Traditional Arabic & Islamic medicine: validation and empirical assessment of a conceptual model in Qatar
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 26 July 2016
Accepted: 15 February 2017
Published: 14 March 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|26 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter James|
|22 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Salim Adib|
|20 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Sara AlRawi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter James|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|14 Mar 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12906-017-1639-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.