay

Sample

Identity

CC50 a

EC50 b (S.I.c)

Unit

PR8d

HKe

Leef

PC1

quercetin

> 300.0

12.6 (> 23.8)

13.1 (> 22.9)

15.0 (> 20.0)

μg/mL

PC2

protocatechuic acid methyl ester

24.1

> 24.1 (N.A.g)

> 24.1 (N.A.)

11.1 (2.2)

μg/mL

PC3

gallic acid

111.1

20.8 (5.3)

17.5 (6.3)

24.5 (4.5)

μg/mL

PC5

ellagic acid

> 300.0

81.1 (> 3.7)

62.4 (> 4.8)

79.2 (> 3.8)

μg/mL

PC6

β-sitosterol

300.0

281.6 (1.1)

300.0 (1.0)

> 300.0 (N.A.)

μg/mL

PC7

methyl gallate

> 300.0

18.1 (> 16.6)

17.1 (> 17.5)

19.2 (> 15.6)

μg/mL

PC8

caffeic acid

> 300.0

37.8 (> 7.9)

32.1 (> 9.4)

14.7 (> 20.4)

μg/mL

RBVh

-

> 100.0

21.7 (> 4.6)

15.5 (> 6.5)

17.0 (> 5.9)

μM

OSV-Ci

-

> 100.0

0.07 (> 1428)

< 0.005 (> 20,000)

0.21 (> 476)

μM

aCC50, 50% cell toxicity concentration; bEC50, 50% effective concentration; cS.I., selectivity index = CC50/EC50; dPR8, A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1); eHK, A/Hong Kong/8/68 (H3N2); fLee, B/Lee/40; g N.A. not applicable; h OSV-C oseltamivir carboxylate; i RBV ribavirin

Fig. 2

Dose response curves of PC1 to PC3 and PC5 to PC8 isolated from P. chinense against PR8, HK and Lee and the MDCK host cell line. Cell monolayers were mock-infected or infected with influenza A and B viruses at a MOI of 0.001 for 1 h. After washing with PBS, compounds serially diluted in MEM with 2 μg/mL TPCK-trypsin were added to the wells and incubated for 3 days. Cell viability was measured by MTT assay. RBV was used as a positive control. The values are means ± standard deviation (SD) from three replicates

Compounds PC2, PC3, PC5 and PC7 are gallic acid and its derivatives (Fig. 1), all of which, except for PC2, exhibited activity against influenza A and B strains (Table 2). In terms of selectivity, PC7 showed the most desirable antiviral profile with EC50 values of 18.1, 17.1 and 19.2 μg/mL against PR8, HK and Lee, respectively. However, it also contained latent cytotoxicity, reducing cell viability by 49% at the maximum concentration, 300 μg/mL (Fig. 2). The inhibition of PR8 by PC7 was described in a previous report [23]. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that this may be the first report of the anti-influenza activity of methyl gallate (PC7) against additional strains A/H3N2 and B. Consistent with other researchers’ observation [21, 24], we found that gallic acid (PC3) and ellagic acid (PC5) are active against influenza viruses, even though PC3 showed cytotoxicity with CC50 of 111.1 μg/mL (Table 2). The anti-influenza viral activity of gallic acid and its derivatives as well as quercetin could be associated with their planar structure and cell membrane permeability, as described previously [21]. The last compound, PC8 showed desirable antiviral activity with EC50 values ranging from 14.7 to 37.8 μg/mL without cytotoxicity or an abnormally increase in cell viability at the maximum concentration treated (300.0 μg/mL) (Table 2 and Fig. 2).

The antiviral activity of the three most effective compounds, PC5, PC7 and PC8, was compared by plaque inhibition assay, a standard method for measuring the activity of viral inhibitors. Consistent with results from the CPE assay (Table 2), they inhibited plaque formation of influenza A and B viruses in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 3). Our findings suggest that among the three compounds, PC8 has the greatest antiviral efficacy and lowest cytotoxicity. Even though PC5 suppressed plaque formation significantly at all concentrations tested (P < 0.05), it was less potent than PC7 and PC8 (Fig. 3a). PC7 showed potent antiviral activity with relatively high S.I. values (Table 2), but it seemed to have marginal cytotoxicity given that crystal violet staining resulted in faint background images at concentrations higher than 33 μg/mL (Fig. 3b). This observation was in agreement with the CPE assay graph (compare Figs. 2 and 3), confirming the reliability of the cell culture-based antiviral screening system. The antiviral activity of caffeic acid (PC8) against influenza A virus, including H1N1 and H3N2 strains, was reported previously [25]. Herein, we evaluated the spectrum of its efficacy also against influenza B virus (Fig. 3c).
Fig. 3

Plaque inhibition assay of PC5 (a), PC7 (b) and PC8 (c) against PR8, HK and Lee. At 1 h after infection with influenza virus at an MOI of 0.001, MDCK cells were treated with serially diluted compounds dissolved in the overlay medium. At day 3 postinfection, viral plaques were visualized using crystal violet staining. The images are representative of three experiments (upper). The numbers of plaques in each well were counted (lower). Shown are averaged percentages and SD of three different wells. n.d., not detected. *P < 0.05

Mode-of-action of PC5, PC7 and PC8

Although anti-influenza viral activity of ellagic acid (PC5), methyl gallate (PC7) and caffeic acid (PC8) in vitro or in vivo was presented in several previous reports [23, 25, 26], their mechanisms of action have not yet been elucidated clearly except for PC8, that targets viral NA protein [27]. To investigate their effects on virus entry and early replication in cells, time-of-addition experiment was performed (Fig. 4). Treatment of PC5 for 2 h before (pre-treatment) or after (post-treatment) reduced viral plaque titers, while plaque reduction was more distinct when it was treated during virus infection (co-treatment) (Fig. 4a). It means that PC5 could affect both viral and cellular factors working at early steps of the virus life cycle and potentially interfere with their interaction. PC7 also showed the most significant antiviral activity when it was co-treated, resulting in about 35% reduction (Fig. 4b). It marginally reduced the viral infectivity by 15% at the maximum concentration (100 μM) in the post-treatment experiment, while no inhibition when treated before virus infection. It is expected that PC7 might regulate a host factor essential for influenza virus entry or early replication. PC8 resulted in no significant antiviral activity when treated before or after virus infection, but its co-treatment barely showed the efficacy at the maximum concentration (Fig. 4c). It can be suggested that PC8 is partially involved in suppression of the influenza virus entry step. To ensure that PC5 and PC7 suppress influenza virus entry or early replication, we analyzed viral NP protein production in cells by confocal microscopy (Fig. 5). Here, the 4-h incubation of influenza A virus PR8 was optimized for nuclear localization of NP. The result clearly showed that both PC5 and PC7 inhibit the early steps similar to EGCG, which is a virus entry blocker [20]. As expected, PC8 did not affect NP signal intensity or its localization within 4 h after virus infection.
Fig. 4

Time-of-addition of the PC compounds. Mock (0.1% DMSO) or increasing concentrations of PC5 (a), PC7 (b) or PC8 (c) were applied to MDCK cells for 2 h before (pre-treatment), during (co-treatment) or after (post-treatment) PR8 infection (40 PFU per well in 48-well plates) at 37 °C. Cells were washed with PBS and additionally incubated under the overlay medium for 3 days at 33 °C. The number of plaques was counted after staining with crystal violet. The values shown are the means ± S.D. of triplicate samples and expressed as a percentage relative to the plaque number with mock solution in each experiment. *P < 0.05

Fig. 5

Confocal microscopy. MDCK cells were infected with PR8 virus at an MOI of 1 in the presence either of 1 mM PC5, PC7 or PC8 or of 10 μM EGCG (an entry blocker) at 37 °C for 4 h. The viral NP was labeled with mouse anti-NP antibody and Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (green). Cellular nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (blue). Original magnification, 400 ×

To further examine whether PC8, known as an NA inhibitor [27], targets not only wild-type NA protein but also its OSV-C-resistant one, fluorescence NA inhibition assay was performed using live influenza viruses, PR8 and rgPR8(H275Y) (Fig. 6). Although NA inhibitory effect of PC8 against PR8 was less potent than that of OSV-C, it showed consistent activity against rgPR8(H275Y), that is a reverse genetically rescued virus resistant to OSV-C (compare panels A and B in Fig. 6). It suggested that PC8 targets influenza virus NA protein as OSV-C does but in a different binding manner. Moreover, previous reports proposed that the NA activity is involved in influenza virus entry as well as release of progeny virus [28]. Thus, it can be explained the reason for marginal inhibition of the initial stage of PR8 infection by the NA inhibitor, PC8 (Fig. 4c).
Fig. 6

NA inhibition assay. The NA activity of influenza virus PR8 and rgPR8(H275Y) was measured in the presence of increasing concentrations of PC8 (a) or OSV-C (b). After addition of the NA-Fluor fluorescent substrate, enzymatic activity was measured by reading the fluorescence intensity with excitation at 350 nm and emission at 450 nm. The data shown are the means ± S.D. of three different samples

Conclusion

The present study is the first report on anti-influenza virus activity of P. chinense and identification of the active components. MeOH extract, EtOAc and BuOH layers of the plant were active against influenza viruses of A/H1N1, A/H3N2 and B. Among constituents isolated from the EtOAc layer, ellagic acid, methyl gallate and caffeic acid exhibited considerable inhibitory activity against the pathogens. Based on the mode-of-action studies, ellagic acid and methyl gallate suppress the early steps of the viral life cycle. In contrast caffeic acid targets the NA protein, comparably suppressing both wild-type and OSV-C-resistant influenza viruses. Our study suggests that the multi-functional botanical materials of P. chinense could be promising inhibitors of influenza A and B viruses and applied to development of a novel herbal medicine.

Abbreviations

BuOH: 

Butanol

CC50

The half maximal cytotoxic concentration

CMC: 

Carboxymethylcellulose

CPE: 

Cytopathic effect

EC50

The half maximal effective concentration

ESI-MS: 

Electrospray ionization-mass spectroscopy

EtOAc: 

Ethyl acetate

FBS: 

Fetal bovine serum

HA: 

Hemagglutinin

HK: 

Virus strain A/Hong Kong/8/68 (H3N2)

Lee: 

Virus strain B/Lee/40

M2: 

Matrix protein 2

MDCK: 

Madin-Darby canine kidney

MEM: 

Minimum essential medium

MeOH: 

Methanol

MOI: 

Multiplicity of infection

MTT: 

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

NA: 

Neuraminidase

NMR: 

Nuclear magnetic resonance

OSV-C: 

Oseltamivir carboxylate

PR8: 

Virus strain A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1)

RBV: 

Ribavirin

S.I.: 

Selectivity index

TLC: 

Thin-layer chromatography

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge National Key Laboratory for Petrochemical and Refinery Technologies and Prof. Chuc Ngoc Mai, Vietnam Institute of Industrial Chemistry for the great general support and encouragement. The authors thank Prof. Hoang Dinh Vu and Dr. Cuong Tu Ho for their assistance in reviewing the manuscript and their constructive comments.

Funding

This work was funded in part by project number CNHD.ĐT.048/13–15 from the Ministry of Industry and Trade, Vietnam. This work was supported by the Transgovernmental Enterprise for Pandemic Influenza in Korea (TEPIK) (Grant A103001 for M. Kim).

Availability of data and materials

All the data are contained within the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

TTT, HTN, HWP and QLD performed experiments of isolation and identification of isolated compounds. MK, HYL and YJ performed experiments of antiviral tests and analyzed the data. HTN and TNN participated in sampling and generation of extraction. QLD, MK and JCK designed the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
R&D Center of Bioactive Compounds, Vietnam Institute of Industrial Chemistry
(2)
Center for Virus Research and Testing, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology
(3)
Department of Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Environmentally Friendly Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University
(4)
Department of Phytochemistry, Vietnam Institute of Industrial Chemistry
(5)
World Institute of Kimchi, an Annex of Korea Food Research Institute

References

  1. Palese P, Shaw ML. Orthomyxoviridae: the viruses and their replication. In: Knipe DM, Howley PM, Griffin DE, Lamb RA, Martin MA, Roizman B, Straus SE, editors. Fields virology. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007. p. 1647–89.Google Scholar
  2. Fujiyoshi Y, Kume NP, Sakata K, Sato SB. Fine structure of influenza a virus observed by electron cryo-microscopy. EMBO J. 1994;13(2):318–26.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Barik S. New treatments for influenza. BMC Med. 2012;10(1):1–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Kiyohara H, Ichino C, Kawamura Y, Nagai T, Sato N, Yamada H. Patchouli alcohol: in vitro direct anti-influenza virus sesquiterpene in Pogostemon cablin Benth. J Nat Med. 2012;66:55–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Regoes RR, Bonhoeffer S. Emergence of drug-resistant influenza virus: population dynamical considerations. Science. 2006;312(5772):389–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hwang BS, Lee IK, Choi HJ, Yun BS. Anti-influenza activities of polyphenols from the medicinal mushroom Phellinus baumii. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2015;25(16):3256–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Pham HH. An illustrated flora of Vietnam, vol. I. Vietnam: Tre Publishing House, Hochiminh City; 2000. p. 747Google Scholar
  8. Srividya AR, Shalom A, Chandrasekhar R, Vijayan P, Vishnuvarthtan VJ. Cytotoxic, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Polygonum chinensis Linn. Int J Pharm Sci Nanotech. 2012;4:1569–74.Google Scholar
  9. Tsai PL, Wang JP, Chang CW, Kuo SC, Vhao PD. Constituents and bioactive principles of Polygonum chinensis. Phytochemistry. 1998;49:1663–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ezhilan B, Neelamegam R. GC-MS analysis of phytocomponents in the ethanol extract of Polygonum chinense L. Pharm Res. 2012;4:11–4.Google Scholar
  11. Ismail IF, Golbabapour S, Hassandarvish P, Hajrezaie M, Abdul Majid N, Kadir FA, Al-Bayaty F, Awang K, Hazni H, Abdulla MA. Gastroprotective activity of Polygonum chinense aqueous leaf extract on ethanol-induced hemorrhagic mucosal lesions in rats. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:404012.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Thuan DNT, Phan TNH, Duc HT, Trung ND. Bio-activities of the methanol extracts from some species belonging to the genus Polygonum in lam dong province. Vietnam J Biol. 2012;31(2):43–6.Google Scholar
  13. Xiao HT, Tsang SW, Qin HY, Choi FFK, Yang ZJ, Han QB, Chen HB, Xu HX, Shen H, Lu AP. A bioactivity-guided study on the anti-diarrheal activity of Polygonum chinense Linn. J Ethnopharmacol. 2013;149:499–505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang X, Geoffroy P, Miesch M, Julien-David D, Raul F, Aoudé-Werner D, Marchioni E. Gram-scale chromatographic purification of β-sitosterol: synthesis and characterization of β-sitosterol oxides. Steroids. 2005;70(13):886–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Azimova SS, Vinogradova VI. Quercetin (3,5,7,3′,4′-Pentahydroxyflavone). In: Azimova SS, Vinogradova VI, editors. Natural compounds: flavonoids. New York: Springer New York; 2013. p. 98–9.Google Scholar
  16. Nguyen DMC, Seo DJ, Lee HB, Kim IS, Kim KY, Park RD, Jung WJ. Antifungal activity of gallic acid purified from Terminalia nigrovenulosa bark against Fusarium solani. Microb Pathog. 2013;56:8–15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoffmann E, Neumann G, Kawaoka Y, Hobom G, Webster RG. A DNA transfection system for generation of influenza a virus from eight plasmids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(11):6108–13.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Hoffmann E, Stech J, Guan Y, Webster RG, Perez DR. Universal primer set for the full-length amplification of all influenza a viruses. Arch Virol. 2001;146(12):2275–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim M, Kim SY, Lee HW, Shin JS, Kim P, Jung YS, Jeong HS, Hyun JK, Lee CK. Inhibition of influenza virus internalization by (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate. Antivir Res. 2013;100:460–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Jang YJ, Achary R, Lee HW, Lee HJ, Lee CK, Han SB, Jung YS, Kang NS, Kim P, Kim M. Synthesis and anti-influenza virus activity of 4-oxo- or thioxo-4,5-dihydrofuro[3,4-c]pyridin-3(1H)-ones. Antivir Res. 2014;107:66–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaihatsu K, Kawakami C, Kato N. Potential anti-influenza virus agents based on coffee ingredients and natural flavonols. Nat Prod Chem Res. 2014;2:129. doi:10.4172/2329-6836.1000129.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu W, Li R, Li X, He J, Jiang S, Liu S, Yang J. Quercetin as an antiviral agent inhibits influenza a virus (IAV) entry. Viruses. 2016;8(1):6. doi:10.3390/v8010006.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Kane CJM, Menna JH, Sung CC, Yeh YC. Methyl gallate, methyl-3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate, is a potent and highly specific inhibitor of herpes simplex virus in vitro. II. Antiviral activity of methyl gallate and its derivatives. Biosci Rep. 1988;8(1):95–102.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen GH, Lin YL, Hsu WL, Hsieh SK, Tzen JTC. Significant elevation of antiviral activity of strictinin from Pu'er tea after thermal degradation to ellagic acid and gallic acid. J Food Drug Anal. 2015;23(1):116–23.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Utsunomiya H, Ichinose M, Ikeda K, Uozaki M, Morishita J, Kuwahara T, Koyama AH, Yamasaki H. Inhibition by caffeic acid of the influenza a virus multiplication in vitro. Int J Mol Med. 2014;34(4):1020–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Park S, Kim JI, Lee I, Lee S, Hwang MW, Bae JY, Heo J, Kim D, Han SZ, Park MS. Aronia melanocarpa And its components demonstrate antiviral activity against influenza viruses. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2013;440(1):14–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Xie Y, Huang B, Yu K, Shi F, Liu T, Xu W. Caffeic acid derivatives: a new type of influenza neuraminidase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2013;23(12):3556–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ohuchi M, Asaoka N, Sakai T, Ohuchi R. Roles of neuraminidase in the initial stage of influenza virus infection. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:1287–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement