Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Appraisal of phytochemical and in vitro biological attributes of an unexplored folklore: Rhus Punjabensis Stewart

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patrick Amoateng
23 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Serhat Keser
9 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Saira Tabassum
Resubmission - Version 2
9 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Serhat Keser
28 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patrick Amoateng
2 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Saira Tabassum
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
4 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
9 Mar 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12906-017-1659-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement