Open Peer Review Reports for: Androgenic effects of aqueous and methanolic extracts of Ficus asperifolia in male Wistar rats
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
27 Sep 2015 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
2 Feb 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sreenivasan Sasidharan |
2 Mar 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Norhaniza Binti Aminudin |
5 Mar 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Balé Bayala |
3 Apr 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Pierre WATCHO |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
3 Apr 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
25 Jun 2016 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Sreenivasan Sasidharan |
5 Sep 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Pierre WATCHO |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
5 Sep 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
27 Nov 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Pierre WATCHO |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Nov 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
18 Dec 2016 | Author responded | Author comments - Pierre WATCHO |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
18 Dec 2016 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
Publishing | ||
20 Dec 2016 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Jan 2017 | Article published | 10.1186/s12906-016-1547-5 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.