Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Gaultheria trichophylla (Royle): a source of minerals and biologically active molecules, its antioxidant and anti-lipoxygenase activities

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine201717:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1511-4

Received: 18 October 2016

Accepted: 5 December 2016

Published: 3 January 2017

Abstract

Background

Gaultheria trichophylla (Royle) is used as food and for treating many ailments in folk medicine especially against inflammation. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the ability of extracts of G. trichophylla as anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory agent and for its mineral contents.

Methods

Powdered plant material (100 g) was extracted with 100 ml each of methanol, chloroform, and n-hexane using soxhlet extractor. Antioxidant activity of methanol extract was assessed by DPPH radical scavenging and FRAP assays. Determination of enzyme inhibition activity was determined using 5-LOX inhibitory activity. Total phenolic and flavonoids contents were measured by Folin-Chicalteu and colorimeteric methods respectively. Minerals and heavy metals contents were determined using Atomic absorption spectrophotometer. Qualitative HPLC analysis were performed using some standard phenolic compounds.

Results

The highest phenolic (17.5 ± 2.5 mg GA equivalent/g) and flavonoids (41.3 ± 0.1 mg QE equivalent/g) concentrations were found in methanol extract, which also showed more scavenging activity of 1, 1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl and ferrous reducing power with IC50 = 81.2 ± 0.2 and IC50 = 11.2 ± 0.1 μg/ml, respectively. The methanol and chloroform extracts showed best inhibition of 5-lipoxygenase enzyme with 90.5 ± 0.7% and 66.9 ± 0.1% at 0.5 mg/ml, respectively. G. trichophylla extract was also evaluated for mineral contents (K, Na, Ca, Mg, Fe, and Cu), and for chemical profiling of heavy metals (Cr, Pb, Cd, Co, Zn, Ni and Hg).

Conclusion

Our current findings suggest that this plant is good source of minerals and concentration of all heavy metals were within permissible limits. The results revealed that this ignored plant has great pharmaceutical and nutraceutical potential.

Keywords

AntioxidantAnti-inflammatoryHimalayan snowberryPhenolicsMineralsHPLC

Background

The free radicals and reactive oxygen species (ROS) leads to the formation of harmful chemical compounds and have an important role in the management of health and disease and is therefore producing a medical revolution [1]. Research suggests that free radical damage to cells leads to the pathological changes associated with aging and therefore have an increasing number of diseases or disorders, as well as the aging process itself, demonstrates link either directly or indirectly to these reactive and potentially destructive molecules [2].

The antioxidants through their free radical scavenging property can delay or inhibit cellular damage. The antioxidants are usually being low-molecular-weight and can interact with free radicals and terminate the chain reaction before the important molecules are damaged. Antioxidants are produced in the body and others are found in the diet [3]. The intake of natural antioxidants has been reported to reduce risk of cancer, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and other diseases associated with aging [4]. In many cases, it is concluded that antioxidants modulate the pathophysiology of chronic inflammation up to some extent [5]. In view of increasing risk factors of synthetic phenolics to human health, there has been a trend globally toward the use of medicinal and dietary plant substances as therapeutic antioxidants. Many antioxidant compounds, naturally occurring in plant sources have been identified as free radical or active oxygen scavengers [6]. Lipoxygenases (LOX) are enzymes are correlated with inflammatory and allergic reactions because of the formation of the leukotrienes (LTs) [7]. Increased levels of leukotrienes could be observed in the pathological conditions of asthma, psoriasis, allergic rhinitis, rheumatoid arthritis and colitis ulcerosa. The production of LTs can be prevented via inhibition of the lipoxygenase pathway [8]. The drugs having ability to inhibit LOX isoforms and/or their biologically active metabolites can be useful in cancer treatment [9].

Other than medicinal values the plants and their polyphenolic compounds have become the focus of current nutritional interest due to their health-promoting effects [10]. Because of the increasing interest in traditional medicinal products, it is important to determine whether they are safe for consumption. Levels of toxic elements such as As, Cu, Cd, Hg and Pb in the plant samples must be determined. Some common elements such as K, Na and P are essential for health and the quantification of these elements is important for nutritional purposes [1113].

Many species of plants have been successful in absorbing metal contaminants which are essential for plant growth (Fe, Mn, Zn, Cu, Mg, Mo, and Ni). Some metals with unknown biological function (Cd, Cr, Pb, Co, Hg) can also be accumulated [14]. Arsenic, mercury, and lead are contaminants found in the environment which are notoriously toxic to man and other living organisms. Investigation of such heavy metals is necessary before the adjustment of the final recommended doses of the plant to avoid toxicities [15]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for quick assessment of these heavy metals in medicinal plants to control the level of contaminants in herbal raw materials [16].

Gaultheria (Ericaceae) consists of over 1700 species. Gaultheria trichophylla (Royle) is native to the Himalayas and commonly known as Himalayan Snowberry [17]. It is more distinct due to its blue color berries which are eaten as refreshing food from the local community and red to pink color flowers. The small green leaves are approximately 3 – 7 mm in length. This plant is furnished with setae and found in cold and lofty situations of the mountains [18]. Research work on other species of this plant indicates anti-inflammatory, [19], antibacterial, [20] and anti-arthritis [21] activities. Other species of the genus Gaultheria like G.yunnanensis, G. fragrantissima and G. procumbens are used in traditional medicine to treat arthritis in China, India, America and Canada. Gaultherin a natural salicylate isolated from G.yunnanensis possess analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity [22]. The phytochemical investigation of the species investigated reported to contain methyl salicylate, diterpenoids, acids, dilactone, alkaloids and other glycosides [23].

The present approach was based on the fact that Gaultheria trichophylla was described as being used as anti-inflammatory in traditional medicines, therefore it was evaluated in vitro for antioxidant and lipoxygenase inhibitory activities, and to determine its potential as a safe functional food and alternative medicine.

Methods

Plant material

The Gaultheria trichophylla plant was collected from Kaghan valley, District Mansehra, KPK, Pakistan, in the month of November, 2013. After authentication by taxonomist, Professor Dr. Qazi Najum us Saqib, voucher specimen (CTPHM-GT01, 13) was deposited in the herbarium of the Department of Pharmacy, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad. After washing with water the whole plant was dried in shade at room temperature. The dried material was ground to a coarse powder. The powder drug was stored in air tight and light resistant container before extraction.

Extract preparation

The powder material (100 g) was extracted with each of methanol, chloroform and n-hexane using soxhlet extractor for 20 h each. It was filtered through a Whatman Grade-I filter paper. The filtrate was evaporated on a vacuum rotary evaporator under reduced pressure at 40 °C. Extractive yield (percent) of the methanol (Gt. MeOH), chloroform (Gt. Chlor) and for n-hexane (Gt. Hex) was 21.85%, 16.35% and 7% respectively.

Chemicals

1, 1-diphenyl, 2-picryl hydrazyl (DPPH), Ascorbic acid (Vitamin C), Gallic acid, Quercetin, tetrazolium chloride, Folin Ciocalteu’s reagent, 5-LOX enzyme from soybean, KH2PO4 buffer, and Baicalein were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA. DMSO dimethyl sulphoxide, and Methanol (analytical) were purchased from Merck, Germany. HClO4, H2SO4, and Standards of Na, K, Ca, Fe, Pb, Mn, Cr, Zn, Cd, Co, Hg and Ni procured from Merck, Germany.

Determination of total phenolic contents (TPC) and qualitative HPLC analysis

TPC of methanol extract of Gaultheria trichophylla was determined by the Folin-Chiocalteu method [2426]. The modification made in the method was to use gallic acid as a standard phenolic compound. The extracts were diluted with distilled water to a known concentration in order to obtain the readings within the standard curve range of 0.0 to 600 μg of gallic acid/ml. 250 μl of diluted extract or gallic acid solution was mixed with 1 ml of distilled water in a test tube followed by the addition of 250 μl of Folin-Chiocalteu reagent. The samples were mixed well and then allowed to stand for 5 min at room temperature and allowed to complete a reaction with the Folin-Chiocalteu reagent. Then, 2.5 ml of 7% sodium carbonate aqueous solution was added and the final volume was made up to 6 ml with distilled water. The samples were then incubated for 90 min. The absorbance of the resulting blue color solution was measured at 760 nm using spectrophotometer. The result was expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g of extract by using an equation that was obtained from standard gallic acid graph. All the experiments were conducted in triplicates.

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with autosampler (PerkinElmer series 200, PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA), UV–visible detector, column (SUPELCO) C18, 25 cm, 4.6 mm2, particles diameter 5 mm was used. Samples were analyzed using Total ChromWork Station software (SAS Inc.,Cary, NC), version 6.3 with LC Instrument control.

Hydroxy benzoic acid (HBA), Catechin (CA) and epicatechin (ECA) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO), and quercetin (QU) and kaemferol (KA) from Fluka (Seelze, Germany). All the HPLC grade solvents for elution and sample preparation were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany).

The gradient elution of solvent A [water/acetonitrile/formic acid (95:5:0.1, v/v/v) and solvent B (acetonitrile/formic acid (100:0.1, v/v) had a significant effect on the resolution of compounds. Solvent B was increased to 50% in 4 min and subsequently increased to 80% in 10 min at a flow rate of 1 mL per minute. Detection wavelengths were 250, 310, 280, and 360 nm. Injection volume was 10 ml for each sample and reference. Run time was 15 min. Before injection, sample (20 mg) and reference were dissolved in 70% (v/v) aqueous methanol (10 mL) and filtered through a 0.45 -mm membrane filter (Millipore,Billerica, MA) (Michel et al. 2014).

Determination of total flavonoid contents

The total flavonoid contents of G.trichophylla was determined by using of a modified colorimetric method described previously [27]. The dried plant extract (25 mg) was ground in a mortar with 10 ml 80% methanol. The homogenous mixture obtained was allowed to stand for 20 min at room temperature. Mixture was filtered through filter G4. An aliquot of 0.4 ml of filtrate was mixed with 0.6 ml distilled water, 5% NaNO2 solution (0.06 ml). The mixture was allowed to stand for 5 min at room temperature. After 6 min 10% AlCl3 solution (0.06 ml) was added to the mixture. 1 N NaOH (0.4 ml) and 0.45 ml distilled water were added immediately, to the mixture and allowed to stand for another 30 min. Absorbance of the mixture was determined at 510 nm and Quercetin was used as standard compound for the quantification of total flavonoid content. All values were expressed as milligram of Quercetin equivalents per 1 g dry weight. Data was recorded as mean ± SD for three replicates.

DPPH radical scavenging assay

DPPH radical scavenging activity was evaluated as described by [28] with some modification. Ten μl of test solution was added in 96-wells plate followed by the addition of 90 μl of 100 μM methanolic DPPH solution in a total volume of 100 μl. The contents were mixed and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The reduction in the absorbance was measured at 517 nm using Synergy HT BioTek® USA microplate reader. All experiments were carried out in triplicates. For the determination of IC50 values, test solutions were assayed at various dilutions i.e. 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625, 0.0313, 0.015 mM. Data obtained was computed using the computer software Statview version 5.0. Ez-fit software. Standard compounds used were quercetin and Vitamin C (as positive control). The percent inhibition by sample exposure was determined by comparison with a DMSO treated control group. The obtained data were used to determine the concentration of the sample required to scavenge 50% of the DPPH free radicals… The decrease in absorbance indicates increased radical scavenging activity which was determined by the following formula.

Inhibition (%) = (Absorbance of control – Absorbance of test solution/Absorbance of control) × 100.

Ferrous reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)

This assay uses antioxidants to reduce ferric ion in a complex with tripyridiltriazine (Fe3 -TPTZ) to an intense blue ferrous (Fe2) complex that develops an absorption maximum at 700. FRAP values are obtained by comparing the absorbance change at 700 nm in test reaction mixtures with those containing ferrous ions in known concentrations. Hence, this test measures the ability of a sample to reduce ferric ion complex [29].

Ferrous Reducing antioxidant power activity of extracts was determined according to the method of [30] with some additional changes. In the well of 96 microplate 25 μl of test sample was mixed with 25 μl of phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) and then added 50 μl of 1% potassium ferricyanide solution into the mixture. This mixture was incubated for ten min at 50 °C then 25 μl of 10% trichloroacetic acid (w/v) solution and 100 μl distilled water was added into it then measured the absorbance at 540 nm micro plate reader and was taken as pre read value. At last, 25 μl of freshly prepared 0.2% ferric chloride (FeCl3) solution was added into the mixture and measured the absorbance at wavelength of 700 nm on a micro plate reader. Quercetin was used as standard. For the determination of IC50 value, sample solution was assayed with different concentration until it reaches the %inhibition of 50. The ferrous reducing power was measured by using the formula as given below;

%inhibition = (absorbance of sample/absorbance of control) × 100

5-LOX Assay

5-LOX activity was assayed according to the method [31] with slight modifications. All extracts assays carried out in triplicate. A total volume of 200 μl contained 140 μl KH2PO4 buffer (100 mM, pH 8.0), 20 μl test compound and 15 μl purified LOX enzyme (127 units per well). The contents were mixed and pre-read at 234 nm and pre-incubated for 10 min at 25 °C. The reaction was initiated by the addition of 25 μl substrate solution. The change in absorbance was observed after 6-10 min at 234 nm. Baicalein was used as a positive control. The determination of IC50 values were determined at various dilutions i.e. 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, 0.0625, 0.0313, 0.015 mg. Data obtained was computed on Ez-fit software. The decrease in absorbance indicates increased radical scavenging activity which was determined by the following formula;

Inhibition (%) = (Abs. of control – Abs. of test solution/Absorbance of control) × 100.

Where,

Absorbance of control = Total enzyme activity without inhibitor,

Absorbance of test = Activity in the presence of test compound

Determination of minerals

Minerals (Na, Ca, Mg, Fe, K, Zn, Mn, and Cu) were measured by using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer AAnalyst700, USA). Before analysis the samples were digested in mixture of H2SO4, HNO3 and HClO4. All determinations were done in triplicate. The minerals were expressed as mg/100 g of fresh weight [32].

Determination of heavy metals

Heavy metals (Ni, Pb, Hg, Si, Co, Cr, As and Cd) contents analysis in Gaultheria trichophylla are determined according to method of [33] using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer AAnalyst700, USA). Standards of Ni, Pb, Hg, Si, Co, Cr, As and Cd were used as reference analytes for quantitative estimation of heavy metals as well as accurate calibration of each analyte. The standard stock solutions (1000 ppm) were diluted to obtain working standard solutions ranging from 1 ppm to 10 ppm and stored at 4 °C. An acidity of 0.1% nitric acid was maintained in all the solutions. A calibration curve was plotted between measured absorbance and concentration (ppm). All the samples were analyzed in triplicate. Samples were digested in 20 ml mixture of concentrated acids (nitric and perchloric acid in 9:1 ratio) for 3 h in a water bath maintained at 70 °C for dissolving the contents until a clear brownish solution was obtained using wet digestion method. After cooling, these solutions were reconstituted with deionized autoclaved water to 20 ml. Each sample was filtered using whatmann filter paper (pore size 0.45 μ, Axiva) and stored in closed acid-washed glass vials.

Results

Determination of phenolic and flavonoid contents

The Gaultheria trichophylla was evaluated for their phenolic contents by Folin-Chiocalteu assay.

The methanol extract showed the highest phenolic content 17.58 ± 2.51 mg GAE/g of dried extract. The chloroform extract evaluated for phenolic contents showed the values of 5.01 ± 0.90 mg GAE/g of dried extract. The hexane extract of G.trichophylla showed the lowest values of phenolic contents with 3.214 ± 0.35 mg GAE/g of dried extract. The flavonoids contents of G.trichophylla extracts were expressed as quercetin equivalents in mg QE/g of dry weight. The flavonoids contents for G.trichophylla extracts of methanol, chloroform and hexane were found to be 41.345 ± 0.19, 9.828 ± 0.78, and 26.793 ± 1.45 mg QE/g, respectively Table 1.
Table 1

Comparison of Phenolic, flavonoids contents, DPPH, FRAP antioxidant assays, and Lipoxygenase inhibition of Gaultheria trichophylla extracts

Samples

Phenolic contents mg GAE/g of extract

Flavonoids contents mg QE/g of extract

DPPH % inhibition 0.5 mg/ml

IC50 μg/ml

FRAP % inhibition 0.5 mg/ml

IC50 μg/ml

5- LOX Inhibition

% Inhibition at 0.5 mg/ml

IC50 μg/ml

G. MeOH

17.5 ± 2.5

41.3 ± 0.1

90.5 ± 0.8

81.2 ± 0.2

98.2 ± 1.7

11.2 ± 0.1

90.5 ± 0.7

277.3 ± 2.7

G. Chlor

5.0 ± 0.9

9.8 ± 0.7

66.8 ± 0.6

119.2 ± 0.7

77.0 ± 2.7

27.7 ± 0.6

66.9 ± 0.1

379.3 ± 1.4

G. Hex

3.2 ± 0.3

26.7 ± 1.4

58.9 ± 0.2

99.0 ± 0.5

74.2 ± 1.4

13.5 ± 0.7

57.0 ± 0.3

448 ± 0.2

Quercetin

-

-

92.1 ± 0.04

16.9 ± 0.1

95.2 ± 0.1

6.04 ± .003

-

-

Vitamin C

-

-

93.1 ± 0.06

13.5 ± 0.1

94.3 ± 0.09

5.82 ± 0.02

-

-

Baicalein

-

-

-

-

-

-

95.7 ± 1.2

22.4 ± 1.3

Values are given as standard error mean (SEM±) of three determination

The qualitative HPLC analysis of crude methanol extract of G. trichophylla revealed the presence of phenolic compounds including hydroxyl benzoic acid (HBA) with retention time (RT) of 6.2 min when the compound was scanned at 250 nm wavelength (λ). The other compounds detected were, kaemferol (KA); RT = 9.1, λ = 310, catechin (CA); RT = 11.1, λ = 280, epicatechin (ECA); RT = 12.5, λ = 280, and quercetin (QU); RT = 11.5, λ = 360. Fig. 1a-e.
Fig. 1

a-e Qualitative HPLC analysis of extract of G. trichophylla with standard phenolics, a = epicatechin (ECA), b = kaemferol (KA), c = hydroxyl benzoic acid (HBA), d = quercetin (QU) and catechin (CA)

Fig. 2

Comparison of phenolic, flavonoids contents, DPPH, FRAP assays, and Lipoxygenase inhibition of Gaultheria trichophylla extracts

Determination of antioxidant activities

DPPH assay was carried out to investigate the antioxidant potential of G. trichophylla. The methanol extract of G.trichophylla showed the maximum inhibition of 90.55 ± 0.89% with IC50 = 81.2 ± 0.26 μg/ml. The chloroform extract showed the inhibition of 66.83 ± 0.64% with IC50 = 119.2 ± 0.7 μg/ml. The hexane extract showed the inhibition of 58.97 ± 0.23% with IC50 = 99.03 ± 0.5 μg/ml. All the results were compared with Quercetin and Vitamin C as standard antioxidants. The other antioxidant assay conducted was FRAP assay to investigate the antioxidant activity of G. trichophylla. The methanol extract of G.trichophylla showed the maximum inhibition of 98.28 ± 1.71% with lowest IC50 = 11.2 ± 0.16 μg/ml. The chloroform extract showed the inhibition of 77.09 ± 2.7% with IC50 = 27.7 ± 0.6 μg/ml. The hexane extract showed the inhibition of 74.28 ± 1.4% with IC50 = 13.5 ± 0.7 μg/ml Table 1.

Anti-lipoxygenase activity

The G. trichophylla methanol extract showed the maximum lipoxygenase inhibition with 90.50 ± 0.7% followed by chloroform extract 66.98 ± 0.14% and hexane extract 57.05 ± 0.33%.

All the results are tabulated in Table 1 and are expressed as comparison in Fig. 2.

Minerals and heavy metal contents

Determinations of mineral contents of Gaultheria trichophylla are presented in Table 2. The most abundant minerals found were magnesium (4.115 mg/100 g) and potassium (1.935 mg/100 g) and least abundant was copper (0.00097 mg/100 g). The concentration of Ni and Co in G. trichophylla sample were 0.162 and 0.043 ppm respectively, which are much less in concentration. The concentration of mercury (0.76 ppm) in sample was also very low as compared to allowed limits (0.8 ppm) Table 2.
Table 2

The concentrations of minerals and heavy metal contents in G. trichophylla

No

Minerals

Contents (mg/100 g)

Metals

Concentration (ppm)

1

Na

0.3186 ± 0.02

Ni

0.162 ± 0.017

2

Ca

0.2191 ± 0.011

Pb

0.649 ± 0.02

3

Mg

4.115 ± 0.012

Hg

0.76 ± 0.24

4

Fe

0.089 ± 0.001

Si

1.574 ± 0.04

5

K

1.935 ± 0.011

Co

0.043 ± 0.012

6

Zn

0.0128 ± 0.002

Cr

1.277 ± 0.02

7

Mn

0.0118 ± 0.01

As

00.01 ± 0.19

8

Cu

0.00097 ± 0.0001

Cd

0.177 ± 0.015

Values are given as standard error mean (SEM±) of three determination

Discussions

Plants are used traditionally for various conditions in many system of medicine. The claim of their use for different ailments needs to be justified. The phenolic and flavonoids contents of plants are very important medicinally. They are mostly considered as compounds responsible for antioxidant potential and therefore are evaluated mostly for the said purpose. It is now well known that the antioxidant activities of phenolic contents are mainly due to their ability to scavenge radical, donate hydrogen and quench the singlet oxygen [34]. There are many reports that the antioxidant activities of plants are due to presence of phenolic compounds [35].

These phenolic compounds can be used as possible quality control indicators in herbal products. Our previous HPLC analysis for phenolic compounds also showed the presence of phenolic compounds in extracts of G.trichophylla [17].

The extracts of G.trichophylla showed the presence of phenolic and flavonoids and most of these are concentrated in the methanol extract. This may have contributed towards its greatest radical scavenging activity in both DPPH and FRAP assays. The principle of this method is based on the reduction of purple colored DPPH solution in the presence of hydrogen donating antioxidants by the formation of yellow colored diphenyl-picryl hydrazine. DPPH free radical scavenging assay is more indirect assay [36]. The DPPH activity was significant for methanol extract of G.trichophylla. FRAP assay proved to be much sensitive comparatively and showed more inhibition of extracts tested.

The extraction of compounds from plants with antioxidant potential is often carried out using the organic solvents like methanol, chloroform and hexane etc. There is always variation in antioxidant activities of different plant samples extracted with different organic solvents which is attributed to the presence of variety of secondary metabolites [37]. And this can be observed in case of G. trichophylla, where extracts with different polarities of solvents showed different antioxidant activities. The methanol extract showed the maximum inhibition in DPPH and FRAP assay. This showed that most of the phenolic compounds are concentrated in the most polar solvent used for extraction as evident in phenolic content and flavonoids assay.

The analysis of correlation between the total phenolic/flavonoids contents and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory (LOX inhibition) activities showed significant dependence as revealed in the Fig. 2. The methanol extract of G.trichophylla inhibited the enzyme lipoxygenase significantly and showed very good potential of being lipid lowering and possibly anti-inflammatory agent. Chloroform and hexane extracts also showed good to moderate activity against the enzyme.

Every mineral analyzed have its own importance in human body. Magnesium have a very important role in structure and function of the human body [38]. Gaultheria trichophylla presented high magnesium contents. It is reported that high potassium contents in the body enhance the utilization of iron and in patient suffering from extra excretion of potassium from the body fluid and are using diuretics to control hypertension [39]. To maintain the electrolyte balance in the body sodium has a very important part. Calcium is an important mineral and has beneficial effect in development of teeth and bones in children, pregnant and lactating women. It is well known that Iron is required in the body for the formation hemoglobin and a person can get anemic in case of deficiency. Manganese (Mn) is known as an essential trace element which acts as cofactor for many enzymes. Zinc (Zn) is an essential component of thousands of proteins in plants, although it is toxic in excess quantities [32]. Similarly other minerals also play their role in functioning of human body. It is clear from the analysis that G. trichophylla beside its medicinal values is also important in nutritional point of view.

Besides the wholesome minerals, the contents of heavy metals (As, Cd, Ni, Cr, Hg and Pb) are also the important standard to identify the quality of the plant. The medicinal plants may face serious consequences if heavy metal accumulation beyond permissible limits is detected. Therefore, it is necessary to check the levels of pollutants in extracts of medicinal plants before use. This practice of standardization will help to select the proper site of collection of medicinal plants and will exclude the environmentally polluted sites. The contents of heavy metals are defined by certain limits and these limits are different in different areas of the world e.g. the minimum permissible limits for arsenic, lead, cadmium, mercury and chromium are 5.0, 10.0, 0.3, 0.2 and 2.0 ppm respectively in Canada respectively [40]. The results showed that the concentrations of heavy metals in G. trichophylla were either low or are within defined limits [40]. Chromium (Cr), is considered one of the most toxic pollutant element. The permissible limit for Cr in raw herbal materials is 2.0 ppm and that for finished products is 0.02 mg/day [40]. Another element, Lead (Pb) is highly toxic for plants, animals and microorganisms which escalate in pollution due to increased fertilizer consumption, fuel combustion and sewage sludge. The sample of G.trichophylla showed to contain low concentration of Pb (0.649 ppm) as compared to the permissible limit of 10 ppm defined by [40]. Cadmium (Cd) is which occurs widely in medicinal plants is a hazardous heavy metal. The major sources leading to accumulation of cadmium in soil and plants are phosphate fertilizers. The sample of G. trichophylla analyzed in this study had Cd concentration (0.177 ppm) within the acceptable range of 0.3 ppm recommended by [40]. Ni is considered as allergen and has direct interaction with proteins and Co is mostly used as component of cyanocobalamin vitamin [41]. However no limit has been set for Nickel food stuffs [42]. The concentration of Co, another major cause of contact dermatitis next only to nickel and chromium, was also found to be within permissible limit [43].

Conclusion

In our experiments we have evaluated the G.trichophylla extracts for antioxidant and lipoxygenase activities. The results revealed that methanol extract of G.trichophylla is more concentrated with the phenolic and flavonoids contents and, therefore, have more DPPH and FRAP reducing activities. The results clearly indicate that G.trichophylla has strong antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potential and can be a source of important alternative therapeutic agent. Moreover, investigation also revealed that Gaultheria trichophylla is fortified with important minerals and it is a safe as a food and drug. As far environmental contaminants are concern it grows in hilly areas with very less population effect.

Highlights

  • Gaultheria trichophylla is an important medicinal plant.

  • Phenolic compounds are related to antioxidant activities.

  • Inhibition of 5-LOX showed its anti-inflammatory potential.

  • Investigation showed its nutritional importance.

  • In crude form it is a safe drug to use.

Abbreviations

DPPH: 

2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl

FRAP: 

Ferrous reducing antioxidant power

G. trichophylla: 

Gaultheria trichophylla

GAE: 

Gallic acid equivalent

HPLC: 

High performance liquid chromatography

LOX: 

Lipoxygenase

TPC: 

Total phenolic contents

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

No source of funding to mention.

Availability of data and materials

The materials and data of study are available to other researchers upon request.

Authors’ contributions

FA has carried out the whole work in laboratory, design of study and as corresponding author. QNS is supervisor and contributed in overall theme and design of experiments. MA has contributed towards the Enzyme Inhibition activity. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

We declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pharmacy, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology
(2)
Department of Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Islamia University of Bahawalpur

References

  1. Aruoma OI. Methodological considerations for characterizing potential antioxidant actions of bioactive components in plant foods. Mutat Res Fundam Mol Mech Mutagen. 2003;523:9–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Sastre J, Pallardó FV, Viña J. Glutathione, oxidative stress and aging. Age. 1996;19(4):129–39.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Lobo V, Patil A, Phatak A, Chandra N. Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: impact on human health. Pharmacogn Rev. 2010;4(8):118.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Kushi LH, Folsom AR, Prineas RJ, Mink PJ, Wu Y, Bostick RM. Dietary antioxidant vitamins and death from coronary heart disease in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(18):1156–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Grimble R. Nutritional antioxidants and the modulation of inflammation: theory and practice. New Horiz. 1994;2(2):175–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kumaran A, Karunakaran RJ. Activity-guided isolation and identification of free radical-scavenging components from an aqueous extract of Coleus aromaticus. Food Chem. 2007;100(1):356–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Pontiki E, Hadjipavlou-Litina D. Synthesis and pharmacochemical evaluation of novel aryl-acet acid inhibitors of lipoxygenase, antioxidants, and anti-inflammatory agents. Bioorg Med Chem. 2007;15(17):5819–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pidgeon GP, Lysaght J, Krishnamoorthy S, Reynolds JV, O’Byrne K, Nie D, Honn KV. Lipoxygenase metabolism: roles in tumor progression and survival. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007;26(3-4):503–24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Yus Azila Y, Mashitah Mat D, Ahmad Shukri Y. The effect of culture conditions on the growth of T. lactinea and anti-inflammatory activities via in vitro inhibition of hyaluronidase and lipoxygenase enzyme activities. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2014;45(5):2054–59. Google Scholar
  10. Beevi SS, Mangamoori LN, Gowda BB. Polyphenolics profile and antioxidant properties of Raphanus sativus L. Nat Prod Res. 2012;26(6):557–663.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Zbinden P, Andrey D. Determination of trace element contaminants in food matrices using a robust. routine analytical method for ICP-MS. Atom Spectrosc. 1998;19(6):214–9.Google Scholar
  12. Barnes K. A streamIined approach to the determination of trace elements in foods. Atom Spectrosc. 1998;19(2):31–9.Google Scholar
  13. Rodushkin IRT, Huhtasaari A. Comparison of two digestion methods for elemental determinations in plant material by ICP techniques. Anal Chim Acta. 1999;378(1-3):191–200.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Cho-Ruk KKJ, Supprung P, Vetayasuporn S. Perennial plants in the phytoremediation of leadcontaminated soils. Biotech. 2006;5(1):1–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chutia PKS, Kojima T, Satokawa S. Arsenic adsorption from aqueous solution on synthetic zeolites. J Hazard Mater. 2009;162(1):440–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hussain IUR, Khurram M, Ullah N, Baseer A, Khan FA, Khan N, Khattak MR, Zahoor MKJ. Heavy metals and inorganic constituents in medicinal plants of selected districts of Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa, Pakistan. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;42:8517–22.Google Scholar
  17. Alam F. Najum us Saqib Q: Pharmacognostic standardization and preliminary phytochemical studies of Gaultheria trichophylla. Pharm Biol. 2015;53(12):1711–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Royle JF. Illustrations of the Botany and Other Branches of the Natural History of the Himalayan Mountains and of the Flora of Cashmere: Textband, vol. 1. London: Allen; 1839.Google Scholar
  19. Zhang D, Liu R, Sun L, Huang C, Wang C, Zhang D-M, Zhang T-T, Du G-H. Anti-inflammatory activity of methyl salicylate glycosides isolated from Gaultheria yunnanensis (Franch.) Rehder. Molecules. 2011;16(5):3875–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cybulska P, Thakur SD, Foster BC, Scott IM, Leduc RI, Arnason JT, Dillon J-AR. Extracts of Canadian first nations medicinal plants, used as natural products, inhibit Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates with different antibiotic resistance profiles. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(7):667–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Xiong Y, Xiao B, Ma X, Li C, Zheng J, Ye J. Effects of Gaultheria yunnanensis on adjuvant arthritis in rats. Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi. 2009;34(19):2516–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang B, He X-L, Ding Y, Du G-H. Gaultherin, a natural salicylate derivative from Gaultheria yunnanensis: towards a better non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;530(1):166–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu W-R, Qiao W-L, Liu Z-Z, Wang X-H, Jiang R, Li S-Y, Shi R-B, She G-M. Gaultheria: phytochemical and pharmacological characteristics. Molecules. 2013;18(10):12071–108.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos RM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999;299:152–78.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Stanly C, Bhatt A, Ali HMD, Keng CL, Lim BP. Evaluation of free radical scavenging activity and total phenolic content in the petiole-derived callus cultures of Zingiber zerumbet Smith. J Med Plant Res. 2011;5(11):2210–7.Google Scholar
  26. Sulaiman SF, Yusoff NAM, Eldeen IM, Seow EM, Sajak AAB, Ooi KL. Correlation between total phenolic and mineral contents with antioxidant activity of eight Malaysian bananas (Musa sp.). J Food Compos Anal. 2011;24(1):1–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W. The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999;64(4):555–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Pineli LLO, Moretti CL, Santos MS, Campos AB, Brasileiro AV, Córdova AC, Chiarello MD, 1. Antioxidants and other chemical and physical characteristics of two strawberry cultivars at different ripeness stages. J Food Compos Anal. 2011;24:11–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Benzie IF, Strain J. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996;239(1):70–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Saini N, Singhal M, Srivastava B. Evaluation of antioxidant activity of Tecomaria capensis leaves extract. Inventi Rapid Ethnopharmacol. 2011;2011(2):117.Google Scholar
  31. Ben-Nasr S, Aazza S, Mnif W, Miguel MGC. Antioxidant and anti-lipoxygenase activities of extracts from different parts of Lavatera cretica L. grown in Algarve (Portugal). Pharmacogn Mag. 2015;41:48.Google Scholar
  32. Rosario G, Sara R, Alejandra P, Antonio Vega-Gálvez IQ-F, Elsa U, Scala KD. Chemical characterization and antioxidant capacity of red radish (Raphanus sativus L.) leaves and roots. J Funct Foods. 2015;16:256–64.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Meena AK, Bansal P, Kumar S, Rao M, Garg V. Estimation of heavy metals in commonly used medicinal plants: a market basket survey. Environ Monit Assess. 2010;170(1-4):657–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Rice-Evans C, Miller N, Paganga G. Antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds. Trends Plant Sci. 1997;2(4):152–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Chinnici F, Bendini A, Gaiani A, Riponi C. Radical scavenging activities of peels and pulps from cv. golden delicious apples as related to their phenolic composition. J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52(15):4684–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang HCG, Prior RL. Total antioxidant capacity of fruits. J Agric Food Chem. 1996;44:701–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Grzegorczyk I, Matkowski A, Wysokińska H. Antioxidant activity of extracts from in vitro cultures of Salvia officinalis L. Food Chem. 2007;104(2):536–41.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Bangash JA, Arif M, Khan M, Khan F, Hussain I. Proximate composition, minerals and vitamins content of selected vegetables grown in Peshawar. J Chem Soc Pak. 2011;33(1):118–22.Google Scholar
  39. Sodamode A, Bolaji O, Adeboye O, 6. Proximate analysis, mineral contents and functional properties of Moringa oleifera leaf protein concentrate. J Appl Chem. 2013;4:47–51.Google Scholar
  40. World Health Organization. Guidelines for assessing quality of herbal medicines with reference to contaminants and residues. Geneva: WHO; 2007.Google Scholar
  41. Zhang YRD, Gelfand MS, Gladyshev VN. Comparative genomic analyses of nickel, cobalt and vitamin B12 utilization. BMC Genomics. 2009;78:1–26.Google Scholar
  42. Bhat RKK, Arun AB, Karim AA. Determination of mineral composition and heavy metal content of some nutraceutically valued plant products. Food Anal Methods. 2010;3:181–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Basketter DA, Angelini G, Ingber A, Kern PS, Menné T. Nickel, chromium and cobalt in consumer products: revisiting safe levels in the new millennium. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;49:1–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement