Feasibility study of transfer function model on electrocardiogram change caused by acupuncture

Table 2 Goodness of fit of individual and generalized transfer function model

	Before and during acupuncture		During and after acupuncture		Before and after acupuncture
ID	GF of ITFM	GF of GTFM	GF of ITFM	GF of GTFM	GF of ITFM	GF of GTFM
1	94.03	94.35	97.95	95.34	95.62	94.47
2	97.53	95.90	94.71	92.98	90.41	90.27
3	98.01	97.23	94.19	93.59	93.78	92.49
4	98.44	98.03	97.96	97.33	98.15	97.85
5	96.16	94.30	97.68	96.44	94.75	91.71
6	96.06	95.71	98.31	97.79	96.03	95.62
7	90.90	88.93	90.89	88.10	82.35	76.95
8	92.65	92.94	97.16	96.57	95.66	93.88
9	93.02	91.76	96.68	96.02	91.02	88.24
10	83.03	96.42	98.48	97.72	94.01	94.43
11	92.95	87.80	97.65	96.82	91.32	84.31
12	92.42	90.16	96.93	96.60	94.03	93.50
13	94.47	93.76	97.51	97.44	92.98	92.02
14	94.03	93.19	98.91	98.60	89.08	92.88
Avg	93.84	93.61	96.79	95.81	92.80	91.33
SD	3.857	3.074	2.157	2.712	3.894	5.282

ID subject identification number, GF goodness of fit, ITFM individual transfer function model, GTFM generalized transfer function model, Avg average, SD standard deviation

ISSN: 2662-7671