Appraisal of phytochemical and in vitro biological attributes of an unexplored folklore: Rhus Punjabensis Stewart
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|23 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patrick Amoateng|
|23 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Serhat Keser|
|9 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Saira Tabassum|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|9 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Serhat Keser|
|28 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patrick Amoateng|
|2 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Saira Tabassum|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|9 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12906-017-1659-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.