This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Quantifying traditional Chinese medicine patterns using modern test theory: an example of functional constipation
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 25 August 2016
Accepted: 14 December 2016
Published: 13 January 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|25 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Raffaele Capasso|
|10 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dae Youn Hwang|
|17 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ryan Abbott|
|30 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chongzhi Wang|
|2 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Minxue Shen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|2 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ryan Abbott|
|5 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Dae Youn Hwang|
|9 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Minxue Shen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|9 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|13 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12906-016-1518-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.