Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Microscopic identification and in vitro activity of Agastache rugosa (Fisch. et Mey) from Xinjiang, China

BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:95

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-017-1605-7

Received: 28 August 2015

Accepted: 26 January 2017

Published: 7 February 2017

Abstract

Background

Agastache rugosa is well-known as a common traditional Chinese medicine, which have relieving summer-heat, analgesic and antipyretic effects, have long been used as folkloristic remedy in the treatment of several infectious diseases, anti-inflammatory, and for its antibacterial properties. Considering the lack of available data on the morphology, anatomy and in vitro activity of A. rugosa, the goal of the present study was to carry out the microscopic identification of its aerial parts and in vitro activity research as a contribution to the quality control and reasonable utilization involving A. rugosa.

Methods

The present study was (a) to describe the microscopic identification with usual light and scanning electron microtechniques of A. rugosa, collected from Xinjiang Region; (b) based on previous research on the essential oil constituents among different parts of A. rugosa from Xinjiang by GC-MS method, to evaluate its antibacterial effect and cell viabilitity assay.

Results

The microscopic identification of botanical material showed some typical structure. The essential oils from the dried flower (EOF) and leaves (EOL) of A. rugosa were 0.29% and 0.57% (w/w), respectively. The in vitro antibacterial activities showed strong inhibition against S.aureus, E. coli of EOF; strong inhibition against E. coli of EOL. Based GC-MS analysis, the MTT assay showed a dose and time-dependent increase in damage for gastric cancer cell line SGC-7901.

Conclusions

The results of this work, based on an extensive analytical characterization of the EOF and EOL chemical composition, compared with other origins, showed A. rugosa possessed antibacterial and cytotoxicity properties activities, which need much additional work to open up new biomedical application of these components.

Keywords

Microscopic identification Agastache rugosa Antibacterial effect Cytotoxicity

Background

Agastache rugosa (Fisch. et Mey) commonly known as Korean mint, purple giant hyssop, Indiana mint, and the wrinkled giant hyssop [1], which belongs to Lamiaceae family and widely grows in various regions of Xinjiang (Fig. 1a). As an edible plant, it is used as a herbal medicine for anxiety, nausea, bacterial infections, or gas in folk medicine. A. rugosa is one of the 50 fundamental herbs, which is known as huò xiāng, has antifungal, antibacterial, carminative, and antipyretic properties [2]. As a fungicide, this plant is used to prevent fungus from growing on potato crops [3]. Some studies reported that A. rugosa have antioxidant activity [4] and anti-HIV integrase action [5]. A. rugosa constitutes one of the most important renewable sources of natural remedy for the populations of the Xinjiang region. In China it is a representative in Huoxiang Zhengqi Liquid, which is family essential medicine. Notwithstanding various terpene compounds were isolated from A. rugosa and pharmacological studies have been done, few studies focus on A. rugosa derived from Xinjiang region. An accurate identification of the investigated species is remarkable required for pharmacognostic purposes. So morpho-anatomical studies are essential tools to provide low cost and reliable data, which can be used as the first parameters for medicinal plants quality control. Considering the lack of available data on the morphology, anatomy and in vitro activity of A. rugosa, the goal of the present study was to carry out the microscopic identification of its aerial parts and in vitro activity research as a contribution to the quality control and reasonable utilization involving A. rugosa.
Fig. 1

The photo of Agastache rugosa from Xinjiang, China

Methods

Plant material

The aerial part of A. rugosa were cultivated on Liyu mountain in Urumqi of Xinjiang, China by our research group, and collected in September 2010, Authentication of the species was carried out by the examination of aerial parts, including its flower, stem and leaves by Traditional Chinese Medicine Ethnical Herbs Specimen Museum, Yonghe Li. A voucher specimen (No. TCMEHSM 2010-352) was deposited in the herbarium of Xinjiang Medical University.

The plant material was fixed in FAA 70 [6] and kept in 70% ethanol solution (v/v) [7]. This material was sectioned by hand to obtain semipermanent and permanent slides for microscopic studies. Photos were taken using light microscope with different magnifications.

Essential oil and extracts isolation

The flower and leaves of A. rugosa were separated and dried in shadow at room temperature, submitted (100 g of each) to hydrodistillation with 1 L of distilled water in a Clevenger-type apparatus for 6 h. Then collected the oils and dried with anhydrous sodium sulfate prior to analyze, measured, transferred to glass flasks and stored at 4°C.

The aqueous extracts and alcohol extracts of different parts (flower, leave) were obtained with reflux method and ultrasonic extraction, respectively. Than obtained the crude dried extracts by using a rotary evaporator and freeze dryer. The dried extracts were stored at -20°C until used.

Biological activity: in vitro studies

Test organisms

Organisms contain Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), which were maintained by serial sub-culturing every day on nutrient agar slants and incubating at 37°C for 18-24 h. The cultures were stored under refrigerated condition. The antifungal activity of the plant was tested against Candida albicans (ATCC 10231).

Positive control: Penicillin (Zhongnuo Pharmaceutical Institute Company, H13021634) was served as positive control to determine the sensitivity of S. aureus tested. Gentamycin (Zhenzhou Linrui Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, H41020318) was served as positive control to determine the sensitivity of E. coli tested. Fluconazole (Tianjin Pharmaceutical Group Xinzheng Co. Ltd, 100108) was served as positive control to determine the sensitivity of C. albicans tested.

Antibacterial and antifungal activity

The inhibitory potential of EOF, EOL, aqueous extracts and alcohol extracts of different parts (flower, leaves) against growth of three different bacterial was assessed of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) using broth microdilution techniques following Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute methods [8]. The essential oils, aqueous extracts and alcohol extracts were added aseptically to sterile melted Mueller Hinton Broth medium (Sabouraud’s Borth medium for B. albicans) to produce the concentration range of 5.25-336 μg/ml for EOF, range of 4.72-302 μg/ml for EOL, range of 3.125-2000 mg/ml for aqueous extracts, range of 1.563-100 mg/ml for alcohol extracts. For the determination of MIC, MBC. Standard reference antibiotics (penicillin, gentamycin, fluconazole) were used as positive control. The MIC was defined as the lowest concentration that completely inhibited growth of the organism, as detected by the unaided eye after incubation for 24 h. The MBC was defined as the lowest concentration at which no microorganism growth was detected on the agar plate. S. aureus and E. coli were incubated at 37°C, and C. albicans was incubated at 25°C.

Cell viability assay (MTT)

The cytotoxicity was measured by the MTT assay using gastric cancer cell line SGC-7901 cells damage induced by essential oils from A. Rugosa, which used 5-fluorouracil (5-F) as the positive control. The effect of the plant extracts on the proliferation of the SGC-7901 cells were determined in 96-well tissue culture plates. A MTT colorimetric method based on the reduction of a tetrazolium salt was used according to Kairo et al. [9] with modification of Walencka et al. [10], as followed: after incubation SGC-7901 cells suspensions were added in well per 100 ul (3.44 × 107/well). Based on previous research on the essential oil constituents among different parts of A. rugosa from Xinjiang by GC-MS method, the EOF showed pulegone (34.1%), estragole (29.5%), p-Menthan-3-one (19.2%), the EOL showed p-Menthan-3-one (48.8%), estragole (20.8%), as the main components [11]. According to the assay of chemical composition, apply the pulegone (Fig. 2a, Chemical formula, CAS: 89-82-7) and estragole (Fig.2b, Chemical formula, CAS: 140-67-0) as standard substances which were the main active compounds in the EOF and EOL of A. rugosa.

Then added different samples: EOF (S1), EOL (S2), estrogole (S3), pulegone (S4) and 5-F in 96-well plates per 10 ul, respectively. Incubating at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, then add 10 μl of 5 mg/ml MTT (Sigma-Aldrich, Switzerland) in Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS, Gibco, Life Technologies, Switzerland). After incubate 4 h, the medium was replaced with 200 μl of DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) to stop the reaction and lyse the cells. Uninfected SGC-7901 cells served as 0%-damage control and wells containing medium alone were used for background correction. Absorbance of 200 μl of the solution was measured at 560 nm. Damage was calculated using the following formula: 1− (A560 of test well/A560 of 0%-damage control well).
Fig. 2

Chemical formula of Pulegone (A), Estragone (B), P-menthan-3-one (C)

1 control and 4 experimental groups were run in triplicate for cellular viability analysis by the MTT assay.

Statistical analysis

All experiments were performed in quadruplicates. A comparative analysis of means was performed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s multiple comparison test (P < 0.05). Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS ver. 18.0 software (SPSS Inc., USA).

Results and discussions

Microscopic identification

Morphological analysis of A. rugosa (Fig. 1a, 1b) reveals stem range from 0.5 to 1.3 m, four prism with 0.6-0.8 mm in diameter, upper being ultrashort floss without for lower. Leave opposite and varying from heart-shaped oval to oblonglanceolate in form and measuring 3.5-11 cm in length and 1.5-6 cm in width, rounded or heart-shaped base, saw-toothed margin, back with puberulent and glandular punctuate. With 1-3.5 cm in length of petiole (Fig. 1c).

The microscopic identification of the plant revealed the presence of oil cells, non-glandular trichomes, corolla epidermal cells, wood fiber, phloem parenchyma cells, catheter in flower and leaves powder (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

The microscopic identification of Agastache rugosa a. oil cells; b. non-glandular trichomes; c. corolla epidermal cells; d. wood fiber; e. phloem parenchyma cells; f. catheter

The results relative to the organoleptic characteristics and to the physical-chemical descriptors of the EOF and EOL are reported in Table 1. The yields of essential oils from flower, stem, leaves were 0.29%, 0.02%, 0.57%, respectively. The data showed the essential oil yields from stem was low, so made the in vitro experiment impossible.
Table 1

Physical descriptors of the EOF and EOL of A. rugosa

Descriptors

Experimental evaluation

Flower

Leave

Color

presented light yellow

brilliant yellow

Odor

powerful spicy odor

stronger aromatic odor

Yield (w/w, %)

0.29

0.57

Specific gravity (g/mL)

0.840 ± 0.001

0.755-0.760

Refractive index (t = 25 °C)

1.1231 ± 0.003

1.1322-1.1400

Antimicrobial activity

The antibacterial activity results of EOF, EOL, aqueous extracts and alcohol extracts of A. rugosa were summarized in Tables 24. With the broth dilution method, the MIC values of EOL and EOF were in the range of 9.4-37.8 μg/ml, 21-31.5 μg/ml, respectively. The MBC values of EOL and EOF were in the range of 18.9-75.5 μg/ml, 42-63 μg/ml, respectively. Tables 34 showed the aqueous extracts and alcohol extracts from flower and leaves of A. rugosa have a certain antibacterial activity.
Table 2

Antimicrobial activity of EOL and EOF of A. rugosa

Organisms

EOL

EOF

Penicillin

Gentamycin

Fluconazole

MICa

MBCa

MICa

MBCa

MICa

MBCa

MICa

MBCa

MICa

MBCa

Staphylococcus aureus

37.8

75.5

21.0

42.0

30

60

  

Escherichia coli

9.4

18.9

21.0

42.0

 

100

200

 

Candida albicans

28.0

57.0

31.5

63.0

  

25000

50000

a Values given as μg/ml, MIC a Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, MBC a Minimal Bactericidal Concentration

Table 3

Antimicrobial activity of aqueous extracts from leaf and flower parts of A. rugosa

Organisms

Leaf part

Flower part

Penicillin

Gentamycin

Fluconazole

MICa

MBCa

MICa

MBCa

MICa

MBCa

MICa

MBCa

MICa

MBCa

Staphylococcus aureus

50

100

100

1000

0.026

0.053

  

Escherichia coli

50

100

50

100

 

0.1

0.2

 

Candida albicans

25

50

100

1000

  

25

30

a Values given as μg/ml, MIC a Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, MBC a Minimal Bactericidal Concentration

Table 4

Antimicrobial activity of alcohol extracts from leaf and flower parts of A. rugosa

Organisms

Leaf part

Flower part

Penicillin

Gentamycin

Fluconazole

MICa

MBCa

MICa

MBCa

MICa

MBCa

MICa

MBCa

MICa

MBCa

Staphylococcus aureus

25

50

50

100

0.026

0.053

  

Escherichia coli

50

100

25

50

 

0.1

0.2

 

Candida albicans

25

50

50

100

  

25

30

a Values given as mg/ml, MIC a Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, MBC a Minimal Bactericidal Concentration

Table 2 showed EOF is strong inhibition against S.aureus and E. coli, strong inhibition against E. coli of EOL. And low activity against B. albicans from EOF and EOL. The results of MIC, MBC values indicated that E. coli was inhibited at lower concentrations by EOL than S. aureus, which the lowest MIC value is 9.4 μg/ml. The EOL was sensitive than EOF in fungicidal activity against B.albicans. The antibacterial ability showed by the EOL may be due to the chemical composition.

Cell viability assay (MTT)

Among the samples for cytotoxicity against SGC-7901 cells, the result of MTT assay showed a dose and time-dependent increase in demage induced by S1-S4 in SGC-7901 cells (Fig. 4). Meanwhile, the EOF showed sensitive (inhibition rate >70%) to SGC-7901 cells ranging from 250 to 1000 ug/ml, from 500 to 1000 ug/ml for the EOL, from 12.5 to 100 ug/ml for estrogole, pulegone and 5-F (inhibition rate >85%). Comparing the inhibition rates, the estrogole and pulegone inhibition effect were better, which were pure and single chemical components. Meanwhile, EOF have better cytotoxicity activity than EOL, which inhibition rate reach to 96.24% at 800 ug/ml (72 h), extracted from cultivated plant of A. rugosa.
Fig. 4

Inhibition rate of each group at different time (24 h, 48 h, 72 h), expressed in percentage

There were significantly differences in inter-group and intra-group of EOF, according to analysis of variance (P < 0.05).

Compared EOF and EOL groups, there was significantly differences in inhibition rates under 800 ug/ml (24, 48, 72 h), and 400 ug/ml (72 h). However, there is no significantly differences in estrogole, pulegone and 5-F groups (P > 0.05).

We acquired that EOF and EOL have a certain cytotoxicity activity, especially EOF. Considering plant application value, explore the single and pure chemical components from EOF and EOL, it was found estrogole and pulegone have well inhibition effect. This was potential anti-tumor plant or components, which need to further research and may obtain worthwhile discovery.

Conclusions

Considering the application value, the characters of microscopic identification of A. rugosa should be taken into account as quality control parameters for its pharmacognostic study. With the development of industry and population growth, environmental pollution is also more serious. The forest vegetation is broken seriously, and medicinal herb is severe decreased. So we should rational utilization of medicinal herbs.

Many of the components identified in essential oils have previously been identified from other Lamiaceae species, previously studied by us [12, 13]. In the EOF, 21 components were identified which the major compounds were oxygenated terpenes (35.4%), including pulegone (34.1%), estragole (29.5%), and p-Menthan-3-one (19.2%). Meanwhile, 26 components were identified in EOL, and p-Menthan-3-one (48.8%) and estragole (20.8%) as the main components. The oils have high contents of p-Menthan-3-one (Fig. 2c, Chemical formula, CAS: 1196-31-2).

The experimental plant was cultivated in Xinjiang by our research group, which were collected among 5-7 month for A. rugosa. We initiated this study to investigate the antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity of essential oils of EOL and EOF from A. rugosa. We isolated different parts of A. rugosa offer choice for clinical treatments and application. Our results thus offer reliable base for resource optimization, clinical choice and standard of quality control.

Abbreviations

5-F: 

5-fluorouracil

A. rugosa

Agastache rugosa

ATCC: 

American Type Culture Collection

B. albicans

Blastomyces albicans

C. albicans

Candida albicans

DMSO: 

Dimethyl sulfoxide

E. coli

Escherichia coli

EOF: 

Essential oil of flower

EOL: 

Essential oil of leaves

FAA: 

Formalin fixed-acetic acid-alcohol liquid

GC: 

Gas Chromatography

GC-MS: 

Gas Chromatography coupled to a Mass Spectrometry

MBC: 

Minimal bactericidal concentration

MIC: 

Minimal inhibitory concentration

MTT: 

3 -(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide

NCCLS: 

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards

S. aureus

Staphylococcus aureus

Declarations

Acknowledgement

We thank the college of Traditional Chinese Medicine, the fifth hospital of Xinjiang Medical University and Prof. Shuge Tian for providing the plant and strains of bacteria.

This work was supported by a grant from China, the Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2016D01C227).

Funding

This work was supported by a funding from China, the Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2016D01C227).

Availability of data and materials

All data are fully available without restriction, just some basic data have been uesd in another paper.

Authors’ contributions

HG design, definition of intellectual content, literature search, clinical studies, experimental studies, data acquisition, manuscript preparation, manuscript editing, manuscript review, final approval.SL literature search, experimental studies, data acquisition, manuscript review, final approval. LH definition of intellectual content, clinical studies, data analysis, statistical analysis, manuscript review, final approval. RK concepts, design, manuscript editing, manuscript review, guarantor, final approval. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

I confirm that none of the authors have any competing interests.

Consent for publication

All of the authors agree to publish the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The manuscript is not involved with animal or human experiments.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Postdoctoral research station of college of pharmacy, Xinjiang Medical University
(2)
The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
(3)
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
(4)
Xinjiang Medical University

References

  1. Hudaberdi M, Pan XL. Introduction of Agastache rugosa (Fisch. et Mey) of Xinjiang (4th of Flora Xinjiangensis). Xinjiang: Xinjiang Science&Technology Publishing House Publ; 2004. p. 237–9.Google Scholar
  2. Liu YM. Uighur Medicine Standard, upper volume. Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Health Department Edits. Xinjiang: Health Science and Technology Publishing House Publ (K); 1993. p. 120–7.Google Scholar
  3. Cho SE, Park JH, Hong SH. First report of powdery mildew caused by golovinomyces biocellatus on Agastache rugosa in Korea. Plant Disease. 2014;98(9): 1278-1279.Google Scholar
  4. Oha HM, Kang YJ, Leea YS, Parka MK, Kima SH, Kima HJ. Protein kinase G-dependent heme oxygenase-1 induction by Agastache rugosa leaf extract protects RAW 264.7 cells from hydrogen peroxide-induced injury. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;103:229–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Kim HK, Lee HK, Shin CG, Huh H. HIV integrase inhibitory activity of Agastache rugosa. Arch Pharm Res. 1999;22:520–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Johansen NDA. Plant microtechnique. New York: McGraw Hill Book; 1940. p. 121–4.Google Scholar
  7. Berlyn GP, Miksch JP. Botanical microtechnique and cytochemistry. Ames: Iowa State University; 1976. p. 1256–31.Google Scholar
  8. CLSI. Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically, Approved Standard 9th Ed. Document M07–A9. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012.Google Scholar
  9. Kario SK, Bedwell J, Tyler PC, Cater A, Corbel MJ. Development of a tetrazolium salt assay for rapid determination of viability of BCG vaccines. Vaccine. 1999;17:2423–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Walenka E, Sadowska B, Rozalska S, Hryniewicz W, Rozalska B. Lysostaphin as a potential therapeutic agent for staphylococcal biofilm eradication. Pol J Microbiol. 2005;54:191–200.Google Scholar
  11. Gong H, Zhou X, Zhu M, Ma X, Zhang X, Tian S. Constituents of essential oil from the dried flower and leaf of Agastache rugosa (Fisch. et Mey) from Xinjiang, in China. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants. 2012;15(4):534-538.Google Scholar
  12. Gong HY, Liu WH, Lv GY, Tian SG. Analysis of Essential Oils of Origanum vulgare from Six Production Areas of China and Pakistan. J Pharmacogn. 2014;24:25–32.Google Scholar
  13. Zhou XY, Yu Q, Gong HY, Tian SG. GC-MS Analysis of Ziziphora clinopodioides essential oil from north Xinjiang, China. Nat Prod Commun. 2012;7(1):81–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement