Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of electroacupuncture for stroke

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Dec 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erich cosmi
3 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wu Tu Hsing
2 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hegyi Gabriella
7 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Winston
11 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hong Lei
23 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Guoqing Zheng
Resubmission - Version 2
23 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
6 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hong Lei
16 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Winston
26 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hegyi Gabriella
4 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Guoqing Zheng
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
6 Dec 2016 Editorially accepted
9 Dec 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12906-016-1497-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement