This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of electroacupuncture for stroke
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 10 December 2015
Accepted: 6 December 2016
Published: 9 December 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Erich cosmi|
|3 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Wu Tu Hsing|
|2 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hegyi Gabriella|
|7 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Winston|
|11 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hong Lei|
|23 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Guoqing Zheng|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hong Lei|
|16 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Winston|
|26 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hegyi Gabriella|
|4 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Guoqing Zheng|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|6 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|9 Dec 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12906-016-1497-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.