This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A comparative study on the effects of systemic manual acupuncture, periauricular electroacupuncture, and digital electroacupuncture to treat tinnitus: A randomized, paralleled, open-labeled exploratory trial
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 8 August 2016
Accepted: 17 January 2017
Published: 31 January 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Changwei Li|
|5 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hong Lei|
|2 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Hae Jeong Nam|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hong Lei|
|9 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Changwei Li|
|13 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Hae Jeong Nam|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|13 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|31 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12906-017-1589-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.